User talk:IHelpWhenICan/Archive 10
Grammy Awards Task Force Update
Re:Naw, I just like the picture. How've you been? Long time no talk. D: ℥nding·start 04:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC) Welcome backWelcome back IHWIC! I'm so happy to see you back :) How are you doin'? Novice7 (talk) 07:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
CountdownPlease do not get me wrong. Actually i am not a native speaker of English? Did you mean it is your favorite song? Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Put your hands upI know you're fixing the article hence i've helped you out. My edits remove the unsourcesable and unverifiable crap from the album as well as copy editing much of the material. Though it looks like i've deleted masses from the article I've actually reinforced its notability by leaving the most verfiable and encylopedic of information. it is upon this which you should continue to add information. In your absense from editing the article it became a complete mess, the stuff within is not worthy of an article on wikipedia at all. How can you expect to build a GA upon a shaky foundation? Rather than try to source numerous unclaimed facts to produce a fluffy airy article it makes more sense to make a concise but accurate and factual article. It is possible for very small articles to become GAs (see Grown Woman for example). I actually really like the song... A LOT!" — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Re: Front page templateYou mean my profile page? I copied the template from another Wikipedia contributor, whose username I can no longer remember. I do love its appearance, however. I have noticed on some computers the text/numbered lists are centered, which is not my preference, though I cannot seem to determine where the code needs to be adjusted to leave the text left-justified. I would recommend copying and pasting the template into a blank page then replacing the content with your own (or is this for a WikiProject?). --Another Believer (Talk) 15:17, 13 July 2011 (UTC) HeyHow come the GA review for Only Girl has stalled? Calvin • 999 18:35, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Songs by StarsmithCategory:Songs by Starsmith, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 21:14, 14 July 2011 (UTC) My talk pageI'm sorry, but I have absolutely no interest in dealing with whatever content dispute you are asking for my input in. I apologize if my bluntness offended you.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC) Help with editor?Would you mind helping me explain to User:Theodorerichert that his recent edits to Speak Now are unencyclopedic and innacurate? He insists on making up total sales figures for an album using two sources, one article from Dec. 16, 2010 supporting total sales up to that date, and another mid-year total for its sales up to July 2011; his revision "The album sold 2,960,000 copies in the United States in 2010<ref>http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/71209/chart-watch-extra-eminem-does-it-again/</ref> and 563,000 in 2011<ref>http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/retail/top-selling-albums-of-2011-so-far-1005267092.story</ref> for a total of 3,523,000". I've had an issue with him before, as he was not responsive and offensive ([1]), so I doubt any more messages to his talk page by me would help. I'd appreciate anything you can add to this. Dan56 (talk) 21:12, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Re: Jennifer & Mark.I know. :( It's pretty sad. I thought they were pretty solid. I never necessarily thought they were a great couple together, but what they had seemed to be special. I hope she doesn't go the Madonna route... Oh and it's funny how you write on my talk page when I was about to write on yours and ask if you know if Aphrodite World Tour is over. :L ℥nding·start 03:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Pretty much never. xD Well not pretty much, exactly NEVER. I haven't heard it. Honestly, I don't like her music. Yes, her voice is AMAZING, but the songs she records are just blah for me. ℥nding·start 02:51, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Hello, IHelpWhenICan. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the ℥nding·start 03:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
End of TimeHi. Do you like the song? Jivesh • Talk2Me 09:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Your recent revertAbout this, I'm not sure whether your action there is appropriate. I see you reverted because I'm a new user. Is there any policy which forbids new users from taking part in CFD discussions? I would have thought the closing admin would have taken my history (or lack of) into account, without your blanket revert? Office of Disinformation 11:37, 17 July 2011 (UTC) You may also want to take a look at WP:BITE and WP:TPO, as both apply here. - SudoGhost™ 11:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Speak Now issue, talkI opened a talk page post at Talk:Speak_Now#SYN:_Total_sales regarding the issue I talked to you about before, since another editor has addressed it the other way. Would you mind adding your thoughts on the matter? Dan56 (talk) 19:57, 17 July 2011 (UTC) How come you guys won't even investigate my sources, they are both the billboard. This is a routine calculation. Two numbers from the same source added together dosen't violate any rules. Billboard.com=Billboard.biz. You just have to pay for most of the charts on billboard.biz and billboard.com only has a few charts some of which are just top 25 or 40 however they are identical to the charts on billboard.biz and numbers are from the same source Neilsen Soundscan. According to Neilsen Soundscan Speak Now sold 2,960,000 in 2010 http://www.billboard.com/#/news/eminem-s-recovery-is-2010-s-best-selling-1004137895.story also according Neilsen Soundscan it sold 563,000 in the first half of 2011 http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/retail/top-selling-albums-of-2011-so-far-1005267092.story so it MUST have sold at least 3,523,000 so far. How is this so hard to understand?Theodorerichert (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC) If you 'really don't give a rat's ass' then you shouldn't have changed my edits. And I have tride to knock myself out several times before and it never seams to work. Any tips on method? LOL Theodorerichert (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Re: WellBut of course. ℥nding·start 06:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Only Girl GANIf you are too busy to complete the review then could someone else take it over please? Calvin • 999 09:56, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Run the WorldGood catch. BTW, why are you still up at 4am lol? —Andrewstalk 08:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Amy winehouse.pngThanks for uploading File:Amy winehouse.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Page of Chittoor SubramanyamHi, I spent nearly 8 hours to update the bio-data of this legendary singer...now I have added references too... Can you please restore the valuable information that I contributed along with the picture that I posted? Thanks, Ravi Akula — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviakula (talk • contribs) 14:30, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Regards, Ravi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviakula (talk • contribs) 14:52, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Sure, I will ensure that for all verifiable portions I will add the references. Note that this contribution is being enriched by getting information from various old printed material on this great legend. Can you now remove the two error banners? Thanks, Ravi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviakula (talk • contribs) 15:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Look, I have added citations where applicable. some of the information are original and from source (printed material). It is impossible to cross reference every bit of info. I am sure you understand that not every information is available on the net and I am making an effort to provide information on this legend. If you dont understand, then let me know how I can delete this contribution. Thanks and have a nice day. Regards, Ravi Akula — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviakula (talk • contribs) 15:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Only Girl GANDo you think you could have the entire review completed by tomorrow? Because this is taking wayyy longer than it should. Calvin • 999 20:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia