|
User talk:J.delanoy/Archive 5
User warningsThe warnings on the article creators' talk pages aren't meaningless -- they need to be there (1) to warn the user not to do it again; (2) to make it easy to see if they're creating multiple bad pages. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC) HowHow do you put that status box? Can you put it in for me? Please and Thank you!Mooncrest (talk) 21:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC) Thank you!Mooncrest (talk) 23:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC) Tit for tat
New ProjectMyself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active. If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Orangutan ArticleHi, I've noticed your edits on this article, and I was wondering if you could clarify what exactly it was that you meant 86.141.33.252 (talk) 19:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Help With TEMPLATESHello. I am DRfubar. I am new. I was wondering if there is a long and full list of templates anywhere with the tags you need to activate them. I thought i could ask you as you have many them! Thank for help of much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drfubar (talk • contribs) 21:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Vandalism on InstranetCould you provide any help with this pressing problem? 86.135.195.87 (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC) What is your responses to my enquiries? 86.135.195.87 (talk) 13:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC) There is extreme vandalism on many monitored pages. Please can you semi-protect 86.135.195.87 (talk) 14:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC) I try doing this in past, but mostly fail. They don't listen to my warnings. Is there no other way? 86.135.195.87 (talk) 14:17, 4 May 2008 (UTC) But can you tell me how to semi-protect, so that I can ensure factual accuracy? 86.135.195.87 (talk) 19:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC) CAN YOU tell me why you edited my edit on the south park page ? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.207.0 (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism from FinlandHello there. Notice you gave user Kreegah several warnings. Thank g-d, finally! New vandalism has occurred in "List of North European Jews", "List of Canadian Jews" and "List of Manitobans", checked "Canadian Who's Who" and "Who`s who in the world" all show that the edit was bogus, so I reverted, am not a regular user here, though so it was just a fluke, also vandalism seems to be race-related. There have been several major vandalism sprees of this type, most originating in Finland, Sweden and Czeck. Thanks again for noticing it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.209.4 (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Vandalism IVJust because you're paranoid. Don't mean they're not after you. 86.135.132.147 (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC) He's right you know 86.145.151.85 (talk) 15:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC) He just made a huge breakthrough in particle Physics!!! 86.163.86.45 (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Come on you U's!!!!! 86.163.86.45 (talk) 19:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Don't know much about rangeblocking, but it sounds hideous. 86.163.86.45 (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Also, I wouldn't bother nuking Derby, because it won't make much difference 86.163.86.45 (talk) 19:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Help With TEMPLATESI love TEMPLATES. They convey short, simple message (plural) ratehr than lots of words. This is good as it is far easy to see a sign and understand the message than to read extensive TEXT and get the message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drfubar (talk • contribs) 21:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC) BS
WelcomingSorry about that. Also, if you use twinkle, it fixes the edit conflict. LegoKontribsTalkM 02:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Edits to Twin articleMy recent edit to the Twin article does not at all constitute vandalism. I made a legitimate edit: one which improves the article by rewriting (or in this case, omitting) redundant phrases. Wikipedia's definition of vandalism is "any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." I have not done any of this. I made a constructive edit and described my changes in the edit summary. 75.27.41.134 (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Edits to South Texas College of Law articleHi, J.delanoy -- Your definition of constructive differs from mine; I will revert your deletion of my edits. Feel free to delete them again if you are able to prove them to be erroneous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.153.228.2 (talk) 21:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Cookies!!Thank you very much for the cookie. After this weird week this has been, it is greatly appreciated. MMMMMMMM (talk) 01:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Help With TEMPLATESIt is OK. Someone helped me find a FULL list of templates. The list only includes article templates. Do. You know where i could find little templates? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drfubar (talk • contribs) 16:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC) COOKIE MONSTeR Fattyjwoods (Push my button) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hi, just to make sure you're not hungry - keep up the good work! Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 01:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC) DFW Meetup
Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours at 01:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Thank you for your help at this article, removing info that was sourced only to photobucket. The info has now been reinserted, not by an IP but by XtremeNL (talk · contribs). This time it is sourced to an internet messageboard forum, forums.enturbulation.org. Would appreciate your advice and/or input, and also would appreciate a clarification/comment on the article's talk page if you get a chance please. Cirt (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Re: article on Mark SmeatonI am currently going through this page. I have marked where I am adding the references and will be working on this for the next couple of hours. Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Edits
