User talk:Hordaland/Archives/2014/May
hello-please discuss on talk pageregarding your edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tasimelteon&oldid=607441816 which deleted info about the experiments to get this drug approved, I see in your edit remark something like, "up to 75 times the normal human dose". First of all in one of the very adverse Category "C" results, it was only two times the normal human dose. Believe me the way that I had that edit worded was STRICTLY true to the research. Please do not delete that info. or blank it out of the article again. Of course you are free to add or change-(edit), with factual information, or correct, but removing for no reason does not make sense unless there is some outside agenda--in any event, please discuss on the article talk page to avoid undoing each-other's work or disrupting the article-thanks24.0.133.234 (talk) 15:21, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Disability style guide - you're invited.Have you seen this - WT:WikiProject Disability#Developing a style guide? Your participation would be appreciated. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:51, 22 May 2014 (UTC) Norwegian as two languagesHi, Since you're editing the Norwegian page, I wonder if you could help with the classification of Norwegian at North Germanic languages#Family tree. An editor is edit-warring over the claim that there are two languages called Norwegian. One of them has a dialect Nynorsk, and is Western Scandinavian, while the other has a dialect Bokmal and is Eastern Scandinavian. This is just a misrepresentation of the two principal standard registers as separate spoken languages, but the editor insists that there really are two separate languages, both called "Norwegian". Since he's Norwegian, he thinks he knows best, and doesn't recognize the difference between the spoken and written language. — kwami (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Hehe, "Hordaland", I've found you! I am so happy to see you keeping up the good work here at en.wiki ;) So, so tired of people rambling about like this one... "Since he's Norwegian, he thinks he knows best, and doesn't recognize the difference between the spoken and written language." Well, even if it was the reason, why couldnt he ask first what my background for the edits were ? The established language reference "Ethnologue" actually supports my view, but the dumbwit is not interested. Here is another one : http://www.omniglot.com/writing/norwegian.htm The article itself is full of contradictions, errors and misconceptions, but I think I'll just leave it at that. I dont have the time or the energy to fight trolls. Even if they're originally Norwegian... Ha det fint, NB ! ;) Helsing Ø... :D Wikarth (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 30Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melanopsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ganglion cell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia