User talk:PadFoot2008

Magdhan Empire

Hi @PadFoot2008 I was going through the Magdhan Empire page created by you, and at that time I saw that it was nominated for deletion, but before voting, I want to ask you as you have created the article. How would you explain Maurya Empire and Magdhan Empire, and prior to that, Nanda Empire, basically one state with two different names and articles? What I think is that Maurya and Nanda should be changed to dynasties instead of empires.

Regards Rawn3012 (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with you. Nandas and Mauryas were dynasties of the Magadhan Empire. There is currently an ongoing RM at Nanda Empire to move to Nanda dynasty, if you'd like to participate. PadFoot (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Foreign_relations_of_the_Magadhan_Empire JingJongPascal (talk) 15:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JingJongPascal, I apologise but per the Wikipedia policy WP:CANVASSING, you are not allowed to ping other editors in AfDs. I cannot participate now, or else you shall be accused of canvassing and my vote will be discounted. PadFoot (talk) 15:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like, there has been a favourable deletion on your Magadhan Empire article, maybe try putting in some more sources? JingJongPascal (talk) 14:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
this book is entirely based on "Empire of Magadha" and uses the term to describe Nandas and Mauryas. Could be helpful in the article's deletion. JingJongPascal (talk) 14:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PadFoot2008 JingJongPascal (talk) 14:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of articles

With regards to your behaviour on articles, you seem to be behaving in a way that gives off the impression that you “own” the article e.g. repeated unilateral bold moves and always trying to get the last edit in any minor disagreement. Please refer to WP:Ownership of content.


Kind regards Ixudi (talk) 17:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided to support your disambiguation, and anyways you were the one making bold undiscussed moves, I was reverting them. PadFoot (talk) 17:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Magadha Gupta

Would like your help here, whether Guptas were rulers of Magadha or not.

List of wars involving Magadha - Topic Page JingJongPascal (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He has also removed all mentions of Magadha from Gupta Empire article page, because he thinks they did not rule from Magadha JingJongPascal (talk) 06:14, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gupta Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prayag.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look

Take a look at this. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could be better, I've done some work. PadFoot (talk) 13:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Indian kingdom

Template:Infobox Indian kingdom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nagas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 6 § States and territories (dis)established in YYYY

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 6 § States and territories (dis)established in YYYY on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. harrz talk 21:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help

Hi @PadFoot2008,

1) I am a good faith editor whose start on Wikipedia might have been not that good but I am getting better and now editing the space in good faith.

2) The enforcement started as a retaliation as mentioned by me in the discussion here.

3) I have edited on Wikipedia and in the past month, we can not find a single instance where I indulged in vandalism or POV pushes as mentioned in the enforcement.

I request you to Kindly share your opinion in the discussion.

Note: I am currently undergoing my semester exams in university till 15th jan, might not respond swiftly. I respect your fair-mindedness and have a good faith that you will take side of Justice.

Thank You ! PPicazHist (talk) 08:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Indic languages (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Indic languages (Disambiguation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 9 § Indic languages (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]