|
User talk:IxudiWelcome!
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 21:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 27Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khuda Bakhsh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC) July 2023
Wikipedia and copyright
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC) Not vandalism
Disambiguation link notification for August 3An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maulana Mazharul Haque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Sake Dean MahomedCan you please stop vandalising my history of a famous figure. Trying to change the history from hiding his ethnic and his identity. He is bengali. Bengal213x (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC) TyposPlease note that some of your edits such as this which you marked as copyedits introduced a lot of typos into the article which I had to revert. Mellk (talk) 04:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Regarding your Recent revert in Purbiya (soldiers)The Term 'British Bengali Army' is usually used to represent The Bengali Army Raised During The British Rule , There's Nothing Confusing about this. We can't always Copy Paste from the Sources and the grammatical errors are minimal , I also added a bit more Sourced info on the Topic which also went in Vain , if you keep reverting Edits from new editors how would one learn . i would request you to undo your revert and Let me know the errors here so that i could Rectify them. Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 10:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Location of SimroungarhHow do you say that half of medieval city of Simroungarh lies in India? Simroungarh has a distinct boundary wall. The southern wall is part of Indo-Nepal boundary. This way, all of Simroungarh today is part of Nepal. Scyfie (talk) 10:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abhayakaragupta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 28An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buddhaguhya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC) August 2024 Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PadFoot (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi Ixudi. Thank you for your work on Relic Stupa of Vaishali. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with Dcotos (talk) 12:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi Ixudi. Thank you for your work on Vanaratna. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with Dcotos (talk) 15:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC) Talk Topic on PadmasambhavaPlease stop reverting sourced corrections to Padmasambhava. It appears that you are supporting fictional narratives and edit warring. Bring it to talk. Metokpema (talk) 16:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC) Ok, You refused. You didn't bother to answer this note on your own talk page, but went for another revert. That's hostile behaviour. I see you've been cited already for edit warring, and you're doing it again after I opened the talk topic to stop your edit warring. I read the Padmasambhava page a few years ago, when it was well written and sourced. The lede and following paragraphs are now embarrassing for an encyclopedia, and contradict unerased facts further into the page as if those facts haven't been deleted yet. It's now junk. Your notes on reverting my corrections are not factual, another technique of edit warring. First you complained on the 'serious changes' now its deleted sources. No sources were deleted. van Schait is still a source, but his scholarship is questionable. His fantasy of Padmasambhava being asked to leave Tibet is unsupported by any research I have read, and I have read a lot. His POV is hostile as is the POV of the editor who wrote the lede and following paragraphs. He's the latest Chinese go-to for disinformation cloaked as scholarship. Your reverts are supporting hostile POVs and fantasy narratives. Why? For whom? It's clear your depth of scholarly knowledge of Tibet's history and Tibetan Buddhism is shallow. To grasp onto incorrect information so much so that you're edit warring suggests more than just shallow understanding. What's going on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metokpema (talk • contribs) 17:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Recent ConflictStraightforwardly asking on behalf of my eternity what conspired you to remove the edit without calling put the standard offers! for third party attribution — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xstream Interest? (talk • contribs) 11:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
DexasHi, could you nominate this one? article for deletion, I don't see that it has references nor is it well written 190.219.102.114 (talk) 19:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi Ixudi. Thank you for your work on Gayadhara. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with Dcotos (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC) Magadha principalityYou seen to have much knowledge about magadha, may I ask you , do you have any idea about the "principality of Pataliputra or magadha", basically a source mentions that after kanvas were defeated by satavahanas. Any idea? All I know is Sri Gupta and Ghotakacha ruled this principality but what about before? JingJongPascal (talk) 16:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Sorry[2] ...Sorry, lol Noorullah (talk) 23:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