Just to say hai Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Have a great day ! -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 11:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Requested DeletionYour U1 request has been taken care of. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 19:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Header AddedI'm not fucking vandalizing any page, I'm adding new information based on this site. http://www.netvasco.com.br/mauroprais/futbr/braxarg.html If you continue to revert my edits, I'm going to report you to an administrator. Have you really read the section I tried to remove? It didn't cite any reference, and in fact the only reference that section cites was inserted by me (reference 10). Some users complained about the bias in the section and it was flagged as probably "non neutral".Guinsberg (talk) 15:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC) yes?ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.175.184 (talk) 15:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
here is the link being used over wikipedia http://pictures.footymad.net/upload/247/284217-1.pdf You asked me to provide a link to show the ratings, but can you show me a link for a list of all the stadium ratings? I don't think footymad.net should be enough, the images have been uploaded by users and could easily be fake. additionally it can't be recent because old trafford's capacity has been larger than that for some time and i don't believe 67,400 was ever it's capacity, suggesting that this file is unofficial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.175.184 (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks!Thanks for recommending rollback to me! I promise to use this new power for good! Ejosse1 (talk) 17:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC) WBOSITG's RfAMy RfAHi J.delanoy, I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 23:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC) By far the best support I've seen! Thanks for participating. :) PeterSymonds | talk 23:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC) May 2008
Whoops!Hey there, Sorry about that. I accidentally reverted it (using huggle) before I saw your revision. Cheers, Perfect Proposal Speak Out! 01:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Mistake"Hi, the recent edit you made to Inflatable boat has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 00:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)" It wasn't unconstructive, I was moving the sentence structure because the end of a paragraph was cut off by three [Edit] buttons. --70.15.4.226 (talk) 01:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC) S'okay --70.15.4.226 (talk) 02:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC) RE: Unprotecting PlayStation 3No offense taken. We do not protect articles for longer than necessary. There was no reason not to try unprotection after being semi protected for 7 months. - Rjd0060 (talk) 21:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Parasite, Disturbed IndestructibleHello, I'm the guy you helped earlier with vandalism on the page Indestructible. You warned the person who kept re-adding the song "Parasite" without citing sources, he's completely stopped editing, for which I thank you. But now we have a new user, Disturbed92893, having an edit war with me about the song. I've told him to stop editing, unless he has a source to cite, but he continues editing, without a source, and has told me he will not stop editing because he "knows" (AKA speculates) that it is on this album, although, clearly, there's no official statement. I was wondering if you could warn this user please, and possibly place a protection on the page Indestructible. Thank you, tell me what happens please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude527 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)  This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Royal Blue (B, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Royal Blue (B&O train). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC) PsedohistoryExplain to me why a Psuedohistory hypothesis should not go on the article for Psuedohistory, the hypothesis is considered debunked by academica --George127 (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC) It is also very popular amongst atheists (not majority of course) and is very popular on the internet, despite this, it is considered debunked by historians --George127 (talk) 18:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 3RRSo instead of reverting I'll just do regular edits now. Sound good? That way I won't violate.Dude527 (talk) 22:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Oh I didn't take it as a threat, no worries, no hard feelings, I merely saw it as a warning, and I thank you for warning me. Dude527 (talk) 02:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 3RRAll track lists for the album have "Facade" spelled without an accented C. I was simply reverting the wrong information to the previous correct information. If you would like I could just edit instead of reverting. hav0xx (talk) 22:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Heh, no problem. I actually just discovered on the iTunes track list that it is spelled with the accented C. Which is probably the more likely spelling as it would be spelled that way in your iTunes library. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hav0xx (talk • contribs) 22:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC) RFA ThanksThanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. I appreciate your thoughts about some of the oppose !votes, although I’d like to think most of them were based on something important to the person voting; whether or not it was actually me is another question, but one that I will leave with them to decide. Best, Risker (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Acetone Award
All-cap edit sumsYou have every right to note that I may have inadvertently breached WP:CIVIL. I would have to note in turn, however, that any editor who automatically reverts an edit without reading the content of the edit is guilty of WP:VANDALISM. No hard feelings; we're all imperfect, and the fact we can all work together and for the most part get along despite this is a tribute to our community. --69.22.254.108 (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Reginald Earl Clinton.It's all coming from one person, who is now up to a level 4 warning. If he posts it again, he'll get blocked. I generally like to reserve page protections for when more than 1 account is reposting a page. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC) This is getting annoyingThis stupid constant posting of Indestructible is getting annoying. People keep re-posting Parasite (not constantly, like before, but I got home and I think 3 people edited it back up). They even deleted your tag saying that Parasite should not be kept up, they changed it to something like "Keep Parasite up because it was on Inside the Fire single CD, so it belongs on this list". Sorry to bother you again, but are you sure we can't get at least some type of protection? Dude527 (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I like your style, I'm pretty sure that will stop people. Sorry to bug you so much about all this, you're the only person on Wikipedia who has ever really helped me like that though, so, well you know. Thanks again. Dude527 (talk) 00:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC) I found some proof against Parasite being on Indestructible. The only website that lists it as anything, says "Non-Album Track" right next to the song. Hah. Dude527 (talk) 01:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Are you sure "very" isn't an understatement? I'm surprised at some people, for how surprisingly dumb they can be. I mean that level isn't in my capacity unless you get me drunk... Dude527 (talk) 01:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Oh my, now people keep re-adding Parasite to Disturbed Discography under "B-sides to Indestructible". It never ends, why do I even try to keep Wikipedia factual anymore? Oh and the user who you gave a formal level four warning, said if we block him, he will create a new account. Dude527 (talk) 02:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Well, I guess it's ok, many people tend to skipthe "discography" and go to the track listings for the individual albums, the best we could do is keep Parasite off of there as much as possible, and hope people overlook it when it is there. Dude527 (talk) 02:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Eps...The troll was finally blocked [1]. Cheers. —C'est moi Parlez 01:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Andean Development Corporation.The ADC despite "Corporation" in its name appears to be a UN-connected not-for-profit organisation defined as follows: Andean Development Corporation (Corporación Andina de Fomento, CAF) A multilaterial financial institution that reaffirms its commitment to sustainable development and integration through initiatives promoting the Andean region's cultural values It is not therefore a for-profit corporation, which for a moment you tagged as "for quick deletion". Tabletop (talk) 03:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks!Thanks for your tip! — The Final Chronicler (talk) 03:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Thank you for the Barnstar!Thank you for the Barnstar! I love it! :) Captain panda 04:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Do you think this article meets WP:BK? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC) RfA thank-spam Header Addedwhy did you revert my corrections to the article on Linear B? why did you allege vandalism for the correction of various errors of fact?wakan (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC) One problem: instead of using {{afdtop}} and {{afdbottom}}, you should have substituted the templates. I fixed that for you, so don't worry about it! Otherwise the closing was well done. Happy editing, Malinaccier (talk) 14:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC) And againPointless. :) Malinaccier (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
HuggleI noticed your comment on Milk's Favorite Cookie's talk page and just wanted to let you know I could send Huggle to you if I had your email address... - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 23:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)  Thanks for the cookie! - DiligentTerrier (and friends) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit! Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message. - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 00:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Deletion of Interactive ArchitectureHello mister wiki-champion. I started a very poor stub on interactive architecture, but instead of deleting you might want to write about it using the super powers of your brain. Simple suggestion. --cesarharada (talk) 00:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
..... EDIT BEGIN: hay i am sorry (THIS IS TITLE)HEY, guys, i am making edits today, becos i am at currantly disabled. for example, my wheelchair is not movin, they make wheel out, no fixed, just sit, parents gooing away they said look after myself. but i have special condishion when i am autistism! i am. so i edit wikipedia it is free. compact i am trying difecultly, my changes go away. so please leave me alone, leAVE ME ALONE, YOU Cant edit what i say, otherwsie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.91.44 (talk) 00:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC) why did you delete the record for most popped collars?I don't understand, why was the World Reocrd for Most Popped Collars deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cindycrockpot (talk • contribs) 01:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Why did you considermy edits to the paper folding page vandalism? Header truncated How could my edit on paper folding could possibly be considered vandalism? Not only did I remove a mysterious sounding term which would mean nothing to 90 percent of Wikipedia users, but I also added the number of times she folded the paper, and explained that she did nothing more than calculate how long a piece of paper has to be, to be folded in half 12 times then fold a sheet of that length. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.94.101 (talk) 04:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC) A misconception led you to believe that I was vandalizing the page. The girl DID fold the paper in half 12 times, and you CAN fold things in half more than 8 times. The girl proved this. Be fully informed before you revert vandalism that isn't so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.94.101 (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC) The Pledge of AllegianceMy change to the article on the US Pledge of Allegiance was NOT vandalism. Upon checking the source, of the content I changed, "Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 4, US Code," I discovered that the correct words are "render the military salute" rather than "stand at the position of attention." This amendment was added in 2002 and should be reflected in the article. I made the edit again and posted a comment about it on the discussion page for that article. --24.27.110.167 (talk) 05:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC) I noticed you changed it to match the version listed on the source link. That's all I wanted. Thanks for correcting it. --24.27.110.167 (talk) 15:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC) RfA thanks!
Indestructible (Disturbed album)I've done good. I've requested semi-protection until release date (June 3rd) and it's been granted. That means no more IP troubles. Yay right? Dude527 (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Yeah, I just thought, for all the trouble, I'd like to inform you, that song did indeed leak, and under "Album" it says "Indestructible". Of course the track name is "Parasite (Non-Album Track)". Anyways, here's a link if you want to know what all the fuss was about on that wikipage. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ob3eN-CLh0 Enjoy... or not? I really don't know what type of music you like. Dude527 (talk) 17:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC) SockpuppetHi. I have been doing some research and have found that perhaps you have a certain past...and more disturbingly present on the community you are not revealing. The wikipedia community does not approve of 'good cop-bad cop' accounts. I think you really need to consider what your long term plans are, because sooner or later people will find out. It will be best for you if you just admit your alter ego's existence now rather than later in front of the panel. I hope you make the correct choice. Zippycup (talk) 18:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
jewdicialI deleted it as vandalism, and left a suitable warning for the ed. who did it--thanks for catching it. (Just for reference. it isn't a blatant copyright violation to copy one Wikipedia page to another. And it isn't a copyright violation at all if one leaves a link. when its not vandalism, it can be deleted via "Housekeeping" as a duplicate or changed to a redirect. DGG (talk) 16:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Barnstar
Proposals page headingWhat are you trying to do? I've gone through every section-linking problem there is so I can probably help. Equazcion •✗/C • 17:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Re. Be carefulOh. Which one, I reverted quite a few. But I don't think I'd tag it for G7, I'd simply delete it. :-) Anyway thanks for the heads up. Regards, Húsönd 18:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
My recent RfAThank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace and talk space, so that is what I will do. I have made a list and I hope I will be able to get through it. I will go for another RfA in about three month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been about three months. I will not be checking back to this page so if you would like to comment or reply please use my talk page. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 06:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Let's say he's been busy.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
FALSE CHARGES OF VANDALISMBecause the Cypro-Minoan syllabary and the Cypriote syllabary are different systems, the first undeciphered and from the Bronze Age and the second from the classical period. If you don't understand the topic, you should be more cautious in your reverts. wakan (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)wakan (talk) 16:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)wakan (talk) 16:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC) sorryOk, I understand there wasn't enough information but I put a resourse on the article.Mooncrest (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Ok, after I eat lunch. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooncrest (talk • contribs) 17:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC) User Page _____ __ __ _ _
|_ _|__ \ \ / /_ _ _ __ __| | __ _| |___ _
| |/ _ \ \ \ / / _` | '_ \ / _` |/ _` | / __/ (_)
| | (_| ) \ \/ / (_| | | | | (_| | (_| | \__ \ _
|_|\___/ \__/ \__,_|_| |_|\__,_|\__,_|_|___/ (_)
Where did all the information go? (hee hee heeeeeeee!!!!!)
putting articles on an article spaceIf you could give me instruction on how to move my article from my userpage onto an article space, i would appreciate it. test —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdelanoy (talk • contribs) 02:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC) sorry.sorry. it won't happen again . —Preceding unsigned comment added by URZAM (talk • contribs) 15:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Barnstar!
