|
User talk:Hurricanehink/Archive 13Retirement for 2007It seems that WMO, didn't retire any names for 2007. So Dean and Felix, will be an addition, along with Emily, Cleo, Ethel, Edith to become Cat. 5, and not have it's name retired. Do you think that I should add the "Lack of Retirement" to their pages? EC (talk) 06:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC) GA nomination of Hurricane KennethI have asked for a second opinion of this article, but my review as is can be found on the talk page. Million_Moments (talk) 16:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Hello, you commented at the the recently closed FAC for The Last Temptation of Krust. It was closed with 2 comments and one "Support" after 2 weeks, and I'd like to start another FAC for it soon. During the FAC I had left a note on your talkpage that I had done my best to address the points you brought up in your comment at the FAC. Do you feel you could "Support" the article in its current status, if I started another FAC for it? Cirt (talk) 20:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Tropical Storm Vamei GA Sweeps Review: On Hold and Overview of Upcoming ReviewsYou may remember me as having reviewed a few of your GA nominations in the past. As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles to ensure their quality. I have reviewed Tropical Storm Vamei and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool) and because you are one of the leading members of the related WP. Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I will be reviewing all of the hurricane/tropical storm articles and if there are any issues concerning sourcing, fair use rationales, lead expansions, or other issues, I will be leaving a message on the talk pages of the main contributors and the WikiProject talk pages. If you prefer, I can leave all of the messages on a subpage or just the project's talk page if you prefer that. It is entirely up to you since you and your fellow editors. I'm sure I will become quite the thorn in your side for the issues I bring up, but I'm sure for many of the articles they still meet the criteria and will not need further corrections. I apologize if I appear over-bearing, but the quality of the articles is my priority. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
WIlmaI have a better version of WIlma at featured picture candidates. Can you come and look at it? Thanks: --*****Elena85****** 22:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Elena85 Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC) Billy joel pageDo you think you could come up with the track times for the Billy Joel Greatest hits pages? all the other songs have them except for greatest hits Vol.s I II and III. just wondering. thanks 209.56.33.10 (talk) 20:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: History of hurricanes in the CaribbeanWell, I personally decided to leave the article as a disambiguation page. I read the talk page, and I agreed that the article was poorly written and redundant. Additionally, it did not include Dean and Felix, which were obviously Caribbean systems. I think separate, specific pages (i.e. List of Florida hurricanes, List of Bermuda hurricanes, et al) are much more effective. These "regional" pages (similar to the Effects of Tropical Cyclone --- in --- pages) would be much better for the Caribbean, which is exceptionally diverse. I actually prefer those articles for all areas across the world that are affected by tropical cyclones. CVW (Talk) 23:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC) Recent FAC weak opposeYou recently expressed weak opposition to Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol's FAC. Several of the issues you cited have been addressed, and I have questions on some of them. Please see the article's nomination page for these comments. Codharris (talk) 21:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Re: The infoboxThe infobox was in my userspace. It is still there, but hidden. I don't want to work on anything if one or two editors decide they want the problems to stay in. For example, I would probably oppose a FAN for Cyclone Guba or any similar article because the color scale decided on members of this project is being used incorrectly in the article, and probably would confuse readers. You can't refuse to address issues because things are done a certain way traditionally. Anway, the template is still hidden in my userspace. It's about 1/6 to 1/4 complete, and I was still trying to address all of the little issues I could find in the articles. You are welcome to copy it elsewhere and work on it. Sorry, but it is not worth my time to work through bureaucracy created by a couple of people. Putting every package of goods up to a vote doesn't give a very good product. Someone's already rolling out the version of the template with a lot of issues left to address, and that was done by 'consensus.'Potapych (talk) 23:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Re: HenriAlthough the image can be cropped, I just didn't like the image, because there's nothing in it to show position (even though at least the Yucatan should be in that image.) Instead, I uploaded a GIBBS IR image of Henri, not only because of the land masses, but for size. Now that the 1979 images exist in the archive, I can find slightly better images of all storms this season (plus Ernesto of 82). On a side note, I'm starting to think the meteorological bureaus all over the world need a new rule: Never name tropical cyclones "Ivan". Each time one was, something unique (or bad) happened (80: Category 2 in Vince-territory, 98: one of four active hurricanes, 08: 80+ dead in Madagascar, 97: one of the most intense typhoons ever (with its partner Joan), and 2004's is apparent). Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 07:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Infobox Hurricane ImpactHey, what do you think about this? I think it would be helpful on the Effects of XX in X articles. