User talk:Humaliwalay

Hallaur

Mr. HAW!

I never tagged this article (it was re-tagged by User:NeilN on 2010-05-23 18:49:11 after your removal of tags), infact I was trying to verify the references, fixing and arranging them. Regarding your comment his comments like {personal websites/blogs} is absolutely false and absurd. can be termed as personal attack. Content of this article has little to do with the references of India's state level Government and NGO web links. If you think it is based on these websites(or any of references in the list) you may start working on inline citations, that would be more in betterment of this article than accusing others without any reason.

Regarding Hallaur.in, indeed it is personal website may be not of individual but of group and Hallaur.info is under construction.

As per Government references even name of this article is not correct. All Gov references provided refer the place as Haloor & not Hallaur. I think this also needs to be fixed. May be content of article should be moved to namespace Haloor & a redirect put at Hallaur pointing to Haloor.

And finally your attitude and actions don't conform to your user name. First you should have verified and then put an accusations.

--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 09:33, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Faiz,

I tender my apologies for that statement, I realized later when I noticed the changes made by you that your actual actions were to make the article meet standard guidelines. However, at that time I already shot a message to you.

Thanks very much for your efforts, actually this article was composed by a person whose English seemed to be as second language with lots of grammatical errors followed by emotional statements at that time the neutrality was targeted of this articles followed by the language then grammar. I am working on this article since months to get rectified hence I requested everyone not to edit this article with any authentic reference.

I thank you once gain for putting your efforts, pls help us out to get rid of al tags. Apologies again. Humaliwalay (talk) 06:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hallaur, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. This is the second time you've removed maintenance templates without fixing the issues. Please do not remove them again without addressing the issues. Thank you. NeilN ^talk to me 03:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was editing and formatting of this article done by me and Faiz Haider as well. Hence I removed the disputed tags. Pls highlight the errors again as the English language grammar error has been rectified by me to the best of my knowledge now in this article. Humaliwalay (talk) 08:12, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on the article talk page. --NeilN ^talk to me 15:01, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shia Islam in Pakistan

The article is all about Pakistan and its Shia community, officially and international Pakistan is considered as the second-largest Shia Muslims population, despite of fact that India also claims to the be having the second-largest Shia Muslims population, which i not really regarded authentic by the International community neither do they have any neutral sources to prove it. Since i am not repeatedly vandalizing the Shia Islam in India neither denying their claim, and not mentioning anything regarding the Pakistani claim or Pakistani Shia population figure, hence you shouldn't vandalize the Shia Islam in Pakistan article repeatedly, or else your childish behavior will be disregarded as nothing but as repeated vandalism, kindly follow the 3RR rules and regulations. Regards! SyedMANaqvi (talk) 17:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re. this request

Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Thanks. Salvio ( ^Let's talk 'bout it!) 10:26, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

122.177.15.211's legal threat

Hello, You may refer to Article history of article Hallaur, in one of the edits a legal threat was made straight away in the article which was noticed by me and user Qwyrxian.Humaliwalay (talk) 05:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you mentioned on 122.177.15.211's talk page that he or she made a legal threat. Legal threats are a big deal on Wikipedia, but I see no evidence of the user ever making one (of course, if it has been oversighted, then that would explain it). To what are you referring? Also, note that there are easier ways to warn users for vandalism than typing out a whole thing. A non-comprehensive list is located here. The most common is uw-vandalism1 and its higher versions. --Quinxorin (talk) 05:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Shia Islam in Netherlands

On July 20, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Shia Islam in Netherlands, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Courcelles (talk) 12:06, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Library of Congress Country Studies

As per this post - if you have a issue with Library of Congress Country Studies then you take it to the WP:RS/N, I don't have a problem with it. Codf1977 (talk) 11:08, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Humaliwalay. Thank you.Codf1977 (talk) 09:48, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not accuse you of vandalism

I have never accused you of vandalism, however I agree with Atama assessment of your actions. In addition to my comments above, please refrain from accusing, either on talk page or via an edit summary any other editor of vandalism unless it is undeniably that - if you fail to heed this final warning it could also lead to a block for violating the WP:AGF policy. Codf1977 (talk) 08:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to 2010 Baghdad church attack ‎. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. - 220.101 talk^\Contribs 14:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was a very minor edit I edited list of those who condemned the attack. Anyways thanks very much, rest assured. - Humaliwalay (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism

A tag has been placed on Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

the article is original research, POV, in bad faith and soapbox. References given are non-verifiable and out of sync to the matter which they are tagged to.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 09:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Hey, i invite you to join the discussion here, Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Islam#Proposal_Shia_holiest_sites if u want. Someone65 (talk) 14:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright listing for Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism

Hi. This listing has come due for admin closure, and I have a question for you there. Hopefully, we'll be able to close out that matter soon. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:38, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been improved a with efforts rendered by Users FaizHaider, Matthew Vanitas and Aliwiki. Any Copyvio materials deleted at the same time biased wordings are cleaned. My apologies for delay in reply. I was affected by Autoblock mistakenly by User Shizaao for few hours. Thanks.- Humaliwalay (talk) 13:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks & request

Hi Humaliwaley! Thanks for contribution to discussion various platforms we shared recently. I'll be on wiki-break this weekend (fri-sat-sun) and will be active by minimum capacity during next two weeks (due to Muharram activities in my real life). If you are active meanwhile can you have watch on article Aisha, it's talk & temp and ANI entry related to IK. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 05:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be having an eye on my watch-list which includes your concerning pages as well till 15th Dec 2010. On 16th I shall be on break too. Probably, I will resume editing on 17th 18th Dec. Thanks for the consideration. - Humaliwalay (talk) 13:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS

it is preposterous for you to suggest that important points of Shia doctrine can be referenced in no other way than by invoking the website al-islam.org. This is ridiculous.

If you have a valid point to make, kindly base it on actual scholarly literature. Otherwise there is literally nothing to discuss. --dab (𒁳) 13:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just said that you need to take your doubts on WP:RS if in case you have any problem with Al-Islam.org. You just cannot misuse your privileges and take a one sided stand. - Humaliwalay (talk) 13:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Choice of Title t0o generic

Hi, could you please correct the title for the article you just created to "Jundallah Suicide Attacks"? That's what the topic of the article really is and that's what it really should have been named to. Ordibehesht22 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Humaliwalay. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Christian terrorism

It's certainly one thing if you disagree with me about the Lebanon part; that's well within reason. However, please be careful about reverting the part about McVeigh without an explanation. It looks as though you are just reverting every edit I made. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

McVeigh revert happened unintentionally which I realized now. I shall be editing hence forth rather than reverting entire edits of yours. Happy Editing.- Hum Aliwalay (talk) 08:20, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Do please consider that there are a couple of editors, not just me, who see the Lebanon issue at least somewhat differently than you do. Therefore, I would strongly urge you to consider discussing your take on it on the article talk page (where I have a thread already started), instead of just making edits in a way that another editor (not me) is now regarding as "vandalism". It's such a hotly debated subject that calm discussion on the talk page would help keep things from escalating needlessly. Thanks again. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the acknowledgment however there seems no valid point in removing contents from the page. I have placed a message on that editor's talk page. Any thing cannot be considered as vandalism just because we do not agree with that. The section was equipped with citation. - Hum Aliwalay (talk) 08:13, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Your addition to Tatbir has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:30, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]