Thanks
Thanksthanks for helping out —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambo64 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Parasite Wikipedia PageParasite. That makes me a bit nervous. That article has no references (the OP tried referencing YouTube and Wikipedia), no relevant information, not enough information, and very little to run on, yet it's OP insists on deleting the tag when I submit it for deletion... Any ideas? Dude527 (talk) 02:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC) My template issueHi. Just to let you know, Coppertwig popped by and is looking at my template problem also, and he has an idea that might work. Once I'm sure what it is, I'll give it a shot. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Thank you
Your Sig....Doesn't work on a white background and this is something that most users and pretty much every newbie will be editing against. Would you mind considering a change to a sig with darker colours - or at least more contrast anyway. Cheers Spartaz Humbug! 08:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
My RfAHey J.delanoy. I would like to thank you for your support in my RfA and the confidence expressed thereby. I appreciate your trust. :) Best wishes, —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Barnstar
Hello-p Please...I was just wandering to know about "How to report Vandals : Precise & Perfect". I guess, I am at right place. – Deb ‖ Poke • EditList ‖ 03:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
EXCUSE MOI!?!?!Ahem........bite me LexingtonWells (talk) 04:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC) RE: ProtectionI've blocked the IP for 31 hr, there was only one vandal so protection seems extreme. If it happens again, ping me. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 15:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Vandal Report !!!Hello ! you should see this user's contributions... What should we do in this kinda situations ? warn user (he is possibly from a floating IP) or direct report for vandalism ? – Deb ‖ Poke • EditList ‖ 20:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Message you sent meYou sent me something saying would i like it if you moved my created page and yes thanks for that idea because i'm like kinda new to this and thats the first page i ever created by myself, again yes i would like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldsfamous1994 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Kombiman warningHi, you left a vandalism warning for User:Kombiman a bit ago for an edit which deleted most of Fibonacci number. While it's correct that the edit was significantly damaging, it's also a fairly typical newer user or fat-fingered editing error. It didn't look like vandalism at all - vandals rarely put in an apparently correct interwiki link replacing the article content. That was pretty obviously an attempt to append the correct interwiki link which went wrong. Please remember not to bite the newbies. Telling someone who made a mistake that they did so and asking them to be more careful is entirely appropriate. Telling them not to vandalize isn't. Thanks! Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC) Salwa JudumYou reverted edits I made to the Salwa Judum page. There is no complaint against you. I just want to bring to your attention that the page gives information solely from Maoist and Marxist-Leninist sources and request your help in cleaning it up. I don't want to rewrite it and see it getting edited away. First, I agree that the charge of defending pedophilia was without any evidence, but it was actually based on their defence of the Maoists abducting hundreds of children leading to charges of pedophilia. I don't understand why you reverted the word 'popular' though. That is actually a fair representation. Naxalite is a dirty word in India! So Salwa Judum is actually hugely popular. The "human rights" organization, PUCL, actually has a one point agenda -- that of crying out against "injustices" against Naxalites. IOW, it is a Naxalite front. So what the page has is actually a POV. I don't see why the truth should be suppressed on Wikipedia. If the Maoists were actually popular and Salwa Judum was unpopular, why do the Maoists need guns and why do they have to hide in the wooded mountains? They would just sweep the elections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.24.76.176 (talk) 13:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC) Antivandal tool and shiny thingI'm currently quite curious as to what tool you must use to have beaten me to the revert at least a dozen times in the last few minutes. Or do you just have very fast fingers?
Heh, LOL. I knew there was some way to get you off the revert button for a minute to give me a chance. ;) Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Change license?Hello j.delanoy,
William —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.129.243.104 (talk) 04:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Hugh de Largiethanks for the assistance on Hugh de Largie. I don't quite understand how the referencing, which has worked on the other 1000 or so articles I have worked on suddenly didn't work on this one but there you go. --Roisterer (talk) 05:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC) thanks for the warm welcome! Followthebouncingball (talk) 01:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC) Root InstituteHI. Please keep in mind that the article you have just tagged was created within the past few minutes. May you allow this article to establish as time progresses. Thanks. Prowikipedians (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
RE: adviceAhh, thanks! didnt know that. Users either removing them or simply creating a page with the hangon tag already there annoy me something special. Ironholds 19:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC) This is enoughHello, J.delanoy. I'm contacting you for your opinion, let me explain. That user, Deblopper, and I, are basically having a war in the discussions. (Not articles) I'm sick of debating whether or not we should add speculation to the article, this user wants to name this article "Prince of Persia: Prodigy", they even provided a reference. However, they're saying, basically, "The general public believes this to be true, so we must apply it to the article." The reference they provided states this: "First, what do we call it? Though the Ubidays press materials listed the title's name as Prince of Persia Prodigy, the very same name recently trademarked by the IP-owner Jordan Mechner, Mattes wouldn't confirm that that was the final title: "I don't think we've announced the final title."" That means they haven't announced the final title of the game, doesn't it? The user even told me that, even though that reference states that the game is not confirmed to be titled "Prodigy", that we should name it so, because the fans are speculating it. Here is the discussion, where this user clearly states that, because this title is speculated, we should add it. Tells me to stop using my opinion, which I'm not doing I'm simply trying to stick to rules and keep it factual. I find it surprising they use opinions on factual based articles, don't you? Anyways, in conclusion, just give me your opinion, based on the facts, whether the page should be called Prince of Persia: Prodigy or Prince of Persia (2008). Dude527 (talk) 03:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
|
