User talk:Ijustreadbooks

Welcome!

Hello, Ijustreadbooks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Itsmejudith (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Ijustreadbooks, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Moswento ^talky 09:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ijustreadbooks. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 14:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Bert Bell

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Hu12 (talk) 01:49, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ijustreadbooks. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 05:02, 20 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hmm

"Oh well, I guess I just made an idiot of myself. I just blasted another user on the Bert Bell talk page and the Bert Bell page. If you think that your source meets Wikipedia criteria, then I prolly need your help in fixing the article and making amends with the other user." —User talk:Eagles247#bert bell.

Interesting how that never happened. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bert Bell/GA1

Hello! I have reviewed the GA nomination of the Bert Bell article and placed it on hold pending resolution of some issues. You can see my comments at the GA page linked above. Thanks, Resolute 03:06, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ping? I see now that you have really not edited since the start of February. I will see if anyone in WP:NFL is willing to complete the review. Cheers, Resolute 20:41, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go Phightins! picked up the review, and I have passed the article. Excellent work! Regards, Resolute 23:45, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Robson

Hi there, can I recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Doing test edits in the sandbox may help too. Thanks a lot. Richard Apple (talk) 23:30, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response on my talk page. Again, can I suggest you do some test edits in the sand box? This makes it easier for other editors to track your changes, in the event some may need to be reverted (like mine). Thanks again. Richard Apple (talk) 23:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oct. 2013

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

My apologies to you. Having some more time available to me today, it's clear to me after looking at both of your contributions that you are not Catherine Heubscher. I've posted a note to that effect on the AN/I thread. I'm sorry to have reached the wrong conclusion last night. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sink the prose!

I read the Bismarck page, noticed your comments on the talk page and felt a pang of empathy. Lucky for me that most of my writing is about the Great War, which no bugger reads anyway. I don't have much trouble with people trying to interpolate prose, which doesn't scan or make sense. ;O)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ijustreadbooks. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]