User talk:ILoveCaracas

Welcome!

Hello, ILoveCaracas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! South Nashua (talk) 06:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Castro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spanish, Lineage and Noble (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal

Hello, i think it is appropriate to mention all the caves in a template like this. That is why the readers visit the template page. 185.43.229.136 (talk) 03:12, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied you on my talk page. 185.43.229.136 (talk) 03:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sigüenza Cathedral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Capital, Atrium, Crossing and Corpus Christi

Torralba and Ambrona (archaeological site) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Channel and Castanea

List of aqueducts in the Roman Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bolonia

Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cozia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Santuario de Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe (Guadalajara, Jalisco)

Hi, I'm Abishe. ILoveCaracas, thanks for creating Santuario de Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe (Guadalajara, Jalisco)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Hello ILoveCaracas: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I've had to revert you

Hello, I'm really sorry to have to revert your edits, so restoring the redirect on the page for Cruz del Campo to Via Crucis to the Cruz del Campo. We can't have two virtually identical articles, especially where one of them has no citations at all. Now, I'm no expert, and it maybe that Cruz del Campo is the better name to use. In which case, please don't revert again, but do discuss your concerns/wishes for it on the Talk page for Via Crucis to the Cruz del Campo. Of course, you can also merge content into that article, irrespective of whether its name is changed, or not. I hope this makes sense, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 20:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to revert this. If you would like to create a new article, please create in in Draft-space so it can be reviewed. And, as Nick Moyes says, it needs to have references, and it can't be a duplicate of an existing article. I suggest creating an article at Draft:Cruz del Campo, where you are free to work on it until it is ready for review. If you are trying to do something different, please explain here and I will respond. Bradv 03:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bradv, may I just say in ILC's defense that, following an appeal from them on my Talk Page last night, explaining these were about two different but closely related topics, I did give them the authority to immediately revert my reversion. I had intended to then go back and immediately assess whether there was merit in retaining two separate articles. However I was caught up in events from an abusive editor, and have not had that chance. I do suspect that merging into one might be for the best. Can I leave to you both to resolve, or is extra input still needed? Happy New Year to both, Nick Moyes (talk) 10:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why sometimes broken English and other times not?

Sometimes you are inserting broken English (e.g. [1] and "Are two different articles"[2] rather than "There are" or "There ought to be") but other times add considerable volumes of good English ([3]). Is there any particular reason for this? I am mostly asking because I want to make sure there are no copyright violations. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the english, i translate from wikipedia in spanish or wikipedia in french (i know both languages) using google traductor then I change it as best I can (I also have a good level of English), and that is the result--ILoveCaracas (talk) 06:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Camino Real de Tierra Adentro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to English and French

Occitania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Provençal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Occitania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Catalan, Basque Country and Our Country

Castile and León (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Celtic and Ávila

Andalusia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jaén

Homo heidelbergensis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Atapuerca

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Why did you do this? If you look at most monasteries, the titles here are in English not in Spanish or any other language. Before you make these moves, I suggest you check first with users who contributed to the artcile. Maragm (talk) 06:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please notify other editors before making moves such as this one. Most of the articles on the title "duke" are named as such, for example Duke of York, Duke of Somerset, etc. It is not necessary to move something that is correct to begin with.Maragm (talk) 11:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cruz del Campo (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mortee was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cruz del Campo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cruz del Campo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mortee (talk) 07:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman bridge of Talamanca de Jarama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Award

Hello! sent you an award on ur profile. Have a good day! XLPeeker99p9 (talk) 12:46, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endovelicus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtiberian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not include the image of the architecture of Rogelio Salmona?

Why not include the image of the architecture of Rogelio Salmona?. His works are highly representative of Colombian architecture at the end of the twentieth century. There are many images of the architecture of Cartagena in other sections. Colombia is not only Cartagena. --JShark (talk) 03:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• According to the article there is already information about the military architecture of the cities of the colonial period.

Architecture during the period of conquest and colonization is mainly derived of adapting European styles to local conditions, and Spanish influence, especially Andalusian and Extremaduran, can be easily seen.[317] When Europeans founded cities two things were making simultaneously: the dimensioning of geometrical space (town square, street), and the location of a tangible point of orientation.[318] The construction of forts was common throughout the Caribbean and in some cities of the interior, because of the dangers that represented the English, French, and Dutch pirates and the hostile indigenous groups.[319] Churches, chapels, schools, and hospitals belonging to religious orders cause a great urban impact.[320] Baroque architecture is used in military buildings and public spaces.[321] Marcelino Arroyo, Francisco José de Caldas and Domingo de Petrés were great representatives of neo-classical architecture.

--JShark (talk) 03:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Why did you redirect this page? Do you plan to do this to other pages of towns in various Spanish provinces? It would be appreciated that before you move or redirect pages which you did not create to check first and get some consensus. The original name was perfectly ok and there was no need to move it. Maragm (talk) 08:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I live in Spain, so I'm familiar with the geography here. In the Spanish wiki, it's Borja (Zaragoza) and it should be the same here. I should hope that you, do not do as you say and start changing the title of other articles on Spanish cities and towns. Maragm (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also see that you added a lot of text to the article on Aragon which is a translation from es.wiki, without indicating that it is a translation. For license purposes, you must indicate tha whenever you translate from another wiki project. Maragm (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure, y yo me chupo el dedo. Maragm (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read this page: Wikipedia:Requested moves. Maragm (talk) 04:55, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to contest this move. There were quite a few Cortes de León, as you can see in the Spanish wiki: in 1020, 1037, 1135, 1189, 1208, 1342, 1349 and, the one in 1188 which was particularly important. I repeat, before you make any move, propose it in the article's discussion page. Maragm (talk) 12:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just because I said that "I can live with that" referring to the move you made of Borja, Zaragoza to Borja, Province of Zaragoza, does not mean I agree. I still think it was better the way it was before. When you write a letter in Spain, for example, to someone who lives in Borja, you would just put, Borja, Zaragoza and it is understood that it refers to the province, not the city. You don't have to remind me that things are done here differently than in the Spanish wiki...I have been editing here for some time. I'm glad you decided that the move on the Cortes de León was not correct since there were quite a few and the one in 1188 was particularly important and it is the one considered by UNESCO to be the "oldest documentary manifestation of the European parliamentary system". Again, I urge you not to make moves without first checking with other users, especially in the discussion page of the respective article or in the page I mentioned before for requested moves. Maragm (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Si necesitas ayuda en cualquier artículo me puedes contactar o enviar un correo. Saludos, Maragm (talk) 05:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Si vas a mi user talk page, en la columna a la izquierda, verás "email this user"...si pinchas ahí, me puedes escribir un correo. Hoy durante el día no te podré contestar porque voy a estar todo el día fuera de casa. Saludos, Maragm (talk) 06:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lo tienes que ver...en a izquierda de la página, donde está arriba el globo de wikipedia, pone Main page, más abajo una sección que dice "Tools", y ahí, aparece What links here, y si sigues, más abajo pone eso de email this user. Ahora tengo que salir. Maragm (talk) 07:30, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ILoveCaracas. You have new messages at Hhhhhkohhhhh's talk page.
Message added 08:46, 2 February 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 08:46, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aragon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natural park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monastery of San Juan de los Reyes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isabelline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cabo de Gata-Níjar Natural Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmic Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Niche edits

Hi ILoveCaracas. Apologies for the belated reply to your question posed in your edit summary from 6 January 2018 ("Why you delete my edits? if there 3 images referents to Italy") in Niche. The reason that I edited the article was to correct three issues that had recently arisen: (1) An entire phrase was deleted and replaced with a non-existent English word "eithed" by user 67.80.190.218 in December 2017. I restored the text. (2) A duplicate "See also" section was introduced in May 2017 which I edited back into a single section. (3) The lead Uffizi image, which very clearly illustrates the subject was replaced with one that less clearly illustrates a niche (I'm thinking of Wikipedia policy MOS:PERTINENCE).

At that time, it seemed that the best course of action would be to return the article to a previous state. However, because your main concern appears to be the display of new images that you prefer, I have created a new gallery of images, which I hope that you will find to be satisfactory. Thank you, and I look forward to your comments.  —Waldhorn (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a disagreement or a problem with someone's behavior, please read Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

If you have a disagreement or a problem with someone's behavior, please read Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. --JShark (talk) 23:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. As a first step, I suggest Wikipedia:Third opinion. --JShark (talk) 00:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Colombia edit war

Your recent editing history at Colombia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico edit: caption

I appreciate your desire to contribute to pages, but as has been raised in other talk pages, you have a tendency to overadd; not only in images, but also in captions. Some are needlessly long and I'm going to ask that you stop revering my changes that are meant to clean them up. And yes, sometimes in cleaning them I remove what I consider to be in excess for a caption, (see: here). The longest caption in the United States article is 37 words and yours, for this particular edit, is 54 words long—the thumb box is almost doubled by your caption. Beside the point that I find the cloak sentence to make the caption needlessly long, it's also unnecessary for captioning the image as people can go to the Our Lady of Guadalupe article and read about the cloak at the bottom of the Marian apparitions section.

Samgnzlz (talk) 06:17, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Maria de Montserrat Abbey, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enamel and Vault (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alcázar of Seville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Institut Nova Història

I have undone all your additions of Institut Nova Història in the articles where you added it un the "See also" section. I don't believe that it is appropriate to add it to articles such as in William Shakespeare, El Cid, Miguel de Cervantes, Christopher Columbus, etc. If you think that it should be added and do not agree with what I did, open a thread in the Village Pump to discuss it. Please do not add it again until consensus is reached. Maragm (talk) 06:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can bring it up here for discussion. Maragm (talk) 07:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You should move your comment in the Village Pump to the end of the page, not where you left it. Maragm (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Institut Nova Història for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institut Nova Història is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institut Nova Història until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Scolaire (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Basilica of Saints Justus and Pastor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Belfry

Seville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Viewer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Te has ganado esta medalla como reconocimiento por tus ediciones relacionadas a España.

		The Spain Barnstar of National Merit
		You won the barnstar of the Spanish National Merit for improving hundreds of articles related to Spain in the English Wikipedia. TechnicianGB (talk) 09:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Iglesia de San Lorenzo, Toledo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Church

Seville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gothic

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of the Puente de Triana

Hello, ILoveCaracas. I agree with you about the photo of the Puente de Triana that you restored. The other user thought it was pixelated, but it's the softening quality of the evening (or early morning) light. Carlstak (talk) 13:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop doing far-right propaganda

Hello, I'm Filiprino. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jaume Vives have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Filiprino (talk) 13:21, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You confuse 'far-right' with all about 'non-independence of catalonia'. User:Filiprino You are invited to a discussion about your war editions. Here Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Edit_wars_in_Tabarnia_artcles_and_related--ILoveCaracas (talk) 13:34, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of that, I have moved the related VPM discussion here. Erpert ^blah, blah, blah... 15:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you indefinitely, as you have identified yourself on the Twitter linked on your userpage as User:Vvven, an account which was indefinitely blocked by Diannaa (courtesy ping) in Oct 2017 for copyright violations. That account has not been unblocked, and therefore your use of this account is block evasion. If you want to appeal your unblock, you must appeal via that account, because it is the original. An appeal from this account will not be accepted. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Castile and León

Template:Largest cities of Castile and León has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cruz del Campo

Hello, ILoveCaracas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cruz del Campo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 16:47, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Child marriage in Ethiopia

A tag has been placed on Category:Child marriage in Ethiopia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 10:13, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Child marriage in Morocco

A tag has been placed on Category:Child marriage in Morocco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 14:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buildings and structures in Plasencia

A tag has been placed on Category:Buildings and structures in Plasencia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:40, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buildings and structures in Saelices

A tag has been placed on Category:Buildings and structures in Saelices requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buildings and structures in Segorbe

A tag has been placed on Category:Buildings and structures in Segorbe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football clubs in Paterna

A tag has been placed on Category:Football clubs in Paterna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sport in Paterna

A tag has been placed on Category:Sport in Paterna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Castile and León

Template:Largest cities of Castile and León has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Pre-Roman peoples in Spain

Template:Pre-Roman peoples in Spain has been nominated for merging with Template:Pre-Roman peoples in Portugal. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Irecorsan (talk) 14:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]