User talk:Husond/Archive 5Re: Happy birthdayBig thanks for the birthday wishes! Your kindness is greatly appreciated! --Merovingian ※ Talk 22:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC) RE: ThanksNo problem. Congrats! --NMChico24 23:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Re:QuestionsDynamic IP's are constantly changing. It's usually hard to tell, but sometimes looking at page history of certain shows users with almost completely similar IP addresses. It's usually from that, that you are able to establish if a user is using a dynamic IP. Static is just never changing, so it's not really hard to tell (since they will usually stay vandal if they are always a vandal; or good if they are always good). Also, regarding blocks...I just have to tell you that I am one of the hardest blocking admins on Wikipedia. For new users who vandalize more than 5 pages, I automatically indefblock them. For first-time vandals, I usually deal out a 31-hour or a 48-hour block. After that I go to either a 99-hour block or a week block. If I see a repeated abuser, I usually deal out a block ranging from 1 month to 6 months. Also, keep an eye on collateral damage which can come from blocks to shared IP's like that belonging to school and other institutions. Nishkid64 01:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Thank you for your inputI greatly appreciate you opinions and value your perspectives. Your vantage point enables me to better conceptualize Wikipedia’s purpose. I will watch this site in the future to determine if it becomes more notable, however I won’t lose any sleep if it is not included in that particular article. However, I did find it to be quite hilarious, yet I understand that humor is not a criterion for adding a link to an article. Look forward to hearing from you, 69.167.102.181 Congratulations!My pleasure, and congratulations! 02:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayjg (talk • contribs) Survey QHave you ever been to the southern hemisphere? Respond here Deadline for entries is December 15th, PST. AstroBoy 03:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Well Done!I just wanted to congratulate you on your adminship. You really deserved it. I'm sorry I didn't vote; I wasn't aware it was happening, but I would have given my wholehearted Support! I wish you the best of luck with your new tools, and I am sure you will continue to be a great editor! Thanks, Jam01 07:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Australian collaboration of the fortnightHi. You voted for United States-Australia relations for WP:ACOTF. It has been selected, so please improve the article in any way you can. Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 13:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Re:Zack GoodrichGo ahead and salt the page. It's been recreated multiple times, and it seems at this point, that there is no need for the article. Discussing the protection for the page is not necessary in most cases. Just as a tip, if I see an article has been recreated more than 4 times on Wikipedia in the past 6 months, I will protect the deleted page. If I see an article recreated more than two times in a month, then I also will go ahead and recreate the page. Nishkid64 14:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC) RfA thanks
SysopnessGlad you became a sysop. If I had known I would have supported you. Good job. Randfan 19:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Whoa, hey, you became an admin? Congrats, pal.--SUITWhat!? 42! 22:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!Thanks for the nice welcome to Esperanza... :) I think I will be able to participate often, as I have lots of free time. Marialadouce | parlami 22:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
The user has the spam links on their userpage. I'm not really sure how to deal with the userpage of others. But should the spam links be removed? --Lijnema 01:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
So you have a mop now...Congratulations! I would've fought to the death if people had said you weren't worthy, as they would likely have been insane. At any rate, you said if we had questions... *ahem* Mr. Administrator, I have a request. I would greatly appreciate it if you could be so kind as to block the user User:editoratlarge, which has not as yet made any contributions. It was created in September 2006, far after I created my own account. I would greatly appreciate the favour. Sincerely and thankfully yours, — Editor at Large(speak) 03:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC) :-D
RfA Thanks
Husond - if you have a chance, can you keep an eye on the vandals on Marco Rullo? I've reverted a few times, and I think you've already warned them. Thanks. --TheOtherBob 05:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Page protectionThanks re Transmigration Program. I haven't used the SP template before, and I was just about to go out and coudln't hang around playing games with vandals. Yeah, I have been putting the test1 etc templates on people's pages. Neither of them edited again by the way. Thanks --Merbabu 13:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for your input!Thank you for taking part in my RfA. The RfA was not successful, mostly because I did a pretty bad job of presenting myself. I'll run again sometime in the next few months, in the hopes that some will reconsider. In the meantime, one of the projects I'm working on is A Wikimedia Administrator's Handbook. This is a wikibook how-to guide intended to help new administrators learn the ropes, as well as to simply "demystify" what adminship entails. If you are an administrator, please help out with writing it, particularly on the technical aspects of the tools. Both administrators and non-administrators are welcome to help link in and sort all of the various policies regarding the use of these tools on wikipedia in particular (as well as other projects: for example, I have almost no experience with how things work on wiktionary or wikinews). Users who are neither familiar with policy or the sysop tools could be of great help by asking questions about anything that's unclear. The goal is to get everything together in one place, with a narrative form designed to anticipate the reader's next question. A second project, related but not entailed, is a book on wikimedia in general, with a history of how various policies evolved over time, interesting trivia (e.g., what the heck was "wikimoney" about?), and a history of how the wikimedia foundation itself came about and the larger issues that occurred during its history (such as the infamous "Spanish Fork"). Again, thanks for your input on the RfA, and thanks in advance for any help you might be able to provide for the handbook. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 13:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC) FelicitaçõesWell done. You deserved to be an admin. Keep up the good work mate! --Asteriontalk 18:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC) db-r1I cannot find a reference to what the code db-r1 means for a page you have deleted. Could you please advise.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikelcummins (talk • contribs) Soap opera popular couplesI assume that when you deleted this you didn't know that it was originally "List of soap opera popular couples" and was listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of soap opera popular couples. The original author User:MrKing84 moved it, then blanked it and tagged it as a speedy delete. I closed the AfD and deleted the redirect. After that he went and prodded several (speedy tagged one) articles in violation of WP:POINT. I've left him a warning but would ask that you keep an eye on him as I'm going to be gone for a week. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Dang itDarn it, you beat me to the revert on the Molecule article. Good job.--Seadog 00:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Russell Brand ArticleThe Russell Brand article contains a large section titled 'Rape Claims', Russell Brand was in no way involved in this supposed rape. He was never accused or convicted of the rape and someone else was arrested for it. The section is one of the longest on the Russell Brand article, which is bad becuase Brand has had a successful career and the rape claim has no relevance or significance to him. The rape claims part first appeared a few months ago and was deleted and it made the article better but someone continues to re-add it. In my opinion the section is very long, irrelevant and inaccurate, my argument has been backed up in the Russell Brand disscussion page yet no-one has took notice of the criticism. I therefore think the section should not be there, the person actually arrested for the rape Trevor Lock has no mention of it in his article and I believe it has been added because of how successful he is and to tarnish his name. Hopefully you will understand where Im coming from and I hope you agree with me as this I believe will make the article better. 81.153.9.118 00:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks
And on a personal note, Congrats for beating me in the Class of 11/11/2006 most-supported sweepstakes. Enjoy your new powers and put them to good use... ~ trialsanderrors 05:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC) VandalDid it again. [1] Dev920 (Please peer review here.) 15:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Admin tools
AwardGood evening; if you remember away back some months ago you gave me a very appreciated (e) User Page Award. I have now changed the format of my userpage and would like to know if the award stil stands? You can see my new userpage here. I would appreciate you confirming on my talk page if the award still stands, as well as maybe a little comment on whether you like it or not? This would me much appreciated; have a nice night. Regards and Cheers SpongBobThank you for protecting this article from the AOL vandal Gnangarra 04:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Vandal IP 24.57.201.171 would not stopI noticed you already temporarily blocked the above IP once. After the block expired he/she is again continuing to vandalize articles such as McMaster University, University of Toronto and Brock University. Here is the History of this user's edits. Thx 218.102.81.232 01:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC) PortalsHey Husond, since you did such a great job on Portal:Iceland, I was wondering whether you could take some time out of your busy administrative duties (:p) to review some changes I've made to Portal:Chemistry? The changes I've made are in the history. I've also got some major changes in my sandbox, awaiting approval. Let me know what you think - I personally find the version in my sandbox to have an appropriate amount of information, but it does seem a little dense. Hope you're doing well. Cheers, riana_dzasta 03:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
RFA Thanks
SB.comFeel free to delete it in 7 days time. I just want a copy for friends to download and keep. Alyeska 01:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC) [Statement of gratitude]
Because people often complain that RfA thank-you messages are impersonal, I thought I'd give you the opportunity to create your own. -- tariqabjotu 03:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC) NotAWeasel[2] Just thought you'd like to know, given your block-then-unblock-AGF-jig :) Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 12:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Good JobHi Husond...Its me Arjun. I just want to congratulate you on becoming administrator (if I have not already) and to say you are doing a great job at the AIV. During the past the AIV was always clogged up but now is looking very small since you have joined the Admin group. Keep up the Great work.__Seadog ♪ 03:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Leung TingThank you for the help. This person is still vandalizing the page. After tagging their talk page, what is the next proceedure? --Mista-X 04:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC) They keep insisting apon inserting the POV into the article, so I have reported it @ WP:AIV. Thanks again for your help! --Mista-X 07:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Welcome to VandalProof!Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Husond! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (talk) 05:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for helping out against the vandalism whilst Gilbert's on the front page - it is appreciated! Adam Cuerden talk 15:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Idle chit chatHey Husond, we've not spoken in a while which is a shame, I've been busy in real life. And I don't care what those bloody exclusionists do, I'm talking to you here, and I don't need coffee, nor a lounge to do it. Anyway, I'm father of two now, my Wikison's I pit together in a epic fight for my attention (please don't tell child support), and it's quite fun. Like the Simpson's or something only with much more swears and personal attacks (please don't tell child support). I re-structured my page (so did you, I miss the Kracken and Card-boardy and Deputy Dog, tower looks great though) and by that I mean I moved all my junk to my FAQ section. My "pictures" still take pride of place though. I successfully got Vandal proof yesterday, but I'm still learning how to use it effectively. I like doing vandalism patrol because it's Damn funny. I crack up whenever I see: OMG! I HAV THIS FREND AND HE IZ LIK E GAY! LOL! LOLOLOLOL! Gold. I feel over stretched, so much to do and little time to do it. I'm in the process of getting my 85 or so pictures reviewed. It could get messy. See you around, Dfrg.msc 1 . 2 . 3 22:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your support!
CONJECTUREIn the article regarding Owen Chase there is a speculation of a ghost writer. Fine, as long as it conveys well that it is mere conjecture and not factual. I inserted "Perhaps" because it isn nothing but conjecture and not a known fact. That is not a "test" for a sandbox, it is a statement covering that the facts are not known in that conjectural area of that article. MAURY Explain!I don't understand! I insired several new interlinks in the page Troy, and even so I was accused to vandalism! WHY?! DIEGO RICARDO PEREIRA 13:28 19 November 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting that. He got you too and now it's on BJAODN. It's just my friend killing everything in his path. As are all the things on my talk page that have been reverted (including some from my own house! Oh, the agony!) Jorcogα 04:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC) Xie Xie (thanks!)Thanks for helping me block User:67.140.71.147 - I was surprised by the ferocity of his spamming - all told, I think he spammed nearly 20 articles in all before you blocked him, and all were to football and college related articles. Thank you! (xie xie is thanks in Chinese) =) –- kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 01:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) RE:RE: Zack GoodrichZack Goodrich is one of my best friends, and a fantastical animator. He is particularly annoyed at the fact he cannot make a page about himself/his work, as creation has been blocked...please could it be unblocked? JoshHood 10:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 21st November 2006 Re: Ryukyu Islands Move ProtectionHi Tariqabjotu. I was just requesting move protection for this article, it's good that you acted ahead. Could you also protect its talk page? I would but admins are not allowed to protect pages that they were editing. Regards.--Húsönd 04:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello again Tariqabjotu. You closed the move discussion on Talk:Árpád Élő as no consensus. However, someone had already moved the article to Arpad Elo. Thus, following your established result, should the article be moved back to Árpád Élő? Regards.--Húsönd 19:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
HelloI'm currently undergoing an Editor review, and am trying to get a large amount of replies. I am sending messages to those who left me a message on my talk page as a way of getting the word out. I encourage you to add your two cents to the review! Thanks for your time, and Happy Thanksgiving! FireSpike Editor Review! 20:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Happy Turkey Day!Happy Thanksgiving, Husond!!
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia