User talk:Iliochori2

Welcome!

Hello Iliochori2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page FC Desna Chernihiv has been reverted.
Your edit here to FC Desna Chernihiv was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/desnafc/?fref=ts) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shevchenko Theatre Chernihiv

Hello Iliochori2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shevchenko Theatre Chernihiv for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 12:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shevchenko Theatre Chernihiv

Hello, Iliochori2,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Shevchenko Theatre Chernihiv for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should not removed CSD tags from articles you have created.Slatersteven (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Iliochori2

Thank you for creating Shevchenko Theatre Chernihiv.

User:Dps04, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

tagged for speedy deletion

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dps04}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dps04 (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chernihiv City Council moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chernihiv City Council, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Wikivoyage:Chernihiv into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🌴^Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 16:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Museum of history, former Governor's House

Hello Iliochori2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Museum of history, former Governor's House for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for =disruptive editing, WP:CIR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After the above warnings, you added to Transfiguration Cathedral, Chernihiv half-translated text taken from elsewhere, which violates copyright. I am afraid you are currently do not have sufficient conpetence to edit Wikipedia. I blocked your account for 31h as the last warning, but if issues continue, you will be likely blocked for an indefinite period.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Archangel Michael (Chernihiv) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Church of the Archangel Michael (Chernihiv), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Volodymyr Levin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Volodymyr Levin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volodymyr Levin (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volodymyr Levin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Volodymyr Levin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iliochori2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viktor Bannikov.jpg and FC Desna Chernihiv

File:Viktor Bannikov.jpg is a non-free image. Please stop restoring this image to that article, as you did here. There is a policy at WP:NFCC regarding the use of non-free images which requires a separate, specific fair use rationale for each use of the image. You would need to add two such rationales to the image description page to pass that policy. But, it still would not be allowed. The image in the gallery fails WP:NFGALLERY guideline, and outside of the gallery fails WP:NFCC #8, as it does nothing to enhance understanding of the article and has purely a decorative role. I am removing it again. Please do not restore it. If you have questions, let me know. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wedding Palace (Chernihiv) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wedding Palace (Chernihiv), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dytynets Park (Chernihiv) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dytynets Park (Chernihiv), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Desna Chernihiv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Desna Chernihiv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oleksandr Volkov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Andriy Yarmolenko, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 10:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Panetolikos F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dimitrios Papadopoulos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of FC Desna Chernihiv Top Scorer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of FC Desna Chernihiv Top Scorer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. User:Thatoneweirdwikier | Oh, Toodles! 12:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andriy Yarmolenko

Could you please stop adding image galleries to Andriy Yarmolenko? See WP:IG for guidance. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of FC Desna Chernihiv Top Scorer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of FC Desna Chernihiv Top Scorer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Oleh Kuznetsov, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And at whole bunch of other football players. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updating caps and stats

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Robby.is.on (talk) 13:00, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020 1

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Oleh Kuznetsov, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and grammar

Hi. I see you started to include sources with your edits which is good. But whoscored.com is not a great source. Please use newspaper articles and other more reliable sources instead. Also, please make sure the content you add is grammatically correct. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 15:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eurosport and UEFA are better sources. But you need to make sure the references support the content you add. At Yevhen Past, the Eurosport pages do not seem to mention penalty saves and the UEFA page does not mention Past. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you find a better source for Vladyslav Kalitvintsev's move to Desna Chernihiv? http://www.allplayers.in.ua/en/player/952 is mostly a stats page. A newspaper article would be good. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:49, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020 3

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yevhen Past. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Yevhen Past, you may be blocked from editing. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show me an example? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iliochori2 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Oleksandr Filippov. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding all relavant resourse and also from wikipedia, how they are not relavant? Can you please double check? Can you show me an example of relavant resourse? : Can you show me an example? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iliochori2 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC) talkCan you show me an example?[reply]

Thank you for finally responding. I am happy to help.

Newspaper articles and books can be reliable sources. A few users have linked Wikipedia:Reliable sources here on your Talk page, now would be a good time to read that. and also from wikipedia – as Wikipedia:Reliable sources states: "Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose".

Thierry Henry and Alex Morgan are examples of very good articles.

Please sign your posts with four tildes: (~~~~); see Wikipedia:Signatures. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I'ved added relavant resourse and they are have been delete, can you please explaine in which way the resourse from the Ukrainian Premier League Federation website are not relavant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iliochori2 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please indent your posts and sign them properly.

The Ukrainian Premier League Federation's website is a decent source. Can you please show me an example where you think content was properly sourced and erroneously deleted? Robby.is.on (talk) 09:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

are these not a good resourse and not attendible?

* Ukrainian First League: with FC Desna Chernihiv in the season 2017–18

* Ukrainian First League Runner-up with Desna Chernihiv in the season 2016–17 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iliochori2 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC (UTC)

Again, properly indent and sign your posts.

Where is the source for these honours? For the third time: you cannot cite other Wikipedia articles! Robby.is.on (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

why they other users can and me not? They are using the same template and refered to wikipedia in the same way and me I can't? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iliochori2 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where? Robby.is.on (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

here they are using it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filippo_Inzaghi - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego_Simeone . I am in a good fait and I would like to contrubute to increase wikipedia in the right way and the reourses are attendibles also. And also here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudio_Ranieri I found the same template for the Honour. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iliochori2 (talk • contribs) 10:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Start showing your good faith by indenting and signing your posts: Wikipedia:Signatures, Wikipedia:Indent. This will be my last reply until you do that. I am tired of cleaning up after you. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

so are the links that I provided you a good template or not? I've added attendible resourse also from the Premier League Federation and you are cleaning, but as far I know they are attendible. Can I post them or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iliochori2 (talk • contribs)

• There are no Wikipedia articles cited as references in Filippo Inzaghi. I don't know what you mean with "attendible". We obviously have serious language issues here. You will not be able to write article content unless you can use reliable, independent sources to verify that content. If you don't know what that means, if you cannot understand even after reading the pages that Robby.is.on linked to, then I'm afraid you lack the competence to edit the English Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 13:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I am not agree with that, maybe you missed my questions. what I am talking about that I was explain Robby.is.on that in Filippo Inzaghi page there is the section in HONOURS the same that I have provided in my contribution and they have been delete state that they were not good contribution even using the same template. How this is possible? Iliochori2 (talk) 9:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Iliochori2, as far as I can see you have not been providing references. Having an honours section is not the problem. Not having references is the problem. I don't know whether you are using the Visual Editor or not. Click here for a basic guide including information on how to add references using Visual Editor. If you are not using Visual Editor, at the end of each honour the person received, type <ref>; then type the URL of the source you are using (or the title, date, and newspaper for a newspaper article that is not online); then type </ref>. That makes a footnote. If you look again at the articles you have linked to as examples here, you will see that footnote numbers appear after the honours, or after the names of the teams that make subsections. The footnotes are at the bottom of the page. THey are what we need, because one of our most important rules here is that readers must be able to check the information. I think that by "attendible" you mean "notable" or "noteworthy", worth having in the article; that's not the issue. The issue is that you need to say where the information came from. Does that help? (By the way, click on the symbol that looks like a pen writing or a wiggle, to make a signature at the end of what you write. You copied Drmies' signature above, which is hard work and also made a wrong link.) Yngvadottir (talk) 20:34, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I got your point, so for any honour, I need to add the references. But what about, if I add wikipedia page link, where the information are already inside without adding any references? Is this an enought resource or do I need to add and include something else? Iliochori2 (talk) 22:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you need to add something other than Wikipedia. Usually the Wikipedia page will have a reference; open the link to that reference to make sure it says what you want to cite it for, then make a reference to it when you add the fact. We are all volunteers here and sometimes someone misreads a source or forgets to add a reference, so it's not safe to trust other Wikipedia articles as sources; that includes those in other languages. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you very well now and I do agree 100%, but I have one concern in Filippo Inzaghi page in the section "Italy", in the Honour, there are these tags FIFA World Cup: 2006 without reference. I found these tags in this way, many times with a link in other pages of wikipedia and they have not been delete as they did with my contribution. Why happended in my contribution of the Honour, where I have placed the same tags Iliochori2 (talk) 23:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with the usual format for footballers with long careers, but I find the 2006 World Cup referenced in the text above, footnote number 51. I'm pinging Robby.is.on and EdJohnston so that they can see that we have been talking here and that you now understand better what people have been saying; I think they or someone else may be able to give you more precise information about things like listing international caps under Honours. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content in the "Honours" section needs to be sourced. The fact that other articles are insufficiently sourced doesn't mean we can add more unsourced stuff. Robby.is.on (talk) 14:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but you asked me to show where I found these information, why you don't remove them and and you remove my material, I think is not fair. Its look discrimination on my eyes Iliochori2 (talk) 23:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I'm volunteer like everybody else here I can choose how I want to invest my time. Wikipedia has an incredible amount of articles and I could spent years removing unsourced content. But that's not what I am here for.

A few days ago, I noticed that for weeks you had been making massive additions without including references and I reacted to that urgent problem. Robby.is.on (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but I show you the page, it takes you few minutes.

Yes and I didn't know how to reply to you here. Then when I found it, your explanation sometime were confusing. Apologies to be honest, plus I have included references and almost the entire contribution were delete, eventhose that they were provided references. Iliochori2 (talk) 17:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For example now I just added some information in this page Oleksandr Filippov with relavant references as your collegues Yngvadottir kindly explained to me how to do and it was been removed. Can I know exactly what was wring in the article please?. Iliochori2 (talk) 17:3, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

After receiving numerous warnings you should have stopped making further additions and figured out how to respond to the concerns.

Unfortunately I've just learned how to reply the day the 16 June 2020 (UTC), before that I've tried to contact you in many way just to ask any possible clarification Iliochori2 (talk) 20:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You added copyrighted material again. You were previously blocked for copyright violations in May. See WP:COPYPASTE. Robby.is.on (talk) 16:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is the part in the text the problem? Iliochori2 (talk) 20:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iliochori2: Yes, that's what Robby.is.on is saying; you copied some text from your reference about him being the best player. We can't copy text from anywhere into Wikipedia, because it is a copyright violation. Everything in Wikipedia is free for anyone to reuse, including for sale, so if we copy someone's words (or photos), we're releasing them to be reused by others and depriving the owner of their rights. Here's a page for editors summarizing that. But you did add references, and your edit was not completely removed. From the article history (and apologies, this is in the old-style format and not mobile, because I use a desktop computer and the old editing software): this is the changes you made in your two edits and this is how Robby.is.on changed it; leaving the article changed like this from before you made your two edits. Robby.is.on is trying to help you make the article better: he has kept your new section and fixed a mistake you made in the reference formatting, while removing the copied text and the second reference. Does that help?

Yes, he tried but sometimes when I posed some questions, they were a bit vague and sometime he didn't respond to my specific questions. Now since I knew how to reply to you, I can understand what I have to fix and in case pose more questions if its neccessary, thank you. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 11:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether you have found the Teahouse? It's a help page for new editors to ask questions, and you may be able to get good explanations there. We have a lot of articles about footballers/soccer players and we always need people willing to help keep them up to date and search for references, so I really want to get you to where you understand the rules and can help, and there will almost always be someone who can help with things like fixing teh reference format. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn't, thank a million. It will be very useful, I will go and have a read, thanks again. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 11:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Iliochori2. I see you attempted to respond here by mistake. You modified one of our standard templates, which is not the right way. The right place for you to answer is at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing by Iliochori2. At first sight, there is a language problem that keeps you from being effective here. Wikipedia assumes that you can get started here without making too many mistakes, but your error rate is very high. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't respond to the complaints about the quality of your edits you are risking a block. EdJohnston (talk) 15:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iliochori2 (talk) 19:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC) is here that I need to respond or in another link? I have sent and email, can you please double check? Is this place ok to respond? What is the complain that I have to explain about? Please give me some instruction as I am not familiar to respond here in wikipedia, its seems confusing the tools to respond. Why I am in risk? What I have done? I have added appropriate material and valid source, plus some member of your staff are not answering when I am providing explanation or asking questions how to contribute according with the policies of wikipedia. Ok its seems I found the link but I don't know how to respond from here[reply]

Iliochori2 (talk) 19:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC) I think I found the link here I will try to respond but I am not sure if I will manage it over here.[reply]

Iliochori2 (talk) 19:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC) I am sorry I am trying to respond but I can't do it in the link. I would like to respond, but its seems complicate in the link. If you want you can give me an email and I will answer you. In the link it seems very difficult.[reply]

Use this link: [1]. Clicking this will open up the section on the ANI noticeboard where you are being discussed. You can add your comment to the end of that section, sign your name, and hit save. EdJohnston (talk) 19:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have managed properly to reply, can you double check to let me know please? Iliochori2 (talk) 19:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for your response. You managed to create an entire new section separate from the original discussion. I moved your new response, keeping all your words. You can follow the discussion now at WP:ANI#Disruptive editing by Iliochori2. EdJohnston (talk) 20:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

some member of your staff are not answering when I am providing explanation or asking questions how to contribute according with the policies of wikipedia. Almost everybody editing here at Wikipedia is a volunteer, not staff. Robby.is.on (talk) 15:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FC Yunist Chernihiv moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FC Yunist Chernihiv, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EditQwerty (talk) 20:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent changes

Hi there. Some issues I noticed looking over your edits at Oleksandr Ryabokon, Oleksandr Filippov, and Denys Favorov:

• Placement of full stops: full stops go before references. Wrong: "<ref></ref>."; right: ".<ref></ref>".
• date formats: the pages you edited are in the dmy format. Wrong: "the 20th may 2020", right: "on 20 May 2020".
• references titles: Please use the correct title of the articles you use. Example: for https://www.desna.football/trener-1/ you gave "Oleksandr Ryabokon signed for FC Desna Chernihiv <nowiki>| Referee report </nowiki>" as the page title, whereas "Олександр Рябоконь" is the correct title of the page. If you want to include a translation of the title, use the "|trans-title" parameter.

Let me know if anything requires clarification. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iliochori2 (talk) 23:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC) Yes, thanks for your instructions, I will try to don't make the same mistakes and change those that I have done already.[reply]

Please make corrections at Denys Favorov. It's full of the issues mentioned above. Also, stop adding adding unsourced content like here. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 0813, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Sorry, regarding Denys Favorov, I have just paste the wrong resource.

And you shouldn't be adding more stuff to Oleksandr Filippov until you have cleaned up your mistakes. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 0813, 13 July 2020 (UTC) In relation about Oleksandr Filippov, I am a bit confused, there is a wrong source?

I haven't checked the sources. But the article is full of the issues mentioned above: wrong date formatting ("the 20th may 2020") and wrong placement of full stops. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have seen, thanks to point them out. I will correct them, Apologizes. (talk) 10:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed for Denys Favorov. (talk) 10:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there were many issues left which I tried to sort out in a series of edits: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Denys_Favorov&action=history Two other things:

* The ESPN source you gave did not support the claim that the club won the First League, it only stated that it had been promoted,

* adjectives such as "amazing" are usually not appropriate. See WP:Peacock.

I don't have the time to go through all of the changes you have been making to other articles. Please fix these issues as good as you can at all the articles you edited. Other editors might not bother to correct all the problems and instead might just revert the changes you've made. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I perfectly understand that you are running out of time, no worries I keepin mind your instruction for future references. Thanks again for your instructions. iliochori2 (talk) 15:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Volodymyr Levin Illich moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Volodymyr Levin Illich, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 16:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC) (talk) 11 July 2020 (UTC) I have just submit the change, please let me know if they are ok with your guidelines.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volodymyr Levin (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volodymyr Levin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Volodymyr Levin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Amkgp 💬 17:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iliochori2 (talk) 20:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC) I have modified a bit the article, please let me know if it ok according with your guidlines.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volodymyr Levin Illich (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volodymyr Levin Illich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Volodymyr Levin Illich, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maksym Tatarenko

The article Maksym Tatarenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes its true, I am sorry, you can delete. iliochori2 (talk) 14:36, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yevhen Past in August 2020

Hi. I looked over your changes at Yevhen Past and I can see you are consistently including references for your changes which is great. I had to fix a bunch of minor mistakes (see my change here). Specifically, the issue are:

• Reference titles: for a couple of references, you simply used the player's name as the title. Please use the correct title. For example for this reference the title is "Євген Паст: «Удача відвернулася від команди в найвідповідальніший момент»". You can translate non-English titles to English using the "trans-title" parameter.
• "14 August 2020", not "14th of august 2020". See the "Use dmy dates" template at the top of the page, it prescribes the date format.
• If you update the number of appearance, please also update the timestamp – "pcupdate" or "club-update" for club appearances, "ntupdate" or "nationalteam-update" for national team appearances.

Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• thanks a million for your instruction iliochori2 (talk) 12:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of FC Desna Chernihiv Top Scorer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of FC Desna Chernihiv Top Scorer. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – FC Desna Chernihiv. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at FC Desna Chernihiv. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Captain Calm (talk) 15:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• thanks a million for your instruction. What I have to do to create a new pages with the full list? iliochori2 (talk) 17:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have just updated the page List of FC Desna Chernihiv Top Scorer iliochori2 (talk) 18:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

iliochori2, chances are they won't read your replies unless you ping them. Instructions here: Template:Reply to. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 20:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chernihiv Arena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian Championship.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buildings and structures in Cherniv

A tag has been placed on Category:Buildings and structures in Cherniv requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 16:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chernihiv National University of Technology moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chernihiv National University of Technology, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 15:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chernihiv National University of Technology (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AviationFreak were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chernihiv National University of Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chernihiv National University of Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AviationFreak💬 15:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andriy Yarmolenko

Please see the talk page and discuss rather than edit war. Thanks.--Egghead06 (talk) 07:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I am updating a relevant information and providing reliable sources. Whats wrong with my edit? What you mean about war? Recently you have also removed infomation that they were there for while? Why, there is a specific reason? Regards --iliochori2 talk (Egghead06) 12:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

iliochori2, I left a link with information on how notify other editors here. Also see Wikipedia:Edit warring. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PAS Giannina

Good evening!!! You make changes on PAS Giannina F.C..You make mistakes.You put director Dasios but he is out.You write as notable former players Kuzik and Naumets.They are not notable for the club and Naumets is not former player. Please if you are not sure,dont change it.Perhaps you can ask.PAS Giannina is not so famous club and i am sure you dont know it very well.--Fon7 (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, I know PAS Giannina F.C. very well as I am follwing them since the last 20 years. I provided you the source that Dasios is a Director from the official website of the club. Che here Georgios Dasios and the website of the club https://pasgiannina.gr/anakoinwseis/ntasios-niarxakos-9-2019/ - Let me know Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 18:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also Panepirotan Athletic Center is the training field.Zosimades is the home field.--Fon7 (talk) Let me know please 21:47 (UTC)

Regarding the main field is Zosimades but they also use the Panepirotan National Athletic Center. Please check this and let me know http://www.stadia.gr/panipeirotiko/panipeirotiko.html Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 21:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's the training field.PAS plays only friendly matches.Also Velissario doesnt use the facilities.I watch PAS Giannina every day so I know it very well.Your source is outdated.--Fon7 (talk) 09:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Me too I watch and also straming PAS Giannina F.C.'s matches, almost everyday and they used the fiel Panepirotan National Athletic Center also for official matches. You can see in the link http://www.stadia.gr/panipeirotiko/panipeirotiko.html of the offical site of Studia.gr that Velissario use mainly this stadium, furthermore my friend is the part of the managment of the team. What about Datios? Please check this and let me know Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 11:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am supporter of PAS Giannina.It's my team.I think i know more.In Panepirotan National Athletic Center (PEAKI),PAS Giannina plays friendlies every summer.He never played official matches.100%.Also previous years U-20,U-17,U-15 played there.They dont play there now as well.It's te training field.

Velisario used this field on the past.Not now.I told you that your source is outdated.Velisario has problems with his field and it changes its home every year.

Dasios,not Datios, resigned from his position.There were some problems.The president wanted someone else.

Are you from Ukraine?Because only Naumets is from there.--Fon7 (talk) 17:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also Panepirotan National Athletic Center is correct as name.That's not the problem i think.It's not just a field.It's sports facilities.--Fon7 (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, are you a supporter of PAS Giannina like me. I am so happy, yes after you told me about Datios I have seen that he was removed but in his wikipedia page was still as a direct. Thanks for your information about Velisario, what about AE Ioannina, are they still playing there? Ok I can adjust a little bit Panepirotan National Athletic Center. I am italian and my dad is from Ioannina which I have been there a lot but I started known Ukrainian soccer quite a lot and of course I know Naumets befOre joyin to PAS and Orest Kuzyk (that he didn't play well for PAS). Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 21:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you are the first italian supporter of PAS Giannina.There is a forum for PAS but it is in greek.Also there are pages on social.If you want to join.

Perhaps Dasios page needs new info.

No,AE Giannina doesnt play there as well.Both AE Giannina and Velissario play on amateur divisions.

Naumets scored a great goal on sunday against Aris Thessaloniki.He is on a good form.Kouzik transfered to Pafos,Cyprus.I dont know if he is on a free transfer or on a loan.Possible on a free transfer.Kouzik was on loan 2 times but he played for PAS for six months if i remember right.--Fon7 (talk) 18:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know there aren't many italian supporters, but the team is known a little bit in Italy, not like big clubs in Greece. Yes I have seen the forum, please send me the link to check if it is the same one that I have. I also following the team in Facebook, Twitter, Telegram and all social media. Thanks for the information about AE Giannena and Velissario. Actually I know who built the website of AE Giannina is a friend of mine, now the team doesn't have a website anymore. Do you have the page in wikipedia for the Greek amateur divisions?

Regarding Naumets, yes I have seen his goal, actually I have updated his wikipedia page. Regarding Kouzik , I have seen him playing in Ukraine, when he was loaned, he is good in running but I has expecting more with him. With PAS played only 4 games with Giannis Petrakis. Yes now he is in Pafos loned for free for one year, as he has another year contract with PAS. Sorry for my long yalk, have a nice working day. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 08:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are some fans that they travel to Bergamo but we are unknown as a team.We introduced in 2016 but it need more.A famous italian player tried to spell Panepirotikos then.I dont remember his name.

The forum is pas.gr.

The greek page for amateur clubs is Ένωση Ποδοσφαιρικών Σωματείων Ηπείρου.There are more inside.

I think everyone expected more from Kouzik but i dont know why he didnt do better.I know that he has one year more contract but it is possible that he left on a free transfer to Pafos.There is no info from PAS or Pafos.Do you know anything?--Fon7 (talk) 18:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to find his name and I will tell you. Thanks for the amateus club name. I will found out. Kouzik went on loan for one year, but he signed three years contract with Pafos, I just updated his pages the 6 September 2020. Here the link that you can find more info http://sportanalytic.com/football/258324oficiino_-vihovanec-dinamo-perebravsya-na-kipr-foto.html - If you require more info, please let me know and I will provid to yoo. Are you from Ioannina? Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 15:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info.Yes i am from Ioannina.--Fon7 (talk) 14:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Panepirotan National Athletic Center

Hello, Iliochori2,

Thank you for creating Panepirotan National Athletic Center.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for three issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 09:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It possible to rename this page as Panepirotan Stadium instead Panepirotan National Athletic Center? When I created the page I mean to do it for Panepirotan Stadium instead the complex Panepirotan National Athletic Center. Let me know Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 11:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iliochori2, you'll probably needs to ping Boleyn for them to see that you replied. I posted a link with instructions above. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rostislav Vergun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belarusian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I appologize, whick link is incorrect? In this way I will fix it Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 12:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Oleh Kuznetsov, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I've already explained to, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox timestamps

Hi. Please update the timestamp not just for the "International" stats table but also for the infobox. Today was the second ([2], [3]) time I fixed that for you at Andriy Yarmolenko. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robby, thanks a lot, sorry about that. Next time, I will try to be precise. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 17:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to remember to be more precise. Your recents edits to Andriy Yarmolenko had both wrong dates and figures. Thanks.--Egghead06 (talk) 09:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, but the fugures has been recently changed for Andriy Yarmolenko. He has 91 caps in the page of Ukraine national football team and he has 3 caps this season in Premier League according with Soccerway.com. Let me know how is it when you have spare time. Regards Iliochori2 (Iliochori2 12:21, 19October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Obelisk and Eternal Flame (Chernihiv)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Obelisk and Eternal Flame (Chernihiv) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://ua.igotoworld.com/en/poi_object/76499_obelisk-i-vechnyy-ogon-chernigov.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^TT me 15:32, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obelisk and Eternal Flame (Chernihiv) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Obelisk and Eternal Flame (Chernihiv), does not have enough reliable sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Burevisnyk-ShVSM Chernihiv moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Burevisnyk-ShVSM Chernihiv, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 16:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khimik Sports Complex

The article Khimik Sports Complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, does not appear to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^TT me 16:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the main issue of this article in simple words? In this way I can fix it. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 17:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burevisnyk-ShVSM Chernihiv (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Burevisnyk-ShVSM Chernihiv and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Burevisnyk-ShVSM Chernihiv, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khimik Sports Complex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khimik Sports Complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khimik Sports Complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^TT me 22:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, I am adding more sources to fix it. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 23:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Thanks for contributing to the article FC Cheksyl Chernihiv ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Iliochori2: I have fixed few of them, please let me know if they are ok. Regards — Kuru (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dytynets Park (Chernihiv)

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dytynets Park".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Iliochori2: Its seems there are not code like {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}}. Please let me know if I need to fix something more. Regards — talk (talk) 23:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Church of the Archangel Michael (Chernihiv)

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Church of the Archangel Michael".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kyrylo Kryvoborodenko

The article Kyrylo Kryvoborodenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unfortunately, currently does not meet WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^TT me 01:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Iliochori2: Hello I am bit confused, what exactly are the issues in the article? — ^TT me (talk) 13:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danylo Skorko

The article Danylo Skorko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While he has played for Dynamo Kiev, which does qualify for WP:NFOOTY, he has never actually played for their First Team, having only sat on their bench.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^TT me 01:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Iliochori2: I will improve, I will remove that phrase — Onel5969 (talk) 08:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iliochori2 I've just modified the phrase and improved the article, please let me know if there are more to improve. Regards

Iliochori2 More relavant sources have been added (talk) 16:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC). Regards[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khimik Sports Complex

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khimik Sports Complex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khimik Sports Complex. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Amkgp 💬 14:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iliochori2 (talk) 15:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC) I have just improved the source. Please let me know what I have to do.[reply]

Iliochori2 (talk) 16:35428 November 2020 (UTC) More improvement with material and sources has been added.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Iliochori2

Thank you for creating Andrey Veresotskyi.

User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

In the lead yo say "former" Ukranian defender and then state who he play for now - so one or the other needs to be changed. Thank you

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}(talk) I will fix it.

. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 21:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of FC Desna Chernihiv top scorers

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of FC Desna Chernihiv top scorers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 00:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hymn of PAS Giannina Copyvio

Please don't restore the lyrics at Hymn of PAS Giannina again. They are, until proof of the opposite is provided, to be considered copyrighted, and we are not allowed to post copyrighted texts on Wikipedia. Please see WP:COPYVIO for more information. Fram (talk) 16:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, what's wrong with the lyrics at Hymn of PAS Giannina?, I never restored in the past. What is the issue with it Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 17:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The lyrics are the property of Kitsakis Alekos or of the club (if he transferred property), and may not be reprinted without permission. Fram (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I got it, thanks for your instructions. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 17:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I dont think that the lyrics were written in 80s but in the 70s.In the first half. Also there are many songs about PAS as hymns but this is that it's something like official. Also i dont think that there are copyrights or someone will ask.Ok dont put something there but i dont think that there is problem with copyrights.--Fon7 (talk) 15:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will wait for your instruction. Thank you Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 18:39, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no instruction.I just think that this hymn is from 70s.If i find something,we will see then.--Fon7 (talk) 19:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chernihiv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chernihivska.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyrylo Kryvoborodenko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyrylo Kryvoborodenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyrylo Kryvoborodenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

John B123 (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, what is the main issue? I need to improve the sources and information of the player? Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 22:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with article creations

Oleksandr Savenchuk and Valentyn Buhlak seem to have a lot of the same text in them, and some of it makes no sense. I'm guessing you copied some of the content from one article to another by mistake? Problems include:

• They both have same date of birth and date of death listed, and date of birth is a nonsense date (born December 1, January 1963) - they cannot be born in both December and January
• Oleksandr Savenchuk is listed in their infobox as having died in 1996, but the text says they played a match in 2018
• Valentyn Buhlak is named as "Volodymyr Avramenko" in first name of the article, and is listed as "Buhlak Valentyn Vladyslavovych" in the infobox (which is a completely different order of names). Which of these names is correct?
• Oleksandr Savenchuk is also listed as "Buhlak Valentyn Vladyslavovych" in the infobox of that article

Please can you fix all of these above issues? And in future, if you're going to copy content between articles, please be more careful to make it correct. We all make mistakes sometimes, but the mismatch of duplicate information in these articles makes these articles almost impossible to understand. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and for your spot. I will fix it and improve it. If I have some issue I will let you know. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 21:35, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have just fix them, please let me know if there are any discrepancy. Thanks again for let me know Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 21:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksandr Rudenko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksandr Rudenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Rudenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

John B123 (talk) 18:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am only improving the article, but I will not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Please let me know if I have to fix something more Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 21:17, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexey Vorobei for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexey Vorobei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexey Vorobei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 22:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with the article? I am still improving it, providing more relevant sources Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 00:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He has never played in any of the professional leagues in Ukraine so does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL. He does not seem to have any sources that write extensively about him, so doesn't pass WP:GNG. Please note that profile pages on Footballfacts.ru don't make him pass GNG Spiderone 21:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yevhen Novobranets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yevhen Novobranets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yevhen Novobranets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 22:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong also with this article? I am still providing more relevant sources Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 00:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He has never played in any of the professional leagues in Ukraine so does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL. He does not seem to have any sources that write extensively about him, so doesn't pass WP:GNG. Please note that profile pages on Footballfacts.ru, Soccerway etc. don't make him pass GNG Spiderone 21:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of COLLAR

The article COLLAR has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional, no indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:CORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 16:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong also with this article? Please provide me more infomations in order to improve the article Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 17:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It does not show how the company is notable by Wikipedia's criteria. There needs to be significant coverage of the company in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 16:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've provided and I am still adding relevant sources. Can you please check if also the new sources are suitable with the wikipedia criteria? Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 18:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are primarily things like company profiles in databases, and mentions of it in articles about broader business context. I don't see anything about the company, like a newspaper or magazine article dedicated to talking about the company. The Wikipedia entry mentions prestigious awards for the proucts, but it does not say what award, who gave the award, or any kind of citation. ... discospinster _talk 18:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've provided the information requested. Please have a look if match with the criteria. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 20:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment just above. There is nothing in the article that provides substantial discussion of the company. ... discospinster _talk 21:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are no improvments? Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 22:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. I don't know what else to say. ... discospinster _talk 22:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dog Puller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Iliochori2

Thank you for creating Ultras Desna.

User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Re-edit to get rid of terms like "our team" this should be phrased neutrally like "the team"

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 21:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Joseywales1961}}, thanks for your instruction. I have just fix it, I am continuing to improve it. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 22:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Joseywales1961}}, on your expirience, there are any issues to address? Please let me know when you can and I will fix them. Regards Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 23:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Runned

Hi Iliochori2 - There is no such word as "Runned"
You keep adding "Runned up" to articles such as Giorgi Gadrani - I assume you mean "Runner up" i.e. came second - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Arjayay}}, yes I meant that, thanks for your spot, I will fix them. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 22:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FC Yunist Chernihiv

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FC Yunist Chernihiv".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Egghead06. An edit that you recently made to Andriy Yarmolenko seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please remember infobox time stamps. Egghead06 (talk) 06:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Egghead06}}, Hi, I Yarmolenko played 12 matches in Premier League in the season 2020-21 and he played 44 matches in total with West Ham. I think my update was right https://int.soccerway.com/players/andriy-yarmolenko/53039/ Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 11:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Andriy Yarmolenko, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Please remember to update infobox time stamp plus you have again entered incorrect statistics for his cup games and goals in the statistics table. Egghead06 (talk) 12:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Egghead06}}, Hi, can you be a little bit more specific? What mean "SANDBOX"? Where the statistic were incorrected? Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 15:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constantin Dima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kostas Mitroglou, you may be blocked from editing. Per #Infobox timestamps. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yuri Sinitsa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuri Sinitsa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuri Sinitsa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 20:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong also with this article? Can you be a little bit more specific? When it was created has been reviewed correctly Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 21:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the link I provided to the deletion discussion where the concerns about the article are being considered. Mccapra (talk) 22:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In this link Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuri Sinitsa? I have checked and fixed something, please let me know if the link is correcte and the new updates are fine with the wikipedia policies. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 08:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:FC Chernihiv presidents

A tag has been placed on Category:FC Chernihiv presidents requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 13:41, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yuriy Tymoshok moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuriy Tymoshok, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 23:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I still have to improve as I just started the article. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 13:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Volodymyr Levin

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Volodymyr Levin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Volodymyr Levin Illich

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Volodymyr Levin Illich, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have just requested it, if there are improvments that I need to do, please let me know and I will provide it as I don't want the page to delete as there are many relevants sources. Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 13:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Obelisk and Eternal Flame (Chernihiv)

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Obelisk and Eternal Flame (Chernihiv), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tetyana Fedosova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tetyana Fedosova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetyana Fedosova until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 08:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Volodymyr Levin

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Volodymyr Levin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 22:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Volodymyr Levin Illich

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Volodymyr Levin Illich".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 22:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Obelisk and Eternal Flame (Chernihiv)

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Obelisk and Eternal Flame".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hello, I caught wind of your expanding of articles about the city of Chernihiv. They are good, however, your editing skills are subpar. Get help at the Teahouse.

Thank you:) Pyramids09 (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your instructions. I will try to use it. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mayors of Chernihiv

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Mayors of Chernihiv requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vadym Zhuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yuriy Tymoshok

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuriy Tymoshok, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oleksiy Khoblenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yunist Chernihiv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yunist Stadium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of FC Desna Chernihiv records and statistics

added links pointing to Greek, Baltic Cup and Estonian

Joonas Tamm

added a link pointing to Baltic Cup

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuriy Tymoshok

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuriy Tymoshok".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 21:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ultras Desna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FC Prykarpattia Ivano-Frankivsk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Holy Spirit (Chernihiv) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Church of the Holy Spirit (Chernihiv), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 16:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Holy Spirit

Hello Iliochori2,

I'm the editor who moved Church of the Holy Spirit to draft space. You will not be surprised that I decided to this because of the near complete lack of references for the main section. Another problem is the prose in that section. To give you an example of what I mean, consider this sentence: I want it not to be awkward, but if it’s awake, it’s not awkward. It appears in the main body of the article, uncommented and marked as a quotations. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 16:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am still in the process to improve it and I will add more references. Let me know if this is ok Iliochori2 (Iliochori2) 18:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Georgios Ermidis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Georgios Ermidis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 08:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my explanation WP:NFOOTBALL requires the subject to have appeared in a competitive game between two WP:FPL teams and not a friendly match. Also, the coverage cited does not meet WP:GNG standards yet. As the player is young, maybe he will be notable later. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 08:40, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I perfectly understand, you can delete the page, as maybe this is not compatible with your guidelines. Sorry Iliochori2^(Talk to Iliochori2) 10:44, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It will be kept at Draft:Georgios Ermidis for the time being. If he does become notable soon then please feel free to add evidence and submit the draft per the instructions at the top of that page. Thanks for understanding. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 12:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of FC Desna Chernihiv records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Striker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Church of the Holy Spirit (Chernihiv) (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Church of the Holy Spirit (Chernihiv) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Church of the Holy Spirit (Chernihiv), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:31, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Volodymyr Polishchuk

Hello, Iliochori2,

Thank you for creating Volodymyr Polishchuk.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Is the page about Volodymyr Polishchuk or Valeriy Radchenko? as both names are used in the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 15:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Joseywales1961, the player is Volodymyr Polishchuk, I am fixing now and improve it.iliochori2

Ways to improve Anatoliy Verteletsky

Hello, Iliochori2,

Thank you for creating Anatoliy Verteletsky.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

External links point to a different players profiles

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 17:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Joseywales1961, I have just fix it.iliochori2

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Iliochori2

Thank you for creating Serhiy Shpak.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating, please be careful to avoid close paraphrasing, see WP:COPYVIO, an article should be you summarizing what you have read in reliable sources in your own words.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 22:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2003–04 FC Desna Chernihiv season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Iliochori2!

Happy New Year!

Iliochori2,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 02:19, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Unnecessary errors

I have now cleaned up 21 of your articles. Can you please write articles more carefully in the future? What all of them had in common was wrong defaultsort name, but there were many other shortcomings as well:

• Wrong short descriptions ("Soviet footballer and Ukrainian coach")
• Wrong defaultsort names
• Wrong position in stub templates
• Wrong or no categorization by position
• Too few club categories
• Please don't use Cyrillic script in the infobox, state their full name in Latin script
• Some articles called the subject a football rather than a footballer

I like that you cover Ukrainian football, so if you maybe spend 3-4 minutes more on each article, some errors could be avoided. Geschichte (talk) 05:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I am continuing to clean up articles that you are making with the above errors. 15 articles! Please be more careful. If the problem persists without you reacting, you will be blocked from editing for a couple of days. Geschichte (talk) 14:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank a lot for your instruction, I will try to be more carefull and avoid the mistakes above. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• While the work have improved, every single article still contains one or more of the above errors, such as the wrong stub category, position category, defaultsort name or even name. I thus gave you a block, but only for 12 hours. Geschichte (talk) 08:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I am sorry about that. I don't know where are the mistakes, but I respect the action. Can you please show me where I made the mistakes in order to fix them and don't repeat them in the future? As I would like to create the best experience for wikipedia. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 15:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• You can see the created pages by you, click on "hist" next to the article names, and see the changes that have been made. I also note that another user moved several of your articles, seemingly from a Russian spelling to a Ukrainian spelling, but I don't know that much what is correct in those instances. I only want to help you, because it's great to have someone writing about Ukrainian topics here. Geschichte (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your clarification and your linke page. I wasn't aware of it. It is very useful in order to check my mistakes and try to don't repeat them in the future. Now seems a bit more clear for me. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 11:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1995–96 FC Desna Chernihiv season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serhiy Datsenko.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have just fix it. Iliochori2 (talk) 22:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Iliochori2

Thank you for creating Oleksandr Stelmakh.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 23:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Celestina007 I m a little bit confused about the issue. Can you be more specific in this way I can avoid in the future and be more carefully. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksandr Kuzmik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksandr Kuzmik, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Kuzmik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Greek football transfers winter 2021–22, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipe Soares.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blaze Bayley

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.[4]

If you are having difficulty finding reliable sources suitable for BLP's, it may help to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN. --Hipal (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Expatriate footballers in Georgia

A tag has been placed on Category:Expatriate footballers in Georgia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 06:19, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Expatriate sportspeople in Georgia

A tag has been placed on Category:Expatriate sportspeople in Georgia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Expatriates in Georgia

A tag has been placed on Category:Expatriates in Georgia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Footballers in Georgia

A tag has been placed on Category:Footballers in Georgia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football people in Georgia

A tag has been placed on Category:Football people in Georgia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:04, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football in Georgia

A tag has been placed on Category:Football in Georgia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:10, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sport in Georgia by sport

A tag has been placed on Category:Sport in Georgia by sport indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate categories

Hello, Iliochori2,

Please do not create new, duplicate categories with similar names when there have been existing categories, like Category:Expatriate footballers in Georgia (country) and Category:Sport in Georgia (country), for years now. Categories involving "Georgia" always have a modifier to distinguish between the country of Georgia in Europe and the state of Georgia in the United States.

And unless some new football tournament or a new league is created, most categories involving football and football players already exists and so no new categories need to be created. We have a lot of long-time editors who work in the area of football players and teams and so it is unlikely that they missed something as large as a category of football players who live and work in a European country. But thank you for all of your contributions! Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hotel Ukraina, Chernihiv for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hotel Ukraina, Chernihiv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotel Ukraina, Chernihiv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kadı Message 14:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 19:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Snowflake91 (talk) 20:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be a little bit more specific about the editing that I have made and it is not allowed? In this way I will not repeat. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 22:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked for a source at NK Nafta 1903 and you simply reverted two times without providing one, there is no source that Oleksandr Safronov is loaned, the official club's website literally said that he signed as a free agent. Snowflake91 (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, I got it, I didn't know I thought the player went on loan. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 22:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Ukrainian football transfers winter 2021–22

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Ukrainian football transfers winter 2021–22, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Georgios Ermidis

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Georgios Ermidis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dmytro Sydorenko

The article Dmytro Sydorenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 20:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Church of the Holy Spirit (Chernihiv)

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Church of the Holy Spirit (Chernihiv), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Romelu Lukaku, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2022 Veikkausliiga

Hello, Iliochori2,

Thank you for creating 2022 Veikkausliiga.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article has no references.

This article is missing prose, which means it fails notability for sports teams. Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players. Wikipedia is not a stats directory. See WP:NSEASONS for guidance.
It may be useful to include some content about the previous season performance and outcomes.
Failing this notability guide, this article may be redirected to the main team page. For good example of a season article for a team with prose, consider the Overview in 1987–88 AEK Athens F.C. season

Other examples are LSU Tigers football and the 2022–23 North Carolina Tar Heels men's basketball team articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SDYuShOR Desna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Greek football transfers summer 2022 moved to draftspace: article has no content

An article you recently created, List of Greek football transfers summer 2022, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whiteguru (talk) 20:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Iliochori2

Thank you for creating Heroes of Stalingrad Square.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thanks for your email. I am a bit confused about the issue. Can you be a little bit more specific in this way I can fix it. Thank you so much for your help.

Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 16:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I wasn't clear. I already marked it as reviewed. (="passed" it) Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 16:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all, thank you for your review and explanation. Sincerely Iliochori2 (talk) 10:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Iliochori2

Thank you for creating Chernihiv Museum of Ukrainian Antiquities.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Half-translated articles

Hi,

I don't want to be obnoxious, but I was looking at this list of most common typos on Wikipedia, and noticed "viyshov". This is obviously not an English word but a transliteration of вийшов ("he exited"), past tense of the Ukrainian verb вийти ("to exit"). But then when I looked at one of the articles it was found in, Volodymyr Polishchuk, I noticed that, frankly, this is a failed half-translation, perhaps a machine translation gone wrong, and "viyshov" was just the tip of the iceberg. Even Google Translate produces a better result. Some example passages:

• It became the 15th birch 1997 rock in the nichi (0; 0) visceous match of the 17th round against Ternopil's.[5] And decilcom days earlier, 6 Bereznya, [...]
  • Original text from Ukrainian Wikipedia: Сталося це 15 березня 1997 року в нічийному (0;0) виїзному поєдинку 17-го туру проти тернопільської «Ниви». [...] А декількома днями раніше, 6 березня, [...]
  • Google Translate result: It happened on March 15, 1997 in a draw (0; 0) away match of the 17th round against Ternopil "Niva". [...] And a few days earlier, on March 6, [...]
• Polishchuk viyshov at the starting warehouse and debut for the new one was simply zhakhlivim, on the 38th hvili, [...]
  • Поліщук вийшов у стартовому складі й дебют для нього виявився просто жахливим, на 38-й хвилині, [...]
  • Polishchuk came out in the starting lineup and his debut turned out to be just awful, in the 38th minute, [...]
• I am part of the 2004/05 season at the warehouse of Vorskla Poltava.
  • Першу частину сезону 2004/05 років провів у складі полтавської «Ворскли».
  • He spent the first part of the 2004/05 season as a member of Poltava's Vorskla.

Lots of mistranslated words come up again and again, like "rock", which appears eight times; this is actually року/років, meaning "of/in the year". The words translated as "rocketed", "rik", and "rotsi" in the article are also inflections of the same word, рік, Ukrainian for "year". The word "warehouse", occurring 15 times, is an accurate translation of склад in certain contexts, but in this article it is being used to mean something like "lineup" or "composition of a team". (Compare the entry in the Ukrainian dictionary СУМ-11, where one of the definitions of склад is "Сукупність людей, що утворюють який-небудь колектив, якусь організацію." / "A set of people who form a team, an organization.")

Could you please clean such entries up, or at least not make more like them? This one at least is quite a mess; I did not check all the others in detail, but from a glance Oleh Syzon, Yuriy Bondarenko, Yuriy Nikitenko, etc. suffer from similar errors. Thank you. 70.172.194.25 (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you to let me know, of course I realized that there were few mistakes. I improved them, please check and let me know also for the other players. If there anything to fix and improve I will do straight away. Best Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 09:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Greek football transfers summer 2022 (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Greek football transfers summer 2022 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Greek football transfers summer 2022, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:56, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your message with the instruction. I have just edit and modified the article I hope now meet the criteria. Please let me know. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 12:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ihor Khymanych

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ihor Khymanych, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Holy Spirit (Chernihiv) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Church of the Holy Spirit (Chernihiv), is not suitable as written to remain published. The language of the history section is completly unsuitable for modern readers. Update the article using modern encyclopedia language and lose the tone issues.

Concern regarding Draft:1994–95 FC Desna Chernihiv season

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1994–95 FC Desna Chernihiv season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from PAS Giannina F.C. into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 01:44, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ihor Khymanych

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ihor Khymanych".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hotel Reikartz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hotel Reikartz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotel Reikartz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MB 03:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukraine awards

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukraine awards indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 04:19, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English writing

Iliochori2, here we are again. Anwegmann has been cleaning up after you--and versions like this prove they're right. You've been here a few years now. It's been pointed out to you that your writing in English is not very strong. Other problems were noted--with citations, but also with the basic skills of being a Wikipedia editor. I find comments here from users including User:Robby.is.on, User:EdJohnston, User:Arjayay, User:Egghead06, User:Geschichte. In addition, but that's by the way, I find that a lot of users here are admonishing you for edit warring; there's some conflict you had with User:Snowflake91, and your best answer was "I thought he went on loan"--meaning you reverted because you thought you were right, despite the evidence.

I mean, there are a whole bunch of problems, and you are leaving those for other editors to deal with and clean up. That cannot be. So here is what I suggest you do to make things a bit more acceptable for others. First, give edit summaries so that others know what you are doing. Second, PROOFREAD. Work on your English and improve it, and correct things BEFORE you hit "Publish changes". I don't know if you know about WP:CIR, but it matters, and in the end, incompetence that makes too much work for other editors, that can be a reason to block someone. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I will try to be more accurate. When I replied "I thought he went on loan" it is because I found a sourse that said so after this was denied and the player did not go on loan. Iliochori2 (talk) 07:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So why didn't you use that source, as is required by WP:MOS standards? Anwegmann (talk) 13:31, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which source? Iliochori2 (talk) 13:54, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Cinemas in Chernihiv

The article List of Cinemas in Chernihiv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Trivial, non-notable subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Museums in Chernihiv for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Museums in Chernihiv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Museums in Chernihiv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 18:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yevhen Novobranets

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yevhen Novobranets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yevhen Novobranets. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yevhen Novobranets moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yevhen Novobranets, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iliochori2,

This article should be deleted as it was the recreation of an article deleted through an AFD discussion. But I decided to move it to Draft space instead. Please submit it for review to AFC. It it is reviewed and approved, it has a much more likely chance of not being deleted should it be moved to main space. But if you just move it back, I'm sure it will be tagged for speedy deletion again. It's your choice though. Good luck! Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yevhen Novobranets has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yevhen Novobranets. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:19, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of cinemas in Chernihiv for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cinemas in Chernihiv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cinemas in Chernihiv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 03:39, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking and repeat linking

I have noticed that in nearly every page you have created and work on, you routinely produce repeat links, especially for football leagues and teams. Please refrain from doing this in the future and remember that per MOS:REPEATLINK, a page for a league, player, team, or anything else of that nature should only be linked once, not each time that thing is mentioned. Anwegmann (talk) 15:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for your explanation. I will not do anymore. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And while we're at it, another mistake I consistently see you make is the order in which you place the year that describes a season. You often write, for example: "...in the season 2020–21..." This is incorrect. Adjectives and descriptors almost always come before the word they describe. So you should be writing, for example, "...in the 2020–21 season..." A good example of this is from your writing in Yevhen Tsymbalyuk's article. You originally wrote the following extremely confusing and incorrect sentence: "In the season 2014–15 he got into the semi-final of the Ukrainian Cup". Not only is the order of "2014–15" and "season" incorrect, there is also no need to link the "2014–15 Ukrainian Cup" separately from the "Ukrainian Cup". You only need to mention (and link) one of them, as the one inherently describes the other. So the correct version of this sentence is: "He went on to help the side qualify for the semi-final of the 2014–15 Ukrainian Cup". Please make sure that your writing is grammatically correct (especially at such a basic level as word order and sentence structure). If it is not, I will be left with no other option but to consider it unconstructive. Thanks again. Anwegmann (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your instruction with the english grammar. I will use all of them, when I have to add new wikipedia articles. Again thanks million. Iliochori2 (talk) 12:44, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are obviously not interested in producing readable, quality edits, as you have not fixed any of the common, very basic mistakes I noted in the above comments, even though you said that you would. Again, and for the last time, the phrase is "2020–21 season" not "season 2020–21". Also, the names of months are capitalized. So it is "December" not "december," as you have frequently added to articles lately. Given that I and several others have already warned you and made you explicitly aware of this, and given that your knowledge and use of English has clearly not improved, in the future, when I see a basic, common-knowledge mistake like this, I will revert the entire edit. I do not have the time to serve as your personal copyeditor if you are unwilling to take the time to understand what you are writing and to use proper grammar and spelling in writing it. Also, you need to start using the "Edit summary." If you do not, other editors will be forced to consider your edits as vandalism. Anwegmann (talk) 21:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Raydann (talk) 14:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will do it for the next time. Thank you for your suggestion Iliochori2 (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ukrainian Premier Second top scorers

Template:Ukrainian Premier Second top scorers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eduard Galstyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dzhilindo Bezghubchenko

The article Dzhilindo Bezghubchenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer which fails WP:SPORTBASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 04:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taras Movlyan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taras Movlyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taras Movlyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 20:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dzhilindo Bezghubchenko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dzhilindo Bezghubchenko, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dzhilindo Bezghubchenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Industrial Arthropod (talk) 14:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Ukrainian football transfers winter 2022–23

The article List of Ukrainian football transfers winter 2022–23 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like this page has been created in error - the title is for Ukraine, but the content is for Greece.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 15:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, appologize, it was my mistake as I wanted build it when the Ukrainian winter transfer start. Iliochori2 (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will try fix it, if this is ok with the Wikipedia Policies Iliochori2 (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Iliochori2. Thank you for your work on Ihor Khimanych. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Iliochori2. Thank you for your work on Maksym Leshchenko. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mykola Stetsko moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mykola Stetsko, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently you have none. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^TT me 11:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Expatriate sportspeople in Republic of Ireland by nationality

A tag has been placed on Category:Expatriate sportspeople in Republic of Ireland by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian expatriate sportspeople in the Republic of Ireland

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian expatriate sportspeople in the Republic of Ireland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Expatriate sportspeople in Republic of Ireland

A tag has been placed on Category:Expatriate sportspeople in Republic of Ireland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 22:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buildings and structures in Ukraine by subdivision

A tag has been placed on Category:Buildings and structures in Ukraine by subdivision indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2022–23 League of Ireland transfers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Lyons.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Mysak

Hi there, please stop adding Desna Chernihiv as the club he joined Alashkert from, he left them six-months prior, so is incorrect information regarding he transfer there, he was a free agent. Klio654 (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Kévin Koubemba article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 22:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yevhen Novobranets

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yevhen Novobranets, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pathy Malumandsoko, Bohdan Boychuk, and Vladyslav Naumets, among others. This is the third time you've been warned about this alone. Indeed, your talk page is full of similar warnings. This is your last chance. I am getting tired of cleaning up after your poorly written, unsourced, and otherwise incomplete and improper edits. Anwegmann (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:FC Marijampolė City players

A tag has been placed on Category:FC Marijampolė City players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yevhen Novobranets

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yevhen Novobranets".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of FC Lehenda-ShVSM Chernihiv managers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valery Tretyakov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Illya Siryi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Illya Siryi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illya Siryi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 15:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will improve the article Iliochori2 (talk) 15:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've just improved the article Iliochori2 (talk) 18:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The deletion discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illya Siryi. Pelmeen10 (talk) 00:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating unfinished pages

Please stop publishing articles that are clearly still under construction. That is why draftspace exists. As a result, I have moved Draft:1993–94 FC Desna Chernihiv season to that space. I will also continue to move all articles that are clearly still under construction and not suitable for publication. Anwegmann (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, now for the second time in two days, please stop publishing articles that are clearly still under construction. That is why draftspace exists. As a result, I have moved Draft:1993–1994 FC Desna Chernihiv season to that space. I will also continue to move all articles that are clearly still under construction and not suitable for publication. Anwegmann (talk) 20:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Georgios Ermidis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgios Ermidis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgios Ermidis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 21:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have more information about where exactly I need to improve the article? Iliochori2 (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate articles

Two articles you recently created, Yuriy Denysyuk and Yuriy Denysiuk, are duplicates and do not show the necessary level of completion and/or language competence to remain published. There is no reason to create two separate pages for the same person. Indeed, all this does is clutter Wikipedia with incomplete and/or incorrect articles. You must use the draftspace to draft articles before publishing. Otherwise, you will continue to create poorly-written, incorrect, and/or duplicate articles, as you have often done in the past. Additionally, your drafts and articles must be written in such a way as to show competence in written English. They also must be complete enough to stand on their own without incomplete and incorrect information and without requiring other editors to spend their own time fixing your mistakes in grammar, formatting, and information. (?) I've moved both duplicate articles to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can work on them with minimal disruption and bring it up to Wikipedia standards. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, and thus is ready for publishing, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Anwegmann (talk) 20:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've just redirect the article of Yuriy Denysyuk to Yuriy Denysiuk in order to don't a duplicate article. Iliochori2 (talk) 08:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Publishing incomplete articles

Stop publishing articles that are clearly incomplete, as you have done on several occasions recently—notably Yuriy Denysyuk and most recently Igor Pakhar. When you publish a new article, it should not require five, ten, or even fifteen additional edits to make the information, narrative, and stats make sense. That is what draftspace is for. By publishing incomplete, incorrect, poorly written, and at times contradictory articles, you are cluttering Wikipedia with pages that do not meet basic standards for publication. You also don't seem to understand Wikipedia's general notability guidelines, as many of the incomplete pages you are publishing use only reference sources and do not meet notability standards. You must start to produce better quality work, as this is now the fifth time I have warned you about similar actions. If you continue to publish incomplete pages that belong in draftspace before they are ready for publication, and if you continue to produce work that does not meet the basic levels of competence outlined at WP:CIR, I will be forced to open an ANI against you. Anwegmann (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'am sorry about that. I will sumbit when I've completed the article. Apologize, I didn't know. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the two articles. For the next article that I will publish I will do when it finished. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been editing for years now. You have made thousands of edits. The fact that you "didn't know" that pages need to be complete and correct before they are published is suggestive of a major competence problem. You also have not completed either article, as the standard of English writing in both, and in most of the narrative edits you have made, is nowhere near the level of competency. That is your main issue. Anwegmann (talk) 20:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you need to submit your drafts for review before you publish them. You are not the one who should decide if an article if complete. A reviewer should determine that. Otherwise, Wikipedia will become filled with incomplete, incorrect, and poorly written articles like the many you have created and published without any review lately. Anwegmann (talk) 20:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't said that I am the one to decide if an article if complete. I've just said that I am not going to edit the last two articles as I've finished to edit. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "For the next article that I will publish I will do when it finished." But it's immaterial. Stop publishing incomplete and poorly written articles. Start following the standards outlined in WP:GNG and WP:CIR. Anwegmann (talk) 20:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to add new articles, but some articles for some retired players don't have much text to add. For the next ones I will do my best to add articles published with more information. I point you out that in particlar the last two articles where about retired football players and it was difficult to find more information at once. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is why you need to understand Wikipedia's general notability guideline. If you can't find information on the players beyond basic references of their existences, they are likely not notable and should not have a Wikipedia page. You have been editing too long not to know this. Anwegmann (talk) 20:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes as I've said next time I will publish an article I will do only when is finished according with Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the next one I will make sure that the page that I will submit is the most attendibile for me and I will not edit many times. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Attendibile" is not an English word. But I understand what you're saying. In any case, you need to submit your articles for review before you publish them. It's that simple. Anwegmann (talk) 20:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

let say "reliable".I will submit articles for review before I publish them. Iliochori2 (talk) 07:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:FC Odishi 1919 players

A tag has been placed on Category:FC Odishi 1919 players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page is not empty empty as I've added some content. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ihor Lyashenko moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ihor Lyashenko, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ihor Lyashenko has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ihor Lyashenko. Thanks! Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've found only one reliable source related to this article :( Iliochori2 (talk) 21:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a second one, when you have spare of time you can check the article is suitable for wikipedia. Iliochori2 (talk) 21:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let one of the expert draft reviewers have a look as I'm not experienced at reviewing drafts. Best wishes Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 21:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Iliochori2 (talk) 21:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Shevelyuk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Boris Shevelyuk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 20:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added new sources, when you have time please check they are suitable. Iliochori2 (talk) 21:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Boris Shevelyuk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Boris Shevelyuk. Thanks! Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 20:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added 3 more sources please check if they are ok for the wikipedia policies. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 21:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:FC Odishi 1919 players has been nominated for deletion

Category:FC Odishi 1919 players has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oleksandr Rudenko moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oleksandr Rudenko, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources, as well as correct language and formatting. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Anwegmann (talk) 18:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted the draft for Review. Iliochori2 (talk) 15:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I would like to provide some new sources, regarding this article.

https://sport.ua/uk/news/665897-skala-1911-gotuie-kontrakti-dlya-eks-gravtsiv-desni-ta-ingultsya

https://sportyvka.com.ua/63957-novachky-dlia-skaly-1911-pidpyshut-ekshravtsiv-desny-ta-inhultsia.html?fbclid=IwAR29WIGGf_CyU9aATtBsz43utfBNY_HGYbsRkdlzaj7gYu6i7ORAcyNNQ3c

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=348334221509539&set=a.100323022977328

http://chernigiv.ua/fk-chernigiv-rozirvav-kontrakt-z-oleksandrom-rudenkom/

Somebody can tell me if this article can be review?

Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 11:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tetyana Fedosova moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tetyana Fedosova, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources, as well as correct language and formatting. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Anwegmann (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted the draft for Review. Iliochori2 (talk) 15:39, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^TT me 10:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted the draft for Review. Iliochori2 (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: please note that this has been contested by the creator and moved back Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 14:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yuriy Esaulov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuriy Esaulov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 11:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted the draft for Review. Iliochori2 (talk) 11:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: please note that this has been contested by the creator and moved back Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 14:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vitaliy Arinin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vitaliy Arinin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 11:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted the draft for Review. Iliochori2 (talk) 11:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you've done is submitted it for review, and immediately afterwards moved the draft to the main article space. Do one or the other, not both. Either submit your draft for review, and wait for the review to take place. Or if you're going to publish it anyway, then don't submit it for review. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it was my mistake. I wanted to submit the article for review. Apologize Iliochori2 (talk) 12:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vitaliy Arinin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vitaliy Arinin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitaliy Arinin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^TT me 12:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I improve the article? Iliochori2 (talk) 12:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oleksandr Yosha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oleksandr Yosha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources, as well as correct language and formatting. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Anwegmann (talk) 15:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to improve the article Iliochori2 (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is almost nothing correct about the language of the article. It is unintelligible. WP:COMPETENCE is becoming a major problem with your edits. The lede is completely incorrect. The paragraph about his career is so poorly written that it does not make sense. The player also fails almost every standard established in the general notability guideline. Please stop arbitrarily creating these pages that are incomplete, poorly written, and not notable. You've already been warned about this. What is it going to take to get you to listen for once? Anwegmann (talk) 15:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand the player failing almost all of the Dov stability standards in the general notability guidelines. Can you post me where the article is incomprehensible? In which part are they incomplete? I'm trying to create articles as understandable as possible and worthy of wikipedia. Please can you show me the incomplete lede so I can improve. Iliochori2 (talk) 16:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you admit that the article fails almost all notability standards, then you admit that it shouldn't exist in the first place. The fact that you cannot determine if what you have written is incomprehensible and very poor written English suggests that you lack WP:COMPETENCE in written English enough to be creating articles and making substantive edits to begin with. Every sentence in the "Career" section has a serious and glaring grammatical problem, some of them so bad that they make the sentence nonsensical. The lede is senseless. There is no such thing as "Ukrainian football," so no one can be a "professional Ukrainian football defender." That is a nonsensical sentence, and it goes against the very clear standards established by WP:FOOTY. Also, there is no such thing as a "Ukraine-17" team. Almost all of your edits do not adhere to Wikipedia standards, and you seem not to care about that at all, as you ignore every warning you have ever received. Anwegmann (talk) 18:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not admitting that the article cannot exist, my English may not be as good as yours but I think the article is written in fairly comprehensive English. I am agreeing with you about that there are something grammatical things to improve. Maybe it seems to you but I take the changes very seriously trying to correct them as soon as I notice some mistakes and that's why I ask you for the mistakes to avoid any mistakes in the future.

I understand that some sentences looks as nonsense and I am working to improve them. In relation to "Career" what should I put? What about "Ukrainian football"? I have to put "Ukrainian footballer"? and about the " professional Ukrainian football defender" I have to put "professional Ukrainian footballer"? I am taking note about all these things in order to improve them.

In relation to "Ukraine-17" team, I can assure you that there is a team called in this way https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_national_under-17_football_team how I have to call it? Ukraine national under-17 football team?  Thank you in advance Iliochori2 (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use other footballers' pages as references. You should not simply create endless articles without referencing other articles and getting to know the WP:FOOTY standards. You are more confident in your English language skills than you should be. In the infobox, the team should appear as "Ukraine U17" as it does in dozens of other articles. "Ukraine-17" is meaningless. Anwegmann (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's "Ukrainian professional footballer who plays as a defender." You should know this because it is the standard practice across Wikipedia and WP:FOOTY. Anwegmann (talk) Anwegmann (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to use other player pages as reference and avoid endless articles without referencing other. Perfect I will use "Ukraine U17" instead "Ukraine-17" as nonsense. I will also use "Ukrainian professional footballer who plays as a defender". I have changed this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleksandr_Rudenko as you've showed to me. Thank millions for all your instructions and dedication to help me. Have a nice day. Iliochori2 (talk) 09:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've improved the article and submitted for review. I hope its fine. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 13:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksandr Rudenko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksandr Rudenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Rudenko (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've just edited the article with few correction Iliochori2 (talk) 09:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yuriy Esaulov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuriy Esaulov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuriy Esaulov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ihor Lyashenko (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ihor Lyashenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^TT me 20:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian football clubs 1992–93 season

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian football clubs 1992–93 season indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 04:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andriy Huz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Andriy Huz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 13:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted the draft for Review Iliochori2 (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksandr Dovhyi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksandr Dovhyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Dovhyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 17:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello in relation to this article Oleksandr Dovhyi I can't improve it as I am blocked. By the way may I ask you for future references what should improve in the article? It's a matter of grammar mistakes or including more citations from reliable, independent sources? Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 13:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neither. The issue is WP:GNG. As I've said multiple times before, none of the sources discuss Dovhyi in depth (e.g. multiple paragraphs writing purely about Dovhyi). Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 21:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In relation to the issue WP:GNG can I send you the sources as I am no able to add them? Iliochori2 (talk) 07:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please send me examples of sources writing multiple paragraphs purely about Dovhyi, not including stats databases, and I will assess them. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 07:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will check and if I find some purely paragraphs about Dovhyi. Not including stats database. Iliochori2 (talk) 07:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As promised I am sending you links where the player is mentioned. Some links in parentheses I wrote what they look like to me:

https://www.fknevezis.lt/site_base/content/view/3597/0/ - https://oddspedia.com/football/teams/nevezis-5736#squads - https://777score.cm/football/players/dovhyi-oleksandr (Seems only stats) - https://www.fknevezis.lt/site_base/content/1/1/68/20/160/ - https://1lyga.lt/klubas/neptunas/36815/?cid=14242827 - https://1lyga.lt/zaidejas/oleksandr-dovhyi/59981/?cid=14242827&tid=36815 (Seems only stats) - https://tipsscore.com/en/football/team/fc-neptunas-klaipeda - https://www.yenisafak.com/spor/oleksandr-dovhyi-futbol-256516-oyuncu (Can't check if they are considered stats or not) - https://www.90min.lt/forumas/fk-nevezis-t186?&start=810 (This is forum I am not sure about it) - https://www.xscores.com/soccer/match/lithuania/i-lyga/nevezis-kedainiai-vs-fk-panevezys-b/2019-2020/1829826 (Here he scored by penalty) - https://www.footlive.com/score/fk-nevezis-kedainiai-vs-zalgiris-vilnius-2021-05-04/ (Maybe for wikipedia this is considered stats) - https://oddspedia.com/football/teams/nevezis-5736#squads - https://rinkosaikste.lt/fk-nevis-sezono-tikslai-ir-mintys-prie-antrj-dvikov-galerija/ - https://www.sportas.lt/naujiena/423617/pirma-karta-isrinkti-pirmos-lygos-geriausieji - https://1lyga.lt/pirma-karta-isrinkti-pirmos-lygos-geriausieji/ - http://pirmalyga.inline.lt/zaidejas/Oleksandr-Dovhyi-/1318 (Seems attendible stats) - https://1lyga.lt/pirma-karta-isrinkti-pirmos-lygos-geriausieji/ (Seems attendible stats) - https://muge.eu/nevezis-soko-i-antraja-vieta-turnyro-lenteleje/ - https://muge.eu/nevezis-cempionas/ - https://www.bullscore.com/nevezis-vs-fk-panevezys-b-live-score-head-to-head-nev-vs-pan-live-1-lyga-tv-channels-prediction/

Please let me knwo when you have spare of time if the are reliable and genuine souces. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 12:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you scroll up, I asked for please send me examples of sources writing multiple paragraphs purely about Dovhyi, why have you posted all of these sources if they are not containing multiple paragraphs of prose discussing Dovhyi? In what world is https://www.fknevezis.lt/site_base/content/view/3597/0/ multiple paragraphs specifically about him? Please can you also limit this to just posting WP:THREE sources in future as nobody has the time to look at all of those sources and you are wasting time. What I am looking for is something like https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64279077 - this is multiple paragraphs about Mudryk. Now do the same for Dovhyi Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 14:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If nobody has the time to look at all of sources how can you judge if an article can be deleted or not? You've asked me to provide you more reliable sources. In relation to the link that you provided thats really make sense but not all players have these kind of paragrap- I point you out for example this player https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Lytvynenko doesn't have articles like the one https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/64279077 . Furthermore I found articles realted to football player without any citations. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At 7:53 you promised to send only links where there were paragraphs purely dedicated to Dovhyi. Please explain how https://1lyga.lt/klubas/neptunas/36815/?cid=14242827 meets that requirement? Do you understand what we mean by a paragraph? Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 14:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I've wrote beside the link if there are stats or not. I've missed to write you about this link. What about the other sources? Iliochori2 (talk) 15:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andriy Huz (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andriy Huz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 18:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 19:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been repeatedly warned for your subjects' lack of notability and articles not being ready for mainspace. You have disregarded all of that advice and now you are no longer able to edit in article space. Star Mississippi 19:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask you the reason why I have been blocked? Iliochori2 (talk) 19:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is posted directly above your question, I'm not sure how you can miss it. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I've missed, what I have done exactly? There is an appeal process. How long will stay the block? I am sorry but I am not familiar with these wikipedia regulations. Iliochori2 (talk) 19:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Until you can convince an administrator that you understand notability and have the English language skills to contribute here. Repeatedly disregarding established editors' draftification and subsequent deletion of the articles is not a good sign. Star Mississippi 19:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can I convince an administrator that I understand notability and language skills? I have not repeatedly ignored the editorial staff of the publishers on the contrary I have tried to put into practice the instructions that have been provided to me. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand why articles like Oleksandr Dovhyi need to be nominated for deletion? If you do understand then why do you keep publishing these articles? Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 20:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Se mi dici che l'articolo Oleksandr Dovhyi dovrebbe essere candidato alla cancellazione non sono contrario anche se non ne capisco i veri motivi. Se c'è un errore di ortografia o migliorare le fonti. Per quanto riguarda il primo caso posso verificare se ci sono errori di ortografia nel caso con il secondo scenario posso provare a fornire maggiori informazioni. Se non c'è alcuna possibilità e l'articolo deve essere respinto, allora non sarò contrario e tu hai le tue ragioni. Ho appena creato l'articolo ed ero sicuro che andasse bene e non creare un brutto articolo per wikipedia . Iliochori2 (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've wrote you first in my native language, here below you can find my message in english:

If you tell me that Oleksandr Dovhyi's article should be a candidate for deletion, I'm not against it even if I don't understand the real reasons. If there are any spelling mistakes or improve and add more sources. If this is the first case I can check if there are spelling mistakes in the case with the second scenario I can try to provide more information. If there's no chance and the article has to be rejected, then I won't be against it and you have your reasons. I just created the article and was sure it was good and not create a bad article for Wikipedia. Iliochori2 (talk) 13:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to request an unblock. Unfortunately when I got the block I was not aware about many wikipedia policies related to some topics, like football players. I am against people who break the rules in any communities or platforms. I don't have problem to admit that was my faults and now I've realized about some mistakes I have done, but this I think was due to lack of experiences in creating articles about some football players from scratch. Fortunately after I got the block, I've asked to few users like User:Spiderone and User:Anwegmann and others, that they have been so kind, patience and clear to guide me to avoid the same mistakes in the future and for this I really appreciate their efforts. Maybe If I will be lucky to get an unblock, before starting a new articles related to this topic I will ask for help without posting at all. However I will accept any of your decision and at the same time, I take the opportunity to apologize if I've created some problems to the wikipedia community. Regards iliochori2 Iliochori2 (talk) 13:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Personally I would like to see you have at least one draft accepted into the encyclopedia by an Articles for Creation reviewer before unblocking you. You may either start such work now(as you are only blocked from Article space) or, if there are edits you wish to make to existing articles, tell us what those might be and agree to use AFC to create new articles. I'm closing this request to remove it from the queue, but you may make a new one if there are edits you want to make. 331dot (talk) 09:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Note from blocking admin I think they would benefit from more time improving their research & writing skills in Draft space, where they remain free to edit. But I am not against unblock if another admin feels they're ready. Star Mississippi 13:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, I think so, maybe I can practice a bit more and then, if you think that I am ok I can apply for appeal. I have one question I would love to update some stats for players or seasons for football club. There is a chance to be free only to do this improvement? Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 08:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Iliochori, you can still make articles, even with this block. See Wikipedia:Articles for creation. They get reviewed before being published to see if they are suitable. This avoids you posting half-complete articles on minor footballers and then them getting nominated for deletion for not having any sources with lengthy prose dedicated to the footballer. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 17:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That's great, thank you. I will to try familiarize first with the procedures here Wikipedia:Articles for creation before creating the article, in order to avoid any possible mistakes. I will create articles about minor footballers when I can see that they have a bit more information apart the stats as you showed me. Hope I do better articles articles compare with the last ones. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  If I found more sources as you told me to use, I am allowed to revert articles that they have been deleted? If I have more materials (reliable sources) can I recreate articles that they have been delete in order to create a draft? Iliochori2 (talk) 13:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  You are welcome to create articles in draft space. If there is material that was deleted that you would like to work on in draft, I'm happy to restore it there as long as there weren't content issues. This is a good guideline on why editors should wait for AfC-less risk of content deletion if you're still actively editing. Star Mississippi 13:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Or do you prefer, if will create a new draft article that was delete from scratch using Wikipedia:Article wizard ? Please feel free to tell me the way that it is better. Of course, I will try to do my best in relation to the content. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Artem Beloshapka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Artem Beloshapka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 09:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, unfortunately as you are aware, I am blocked and I can't provide more more citations from reliable and indipendente sources. Iliochori2 (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you can. You are not blocked from editing drafts like Draft:Artem Beloshapka Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 10:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I edit drafts like Draft:Artem Beloshapka I am not violating some policies? Can I submit the draft for review or is against the policies? Iliochori2 (talk) 13:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Submitting for review is fine. You can edit and create drafts as much as you need to. What you are not currently allowed to do is move them over to article space yourself, the only way to do this is to submit for review and then it's at the discretion of the reviewer to move it over or not. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 21:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, I understand so I will try to find more citations. Thank you Iliochori2 (talk) 19:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added few citations and submit the draft for review. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 13:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent you the information that you requested under the section "Your submission at Articles for creation: Artem Beloshapka (April 25) " Iliochori2 (talk) 12:58, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FC Kudrivka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FC Kudrivka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources, as well as correct language and formatting. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Anwegmann (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to find more citations from reliable sources. Iliochori2 (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added few citations please let me know if they are suitable. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I've added some paragraph in the draft. Please let me know when you have spare of time if this is ok or need to be improved. Iliochori2 (talk) 09:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Artem Beloshapka (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Artem Beloshapka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 18:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In relation to this article I will provide more sources Iliochori2 (talk) 07:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a wikipedia article in Ukrainian version about this player https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%90%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BC_%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 Iliochori2 (talk) 12:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can send you some more citations regarding this player:

https://minfo.rk.gov.ru/uploads/minfo/attachments//d4/1d/8c/d98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e/phpITMFIX_1.pdf (Reliable article)

https://minfo.rk.gov.ru/uploads/minfo/attachments//d4/1d/8c/d98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e/phpITMFIX_1.pdf (Reliable information)

https://minfo.rk.gov.ru/uploads/minfo/attachments//d4/1d/8c/d98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e/phpITMFIX_1.pdf (Reliable information)

https://fcsevastopol.ru/news/1870.html (Reliable article)

https://m.gorod.cn.ua/news_30319.html (Reliable article)

https://football.ua/ukraine1league/219540-pervaja-lyga-sbornaja-16-go-tura.html (Reliable article)

https://football.ua/ukraine2league/206388-vtoraja-lyga-desna-ukragrokom-nakanune.html (Reliable article)

https://www.gorod.cn.ua/news/gorod-i-region/27990-desna-skad-jalpug-40-foto.html#ad-image-0 (Reliable article)

Please let me know about the above sources. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 12:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple paragraphs (molti paragrafi; багато абзаців) about the player only please. Multiple paragraphs. Please can you only post WP:THREE sources - if you cannot summarise the notability of a player while using just 3 sources then they are unlikely to be notable. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 14:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 18:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask you why this article was not been accepted at this time? I added more independent sources and information. Iliochori2 (talk) 07:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tetyana Fedosova (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tetyana Fedosova and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 18:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask you why this article is not accepted? I've included many citations for reliable sources even from Ukrainian Woman association and from his son who mention her on his interviews. There is also an Ukrainian wikipedia version dedicated to her https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%86%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%96%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0

Please let me know about this article when you have spare of time. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 13:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrainian Wikipedia is not a valid reference as it's user-generated. If you believe Fedosova is notable then please post to me a maximum of 3 sources about her all of which must contain at least 2 paragraphs of prose text addressing Fedosova directly and in detail. If this cannot be done then please don't ask me to assess any more sources. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 14:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, no for the moment I don't have any sources as you requested for this article. Iliochori2 (talk) 12:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're missing a simple idea here—namely, that the "reliability" of the sources is not the problem, the coverage within those sources is. You can cite as many general stat sites as you'd like, but that will still fall well short of significant coverage. I know I'm repeating what the comment above says, but you don't seem to be understanding the point, so it bears repeating. In almost all of these pages, you have simply added more basic sources, none of which actually show that the person is notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia article of their own. Basic stat sources only show that someone exists/existed, which is not sufficient to deserve a Wikipedia article—indeed, we all exist, and we don't deserve Wikipedia articles of our own. A brief mention in an interview, a stat page on footballfacts.ru, etc. do not show notability. So stop focusing on the number of sources and start focusing on the quality of the coverage in those sources. Anwegmann (talk) 15:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course, it's clear to me and we will try to reduce the number of sources concerning statistics. But how come there are some articles related to young football players, like the ones, I tried to create, where they have only 1 or 2 souces also not many reliable ones and the articles are online? It's just my curiosity, Thanks in advance for your clarification. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 07:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Valeriy Zhoholko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valeriy Zhoholko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valeriy Zhoholko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vladyslav Kyryn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladyslav Kyryn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Kyryn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boris Shevelyuk (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boris Shevelyuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 21:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:MFC Stalitsa Minsk templates

A tag has been placed on Category:MFC Stalitsa Minsk templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 05:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree as it is empty category- Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 08:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mykola Stetsko (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oltrepier was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mykola Stetsko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleksandr Rudenko (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oleksandr Rudenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 21:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I will check if I get more. But I have a question, please check these players they have only one citation Andriy Khoma, Vasyl Tsyutsyura and Roman Borysevych .They have been published, in particular the first one he is younger that the player that I would like to create an article. I don't find better sources (multiple paragraphs) about them. Sorry about my question but I am confused. Iliochori2 (talk) 21:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mykola Stetsko (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mykola Stetsko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 21:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1993–94 FC Desna Chernihiv season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1993–94 FC Desna Chernihiv season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^TT me 10:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've improved the draft with my reliable sources. Iliochori2 (talk) 12:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksandr Stelmakh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksandr Stelmakh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Stelmakh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 08:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I am blocked can you please move this article to draft in order to improve it? Iliochori2 (talk) 08:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only if the consensus from the discussion is to retain the article in draft. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 09:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian football clubs 1992–93 season

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian football clubs 1992–93 season indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucas Ramires (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oltrepier was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucas Ramires and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 14:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladyslav Tyshyninov (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oltrepier was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vladyslav Tyshyninov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 14:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^TT me 09:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1993–94 FC Desna Chernihiv season (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1993–94 FC Desna Chernihiv season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 09:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1993–94 FC Desna Chernihiv season (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1993–94 FC Desna Chernihiv season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 08:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucas Ramires (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucas Ramires and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:FC Desna Chernihiv captains has been nominated for deletion

Category:FC Desna Chernihiv captains has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 04:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, may I ask you why this categories has been nominated for deletion? Its seems is not empty. Iliochori2 (talk) 06:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iliochori2. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I've received this message. I've checked the link that you provided me. Its look like that I have been linked to another account. This account maybe have been created by my relatives which is located in the same building. How can I appeal to go forward with the unlock process? Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am also trying to make an appeal to unblock my account and in the comment here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iliochori2 the user @Spiderone said that original my account asked about unblocking but doesn't seem I am willing or able to take the steps. I've asked few times to help me to guide me to make the appeal but I am not able to do it. Can you help me please? Iliochori2 (talk) 07:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just copy this {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} and add your reason for why you should be given yet another chance. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 07:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have done it. As its my first time doing it, can you please check if you've got the reason? Thank you. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 08:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't come up with a reason for you, you will need to come up with it yourself. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 08:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I will come up with it myself. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 09:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Iliochori2 (talk) 08:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock account please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am requesting please the unblock of my account. Its seems that I've blocked because I've asked my relative cousing to edit some pages on my behalf in the mean time that my account was temporally blocked for editing. I've spoked with him and he told me that his accout was bloccked too probably for this account that I didn't know was going to cause so many problems

Decline reason:

Even if what you're saying is true, asking someone you know to create an account and edit on your behalf is meatpuppetry (and if done while you were blocked, also block evasion), which is treated exactly the same as socking. Either would be a valid reason for the block. You may wish to review the standard offer for editors whose conduct has led to an indefinite block. Seraphimblade ^Talk to me 09:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would also add that, from your above post, it looks like you are an Italian speaker. I see that you already contribute to the Italian Wikipedia, and being blocked here will not stop you from editing there. If you can show a good history of constructive contribution there (or on any other Wikimedia project) while you are blocked, that would go a long way toward your appeal in six months. Seraphimblade ^Talk to me 09:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock account please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologize if by asking this favor, I have gone wrong. I was unaware of this rule and broke it without knowing it. I am in good faith and I would like to solve this problem by requesting the release in some way. Is there anything I can do to remedy it?

Decline reason:

See below, using sockpuppets to evade a block and simultaneously asking for an unblock is not going to fly here. Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Any admin wishing to consider this unblock, please note confirmed further block evasion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iliochori2. Worth also noting that the above appeal was written about 2 hours after evading their block with logged out editing. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 18:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock account please :(

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please kindly ask if it is possible to unblock my account. I am aware of the procedure that I unintentionally broke by asking a relative to update some statistics. Sincerely the wikipedia team explained to me that this was against the rules of the platform and I admit that it was a stupid mistake that I have done. I kindly ask you, if its possible to reinstore my account promising not to make any further mistakes that I've made in the past. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iliochori2 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have continued to evade your block, even after the decline of the last unblock. The last evasion was only hours before you requested this unblock. It shows that you do not understand the reason for your block, or that you have no intention to stop evading your block and are misleading us in these unblock requests. Dreamy Jazz ^talk to me | my contributions 20:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apologize

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have updated some stats without logging into my account. I remember only doing this recently, if it is this that you are talking about, you are right and by doing it evade the block. Apologize if is this than I stop doing it, its seems that I've doing another mistake :(

Decline reason:

Done enough times that a "mistake" is no longer a viable explanation. Iliochori2, please show sufficient productive editing elsewhere before continuing to file unblock requests here. That is likely the only path to being unblocked. Every time you edit while logged out or using "someone else's" account, the timeline gets longer. Star Mississippi 16:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apologize

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Thank you for your explanation. Where I can show sufficient productive? My account is blocked and even if I will have the opportunity to be honest I am scared of making further mistakes and broke new wikipedia rules. If I stay without editing for a while, my account could be unblocked in the future? Do you think is one solution?

Decline reason:

As per below. Yamla (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• as @Seraphimblade: suggested above, you're free to edit the Italian wikipedia or any project other than the English one at this time. Productive editing there might lead to you being unblocked in six months if you don't edit logged out here. Star Mississippi 19:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:FC Desna Chernihiv sections

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Template:FC Desna Chernihiv sections has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Izno (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1992–93 FC Desna Chernihiv season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 22:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes I will do, thank you for your suggestion. According with the wikipedia policies, Its allowed to log in here time to time or even log in the english one considered something bad against the policies

Decline reason:

Procedural decline since there is no actual unblock request here. To answer your question, you may edit any other Wikipedia project as long as you comply with their policies, including their policies on sockpuppetry. -- Tamzin^[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 20:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Please clarify your question as I do not understand what you're asking. Star Mississippi 00:36, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I didn't explain myself correctly. After your advice I'm dedicating myself a bit to the wikipedia platform in Italian. At the same time I'm occasionally logging into the English platform without doing anything else. According to the wikipedia rules, after the block I got, am I allowed this? Or doing this, I' am breaking some other rule? Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 07:15, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vadym Malyuk

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vadym Malyuk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of FC Lehenda-ShVSM Chernihiv records and statistics

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of FC Lehenda-ShVSM Chernihiv records and statistics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of FC Lehenda-ShVSM Chernihiv managers

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of FC Lehenda-ShVSM Chernihiv managers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maksym Markelov

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maksym Markelov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yuriy Denysiuk

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuriy Denysiuk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vadym Malyuk

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vadym Malyuk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 21:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oleksandr Iosha

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oleksandr Iosha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oleksandr Yosha

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oleksandr Yosha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tetyana Fedosova

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tetyana Fedosova, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:History of FC Chernihiv

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of FC Chernihiv, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucas Ramires (October 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Brachy0008 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Hardly any change since last decline, aside from two sources added. FN8 has no significant coverage, per WP:100WORDS. FN9 might be reliable, but it gets downplayed by the other sources. Did a google search and could not find much reliable sources.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 09:41, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of FC Lehenda-ShVSM Chernihiv records and statistics

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of FC Lehenda-ShVSM Chernihiv records and statistics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of FC Lehenda-ShVSM Chernihiv managers

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of FC Lehenda-ShVSM Chernihiv managers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 17:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FC Avanhard Koriukivka

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FC Avanhard Koriukivka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1993–94 FC Desna Chernihiv season has been accepted

1993–94 FC Desna Chernihiv season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Newystats (talk) 01:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oleksandr Rudenko

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oleksandr Rudenko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1993–1994 FC Desna Chernihiv season

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1993–1994 FC Desna Chernihiv season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Igor Pakhar

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Igor Pakhar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vladyslav Tyshyninov

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vladyslav Tyshyninov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mykola Stetsko

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mykola Stetsko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andriy Huz

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andriy Huz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oleksandr Iosha

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oleksandr Iosha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 20:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oleksandr Yosha

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oleksandr Yosha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 17:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ihor Lyashenko

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ihor Lyashenko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Boris Shevelyuk

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boris Shevelyuk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tetyana Fedosova

