User talk:Hnhusain

Speedy deletion nomination of Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://psatri.org.sa/aboutpsatri.php. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hnhusain/test

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Hnhusain/test, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Denniss (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hnhusain/Sami Mohammed Alhumaidi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Hnhusain/Sami Mohammed Alhumaidi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Denniss (talk) 22:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — ξ^xplicit 01:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Hnhusain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! SQL^Query me! 21:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi. I see over at User talk:Dodger67 that you have provided a letter allowing you to use copyrighted materials for inclusion in a Wikipedia article. However, that it not sufficient for at least two reasons:
  1. While I don't doubt your honesty, anyone could write a letter purporting to be from anyone, and so Wikipedia would need something more.
  2. Anything used in Wikipedia must be appropriately licensed for reuse by third parties under the terms of WP:CC BY-SA or freer, as one of Wikipedia's core aims is for its content to be freely used by anyone else (with appropriate attribution) - and so allowing something to be used just by Wikipedia is not sufficient.

For information on how to properly release copyrighted material for use on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ethanlu121 (talk) 15:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki templates for peer-review of my draft article before final article creation ?!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I would like my userpage draft article to be proofread before finally publishing it to the mainspace to avoid their speedy deletion. Please help me know the wiki templates that can allow my sub-page draft articles to be peer reviewed by Admins/editors for possible improvements/suggestions before moving them into wiki article mainspace.

Thank you. Hnhusain (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft has a button "Submit this draft for review". It will make your draft go through a review in the Articles for Creation process. A reviewer will either accept or decline the draft. If it's declined, its not deleted; you can continue to improve it in order to submit it again. Did this answer your question? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The error has been corrected. Request you to proceed further with the review. Thanks !

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hnhusain, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prior Article Submission declined. Can references in language other than English suffice ?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

As you can notice above, our article had been recently declined due to our weak references. However we only have strong references in Arabic, and not so much in English language. My question is.. can we provide references whose content exists in languages other than English as long as they are authentic ?

Thanks,

Hnhusain (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign-language sources are acceptable, but the issue isn't whether they are authentic but whether they are reliable sources and independent. Apparently there were concerns about the latter aspect in partiular. Huon (talk) 18:18, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Query on on our submitted article for re-reviewing!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

We had submitted our article titled "Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute" for final re-review. The article is under review since 8-10 days. Can you please check and assist as to whether the article has been correctly submitted for re-reviewing?. In how many more days can we expect it getting reviewed ?

Thank you.

Hnhusain (talk) 07:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The draft Draft:Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute has been correctly submitted for review and is in queue. Nobody can tell you the day and time it will be reviewed. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute has been accepted

Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 23:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please review our corrected Article and update the warning messages being shown

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

We have corrected the 2 issues currently being listed on our published article - "Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute". The 2 issues being: Article being orphan and improper usage of external links. We request you to kindly review the corrected article and remove the issues warning if they have been resolved correctly by us.

Thank you.

Hnhusain (talk) 07:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the external link tag, you did a nice job reformatting the links as references. Regarding the orphan tag, it indicates that not enough other articles have a link leading to Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute. I found two articles with a link to Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute, and ideally we want more than three. Please leave a massage on my talk page if you added links to Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute from other pages, and I will gladly remove the orphan tag. Good Luck. WannaBeEditor (talk) 08:28, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the orphan tag as well. You did a great job. We would appreciate further contributions to more articles. WannaBeEditor (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an easy way to see the changes being made to my article by general public?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I would like to know as to how can I see the changes that are being made to my article by the general audience. I usually use the Watchlist to notice such changes. Is there any other simple way ?

Thank you.

Hnhusain (talk) 07:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beside for the watchlist, you can view any and all changes to the page at any time by pressing the View history button located next to the Read and Edit source buttons. I provided the view history link for Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute Here WannaBeEditor (talk) 08:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Conflict of Interest

It seems to me (I may be wrong) that you might be getting paid by Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute or someone else to edit Wikipedia. Wikipedia has special policies for paid editors that I would like you to read. The term usually used is conflict of interest (COI), and editors with COI are usually required to disclose it. Please read the article, and comply with the policy if it is applicable. Thanks. WannaBeEditor (talk) 08:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article still not assessed on importance scale!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I would like to inform you that the article Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute has still not been assessed on importance scale by the Wiki project Wikipedia:WikiProject Saudi Arabia that it belongs to.

Request you to kindly look into the matter and help us get it assessed for its importance in Wikipedia:WikiProject Saudi Arabia.

Thank you.

Hnhusain (talk) 12:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If for some reason you think it's worth calling this to the attention of members of the so-called "WikiProject", then probably a better place to do so is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Saudi Arabia, since there's no reason to suppose that members of that "project" are particularly likely to patrol the list of requests for help. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hnhusain. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]