User talk:Pyramids09

Happy First Edit Day!

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

starship.paint (talk / cont) 08:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

You've violated 1rr by reverting twice within 24 hrs on the zionism page. Please self-revert: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zionism&diff=1253407490&oldid=1253399776 DMH223344 (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is also subject to a consensus required restriction and I have reverted. Selfstudier (talk) 21:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will propose on talk page. Thanks for reminding me. Pyramids09 (talk) 21:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AE

Please see WP:AE#Pyramids09. nableezy - 15:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Pyramids09. Thank you. — xDanielx T/C\R 19:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday from the Birthday Committee

Wishing Pyramids09 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!

Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!--DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 13:56, 4 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

November 2024

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Zionism) for a period of 1 week for Violating the consensus required restriction.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit

Regarding this edit [1], there was consensus to include this here Talk:List of genocides/Archive 15#RFC - Inclusion of Gaza genocide. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 09:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry for striking your comment here [2], I mistakenly thought you weren't extended confirmed. That was a lapse of attention and I apologise. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 11:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism

Re this edit, please explain why you removed "<!-- The following text is the result of consensus on the talk page. Changes to the text have been challenged and any further edits to the sentence should be discussed on the talk page and consensus obtained to change. --> and then changed the text to which it refers, and while there is an ongoing RFC dealing with the subject matter? Selfstudier (talk) 10:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought consensus was already achieved, sorry. Pyramids09 (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it your impression that the ongoing RFC is a consensus for your edit? Selfstudier (talk) 17:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism and Discussing changes on talk page

Please explain why you removed the thing that says "discuss changes to this on the talk page" without discussing changes to this on the talk page. The reason we have that comment there is precisely because people keep removing it without discussing the change first. If you'd like to remove it (and make the other changes in the edit), there is an ongoing RfC to discuss it. Thanks. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If someone on the page for Sky says that the sky is neon-green, should we hold a discussion/RFC to decide whether the sky is green, or should someone just change it? You are free to look at my sources, which are also detailed in the many talk page discussions which have been abandoned/bogged down. Pyramids09 (talk) 10:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You did not provide any sources. Maybe it's worth sharing them in the very much still ongoing RfC? Smallangryplanet (talk) 11:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like I did not import my sources properly. Feel free to look at my other revision, where my sources are detailed (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zionism&oldid=1263196513). Cheers. Pyramids09 (talk) 21:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Pyramids09 that's the edit @Selfstudier was referring to in the previous topic, so I'll repeat their question: Is it your impression that the ongoing RFC is a consensus for your edit? Smallangryplanet (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is the second time, see the preceding section, a clear case of WP:DISRUPTIVE editing. Selfstudier (talk) 12:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]