User talk:DMH223344

June 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

You are repeatedly removing sourced, long-standing content from Israeli-Palestinian conflict, despite being reverted for it. We don't force our views on others instead of gaining consensus. Doing this again and again, while even incoporating incivil comments as you did here ("thoughtless"), is disruptive. Please stop and gain consensus for your controversial deletions. HaOfa (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No concrete points have been brought against my specific edits. Please raise them and bring sources, otherwise you're WP:NOTHERE DMH223344 (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When removing long-standing, sourced material, it is the remover's responsibility to gain consensus for their actions. I see you continue to remove material anyway. These removals have been reverted multiple times now. I ask you again to stop. HaOfa (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's interesting that your revert of my work has a summary of −13,428 characters. Please be serious. DMH223344 (talk) 16:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

This edit is unacceptable for two reasons: it directly contradicts the provided reliable sources, and rewrites history. If you're not sufficiently familiar with the history of the Jewish people (who have been described as an ethnos or nation centuries and possibly millennia before Zionism), consider editing other topics instead. Per WP:CIR, please try to improve your editing. HaOfa (talk) 06:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification of EC rules

Non EC users are explicitly allowed to submit edit requests to a talk page, just fyi 174.247.81.139 (talk) 20:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you weren't being needlessly snarky you'd likely get a better response. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Referral from the Artibration Enforcement noticeboard regarding behavior in Palestine-Israel articles and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks,

— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics: post-1992 American politics

Information icon You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Binksternet (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is IOHANNVSVERVS. Thank you.

I mentioned you in my statement. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 22:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, i find these things incomprehensible. What is happening here? Is the daniel guy trying to get you banned from the topic area for violating 1rr? DMH223344 (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics: Arab–Israeli conflict

Information icon You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

One of the rules (and this showed up on your screen when you edited Zionism) is that you get to revert once every 24 hours. Drmies (talk) 02:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I saw you removed the NPOV tag I put on Zionism. I don't think it's kosher to remove the tag while there are extensive and robust discussions, seconded and thirded and fourthed, about the NPOV issues. However, I'm not sure how consensus required intersects with the tag. I would assume that consensus required doesn't mean that challenging a tag means that the tag need an affirmative consensus, but maybe it does. Either way though, since I just dropped 17k bytes on the talk, mostly of quotes, could you kindly restore the NPOV tag? Andre🚐 00:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete short form references in Zionism

Hi DMH223344. You added two sets of broken references to the Zionism article. The first was "Shafir 1996" in this edit[1], and the second was "Cleveland 2010" in this edit[2]. Short form references such as those created by {{sfn}} are just hyperlinks to full cites elsewhere in the article, the are not valid references on their own. See the template documentation. Could you add the required cites to the Zionism#Works cited section of the article. You may not be able to see the errors you are causing, as they are off by default. You can turn them on by following the instructions here Category:Harv and Sfn template errors. If you're have any questions please just ask. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:29, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this tip, i hadn't caught that. I will fix it asap. DMH223344 (talk) 19:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, what does "Just realised these sae references not a book, they require page number or similar" mean? The cited Gorny ref is a book, so I'm confused by this edit summary. DMH223344 (talk) 19:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry that's just gibberish!! I meant to say "Just realised these references are from a book" not "Just realised these sae references not a book". -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

“why delete this instead of put it in quotes?”

Hey, i did actually do that in the other article iirc and they still removed it and deleted the revision Stephan rostie (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

weird, deleted revision? in any case, lets see what happens now DMH223344 (talk) 17:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from editing Zionism

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating the one-revert rule at Zionism (revert 1 & revert 2) after previous warnings, you have been blocked temporarily from editing that article. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 1RR violation was due to this edit? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zionism&oldid=1250116799
The editor whose change i reverted approved of my edit (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DMH223344#%E2%80%9Cwhy_delete_this_instead_of_put_it_in_quotes?%E2%80%9D)
Fine to get blocked for a week since anyway I am focused on other things, but this seems a bit brutal, no? DMH223344 (talk) 01:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Callanecc I should ask you though, am I still allowed to participate in talk page discussions? DMH223344 (talk) 01:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You've already been warned twice in a few months about edit warring and 1RR in this topic area so I would expect that you are being very careful. That does not seem to be the case. Yes, it's only a block from directly editing the Zionism article so you can still edit the talk page and discussions elsewhere. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you forgot...

...to sign you edit at Talk:Israel#Discussion_(RfC), cheers, Huldra (talk) 23:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, signed DMH223344 (talk) 00:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine-Israel articles 5 arbitration case opened

You offered a statement in an arbitration enforcement referral. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Evidence. Please add your evidence by 23:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC), which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism arbitration procedure

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Dispute over the lead of the Zionism article and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Michael Boutboul (talk) 17:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request for another arbitration case has now been declined. SilverLocust 💬 18:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cite missing from Zionism

Hi DMH223344. You added a short form reference for "Goldberg 2009" to Zionism, but there is no matching cite in the article. Could you add the required cite to the sources section. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 17:15, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine-Israel articles 5 updates

You are receiving this message because you are on the update list for Palestine-Israel articles 5. The drafters note that the scope of the case was somewhat unclear, and clarify that the scope is The interaction of named parties in the WP:PIA topic area and examination of the WP:AE process that led to two referrals to WP:ARCA. Because this was unclear, two changes are being made:

First, the Committee will accept submissions for new parties for the next three days, until 23:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC). Anyone who wishes to suggest a party to the case may do so by creating a new section on the evidence talk page, providing a reason with WP:DIFFS as to why the user should be added, and notifying the user. After the three-day period ends, no further submission of parties will be considered except in exceptional circumstances. Because the Committee only hears disputes that have failed to be resolved by the usual means, proposed parties should have been recently taken to AE/AN/ANI, and either not sanctioned, or incompletely sanctioned. If a proposed party has not been taken to AE/AN/ANI, evidence is needed as to why such an attempt would have been ineffective.

Second, the evidence phase has been extended by a week, and will now close at 23:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC). For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dershowitz

I'm curious about this comment. Can you explain further? Is this info already on wikipedia? VR (Please ping on reply) 22:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry about the uninformative comment. Basically Dershowitz's book The Case for Israel is widely understood to be fraudulent and largely plagiarized from another fraudulent book, From Time Immemorial by Joan Peters. DMH223344 (talk) 22:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vice regent: DMH223344 (talk) 22:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]