I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Sam & Cat episodes, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The article at es:Anexo:Episodios de Sam & Cat uses IMDb as its primary source of information. IMDb does not meet the WP:RS standards on enwiki as it is edited by anonymous users and there is no fact checking. See WP:RS/IMDB for more. Also when you translate from another wiki you must still provide references for future ep info. Wikis can't be used as references.Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Sam & Cat episodes, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wikis which include all wikias and wikipedia itself can't be used as references as all additions are made by anonymous people and there is no fact checking. Info in wikias and wikipedia that are referenced can be used but the supporting reference there must also be used in the article here. Nickandmore is not a reliable source as demonstrated by the fact that the info you added from that source conflicted with an official episode guide. See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_101#nickandmore.com for moreGeraldo Perez (talk) 16:09, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:GNG Under ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a passing mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material" And ""Sources" should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected.Sources do not have to be available online and do not have to be in English. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability."
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
