en User talk:Istvan

A star for you

You deserve this to balance out Anonimu and Anittas. — **$PЯING**εrαgђ 02:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mythology

Szia,

For whenever you get back: how well-versed are you in Hungarian mythology? I'm rather preoccupied with it (and ancient Hungarian history, and the tantalizing instances of overlap between the two) lately and it might be fun, as well as a nice change of pace, to work on some articles on those topics for a while. (I just spent the better part of an hour writing the legend of the Csodaszarvas in as much detail as I can remember off the top of my head--which is actually a lot--on this page, but then I somehow hit the wrong button and lost it all. ARGH.) Anyway, I hope you're well, and anticipating the imminent arrival of Mikulás at least half as eagerly as I am. ;-) Makes up for the imminent arrival of a blizzard tomorrow where I am...anyway, enough rambling...g'night. :) K. Lásztocska^talk 05:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Anonimu

This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Anonimu is banned from editing Wikipedia by the Arbitration Committee for a period of one year, to run concurrently with the existing indefinite community ban. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

S&I

Ha! I like that! :P Sadly, dear István, the two are like a magnet—a magnet with two identical poles, that is; they are insoluable in each other. ;) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 05:22 21 December, 2007 (UTC)

Let's give you a star for the humour

a rather early Xmas greeting :)

Aw, Darwinek left you off his list this year...allow me to pick up the slack by wishing you and your family in no uncertain terms a VERY merry Christmas and much luck and happiness in the New Year! Boldog karácsonyt és kellemes új évet kivánok!! :))))) Best, K. Lásztocska^talk 03:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and if I may, if you have a few spare minutes you might want to take a glance here--we're going around in circles and could use a clear-headed third opinion.

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas, my friend. May this find you in good health, good spirits, good company, and good finances. If any of these be missing, may God see fit to restore you in good time. — $PЯINGεrαgђ 05:07 25 December, 2007 (UTC)

File:Julkrubba.jpg

!!!

István--I GOT THE PUSKÁS BOOK--will start in on the article as soon as I can! :) K. Lásztocska^talk 18:44, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

eBay? Keep dreaming! :P I will, however, keep my eyes out for another copy somewhere, and will let you know immediately if and when I find one. (My copy came from England, via one of my dad's old colleagues.)

Don't worry about not being able to spend much time here lately. (I've been around pretty sparsely these past few months myself--finally learned that real life really IS more important than the Wiki!) I miss having you around of course (a subtle joke a day keeps the doctor away) but I understand you're busy with real life. Just don't stay away TOO long, the project always needs more editors like you! :)

Merry Christmas again, and my very best wishes! (give your daughter a Christmas hug from me!) ;-) K. Lásztocska^talk 03:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Szigeti again

Almost there...as we speak, I'm coming tantalizingly close to getting some nice 30-second sound clips of his playing off my old vinyl LPs (thank you, modern technology) but there are still a few weird little bugs in the system. Anyway, those should be up by tomorrow evening if all goes well, and then I really will write that section about his family and off-stage life you suggested. THEN I'll put it up for FAC. (Do you think I should submit it for a WikiProject Biography peer review first, or just plunge straight in to the big time? Simple impatience makes me lean towards the latter, but whichever...) K. Lásztocska^talk 05:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that was easier than I thought. (I especially like the Brahms...) K. Lásztocska^talk 06:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you've got a spare moment or two, I'd like to hear your opinion on this. I can see the rationale behind explicitly identifying someone as Jewish if he were from a country (Russia, Germany etc.) that considered Jewish a separate nationality, but since that wasn't the case in Hungary it seems a bit odd, like identifying Liszt as a "Christian Hungarian composer." But, eh, I'm open to debate...K. Lásztocska^talk 00:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At last! K. Lásztocska^talk 05:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, wait a minute...

Am I out of my mind, or was this actually an elaborate multilingual pun? Girl peacock = "peahen" = pihen = "relax!" ??? I can't believe it took me all day to figure that one out...but given what else has been going on on-wiki lately, I definitely needed the laugh. Even if I completely misinterpreted the joke (?). K. Lásztocska^talk 05:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. And I thought you'd made the pun of the century...

Oh no, tell me you're not going through more troubles...DAMN the turáni átok, damn it straight to hell!! Why do the worst things always happen to the best people??? My thoughts and prayers are with you, my dear friend! K. Lásztocska^talk 06:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a meager offering of consolation for whatever's going on this time--Bartók's ethereally beautiful Third Piano Concerto. This piece always comforts me when I'm stressed or upset or otherwise frazzled...Part 1 Part 2 Part 3. K. Lásztocska^talk 06:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrospective award

I Cas Liber, hereby award Istvan the Flaming Joel-wiki for raising our collective consciousness for work on a Featured Article highlighted by the Übermuse Billy Joel in his great song We Didn't Start the Fire...cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re

Köszönöm szépen. :) I'm just glad it's finished. No, sadly no academic credit to be had, but it DID re-emphasize the need to properly format one's references in scholarly writing (as if my music history professor hadn't hammered that into my head enough.) :) I hope all is well with you and your family! See you around the wiki... K. Lásztocska^talk 14:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah...I did take it as a good sign though--if the only problems they could find were nit-picky things like reference punctuation, I knew I'd written a good article. And now you've got me stuck on the word "pinhead" again, thanks... :) K. Lásztocska^talk 06:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hungary

The WikiProject Hungary project page is now operational. WikiProject Hungary is a WikiProject whose aim is to increase the quality of articles related to Hungary and Hungarians. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve disputes, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up. As a long term plan it was suggested that this notice board should be integrated into the WikiProject as it was done in the case of Poland. Intrested Wikipedians should sign up at the participants page. Discussion about Banners and other issues takes place at the project discussion page. Hobartimus (talk) 17:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Sorry, I kept postponing this, but first, many, many thanks for your support, and second, I quite concur with your assessment. Life will go on, of course, but at a scaled-back editing pace for a while, I would imagine. Best wishes, and I hope your back is fine now. Biruitorul (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ides of March

I'm quite honored to be among the elite group of editors you allow to affectionately vandalize your page! :) (Did you see I gave Biru one too? Wonder if he noticed...haha) I'm very glad to hear things are going well for you! Myself, I'm up to my neck in exams, papers and all of a sudden, out of nowhere, Bartok's First Violin Concerto...ack. But I have a break soon and will get back to Wiki-work. :) All the best! K. Lásztocska^talk 21:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:1956 hungary freedomfighter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1956 hungary freedomfighter.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

almost certainly

I love how it took them a full month to notice. And yes, next April 1 will indeed be epic. Let's invent a composer and write his biography, in great detail. K. Lásztocska^talk 02:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was an April Fools joke that wasn't caught for over a month? Wow, I came here to tell you off for it, but now that I noticed the creation date, well done. :) --UsaSatsui (talk) 06:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :^=)

Istvan, your smiley-face has a terribly pronounced case of monophiltrumitis itself...K. Lásztocska^talk 19:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hah! I have my own strange smiley face: :-?

I use it for situations when I don't know how I'm supposed to respond emotionally...Anyway, sorry for spamming on your talk page, István! --Kuaichik (talk) 03:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, guess who this is? ## :^ ]

How clever! Thanks for including the link, or I never would have guessed. Now, should I be ashamed to say I never had any idea who Lyle Lovett was? (In my own self-defense, I'm not much of a movie buff, and I definitely don't know any singer-songwriters. Plus, the movies I know best are all Indian!). --Kuaichik (talk) 04:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Istvan, a man of so many hidden talents. :) Can you do a Gyurcsany/Orban smiley? Or Kossuth? Or someone else? Man, look at how I procrastinate my final ethnomusicology paper...K. Lásztocska^talk 05:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I'm limited to just :-? plus the regular AIM smileys :-D

By the way, I forgot just what monofiltrumitis was (other than an April Fool's joke). In what way does István's smiley reflect the, er, disease? :-D --Kuaichik (talk) 05:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a smiley with a philtrum, and only one of them. :) K. Lásztocska^talk 07:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! And I definitely should be ashamed that I never knew there was a word as expressive as philtrum for that little indenture :) (But hey, I learned something new. I found out that in Persian, it's called búszega). --Kuaichik (talk) 14:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Dear István! I've made a short article: Battle of Capua (1348). Please correct it! Thanks, Kuruc, 19 May, 2008, 9:40 (CEST) —Preceding comment was added at 07:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burma Name Change

Excellent points on the Burma/Myanmar debate. Clear, concise, and well argued in relation to Wikipedia policy.Angstriddenyouth (talk) 20:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bestfiver.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Bestfiver.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:1956_hungary_freedomfighter.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:1956_hungary_freedomfighter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Time Man of the year 1957Hunagarianfreedom fighter.jpg

Thanks for the "keep" vote and comment, Istvan! - Ryanjo (talk) 21:11, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo!

The extra effort to defend the Time cover may have actually enhanced the article a bit. Ryanjo (talk) 00:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...yes, I HAVE been gone a while...

sheesh and I was wondering why it was a redlink....I was like "OMG, did Biru get banned?!?!?!" :P

Anyway, on an unrelated topic, I'm probably soon going to start translating some material from HuWiki (writers, etc). Once I do, could I trouble you to double-check over my translation before I actually post anything? K. Lásztocska^talk 01:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article Review (2009)

Please see Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hungarian Revolution of 1956/archive1 Fifelfoo (talk) 14:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1956 Hungarian Revolution FAR

Hello, Istvan. You have new messages at CoolKoon's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Szia István!

Tudom, megkésve válaszolok az üzenetedre; én 1956 -al nem szoktam foglalkozni bár engem is érdekel a történelem, de a huszadik század második felének a történelme, azért annyira már nem. De hogyha a cikkel kapcsolatban valahol szavazni kell, akkor azért értesíts róla engem is. Üdvözletel:--Nmate (talk) 12:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the offer of attention. Yes, I think it would be beneficial to all if you take a look and voice your opinion. As you have experience editing History articles in general, and certainly knowledge in this specific area it would be constructive. Thanks István (talk) 21:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Istvan. You have new messages at SimonTrew's talk page.
Message added 23:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi Steve/Istvan, I alooked at it, but am not sure what I should be looking at. SimonTrew (talk) 23:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't remember sending you a message. I apologize, as there is another editor who was displaying his truncated signature as "Istvan" and this has led to some confusion in the past. Are you sure you have the right person?István (talk) 23:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:56 Article FAR

Szia! Köszi az értesítést. :) Mint látod megpróbáltam. üdv,--B@xter⁹ 08:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks also for helping improve the article! István (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the FAR has been closed (something I'm not concerned about); how should the discussion that was occurring at the FAR's talk proceed? Fifelfoo (talk) 08:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would be nice to tie up some of the loose ends, however, it should be in the context of broad participation, not just two editors, should count for something (experience suggests that it will not) and of course the main page is closed.

HOWEVER - the discussion page is still open, a few other editors might still have this on their watchlist and care to contribute, and we may indeed be able to come to, if not agreement, then accurate measure of the issue. BTW, my absence for the past few days was due to the flu (w/ relapse) and not on purpose. I will try to post something and we can see if this has any traction.

hello

Hello Istvan, I'm new here to editing but I've been reading Wikipedia for a long time so I think I more or less know how to do things around here. :) I see your specialty seems to be Eastern Europe--I hope to soon begin work on substantially improving the articles on Karel Capek and Leos Janacek sometime in the near-ish future, and wondered if you would have the time and/or inclination to join forces on those projects. Thanks, Florestanova (talk) 06:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC) P.S. Emleksz te egy kis madárat? Ez az új nevém és egy új wiki-életem. ;-)[reply]

Persze hogy emlekszem! I will take a look and help out as I can. Do you plan on taking them to GA or FA? That can be fun and frustrating... as I'm sure you will learn should you choose to take that route. ;-) István (talk) 17:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thank you kindly :) Glad I was able to help resolve things. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! :) – Alensha ^talk 16:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you from me as well; that was very kind of you! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Koszonom szepen Istvan! Habar ugy velem, hogy kozremukodesem elenyeszo merteku a Tiedhez kepest, igy igazabol Te erdemelned ezt a kituntetest!--B@xter⁹ 09:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Currency rates

Thanks; x-rates didn't have the rate for Nov 28, only Nov 26, when I checked... Do you think the article has a chance at DYK? It was such a stub when I stumbled upon it that it was a shame... – Alensha ^talk 22:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I use this page for historical rates, but you have to figure the midrate manually as they assume you are either buying or selling (over a spread of course) anyway that was just a tongue-in-cheek edit - good for a laugh (at myself) for being nitpicky. Yes, I indeed believe this has a chance at DYK, but it wouldnt be a bad idea to get some expert advice on preparing it for candidacy (sadly Im not much use in that). Keep up the great editing! István (talk) 04:22, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be a fine idea. The article certainly meets all the criteria. I see Alensha has already nominated it. The only thing necessary is for there to be a footnote after "on July 20, 1590" or the next sentence, telling us where the information in the "hook" comes from. At that point, the article will be ready for approval by some uninvolved user. Biruitorul ^Talk 23:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer rights

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I only hope I can find the time to put it to proper use! István (talk) 14:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Blood of the Hungarians

I have nominated The Blood of the Hungarians, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blood of the Hungarians. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. billinghurst sDrewth 13:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pluto mickeys choo choo 1929 at 1m41s.jpg * File:Pluto The Chain Gang 1930 at 6m06s.jpg

⚠

A quick note regarding a couple of files you have uploaded are not currently being utilized in the mainspace File:Pluto mickeys choo choo 1929 at 1m41s.jpg and File:Pluto The Chain Gang 1930 at 6m06s.jpg. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Kindly Calmer Waters 04:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference

I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.

We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:35, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Arpad speaks.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Credo

Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arpad speaks.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arpad speaks.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 22:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Istvan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Istvan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kisfonok.JPG

The file File:Kisfonok.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly ^hi! 23:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Detective Barnstar

		The Detective Barnstar
		I don't know how you did it, but great work finding that source about the "chaldee years"! AlphabeticThing9 (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! István 16:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Istvan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]