User talk:Ithinkicahn

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:20, Tuesday, January 7, 2025 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together


Committee of Union and Progress and The Young Turks

Your recent reversions of additions I've made to both of the articles involving these topics only helps racist denialists of the Armenian Holocaust. The CUP were the fundamental political group that carried out the killings and therefore their article MUST be a part of the series of "persecution of Armenians." I'm going to revert it back.

I'm not sure what the problem was with the changes to the Young Turks article. I deleted a single useless sentence that spoke of some new "meaning" to the words that have zero to do with the pan-Turkist/genocidal party in question. I will revert it back. Let me know what problems you have before making changes. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.119.138.205 (talk) 11:59, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions are not constructive. You're adding infoboxes to the articles that are meant for other articles. These articles are already in a series of articles relating to the Armenian Genocide. The sentence you deleted is also not a "new meaning", as you say, but an established one. It is sourced. Don't remove sourced content. Your edits seem to be extremely POV and biased, as well as not encyclopedic. That's the problem. Ithinkicahn (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


What's POV? Your deletion of the link of the Young Turks party to the Armenian Genocide is extremely POV. The Young Turks article is a fundamental part of the series of the persecution of the Armenians. This MUST be noted boldly. The main reason anyone even visits that page is in regards to the Armenian Genocide. You try to break a link between the Nazis and the holocaust would you? As to the deletion of hte sentence, that sentence is often used by Armenian Genocide deniers to paint the Young Turks in a favorable light. As far as the Young Turks as a term being used to mean progressives, that is a relatively new phenomenon and doesn't have anything to do with the genocidal Young Turks political party of the 20th century. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.119.138.205 (talk) 11:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise you to check out the Talk pages before doing something like that, since you were simply copying and pasting an infobox not meant for that article. And no, changing the title of the infobox to the article name doesn't constitute a good infobox. The Armenian thing is already mentioned very heavily throughout the article. Your claims about the Young Turks not being a progressive movement before WWI is also an unsupported view and completely POV. You can, however, mention suggestions for improvements on the Talk page (there is now a discussion) instead of making unconstructive edits and removing sourced content to push a certain POV. Cheers. Ithinkicahn (talk) 15:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have mentioned it in the talk page. Interesting use of "Armenian thing" too. Shows your NPOV....--68.119.138.205 (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Safiye Sultan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [http://web.archive.org/web/20060926203638/http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Turkey/turkey.htm ]</ref>) née ''Sofia Bellicui Baffo'', was the favourite consort and later wife of [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Progressive Republican Party (Turkey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustafa Kemal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Secularism in Turkey

Please be careful with your reverts at Secularism in Turkey. I know you believe you're reverting vandalism, but next time, unless it's a clear case of vandalism (see WP:VANDTYPES), be patient and wait for another editor to come along and make the second revert within such a short space of time. Ping me at my talk page, if it's taking too long for another editor to notice. Thanks, Ruby Murray 11:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I was wondering if he'd get up to 3RR again. Notice I've only made 2, to see if he would counter, and it seems like he did. I wonder if I should make another noticeboard report? Ithinkicahn (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I should be careful about raising a new report if I were you, since you've both only just come out of a block for edit warring. There are many eyes on both of those articles now, and any large scale deletions or POV additions won't last long. Ruby Murray 16:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good advice. Hopefully someone will come along on the Secularism in Turkey article sometime soon. Ithinkicahn (talk) 16:58, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Kind regards, Afro-Eurasian (talk) 02:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you very much. Although we do our best, we still need more editors contribute to WP Turkey and WP Ottoman Empire. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Committee of Union and Progress

Would you be interested in joining a discussion about this article? --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely would; both the Committee of Union and Progress article and the Young Turks one. Ithinkicahn (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman governors

Hello! I've begun creating some categories for the governors of some of the major Ottoman provinces. The typical format is "Governors of XXX Eyalet" or "Ottoman governors of XXX", with the latter for cases like Bosnia and Crete where there is a distinctive region with more or less stable boundaries, both pre- and ante-dating Ottoman rule. Anyhow, in two cases, namely Rumelia and Anatolia, I was wondering if maybe the better term would be "Beylerbeys of Rumelia" rather than "Governors of the Rumelia Eyalet", since governor would imply a wali, and these two were the first and IIRC longest where the title of "beylerbey" was used. I am not sure, however, what the proper title of the Rumelia and Anatolia governors was in the 17th-19th centuries, and whether or not it changed to wali as well. Can you perhaps help? Constantine ✍ 18:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your assessment on dichotomy between the two "Governor" category formats. In any case, I think the "Governors of ..." format is better than the "Beylerbeys of ..." and "Walis of ..." formats, since the research I've done on, for example, Egypt Eyalet, indicate that "Beylerbey" (a specific, flowery, occasional title) and "Wali" (just literally "governor" in Turkish) were pretty interchangeable. I think with all the various references to the same figures as "viceroys" and "governors" and "governor-generals" and "beylerbeys" in English sources as well as in native Turkish sources, especially, it's just better to refer to them as "Governor" in context of Wikipedia. It's extremely difficult to get a straight answer from the historical sources, probably showing that it wasn't an exactly-determined title for most provinces, including Rumelia and Anatolia Eyalets. So I think the general and fitting term "Governor" is both accurate and all-encompassing for all of the provincial governor titles. I appreciate you for the category creations! Ithinkicahn (talk) 23:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Koca Ragıp Pasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Koca
The Imam's Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Justice and Development Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the "Justice and Development Party (Turkey)" article: your help needed

Hi there Ithinkicahn. In the AKP article, recent changes by another user have led to the inclusion of Neo-Ottomanism under the ideologies heading of the party's infobox. I'd like to know your position on this matter. Should it be removed, given that the AKP officially rejects this characterization? --Nadia (Kutsuit) (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it should be included, since it's a very loaded term and has been rejected by the party itself quite strongly. However, I'm not staunchly against it, if other editors have the opposite idea and including it would be in line with past examples, then I'd say fine. Still, once again, it's a loaded term, but not quite as loaded as, say, including "American imperialism" under the ideology of the U.S. Republican Party. It's a concept more than an insulting term. I'd say there should be a discussion on this somewhere so consensus can be reached, but it's up to you. Cheers! Ithinkicahn (talk) 20:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Machine elf for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Machine elf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machine elf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Turkish sports corruption scandal article

Hello. The reason of writing this to you is to clarify my situation about the article and also wanted to explain what I wrote to the page protection request.Rivaner (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC) I opened a case about this article to dispute noticeboard but it was denied on the grounds that it was already on the neutral point of view noticeboard. This was what I wrote there and hopefully will help you understand my situation anout this article.[reply]

This article lacks a neutral point of view, I have already made my cae to the neutral point of view noticeboard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#2011_Turkish_sports_corruption_scandal_article) 11 days ago but today, things became really frustrating for me. Some IP adressed users are attacking the article using my edits, I know it is not the right way to do things but the reason for that is they finally found a voice in wikipedia. You can see all the reasons for my edits from one of the inolved users talk page;(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LardoBalsamico#2011_Turkish_sports_corruption_scandal_article) which really sumarizes my siutation. I can understand the users attacking but don't accept their ways. As you can see from here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:93.115.94.149#About_2011_Turkish_sports_corruption_scandal_article) I have did the best I can to calm the situation.

Hope this helps and thanks for you concern about the article.Rivaner (talk) 08:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rivaner, I have no dog in the fight, I was just worried about the repeated vandalism of the page by anonymous IPs, not your edits. I haven't read the article, so hopefully the NPOV process works out for everyone in the end. Good luck! Ithinkicahn (talk) 21:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Rhodes (1522), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Webb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 reminder

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Just reminding you about WP:AA2. I found this edit to be rather problematic since the paragraph was actually cited by several sources. I nevertheless hope we can work together to build a bigger and better encyclopedia and have more constructive discussions. Thanks, Étienne Dolet (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Persecution_of_Ottoman_Muslims. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Alexikoua (talk) 21:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ibrahim Pasha

How Pargali Ibrahim Pasha could be governer of Egypt from 1583 until 1585 when he had been dead in that time?? He died in 1536!!!!!!! Keivan.f (talk) 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Haha what are you talking about? Pargali Ibrahim Pasha was governor as an interim governor in 1525. The governor from 1583 to 1585 was Damat Ibrahim Pasha. Ithinkicahn (talk) 22:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julius Caesar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Anthony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Winston's Hiccup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mersin: city and province

I have seen your edits in these articles. Could you please bring more clarification and details in both articles on the recent history of the province? It is not very clear. Thanks. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 20:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I'm no expert on the subject, all I made were largely formatting and aesthetic fixes, but I will certainly take a look at it. Thanks for looking out! Ithinkicahn (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hadım Ali Pasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Çemberlitaş
Çemberlitaş, Fatih (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Grand Bazaar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fatma Sultan (daughter of Ahmed I) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • demanded he return her dowry to her, which amounted to one year of taxes of [[Egypt Eyalet|Egypt]] (this was possibly related to the fact that one of her previous husbands, the late [[Kara Mustafa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cacık may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • fa| ماست و خیار }}; {{lang-ku|jaj}}<ref>http://www.etimolojiturkce.com/kelime/cac%C4%B1k</ref>) or '''tzatziki''' is a dish of seasoned, strained [[yogurt]], eaten throughout the former [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Gülen movement. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gülen movement. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please see WP:SEEALSO: "As a general rule, the 'See also' section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body" and WP:BRD. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've broken the 3RR rule. I wonder if I should report you for that, like you did me in the past without listening to reason or notifying me? Ithinkicahn (talk) 04:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rostam (name) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Rustam Rahimov]] (born 1979, German-Tajik boxer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:06, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Necati Şaşmaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zaza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slavery in the Ottoman Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Edhem Pasha may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Edhem Pasha was especially successful in the Battle of Dömeke/Domochos {{lang-tr|Dömeke Harbi}}) on the front. He captured Yenişehir ([[Larissa]]) and Tırhala ([[Trikala]]) again, but other

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abd%C3%BClaziz_Bay%C4%B1nd%C4%B1r&diff=612018517&oldid=598726479) The other editor removed all sources from it, hence it has no sources as now. He claimed the sources I added are fanatical Quranist webpages. Kavas (talk) 15:08, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've taken note and restored the cited sources. This user, RookTaker, seems to have an agenda in defacing articles like this, especially by libeling this person because of his criticisms of Said Nursi. Ithinkicahn (talk) 22:30, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kıbrıslı Mehmed Emin Pasha may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ] who had entered the service of the Ottoman Empire, or with other past notables of the same name (see [[Mehmed Emin Pasha (disambiguation)]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Köprülü Abdullah Pasha may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in 1735, part of the renewed [[Ottoman–Persian War (1730–35)|Ottoma-Persian War of 1730–35)]]. Ordering his forces to entrench in preparation for the advancing Persian army, he managed to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Şehzade Cihangir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Şehzade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fülane

A tag has been placed on Fülane, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page, or a redirect loop.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Said Nursi

Hi Batuhan. I just wanted to thank you for your interest in and effort on the article of Said Nursi's biography. I have been planning to improve this article for so long and couldn't accomplish what I want yet, but it is good to see that there are people like you who are also interested in him. rinduzahid(talk) 22:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sidon Eyalet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustafa Pasha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doğukan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 29 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited January 1913, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Izzet Pasha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mustafa Reşid Pasha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibrahim of Egypt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Howard R. Hughes, Sr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glenwood Cemetery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see...

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Ithinkicahn. Thanks, Étienne Dolet (talk) 03:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've suggested that you be topic banned from the Armenian genocide. There may still be time for you to respond if you are inclined to do so. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

As a result of this AE thread (of which you were made aware, and to which I pinged you), and in accordance with discretionary sanctions authorised by WP:AA2, I am banning you from editing any articles related to Armenian Genocide topics, and from adding, removing, or editing any mention of the Armenian Genocide in any other article. Violations of this topic ban will result in blocks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings
Happy New Year !

Hello :Ithinkicahn,

I wish the very best for you and the world in 2015. Cheers, Nedim Ardoğa (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Several undersized Turkey geography stub categories have been nominated for discussion

Several categories which you created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if they abide with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dawynn (talk) 22:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey)

Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in setting up Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey), based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). Now it's not a contest in itself, it's designed to motivate people to inspire others to improve content and build something which demonstrates the hard work going into the country which is visible. The focus is more on quality improvements but new articles are welcome too. Eventually a Turkish National Contest could be created to fuel it, like Wikipedia:Awaken the Dragon, in which contestants can choose to keep the Amazon vouchers themselves to buy their own books for more articles or put them into book fund to help editors further improve Turkish-related topics by giving them the books they want. It will begin though as purely an improvement drive. If interested, or you think anybody else might be interested, alert them and sign up on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey talk page at the bottom. Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ithinkicahn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ithinkicahn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Ithinkicahn! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 22:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts, please read

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 09:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing
Iyi muhabbet (talk) 20:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]