User talk:IHaveBecauseOfLocks

July 2014

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They are being signed automatically:) But to make this more aesthetic I already sign it myself.IHasBecauseOfLocks (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you are a new user. Please be aware that Wikipedia has strict rules on what is called personal attacks; you should be very careful about labelling other users vandals even if you think their edits were misguided. And article talk pages is not the right place for such discussions anyway. I understand you are very engaged in that plane article, but please stay calm and write carefully and take advices from other users. That will help you in the longer run. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I also think this will probably happen. So what is the right place for such discussions? IHasBecauseOfLocks (talk) 18:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may address other users or administrators at their talk pages, like I did to you now. Preferably in a polite way, then. Otherwise, there is something called Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents (ANI) if you want a broader public. However, consider if this is your priority now. It's not always that easy to handle for a new user; I have during my own 2 years at Wikipedia never brought anybody to ANI. At ANI the behaviour of all parties may be examined; some complaints will also be more or less ignored if they aren't considered important by other editors. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 18:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I notice an administrator has brought the article protection to ANI. So you may comment there if you want. Just be careful about calling anyone for vandals. (For your general information We also have a special forum for vandal reports, but that is just for cases where they have been duly warned, and also one forum for reporting edit warring. But all of this takes some time to learn). Regards, Iselilja (talk) 18:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. As for now I am quite calm, because informations I saw deleted are back again in the article. By now the general community has never let me down.IHasBecauseOfLocks (talk) 00:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IHasBecauseOfLocks, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi IHasBecauseOfLocks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Username change

Hello. I saw you asked at another page about a possible username change. You may request it here. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 17:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have done that thanks to you. But it is strange. At the top of the page I stiil have my old username. IHasBecauseOfLocks (talk) 12:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And even in the signature is the old one. IHasBecauseOfLocks (talk) 12:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, seems like your old account name was activated again 13 august. I asked buraucrats for advice here. Hope they will be able to help. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 13:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• @IHasBecauseOfLocks: @IHaveBecauseOfLocks: please press special:Logout and then login with your new account name. The "IHas" account with few edits can be abandoned or used as an alternate account. –xeno^talk 13:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, now I have both of them. I din't try to log to the new one earlier. Thank you both. It was not a small grammar mistake. :) IHaveBecauseOfLocks (talk) 14:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

This is not a good start for someone who shows up after three years complete inactivity. This is essentially an unmotivated personal attack. If you continue, I will possibly need to block your account. Thank you for understanding--Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Your IP 83.21.237.37 can also be blocked if you use it for further abuse. Bishonen | talk 20:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

I wish there would be at least one constructive answer about matter of the article edited as it all started with accusation of me being not constructive since so many another accusations pop up . I am not interestend in mere mumbo jumbo. We go back to being constructive or we end this way or another.

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 21:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So I have read your reverting edit. And u are wrong. I am not backing up my edit with accusations. They are. I am backing up with understanding of Polish language which is the language of the source of the article.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 21:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Withpl.png

Thanks for uploading File:Withpl.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^(Talk • Contribs • Owner) 08:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Withpl.png

A tag has been placed on File:Withpl.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curt ^内蒙 16:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Withpl.png

The file File:Withpl.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Outdated file with no valid use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curt ^内蒙 15:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General Sanctions Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What was this about?

Irtapil (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IT was almost 4 years ago. I do not remember why this general sanctions notice was posted here. But hm seeing this made me wonder if back then the controversi topics were treated differently? Was back then the same policy of not allowing users without extended confirmed rights? IHaveBecauseOfLocks (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azzam al-Ahmad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you must have made 500 edits to make any edits related to the Palestine/Israel conflict anywhere in Wikipedia, except for making edit requests on article talk pages. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@IHaveBecauseOfLocks This is related to the above restriction. Please exercise caution when editing and make sure not to make any edits in the topic area before meeting the necessary requirements. 33ABGirl (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Casa Rosada

added a link pointing to The Sun

Fernando de la Rúa

added a link pointing to The Sun

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Casa Rosada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]