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 13:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC) RFA 21916 AHS articleI noticed that your edit summary states the season still has two intense hurricanes prior to August. I think that's incorrect because the changes have been approved into the HURDAT best track. It isn't visible on some sites (i.e. Unisys Weather), but they're still waiting for the release of Erin's TCR. Essentially, the changes are official; some sites won't update data until the 2007 season's reports are completed. By the way, do you want to review my Hurricane Emilia (1994) article? I created it. I think it meets GA standards. CVW (Talk) 02:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC) List of wettest tropical cyclones in the United StatesI never realized a list needed this amount of text, just figured a list was a list. The problems you noted should all be solved now. Let me know what else it might need. This is a good learning experience...because now I have a better idea what it will take for List of wettest tropical cyclones by country to make FLC. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC) Hello. Do you want to collaborate with me and build this list? It's been consuming considerable time. You write excellent lists within short time spans, so I think you can finish this one. I can add additional information, too. We can also split the list by time period if it grows too long. Thanks! CVW (Talk) 02:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
WP:LOTDAt last look your RFA candidacy looked like it was going well. Good luck for the last 36 hours or so. As a regular voter at WP:LOTD, I thought I would mention that the voting time period is half way over. Your feedback would be helpful.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 03:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC) Hello. If you have any free time, could you please copyedit Opeth? It has been requested on the FAC that the article gets a copyedit. If you don't want to or simply can't please feel free not to, however it would be appreciated if you replied to me on my talk page if you can't. Thank you, —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 18:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Suggestions?Any more suggestions for Charley? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNobleSith (talk • contribs) 21:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC) Your RfACongratulations, you're now an administrator. Good luck with the mop! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC) The greatest thing you could ever get
CongratulationsCongratulations on your promotion to administrator. While my vote was neutral, I would've been dissapointed to see you be denied. Use those powers wisely....TheNobleSith (talk) 21:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
RfA congratsCongratulations. And if you don't get distracted by adminship, well, clearly Awadewit and I will have to resort to something underhanded -- like, er, well, I'm not sure what we could do. Anyway, congrats, and have fun with the new buttons, and good luck on getting to the top of WBFAN -- it will be good to have someone at the top whose articles were all written under the modern standards. Mike Christie (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
CongratsI remembered you from either an RfA or a hurricane related article from 2006. I was very impressed by what you've been doing and know you will do well with the mop. Dlohcierekim 04:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: RFANo prob. But I do mean what I said. It has been a long time since I have seen someone with more than one FA up for RFA. You have what, 32? And the answer you gave to my question proves that you do know what you're doing with admin tasks. (honestly, I don't know how you could possibly not know after being on here long enough to get more than 30 FAs, but that is beside the point) J.delanoygabsadds 14:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC) About your RfA Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. I am glad you passed, and you are welcome for the support. For information on using your new tools, see the school for new admins; you will find it very useful. Good luck! Acalamari 15:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC) ReplyHink, try to get some of the experienced reviewers to look at your FACs; I want to avoid the support being criticized in the future as "thin" or inexperienced (considering the track record of some reviewers). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
A favorI also have an FAC going at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Elderly Instruments. Do you possibly have time to look over the article for remaining prose issues? One editor has stated that there are prose issues and I'm at the point where I'm not finding anything else. I think it just needs a once-over by a different editor and I have come to respect your writing ability. Let me know. Thanks --Laser brain (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Tropical Storm Charley (1998)Take a look at the suggestions I made and the changes being made in the Tropical Storm Charley (1998) article. I know it was recently listed when I made the GAC suggestions, but NobleSith was good enough to review my GAC for Tropical Storm Jerry (1995), even a second time after recently failing it, so I'm returning the favor. This is my first review of an article for the TC project, though I have reviewed 2 or 3 met project articles for GA in the past. See if I covered the basics. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC) I recently made some improvements to the 1924 AHS in this sandbox. Unfortunately, I can't move the page history to the primary AHS article for 1924. Can you help? Thanks. By the way, congratulations on your successful administrator status! CVW (Talk) 02:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Congratulations and more Hey, I missed your RfA... sad. But, congratulations (late again? oh dear...). Surely you are even more busy than before. Well... if you don't mind, would you take a look at Riya Sen, and give a few outsiders comments? BTW, Sitakunda Upazila has passed through the GA barrier, and is up for another round of copyedit and peer review. It's been lying there for some time. Since volunteers are getting scarce, I have decided to spam all the nice people I know to take a look. Would you, please, pretty please? Congrats again. Aditya(talk • contribs) 06:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Hurricane Camille GA Sweeps Review: On HoldCongratulations on your successful RfA! I hope you enjoy using the tools. I have reviewed Hurricane Camille which is currently a GA class, and have placed it on hold for GA Sweeps since it has some issues concerning sourcing and a few other minor things. I have also left messages on the talk pages of other editors and related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC) HHF Automatic InductionsThe following storms have been found to meet the current criteria for automatic induction into the Hurricane Hall of Fame and will be inducted with the five elected inductees this June: Great Caribbean Hurricane of 1831, Hurricane San Marcos of 1870, Great Mexican Hurricane of 1909*, 1935 Caribbean Hurricane. Note, a special exception was made in the case of the 1909 storm. It was initially going to highlight this year's ballot, but in light of the very competetive list this year, it was inducted automatically on the assumption that it would have been elected anyway. Just thought you'd like to know...;) -- §HurricaneERICarchive 18:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Okay good; we have six already <!-- --> Now the fun part begins. First of all, Ioke is not eligible for induction as the storm has to have two full seasons between it and the induction year. That's my fault, I forgot to direct you to the rules I set for the HOF, which are on my HOF page. As for the other four spots, how about we give a brief (a couple sentences) explanation as to why we feel that the other's nominees we left off should not be on the nominations list. For example, because I didn't pick John, Linda and Kenna, I would explain why I left them off. I'm open to suggestions. I do think that you forgot some of the historically destructive storms. You included several of them in the preliminary list you gave me earlier but did not include them in your top ten. I'm gonna have a rough case for 1975 but so are you with Kenna. It only killed 4 people and caused barely $100 million in damage. As for John; it's up there but I don't think it cracks the top ten. Maybe it undercuts 1975 or 1858 and I'll certainly give that some thought tomorrow. The longevity record should get it in eventually. Here's my thinking on Linda: Yes, that record is huge. But that record is all Linda has. If it weren't the strongest EPAC storm of all-time, then it would be scarcely notable. What happens if a future storm breaks Linda's record. Then Linda's place in HOF is meaningless. Right or wrong, that's why I left it off. There may be others we're missing but I can't think of any. Calvin in 1993 killed like 93 people or something but I doubt it'll make it this go-round. -- §HurricaneERICarchive 03:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
And if we're going to get anything done, I'm going to have to act like one. CWY and Seddon are off. That's was not as easy a decision as I just made it sound. This makes you, me, jdorje, bob rulz, thegreatdr, RattleMan, CrazyC, Mitchazenia, Juliancolton, and Hello32020 our almighty panel of judges. Now keep in mind, some may not care to join in on the fun, but I'm hoping we get a good turn out. Hold off on sending out the ballots just yet but very soon we will. Right now, I have to go work on my paper. -- §HurricaneERICarchive 03:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Peer Review Charley?Hello hink! Tropical Storm Charley (1998) just passed GA, and I've put it on peer review in anticipation of a FAN in the next few weeks. Please tell me what you think of the article. TheNobleSith (talk) 04:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC) NHC storm walletsCash depository indeed. Check out these sat photos of Tropical Storm Anna...from 1969! These were taken barely a week after the forecasters were camped out around the TV watching Neil and Buzz walk on the moon. Unfortunately they don't have any of the other storms from that year in the wallets (we already have Camille's though). Surely there's more storms from that year out there; we just haven't found them. I'll keep looking for more goodies from other years. UPDATE: Oh yeah, there's more: check out this site I just found a great pic of Debbie. -- §HurricaneERICarchive 03:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC) Hurricane Iwa - Coral Sea PhotoHi Hink, I posted a photo of the USS Coral Sea that I took in route to Hawaii back in 1982 - I thought this added to your article as there was no mention of the NAVY's help with regards to this event. I'm very new to Wikipedia and really thought this was a welcomed image. I appears that you did a revert? Is there a better way to add this photo to the article? Thanks, Raymond 70.253.202.253 (talk) 13:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)  HiThanks for your message I gues. I editted the references to stop them being quite so long, but why do some of them look good: "Storm Force Wind Warning for the Western Area: Tropical Cyclone Lee. Bureau of Meteorology (November 15, 2007)" and some bd "WebCite query result"? And why do the Australian cyclones have the category wrong - Jacob 2007 was a 3 not a 1.--CycloneAlley (talk) 15:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
NoticeboardHello hink. Charley is now on FAC. How do I add it to the wikiproject's noticeboard?TheNobleSith (talk) 22:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC) ThanksTheNobleSith (talk) 01:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC) TC ProjectCan I join the TC project? --*****Elena85******User:Elena85/2008cyclone 15:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Re: 1988 PHS FAC CommentOthers have looked at the article and improved it further, copyediting was done, so I believe your comments are now fully addressed. Hello32020 (talk) 11:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC) FAC CharleyHink, how do I add non-breaking spaces to convert template output? TheNobleSith (talk) 22:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
