User talk:IQual

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9

This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

A page you started (Martin Válovčan) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Martin Válovčan, IQual!

Wikipedia editor Robvanvee just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Could do with some expansion. Otherwise, good job!

To reply, leave a comment on Robvanvee's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

MFK Dukla Banská Bystrica

Ahoj, vsimol som si ze si davnejsie vytvoril stranku MFK Dukla Banská Bystrica, nemohlo by sa pokracovat v povodnej stranke, s tym ze by sa tam doplnila fuzia s Kremnickou a premenovanie na MFK Dukla[1]? Pride mi to ako logicke pokracovanie povodneho klubu s mierne uprevenym nazvom a podobnym logom[2]. Co si o tom myslis?

(Svk fan) 23:10, 2 May 2018 (CET)

References

1. https://bbonline.sk/foto-novy-klub-mfk-dukla-na-zaciatok-pripravy-vyhral-turnaj-v-priechode/
2. http://tj-sk-kremnicka.futbalnet.sk/

Cau, tak ono to je zlozitejsie s tymi nasimi klubami, tusim dukla mala velke dlhy, preto uz nemohla pokracovat... kremnicka sa preto obetovala aby sa zachranila znama znacka, urcite to dava logiku ze je to pokracovatel dukly bb... chcelo by to nejake vyjadrenie od kompetetnych z klubu ako to vlastne s duklou je... ci je to uplne novy klub ci pokracovatel dukly pomocou licencie kremnicky...a asi by sme mali diskusiu preniest do SVK casti wiki nakolko tato je ENGLISH :) (IQual) 03:06, 3 June 2018 (CET)

Ak vies kde tak to tam kludne otvor, ja na tu Slovensku az tak velmi nechodim :) (Svk fan) 22:02, 3 June 2018 (CET)

Podla tohto clanku to vyzera ze kluby sa spojili, takze by som to videl ako pokracovanie znacky Dukla.[1] (Svk fan) 15:07, 6 June 2018 (CET)

cau (Svk fan), -tak asi to tak bude, je to podobny pripad ako ked FC Licartovce zachranili vtedajsie MFK Kosice...takze skusim to prepojit opat na dukla s tym ze nazov sa zmeni a v historii uvediem zlucenie dvoch klubov pod znackou MFK Dukla BB. Do celoštátnej súťaže sa vďaka Dukle vracia slávna značka. Neobávate sa negatívnych reakcií, vzhľadom na to, že Banskú Bystricu zachránilo jedine spojenie s Kremničkou? „Kremnička bola prakticky farmou Dukly, pôsobí tú gro hráčov i trénerov z Banskej Bystrice. Je dôležité, že sa zachovala značka, pretože keby sa to tu rozpadlo, neviem, ako by to dopadlo s futbalom v Banskej Bystrici. Takto môžeme v horizonte niekoľkých rokov uvažovať aj nad návratom medzi elitu.“ (IQual) 17:30, 6 June 2018 (CET)

Uz som to prehodil (okrem nazvu), bude treba to nove MFK zmazat aby sa dal stary FK premenovat (Svk fan) 13:07, 15 June 2018 (CET)

Nomination of Zdenko Filípek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zdenko Filípek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zdenko Filípek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ladislav Hirjak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ladislav Hirjak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladislav Hirjak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Martin Gomola

Hello, IQual. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Martin Gomola, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Jackuliak

Hello, IQual. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Jackuliak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adam Danko

Hello, IQual. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adam Danko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lukáš Šimko

Hello, IQual. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lukáš Šimko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Artúr Musák

Hello, IQual. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artúr Musák, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Juritka

Hello, IQual. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Juritka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marek Teplan

Hello, IQual. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marek Teplan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matúš Digoň for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matúš Digoň is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matúš Digoň until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dominik Ferenčič for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dominik Ferenčič is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominik Ferenčič until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. https://profutbal.sk/clanok/226837-dukla-sa-vracia-do-celostatnej-sutaze-domovsky-stanok-zatial-nema