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tetyana Fedosova".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 20:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mykyta Hrebenshchykov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mykyta Hrebenshchykov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mykyta Hrebenshchykov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 10:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I am blocked, I can provided so few links of the player. https://upl.ua/ua/people/view/69331 - https://old.pfl.ua/players/23462 - https://int.soccerway.com/players/-/793746/ - https://www.footballdatabase.eu/en/player/details/471747-mykyta-grebenshchykov - https://www.ua-football.com/ua/stats/player/68813-nikita-grebenschikovua - https://www.facebook.com/fc.chernigiv/photos/a.4569259529752828/4906782199333891/?type=3. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 12:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

http://chernigiv.ua/fk-chernigov-statistika-pervoj-chasti-sezona/

https://suspilne.media/142083-gravci-unosti-u-17-stali-cempionami-ukraini-z-futbolu-nimi-cikavlatsa-klubi-upl/ Iliochori2 (talk) 12:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of these are significant coverage. What we are looking for here is multiple paragraphs (molti paragrafi) dedicated specifically to Hrebenshchykov from independent and reliable sources. Posting stats stuff from Facebook, Football Database, PFL, UA-Football and insisting that they were significant coverage even after I explained this to you was the reason why you were blocked in the first place. The fact that, more than three months after the event, you are still doubling down on this position is extremely concerning... Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 12:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, I've just provided few links in order that you can judge them. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 12:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vladyslav Kosov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladyslav Kosov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Kosov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 12:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:History of FC Chernihiv

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of FC Chernihiv".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FC Avanhard Koriukivka

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FC Avanhard Koriukivka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 22:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Igor Pakhar

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Igor Pakhar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 08:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Artem Beloshapka

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artem Beloshapka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Basketball players from Chernihiv has been nominated for merging

Category:Basketball players from Chernihiv has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 12:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lucas Ramires

Hello, Iliochori2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucas Ramires, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please I am requesting a possible unblock of my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Good morning, I am contacting you to kindly request the unlocking of my account in order to be able to contribute appropriately to Wikipedia articles in English again. I haven't changed anything for more than six months and in this period I have focused on the Italian Wikipedia platform, edit articles and create new ones. Please let me know if I will have the opportunity to be useful for the English Wikipedia. Best Regards

Decline reason:

Although there's no technical evidence of block evasion (good!), you've been blocked multiple times for violating our policies on promotion and advertising, with a clear note that you lack sufficient competence to create articles. I don't think anyone's going to be willing to unblock you unless you agree to refrain from creating articles, and possibly from creating drafts, and demonstrate you clearly understand WP:PROMO and what was wrong with your earlier contributions. Yamla (talk) 20:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please I am requesting a possible unblock of my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Thank you for your reply. Yes, I am aware of the mistakes I have made in the past and I am not proud of them at all. I am also aware that I have to improve a lot. Yes I agree to refrain from creating articles and if you will give me the opportunity, I will create drafts in this way I can focus to improve and clearly understand WP:PROMO. Let me know your thought. I think I deserve a second opportunity

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Comment - edits like this one still show a lack of understanding of what actually constitutes significant coverage. I would personally only feel comfortable if this user was still blocked from editing mainspace but allowed to edit in draft or make edit requests on talk pages. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 17:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for interfering in this talk. Yes, unfortunately articles like this were created by me more than six months ago, without much experience and with errors. I will accept every decision you make in this regard with respect and serenity, but even if my account will be partially or totally unlocked I will create articles from drafts, in order to acquire more skills and put the WP:PROMO rules into practice. Only when you think I'm ready to create articles without drafts, will I do so. Sorry again for my Intrusion here. Kind Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I agree with Spiderone here. This user created so many articles that clearly failed WP:SIGCOV and WP:SPORTBASIC that other editors are still cleaning up the mess. The linked edit above shows clearly that the user does not understand the basics of WP:SIGCOV and WP:DRAFT, and their history on this talk page, seen throughout it, shows that they are not receptive to guidance from more experienced editors. Indeed, the language here of contrition feels rather false, as it turned out to be at many instances above, considering that the user has edited through sockpuppetry and using an IP since their ban and their actions did not change after many warnings and guidance before the ban. I have a difficult time believing that only six months away from editing has fixed these fundamental problems in any meaningful way. Anwegmann (talk) 20:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree and have already apologized for my mistakes and for the amount of work I had to make the moderators do. At the same time I point out that I understood my mistakes and the warnings that were given to me that I didn't understand at the time and I'm not proud of them. I think that in more than six months the skills of a person with a great desire to improve can grow considerably and in the last months I have read the rules listed above. As I've said in the past, I would like to have the chance to create good draft articles. I will not touch existing articles without your consent and when you have verified that my skills allow me to do so. I will do everything to avoid creating problems as it was in the past and I will correct myself at the first warning. Promised Iliochori2 (talk) 09:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please I am requesting a possible unblock of my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Good morning, I am contacting you to kindly request the unlocking of my account in order to be able to create articles from drafts, and get more skills and put in practice WP:PROMO. In a second stage, once you will think that I got the neccessary skills you may take the consideration to full unblock, but if you require, I will always create articles from drafts in order to don't create any problems. Let me know your thought. Best Regards

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You already have an open unblock request. If this is not sufficiently convincing for anyone to take action, you should take it down or reword it. You should not open a second simultaneous unblock request. Yamla (talk) 17:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Oleksandr Rudenko

Hello, Iliochori2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oleksandr Rudenko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 22:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2022–23 FC Desna Chernihiv season

The article 2022–23 FC Desna Chernihiv season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article appears to deal with a non-event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C679 07:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello unfortunately my account is blocked and I can't provide any good edit. Apologize Iliochori2 (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to unprod it - but hang on - this season never happened, as the team left the league (and professional football itself) before it happened. Am I missing something here? I frequently disagree with some deletionists very narrow view of significance and referencing; but surely this is a case of something that didn't end up happening. Nfitz (talk) 03:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello yes unfortunately the season never happened as you said. Yes I know what you mean, I am of the same opinion as your, but because of the season never happened is better to delete the article. Have a nice day. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 13:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello yes unfortunately the season never happened as you said. Yes I know what you mean, I am of the same opinion as your, but because of the season never happened is better to delete the article. Have a nice day. Regards 151.47.196.169 (talk) 13:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my account please for draft articles only - Thanks for your time

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Iliochori2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Sirs / Madams, I kindly ask for the unlocking of my account to create draft articles and be reviewed by your moderation team. My account has been blocked for more than a year due to the mistakes I have made. These mistakes were reported to me, but due to the fact that I was not an expert and due to the lack of access to my email linked to the Wikipedia account, I was unable to grasp the teachings that were kindly provided to me. In addition, I also asked a relative of mine to update some statistics and this created other problems for you. I was advised not to touch any article in English for six months and to create articles in Italian and so I did. I did not touch any article even without being logged in and I created many articles in Italian and I was approved brilliantly. I know that I created problems and I have already apologized many times for this and I am ashamed, because after the block and created articles in Italian, I understood my mistakes. I kindly ask you to give me a second chance and unlock my account only to create draft articles, this way they can be reviewed by your moderation team, this way you can see my progress and I will not cause any problems.

Accept reason:

Unblock accepted. We do not have the technical ability to limit you to only editing drafts, but you can choose to only edit drafts and submit them for review if you like. Please ask for help if you need it. Welcome back and happy editing. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to note that WP:COMPETENCE was a major factor in this editor's blocking, and they have not addressed that issue. It's good that they have succeeded at creating articles in Italian, which is their native language, but that does nothing to address the severe issues this editor has shown at producing fluent, logical, and complete English-language content. There is also, quite notably, a history of sockpuppetry/block evasion [5] here. Anwegmann (talk) 16:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, regarding the WP:COMPETENCE skills, I have read it in the last year , I am addressing the this issue in order to produce fluent, logical, and complete content in English. Regarding sockpuppetry/block evasion, as I already stated, I asked a relative of mine to update some statistics, but it was a mistake as I made the situation worse. For the first two points, I have improved my skills significantly, while for the last point, please tell me what I need to do to solve the problem. Thanks in advance Iliochori2 (talk) 17:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{checkuser needed}}, since this is tagged as a checkuser block. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The check is at best inconclusive given what the network is doing here. I would probably frame it as "no evidence to indicate continued socking". Izno (talk) 23:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editors are not required to take a skills or language test before editing here: it is the nature of a global collaborative project that some editors will not have perfect language skills and other editors will correct their work. With no evidence of sockpuppetry in nearly a year and a half, and the user's commitment to submit drafts for review, I am unblocking. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, thank you for the second chance you have given me to contribute to the creation of new articles on Wikipedia. I take this opportunity to apologize for all the mistakes I have made in the past and for the problems I have created to all moderators and the platform. I am ashamed of it and I promise you that my goal is to create good articles and put into practice your teaching and I will listen carefully to your warnings and advice. I have no words to thank you enough for this new chance. I ask you to guide me now how I can start creating draft articles in order not to create new problems. Best regards to all of you. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For creating/editing drafts, please have a look at the articles for creation process. These pages are designed for new and inexperienced users to learn about the article creation process, and once you have created and submitted a draft you should get helpful feedback from more experienced reviewers. You can also ask for help at the help desk, or ask general questions about editing at the teahouse. Cheers. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. Yes I've submitted few drafts as I would like to get helpful feedback from more experienced reviewers. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 22:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pavlo Shostka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavlo Shostka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavlo Shostka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 11:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree because there are no more fresh resources and for some years the player seems not to play anymore. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 13:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding. I imagine if you continue to demonstrate this understanding, then you will be given a chance to edit in draft space soon. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 22:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. In fact now many mistakes I made in the past are a little bit clear right now. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 22:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Anwegmann (talk) 17:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you so much for your guidline. I checked the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in my preferences. I hope it helps, thanks again for your guide. Please give me all the advice to always do better and try not to make the past mistakes. Thanks again for your support. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 18:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I started to familiarize with the option that you kindly showed me with this template Template:FC Chernihiv Squad in order to don't create problems. When you have time, can you please check if I did correct in this way I will use this option on the daily basis. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 22:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. I have informed you about this numerous times before: When describing a season, you DO NOT write "season 2023–24". Instead, you write "2023–24 season". Please stop making very basic mistakes that have been mentioned to you many times before. Anwegmann (talk) 03:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleksandr Rudenko (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oleksandr Rudenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 22:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. Sorry I thought for this player there were more new reliable resources, but I was wrong. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 22:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dzhilindo Bezghubchenko (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dzhilindo Bezghubchenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 22:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. As you can see I am trying to familiarize myself with the English Wikipedia procedures as it is a bit different from the Italian one. Most likely I am much behind what I thought. Please can I have again please the link with the articles related to soccer player? Thanks in advance and thank you again for giving me the opportunity to be back. I will try to do my best don't give you problems as last time. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 23:04, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPORTBASIC is the guideline for notability. In other words, a source must have significant coverage, multiple paragraphs (molti paragrafi) specifically about the player. Not every footballer is actually notable as some footballers do not have significant coverage. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 23:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your help. 151.43.248.181 (talk) 08:06, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023–24 FC Chernihiv season has been accepted

2023–24 FC Chernihiv season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your feedback. I am so happy about this article. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 12:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024–25 FC Chernihiv season has been accepted

2024–25 FC Chernihiv season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 06:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I will read all the grading scheme. You I would love to continue submitting work to Articles for creation as I am not ready to create articles by myself. I would like to avoid any troubles. Thank you again. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 12:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have been unblocked after taking standard offer. Noted. In that case you are limited to draft pages only I guess. Don't worry, AFC is a good place where you will learn about creating articles under the rules and understanding how sources are cited. :) ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 12:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I don't want repeat the past mistake and I want get as much knowledge by the team as they have a great experience and I will learn about creating articles under the rules. Thank you so much. Iliochori2 (talk) 12:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniil Volskyi (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniil Volskyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 13:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maksym Tatarenko (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maksym Tatarenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 14:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danyil Khondak (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danyil Khondak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 14:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedbak. Sorry if I ask a question regarding this player. In terms of articles, I would like to improve, but regarding the sources yes maybe some of them are brief but there some like these https://www.fcnyva.com/news/press/4558 https://fcnyva.com/news/review/4256 where we can find also a video interview about the player. Can we reconsider these as independent? Just for my future references. Thank you in advance for your time. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 11:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not an independent source. He was employed by the club at time of writing. An employer is not independent from an employee. My employer has written articles about me and has interviews with me on their website but it doesn't mean I can have a Wikipedia article... Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 23:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Good explanation, I've got it. Thank you so much. Iliochori2 (talk) 11:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleh Osypenko (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oleh Osypenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 14:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am in the process of identifying the various resources. Before resubmit this article, I would you like to ask you, when you have few minutes to guide me in the categorization of these sources?

https://www.footboom1.com/ua/ukrainian/ukrainians/1580212063-poluzashhitnik-kolosa-u-19-oleg-osipenko-prodolzhit-kareru-v-chekhii.html

https://fcmsm.eu/nash-igrok-oleg-osipenko-podpisal-kontrakt-s-komandoj-pervoj-ligi-ukrainy/

https://xsport.ua/ru/football_s/news/ingulets-podpisal-khavbeka-iz-chekhii_8771474/

http://chernigiv.ua/oleg-osipenko-orendovanij-u-ingulcya/

https://suspilne.media/kropyvnytskiy/542637-ingulec-projsov-zaporizkij-metalurg-v-kubku-ukraini-z-futbolu-v-matci-z-simoma-golami/

https://football24.ua/ru/ingulec_vernul_ukrainskogo_poluzashhitnika_iz_evropy_n762055/

Thanks in advance

Have a nice day Iliochori2 (talk) 14:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chrístos Chatzipantelídis (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chrístos Chatzipantelídis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 17:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Ukrainian football transfers summer 2024 (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Ukrainian football transfers summer 2024 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:58, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I will read all links in order to improve the articles. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 10:22, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mollo Bessala (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mollo Bessala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 11:27, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniil Davydenko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniil Davydenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniil Davydenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 22:24, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi according with your experience and knowledge how can I do to improve the article? For sure I need to increase the poorly content, but what about the sources? I mean which type of sources is missed to help the article to stay on? Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 12:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Anwegmann but I think I can answer your question. I believe this issue has come up for many of your article creations: Significant coverage WP:SIGCOV is required, database entries (Soccerway, …) and non-independent sources (the player's club, Ukrainian Premier League) are not sufficient. Examples of significant coverage are a longer newspaper article or a book chapter about the player. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your clear explanation. It all makes sense, yes indeed in the past I have not done a good job with the articles. I hope to do better in the future. Have a nice day and Happy New Year. Iliochori2 (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Jarju has been accepted

Moses Jarju, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 08:40, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your feedback. Have a nice day and Happy New Year! Iliochori2 (talk) 09:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vitaliy Mentey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vitaliy Mentey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitaliy Mentey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 02:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved with news fresh sources. Let me know your thought Iliochori2 (talk) 14:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artur Bybik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artur Bybik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Bybik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 03:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved with news fresh sources. Let me know your thought Iliochori2 (talk) 14:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vladyslav Shkolnyi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladyslav Shkolnyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Shkolnyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 03:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved with news fresh sources. Let me know your thought Iliochori2 (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksandr Roshchynskyi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksandr Roshchynskyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Roshchynskyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 04:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved with news fresh sources. Let me know your thought Iliochori2 (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andriy Storchous has been accepted

Andriy Storchous, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your feedback. Happy New Year 2025. Iliochori2 (talk) 12:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roman Vovk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Vovk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Vovk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved with news fresh sources. Let me know your thought Iliochori2 (talk) 18:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Vladyslav Shkolnyi. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Anwegmann (talk) 22:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vyacheslav Koydan, you may be blocked from editing. Anwegmann (talk) 01:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry if I did something wrong. I am trying to do my best to create good articles or to contrubute to increase them. Please give me an example what you mean for "unsourced or poorly sourced". In particulal the second case look to me a bit a grey area. If you can guide me I can follow it. In the Vyacheslav Koydan article, I have add something that can be proved in the 2020–21 FC Chernihiv season without any souce. If this cause any issue let me know, but I would like to point out that the same phrase are state in other players without source. Let me know your thought. Iliochori2 (talk) 12:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For example in some articles I've removed sorces where the links are broken like this one https://pfl.ua/games/31464/online-report . It will be better leave them or to remove them? Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 13:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unattributed translations

Hello! It seems like some of your older articles were partially translated by you from Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedias but weren't attributed — for example, Station Square (Chernihiv) (compare this and that) and Hotel Ukraine, Chernihiv (compare this and that). You need to repair insufficient attribution in these two articles (and other translated articles, if any) per this.

Please also see my deletion request about photos on Commons for some of the files you've used. Well very well (talk) 07:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I will try to improve the 2 articles. Thanks for let me know. Have a nice day. Iliochori2 (talk) 08:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Giorgi Parpalia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgi Parpalia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgi Parpalia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 11:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I understand very well. The article needs to be improved and I will try to do it and find new fresh sources even if I afraid that I will not find new sources. Have a nice day and Happy New Year 2025 Iliochori2 (talk) 11:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vladyslav Panko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladyslav Panko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Panko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 11:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedbackthis article can be delete. I've created it at the begining of his debut and now its seems that he gave up playing. I should wait a bit longer to decide to create it. Have a nice day Iliochori2 (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. You too. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 11:51, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2018–19 FC Chernihiv season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018–19 FC Chernihiv season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018–19 FC Chernihiv season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 11:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to improve it as this season 2024–25 FC Chernihiv season Iliochori2 (talk) 13:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2017–18 FC Chernihiv season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017–18 FC Chernihiv season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017–18 FC Chernihiv season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 11:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I will check and I will try to improve it as this season 2024–25 FC Chernihiv season Iliochori2 (talk) 13:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The prose that you have added would be better placed at FC Chernihiv, which currently has almost no prose. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 15:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. With your permission I would like to improve all seasons for FC Chernihiv and find potential sources. I am also working for a new prose for FC Chernihiv club. Let me know your thought. Regards Iliochori2 (talk) 15:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FC Chernihiv is what we call a 'stub' and needs expansion first before creating any more sub-articles for each season. Season articles are only necessary when you are running out of room in the main article. For example, 1999–2000 Gillingham F.C. season is necessary because Gillingham F.C. is too big to contain all of the relevant season information. I would argue that spending all of your time writing sub-articles but completely neglecting the main article is not the correct way around. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 15:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this suggestion. Making endless sub-articles for an article that is hardly complete to begin with is asking for a) those sub-articles to be nominated for deletion and b) the information about the main article to be scattered across too many places, ultimately doing a disservice both to the subject and readers. Anwegmann (talk) 17:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I asked your opinion because my idea was to improve sub-articles before it was deleted and also improve the main article. But if the sub-articles nominated for deletion are not deleted then I can dedicate myself to the main article first Iliochori2 (talk) 19:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's up to you how you choose to spend your time here but, in my opinion, working on sub-articles before the article is what we in England call putting the cart before the horse. If FC Chernihiv ends up getting too big then maybe we can discuss whether we need to split into season sub-articles. I would also add that if you decide to spend hours on a non-notable season article and it just gets deleted anyway then all of those hours that you put in were wasted. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 23:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I understand and thank you for your advice. I am already working on the article by FC Chernihiv. As soon as you have a few minutes free could you check it and tell me if I am following the right path. Thanks in advance Iliochori2 (talk) 23:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anatoliy Naumenko

The article Anatoliy Naumenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Former footballer with zero significant coverage per WP:GNG. Please remove this notice and add significant coverage to the article if you disagree.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 23:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree, also this player was created when I was even less confident in wikipedia articles. The player is not playing anymore. Iliochori2 (talk) 23:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree with this feedback Iliochori2 (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Denys Kildiy

The article Denys Kildiy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer with zero significant coverage per WP:GNG. Please remove this notice and add significant coverage to the article if you disagree.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 23:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree with this feedback Iliochori2 (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Denys Sadovyi

The article Denys Sadovyi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Played 4 minutes of professional football and my Ukrainian searches yielded nothing per WP:GNG. If you disagree, please remove this notice and add sources showing significant coverage to the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 23:18, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree with this feedback Iliochori2 (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of language in updates

Concerning the conversation above, I want to warn you that the content you have so far added to several FC Chernihiv-related articles—including 2020–21 FC Chernihiv season and the FC Chernihiv article itself—has been very, very poorly written. It is to the point that I cannot, and indeed I should not have to, fix every major grammatical problem in the content you have added. WP:COMPETENCE in written English is required to edit successfully on English-language Wikipedia. Your understanding of English does not appear to be complete enough to contribute large passages and full paragraphs of text without requiring an enormous amount of editing from other users, which is an unneeded and unreasonable burden. If I cannot, within the limits of a reasonable use of my time, edit your additions, I will either revert them or hide them until they can be fixed properly. I ask that you do not add more information than you are capable of writing clearly and correctly in English in the future. Anwegmann (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand and thank you for pointing it out. In fact, as you may have noticed, I am not a native English speaker, but I am trying hard to write good articles. Thank you for taking the time to proofread my texts. Iliochori2 (talk) 23:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andriy Lakeyenko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andriy Lakeyenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andriy Lakeyenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 02:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved with news fresh sources. Let me know your thought Iliochori2 (talk) 14:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved with news fresh sources. Let me know your thought Iliochori2 (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andriy Veresotskyi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andriy Veresotskyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andriy Veresotskyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved with news fresh sources. Let me know your thought Iliochori2 (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eduard Halstyan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eduard Halstyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduard Halstyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article improved with news fresh sources. Let me know your thought Iliochori2 (talk) 14:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bohdan Lytvynenko

The article Bohdan Lytvynenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player with zero WP:SIGCOV to meet standards of WP:GNG. If you disagree, please remove this notice and add sources showing significant coverage to the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anwegmann (talk) 03:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yaroslav Bykovets

The article Yaroslav Bykovets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player with zero significant coverage per WP:GNG. Nearly all of his career appearances came on either amateur or youth teams.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anwegmann (talk) 03:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ihor Samoylenko

The article Ihor Samoylenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player with zero significant coverage per WP:GNG and played only four matches—113 total minutes—in his entire career.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anwegmann (talk) 03:32, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree with this feedback Iliochori2 (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ihor Samoylenko

The article Ihor Samoylenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Blatantly fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 11:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree with this feedback Iliochori2 (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yaroslav Bykovets

The article Yaroslav Bykovets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I found some brief coverage in Chernihiv media but that's it

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 12:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bohdan Lytvynenko

The article Bohdan Lytvynenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any decent coverage of the footballer of this name

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 12:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleksandr Rudenko (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oleksandr Rudenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not submit this again unless you have at least two sources showing significant coverage of Rudenko. The submission at the moment has none. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please when you have time, can you please give me an example of significant coverage in this way I can avoid to submit again without it. Thanks in advance Iliochori2 (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is significant coverage of Shevchenko Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:38, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Iliochori2 (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maksym Tatarenko (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maksym Tatarenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artem Lutchenko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artem Lutchenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artem Lutchenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksiy Zenchenko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksiy Zenchenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksiy Zenchenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 02:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs

Hello, Iliochori2,

I see a lot of articles you created have been nominated for AFD discussions which I realize can be very difficult for content creators. But rather than posting responses on your User talk page, which no one will see, I'd like to encourage you to go to these AFD discussions, or at least some of them, and participate in those discussions. See what the arguments are for deleting these articles which can help you avoid these problem with any future articles you want to write. Thank you. Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with AFD discussions. Most of the articles I've provide new good souces but they have been removed few times and the articles have been nominated for AFD and closed. Can you show me how to go to the AFD discussions? Iliochori2 (talk) 06:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They can all be found in the many links above and also here Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Ukraine Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 18:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Ukrainian football transfers summer 2024 has been accepted

List of Ukrainian football transfers summer 2024, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 02:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your feedback. Iliochori2 (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Ukrainian football transfers winter 2024–25 has been accepted

List of Ukrainian football transfers winter 2024–25, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 02:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your feedback. Have a nice day. Iliochori2 (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:History of FC Chernihiv has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of FC Chernihiv. Thanks! Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 18:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. Sorry if I am answering you here, as I am not familiar to answer in the draft. This article is under costruction, for the moment I am not going to submit as review. Of course "FC Chernihiv" article needs to be improved, I'm creating both articles in parallel. Except that there are more details in the history. Iliochori2 (talk) 19:22, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The point SpiderOne is correctly making, I believe, is that the History of FC Chernihiv article does not need to exist, as all of the information capable of being contained within it actually belongs in the FC Chernihiv article. So it is a waste of time to continue working on the History of FC Chernihiv article draft. Anwegmann (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But there articles of soccer team, that they have the History article. Iliochori2 (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the FC Chernihiv article does not have a full history section, and it should. So don't waste your time on a separate article when the full history of the club can and should be contained in the club's article alone. You are making two articles when there should only be one. This history article will be rejected because it contains information that can be fully contained within FC Chernihiv. Finish one article before moving on to a new article on the same thing. You're wasting your time. Anwegmann (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, So once I finish the main article, it will be ok to create History article? Iliochori2 (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. Do not create a history article. We don't need a separate history article because Chernihiv's article is so small. Some of the best football club articles don't have the history split off. Look at Central Coast Mariners FC and Carlton Town F.C.. Focus on getting the quality of the article to that level instead of worrying about the quantity of articles. Even FC Dynamo Kyiv and FC Shakhtar Donetsk don't have the history article split off and those are clubs with much more history than FC Chernihiv. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 20:09, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree entirely with this. Anwegmann (talk) 20:10, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand, but my concern is that if I put in the article "FC Chernihiv" all the information regarding its history, won't the article be long and with many irrelevant (but important for the story) things in the central article? Sorry for my thoughts and questions but to understand Iliochori2 (talk) 20:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it won't be too long. But remember that the information you add does need to be written in clear, correct English, as is the case with all information. Anwegmann (talk) 20:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We only need to write about the important events. Dynamo Kyiv and Shakhtar Donetsk manage to summarise the history fine and they are much bigger clubs that have been around for much longer. If it gets too long then we need to trim it down and remove any unnecessary trivia. FC Chernihiv has only existed since 2003 and has only played professionally since 2020 so, with all due respect, does not warrant separate articles for every small aspect. This is Wikipedia not Chernihivpedia. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 20:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, I've got the point. I have only one request, as you know I am not a native English speaker and I need your help to monitor my articles, for sure you will find a grammar mistakes, but I am here willing to learn and not create any other problems. So please be patient with me and show me where I've made any potential mistakes to don't repeat in the future. Thank you in advance for you help and patience. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleksandr Dudarenko has been accepted

Oleksandr Dudarenko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your feedback. Have a nice day. Iliochori2 (talk) 11:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danyil Khondak (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danyil Khondak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop submitting articles without significant coverage. The sentence "In september 2024 he joyned to Mynai in Ukrainian First League" should never require 6 references, especially when none of them contain significant coverage. You have received so many warnings from myself and from User:Anwegmann. Just bombing an article with 31 sources with none of them showing significant coverage is a complete waste of my time. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:19, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought they required all of them in order show significant coverage. Thank you to show me the mistake, I will not include anymore 6 references for a player when he/she will move to another club. Next time if I will have a new source for this player can I send to you here and you will tell me your thought? In this way I will not submit the article for a new review. Apologize Iliochori2 (talk) 19:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is the depth of coverage that counts. One news article showing significant coverage adds more value than 6 showing a trivial mention. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. That makes sense. Thank you so much. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you still appear not to understand the meaning of WP:SIGCOV, even after countless examples have been given to you as well as countless warnings, pieces of advice, and deletions/rejections of poorly-sourced articles, shows inability or unwillingness on your part to be collaborative. In addition to that, as the example sentence above shows, your WP:COMPETENCE in written English is severely below what is acceptable. As @Spiderone has already said, your edits and your article creations are a time sink for other editors. Anwegmann (talk) 19:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your question, please do not ask me to review any sources unless they have multiple paragraphs about the topic at hand. It is very time consuming being called to review sources that are only trivial mentions and database sources. You have been given several examples of what significant coverage looks like. If you still don't understand by now, then this is a concern. Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 19:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course, I know you don't have much time available. As per your request I will only ask you if I have sources with more paragraphs on the topic and not trivial quotes and database sources. Iliochori2 (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maksym Shumylo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maksym Shumylo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maksym Shumylo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksandr Shyray for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksandr Shyray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Shyray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyrylo Matvyeyev (born 2002) (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyrylo Matvyeyev (born 2002) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^(Talk to Spider) 09:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]