You're invited!You're invited to the
Can I JoinCan I join the project? --Santhi47 (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC) ThanksYes, thanks for the encouragement. I'll get to Iris soon. I was just on the IRC channel, and it seemed pretty simple. That will come in handy. Thanks! TheNobleSith (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC) BTW, I have been working on re-writing Hurricane Lili. It's in my userspace User:TheNobleSith/Hurricane Lili. Tell me what you think so far. TheNobleSith (talk) 18:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC) The infoboxI might work on the infobox again. There's no way many WPTC articles could be made FA with the current templates in use, and it seems that no one has done anything yet to fix that situation. Anyway, here're the colors no one bothered to look at before reverting everything (minus a couple that were too similar) [1]. Potapych (talk) 02:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi. At the moment I am preparing the translation of the article into German language; I have a question on this. You have included several references ("news reports") without links. How/where have you obtained this informations? Thanks in advance. --Matthiasb-DE (talk) 21:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Euro currency in 1924 AHSI apologize for the inconvenience, and I know the currency was first utilized in the 1990s, but the source for the damages still lists losses with the Euro sign. This newspaper article was published in 1924. How do we resolve this one? CVW (Talk) 20:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC) Thank you...I'm quite flattered to have been selected as the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject's Member of the Month! There is a plethora of several excellent editors, including you, David Roth, and many others whom shall be nameless. Regardless, they also deserve a "thumbs up" from me. My edits have been principally concentrated in meteorology articles, though I have also made edits in several additional subjects, many of which were not weather-related. Regardless, I never thought I would have received these honorary mentions! Thank you. CVW (Talk) 02:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC) May 2008 image
Barry(tickles Hink) Really, I can't do an indepth review of every article, especially not at the rate you produce them! How about I try to do half of the ones you put up? Ealdgyth - Talk 16:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
InfoboxThere is different infoboxe in the 1924 Atlantic hurricane season, should I change the other storms to that infobox? --*****Joan97******Active Storms 19:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Naomi's RainfallAfter reading Julian's comments on the article, I was thinking about how to incorporate the totals without needing to break the paragraph since a) the old way wasn't good writing (and was less of a sentense and more of a thesaurus on how to say "report"), and b) there is no HPC map for the hurricane. I was tossing the idea of either having a table in the section or realtering the flow of the section. Problem is, I have no idea how to make a decent table for such. Can you offer me advice on how I can try it, and if you think it'd work? Thanks! Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 03:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm starting to get a bit concerned now. Hurricane Archive has been under maintenance for a while and I am starting to question whether the links for those articles will last through a possible FAC (and Rambling Man's comments in the PR aren't helping that problem). Given your experience with FAs, how should I approach this? Should I keep the webpage links, or put sources that list just the paper and which page its on, so that maintenance doesn't throw the article's sources into disarray during a possible future run? Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 02:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC) I dont like the look of that track map. The background in it is poor quality compared to the other track maps that use the superior NASA background. Storm05 (talk) 11:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC) LiliI checked already. Thanks. TheNobleSith (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Alright, I did add a few things from the previous article. For most of what I didn't add, the new article covers it, just with different wording. One thing which I don't think should be added is this:
I have no source for that, and it seems like more of a trivia item anyway. TheNobleSith (talk) 18:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC) GAAlright, go ahead and revert it. Are you saying I wasn't strict enough, or something to that effect? TheNobleSith (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Sorry, I see what the problem was now. No worries, thanks for your help. Happy editing! TheNobleSith (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC) DYK for Cyclone Jokwe
--BencherliteTalk 00:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: The InfoboxSwitching from JMA to JTWC isn't a job for the templates. It's all up to the information provided (basin, 1-min winds, etc.). Anyway, I've added support for subtropical storms (in the Atlantic/East Pacific) and I have one question. Subtropical storms could be of any strength, so would it be correct to call it a "Category 1" subtropical storm? The other thing I showed you was just a quirk found in a lot of these templates. It will be very prominent in many of the season articles because of the diversity of the storms. If someone creates an article of a tropical storm in the West Pacific, it will appear in that article.Potapych (talk) 03:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Re: Kesiny ArticleWell, given that many of my projects are effectively halted due to THArchives, I can focus more on Kesiny with a few other articles (Fausto, Sudal, Toraji, and storms in the 2002 PHS). Right now, while I wait for THA to come back up (and up Naomi for FA status...even though I doubt it can get through), I might as well kickstart Kesiny and Fausto once I get back on my computer (I'm doing room cleaning). Maybe at the end of the day, I could work on all 2002 cyclones. Who knows? Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 00:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Copyright QuestionAre these images from the NWS allowed? http://web.archive.org/web/20021201091918/www.srh.noaa.gov/lch/tropical/lili/lili_pics.htm Don't worry about how most of them come up as "X" when you click on them, I can fix that. I'm just asking if they can be used in the article. TheNobleSith (talk) 04:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
HHOF Expansion BallotSH!T! I forgot all about it! Great, now this throws my whole schedule off. Sorry about that. I'll have to send 'em out tomorrow, it's after midnight right now and I spent six hours on the road today getting back from the Georgia coast. Fortunately, we have plenty of time for the expansion caucus before it's time for the Atlantic vote. <!-- --> §HurricaneERICarchive 05:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:LOTDAs a past voter I am reminding you that there are over five days remaining at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200805 to cast your votes.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 20:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC) GREAT...The Hurricane Archives go under some heavy scrutiny and maintenance...just to die. Now the site's been merged with the old Newspaper Archives, which provides papers only if you sign up for a plan. I've been kicked in the face often (my work appearing on other sites, sites stopping me midway on an article), but when THE MOST VITAL SITE for my work goes under...well, lets just say I have a flurry of words that must be heard...but the censors would be too overworked. In other words, now HALF of the articles I wanted to do go under, leaving scant few remaining. Unless this is a joke, I'm going to have to yank the GA stats under from Nina and Naomi (and drop Naomi from PR. Both articles were practically built on that site...Pauline and Rick too)...and I was SO...CLOSE...to getting my first FA. Any advice for me, I'm no longer thinking rationally. Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC *RIP: The Hurricane Archives* 04:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cyclone JokweThe article Cyclone Jokwe you nominated as a good article has passed
DYK
--Bobet 13:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Congrats on the RfA. You deserved much better. I got 160 supports when I passed RfA and at that time I only had 1FL and 15 DYKs... and no FAs....Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
What is your FA count?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
TCWC JakartaNope. The website with their advisories on is in TXT format just like Bureau of Meteorology. -- グリフオーザー (talk) 06:03, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:LOTDCongratulations! A list you have been involved with was selected a WP:LOTD for May. You may want to add the {{ListoftheDayheader}} or {{ListoftheDaylayout}} templates somewhere in your userspace. Other template options are at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/templates. Your list will appear as WP:LOTD twice. If you have any date preferences in May let me know by April 25th.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 19:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC) LOTDProgress would be described as slow but steady. We missed your voice this month. We hope to pick new people and keep the old ones. That is how we will build momentum towards a more official procedure, IMO. I would be uncomfortable making another proposal with the current level of participation. However, if we can maintain the current level, I might renominate this at the time of the LOTY voting when such a nomination could serve two purposes. By nominating at that time, we might get some people to help us decide the list of the year who otherwise would overlook it. In addition, it is probably going to be the highpoint of the year for the project, if we can get a slate of good lists. Is there a particular policy guideline you think the WP:LOTD and WP:LOTM redirects violate?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 03:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
4/24 DYK
--Bedford 04:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Vote regarding youHi, I don't know if you are aware or not, but there's a vote regarding you at Wikipedia_talk:Featured_list_candidates#User:Hurricanehink. It's a vote on choosing an FL director. Cheers. Gary King (talk) 17:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Storms that may have been more damaging than what NHC said: Cristina (02)Like Lidia of 93 before it, Cristina may have been responsible (indirectly) for more damage than the NHC said: this time, $45 million to upwards of $70 million damage due to a thunderstorm outbreak over Arizona on July 14. Specifically, the damage comes from a microburst that hit Sky Harbor Airport. Alone, its not enough to say that Cristina had a role in this, but a document I salvaged [2] says that when Cristina's outer bands passed over the southern Gulf of California, it caused a surge of low-level moisture that reached southern Arizona and contributed to the development of these storms. However, two subsequent documents [3] (which is a double whammy on the part of the cyclone, calling it "Hurricane Christine") and [4] both say that the surge wasn't high enough to have a good chance of thunderstorm development. Might as well ask: What do you make of this? Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 00:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC) (EDIT: Might as well ask as well: Are we going to use Wikia for the 08 seasons as well? Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 00:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)) By the way, I already started this one over here. It's incomplete though, but more detailed than the stub which you made. What should I do?! RaNdOm26 (talk) 05:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
