User talk:Helenalex

Archive

2007 (and New Year's Eve 2006).

Orange Order

Wanted to explain this here rather than the article talk page, to prevent starting any new arguments. I don't object to the views of Paul Butler being included, what I objected to was this edit combining what he said with another source to provide a piece of information that is in neither source. Yes Paul Butler may be in a position to know to an extent, but even if he had said that all 282 attacks were committed by nationalists (which he didn't) it's still dubious. The attacks were across Ireland over a 30+ year period, it's not plausible that he could say in any certainty that all 282 were committed by nationalists. Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 11:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you raising this ONiH? The article doesn't say that anymore, and rightly so. I added a source and the way I did it made the sentence read badly, this was rectified with, it must be said, no positive contribution from you. There is no reason to bring this up again as the problem, such as it existed, went away weeks ago.Traditional unionist (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm raising it here as I didn't have time to address this at the time, in particular the part that says "The page doesn't say that every hall was burnt by a nationalist, just that Paul Butler has said there is a nationalist arson campaign against Orange halls, and it does seem like he would know". I've never objected to the current version of the article, and wanted to clarify that. Rather than risk starting yet another heated discussion on the talk page, I thought it best just to clarify things here. OK? One Night In Hackney303 18:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
1)You didn't make that clear and 2)I note you still haven't retracted your vile and unsubstantiated claims.Traditional unionist (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For the love of god, why are you two having an argument on my talk page??? Can't you be annoying somewhere else?
In reference to ONiH's statement which refers to something I actually did write, I really can't see what the problem is. I specifically said I don't think every attack on an Orange hall was the work of nationalists - hell, I even said the odd one probably was the work of loyalists. Unless you're trying to claim that Paul Butler is completely wrong and there's no nationalist campaign against Orange halls whatsoever, I don't even see what you're disagreeing with. If that IS what you're arguing, I don't even know what to say, but I'd love to know how you explain the high rate of arson against them... --Helenalex (talk) 23:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Would you like to have rollback? It's more efficient for some anti-vandalism purposes than the javascript tools such as Twinkle.-gadfium 07:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done.-gadfium 08:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AUK

WikiProject Auckland This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us.

Taifarious1 09:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hagley Community College

Why did you mark it for notability? Hagley is perfectly notable as far as schools go in Christchurch. Has a large school roll too. Bactoid (talk) 23:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Ireland law template

I really like that template, however it refers solely to the House of Commons, Northern Ireland has a very similar but seperate legislative body at present, for which this temnplate can't be used. Perhaps just a rename and new template with a different logo?Traditional unionist (talk) 13:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The senate was a fully functioning legislative upper house, it was just a bit inneffectual! I'll take a look at that sometime.Traditional unionist (talk) 18:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Northern Ireland

Hi,

I'd like to take the opportunity to advise you on two matters which, being a member or former member of the Northern Ireland WikiProject or it's sister project on Belfast, you might be interested in the following submission about a recent terrorist attack Wikipedia:Northern Irish Wikipedians' notice board#News.

I'd also like to take this opportunity to ask for your help in reviving the Northern Ireland WikiProject. Given that there are only a small number of Wikipedians from Northern Ireland or interested specifically in the region, the project needs all the help it can get.

Cheers, --Setanta747 (talk) 13:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westlake

Hi. Thanks for your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westlake, County Londonderry. Can I just ask you to return to the page and read my reply because I think there's been some confusion. Westlake isn't a village, it's just a road with some new houses on it. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Antipasto: A response

(I posted this on my talk page as well, but thought cross-posting here is a good idea)

Interestingly and relevant to my response here, we just had a company social/meal celebration earlier this afternoon here in a rural and non-touristy part of North Canterbury (it is a farming district, not Hanmer Springs or Kaikoura) which is one of the two most Pakeha-internsive regions in the country, and my boss, who organized the meal, is about as traditional Kiwi as you get here - certainly no Jafa and not even a city person. The main feature of the meal gathering is, you guessed it, antipasto. A bowl of aioli surrounded by julienned celery and carrots, and another plate is plattered with green and black olives, sun-dried tomatoes, liver pate, salami (pepperoni?). Mind you, we are not in Jafaland aka Auckland, so you can't simply dismiss our case as a cosmopolitan-area outlier. So the fact that we in rural NZ serve antipasto for entertaining guests does say something.

Allyson Gofton has put ways to make an antipasti platter in her recipe books without labelling this as "ethnic dish" as she does laksa (eg see this http://www.ecook.co.nz/index.php/ps_pagename/recipedetail/pi_recipeid/2080 ), and Peta Mathias claims it has become a common part of meals for entertaining guests (see her descriptions on olives, delicatessens, aioli on her A Cook's Tour of New Zealand (2005)), so I strongly disagree it is not yet a part of New Zealand cuisine. I wouldn't say your picture is incorrect, and indeed your perception of what NZ cuisine is and should be is identical to the picture my HK Chinese migrant parents still hold. It is only that perception has become a little out of date or old-fashioned. NZ food has been turned upside down pretty much since 1995, so perhaps the wave of change hasn't caught among your family and friends yet.

Anyhow, there is soon going to be a publication on the history and evolution of New Zealand cuisine in September, First, Catch Your Weka: The Story of New Zealand Cooking by David Veart. I think we should declare ceasefire to the argument of whether NZ cuisine is morphing into generic cosmopolitan fares (my side) or still sticking to traditional dishes (your side) these days, and use Veart's book as a judge. --JNZ (talk) 11:02, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your response, I agree that we may be stepping onto the territory of "what people eat in NZ" rather than cuisine that represents NZ to the outsiders. But isn't accepting foreign influences an integral part of NZ cuisine due to its young history? In Australia, no one would protest what Neil Perry or Bill Granger cook are not iconic Australian food to outsiders. I'm sure the staff at the Cuisine magazine would be interested to take someone to task for declaring Pacific Rim influenced dishes are cuisine in NZ rather than cuisine of NZ. Nowadays Tourism New Zealand's promotions overseas do depict the quasi-Mediterranean/Pacific Rim styles of cuisines of 21st century New Zealand. I'm sure you can go philosophical and argue being there does not necessarily mean it is iconic yet, but common sense would deduce this picture, being used to sell the idea to foreign tourists, shows the modern NZ cuisine of green curry and antipasto are just as representative to NZ cuisine as pavlova.
If you aren't happy with this in the mean time before Veart's book's publication, I'm sure Mark McDonough of Zarbo Deli in Newmarket will only be too happy to argue with you, and he is quite outspoken that fusion Pacific Rim cuisine is modern NZ cuisine. <G>--JNZ (talk) 01:24, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The reason antipasto is but yum cha isn't is because a) a whole lot of people prepare and eat them at home; b) more New Zealanders in proportion know what antipasto is than dim sum, and c) it is sold at restaurants that regard themselves as "New Zealand" as well. This does make a lot of difference. --JNZ (talk) 09:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC) Addition: I should add that plenty of people of the type like Peta Mathias or Lauraine Jacobs already argue the likes of antipasto is representative of 'new' New Zealand cuisine. You may dismiss these as food snobs' takes and thus unscholarly, but in this field, foodies are the experts. --JNZ (talk) 07:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St Clair Surf Life Saving Club restored

This article has been restored after its deletion was contested. This is a courtesy notice, as you nominated the article to be deleted via WP:PROD. While the creator of the article has indicated that he or she intends to expand it, if you find your concerns persist, you may choose to nominate the article for a full deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At least

You havent had the fooian booian stuff thrown your way :) SatuSuro 10:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC) Please dont ever consider it - i avoided all the conversation about at demographics australia in that department and simply tagged instead :) SatuSuro 10:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duncree

I put clarity tags on the statements that don't make much sense in American English. I also added a reference tag to the page since it still lacks adequate referencing. Please consider using a personal sandbox for developing articles prior to creating a page. you can do this as follows User:Helenalex/My Sandbox. PB666 yap 01:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the US parades do not need lodges, a lodge in the US is either a private meeting house, or place to stay for the night. It is occasionally used as a grand lodge, such as a public area in a hotel. A parading dispute would translate as "a dispute on parade". Whereas to clarify the to one would write "a dispute over parade routes". With regard to the lodges, identify what types of lodges. :Pages can be deleted moments after creation and are frequently deleted because the creating editor does not provide enough notability to the subject of the page, one good way to prevent this is to have at least two external and independent references. Its a good idea to let a page sleep overnight in a sandbox so that potential db traps are found. Putting a page without references in wikipedia recently is like putting a boat in the water that has a small hole in the bottom, sometimes it won't sink before you fix it.  :^) There just tagsPB666 yap 02:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I had a page on a highly notable scientific topic deleted. Had I placed the page in a sandbox and added one more reference, it would not have been deleted. There are 100s of people that screen new pages. I am a anti-deletionist myself, I have seen pages targeted for deletion within seconds of appearing. So I prefer to give the benefit of the doubt, but that does not stop someone else, therefore the tags are good ways of getting people to hurry up and make the changes that will assure page survival.

But to be safe, make pages in a sandbox, all you have to do is push the link and you have a page 'wild-life' refuge that will protect it until its big enough to avoid those deletionist out there.PB666 yap 02:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes

yes. Plan 8 (talk) 22:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NIR

This discussion has been reopened. I'd appreciate your input.Traditional unionist (talk) 10:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Prods

Just so you are aware anyone, inlduing the page's author, can remove a prod and once removed it can not normally be readded (see WP:PROD#Conflicts). Hence you were incorrect to add another prod to The Tattooed Lady of Lochee. If you wish for this article to be deleted you will now have to take it to AfD. Dpmuk (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Saw your comment on the Miss Drag Wellington deletion discussion. Are you interested in WP:LGBT studies? If so, come on by and sign up! =D -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 06:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ena Te Papatahi.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why a fair use claim is required. {{PD-NZ}} would seem to be the appropriate tag. The picture was painted in 1902, and the artist died in 1947 ie more than 50 years ago.-gadfium 19:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic group articles

Hi. In light of the failure to reach consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghan British‎ I've suggested that there be a discussion of the various issues raised, here. Your input would be appreciated. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland meetup

Hi there. We're having a meetup in Auckland shortly, and as you seem to live here, I thought I would call your attention to it. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 4 if interested. Richard001 (talk) 07:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rodney Hide photos

I notice that these have fields missing - you might need to get an OTRS permission if they are not your photos. They should also be uploaded (moved) to Commons, and since there is more than one, a Commons page created. Richard001 (talk) 06:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTRS and Commons:OTRS. Richard001 (talk) 01:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved them to Commons, but they'll be deleted in seven days it seems. It says "Stuart Wilson of Act New Zealand" provided them. Did he send you an email saying this? Were the conditions (modification/commercial use) clear to him when he gave permission (people often think they are just giving permission to use them on Wikipedia - that's not how it works though)? We need some sort of formal record of this before we can accept such images. Are you able to provide one (either an old email or a new one from him). Don't worry if they get deleted quickly; they can always be undeleted if permission comes though. Richard001 (talk) 06:22, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Databank

I object to deleting the page Databank Systems Limited which you may have tagged to be deleted, and as there is nowhere else to object, I am objecting here, as the company was a notable innovation in banking in New Zealand Hugo999 (talk) 06:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Women's suffrage

I generally prefer to see a longer protection log before I indefinitely protect something, even for semi-protection. This article has only been protected three times, and never for more than three months at a time. Anonymous users do have useful edits to make as well, and it is sort of against the spirit of the site to make them register to edit such an article. If vandalism continues after the protection expires, we can always put it back on. It's really no big deal. Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Glenfield college

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Glenfield college, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Glenfield college is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Glenfield college, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move of WikiProject New Zealand/Election 2008 taskforce

I moved WikiProject New Zealand/Election 2008 taskforce to Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/Election 2008 taskforce since I assume you wanted it in the Wikipedia namespace, not the main namespace. I deleted the redirect that was left under the original title and fixed a couple links. I hope you don't mind; I just did a little housekeeping while doing a new page patrol. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 05:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Hide_and_car.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hide_and_car.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 02:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see you have sent the email to OTRS. You might want to add {{OTRS pending}}. I'm not sure how they handle Wikipedia OTRS permissions if it is moved to Commons, though I guess it works smoothly.
I took the global history course this semester, was quite interesting. I suppose you know my tutor, Elinor. Would you be interested in joining a Wikipedians (or Wikimedians) club at the university? It might be tricky finding members at first, but we could probably recruit some new ones as well, and would probably be the first thing of its sort in the country. Richard001 (talk) 06:28, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COI case

I've just seen the case of User talk:Artsfounation, who I think is making well-meaning edits but is suspected of spam. Since you are becoming involved in this area, you might like to comment.-gadfium 09:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot WPNZ tagging

Hi Helenalex, sorry for the late reply, didn't get a notification of your message for some reason. I've replied on my talk page. XLerate (talk) 04:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listen Helenalex,

I am providing truth about what happens in the Orange Order. Please do not disrupt my editing as it is the festive season. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robmuntzawesome (talk • contribs) 05:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic groups template

Hi, just to let you know that I've responded to the comment you made some time ago at Template talk:Ethnic groups in the United Kingdom. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fiction Survey 2009

Thank you very very much for editing User:Pixelface/Fiction Survey 2009, but the survey is not ready to be answered yet. If or when it does become ready, I may move the survey to a subpage of Wikipedia:Centralized discussion. I still want people to rewrite questions if they think the questions could be better, or say on the talk page if they think a survey would be a bad idea; I want feedback on the structure of the survey. I hope you don't mind, but I've removed your answers (and linked to them on the survey talk page). Please change the questions themselves if you want, or add more questions, or remove questions. Let me know what you think about the survey on its talk page. Did you find out about it at the village pump? If the survey goes "live", your input would be appreciated. Thanks :) --Pixelface (talk) 14:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland naming question

You are receiving this message because you have previously posted at a Ireland naming related discussion. Per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names#Back-up procedure, a procedure has been developed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration, and the project is now taking statements. Before creating or replying to a statement please consider the statement process, the problems and current statements. GnevinAWB (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taikura Rudolf Steiner School

I removed the prod since the school covers secondary as well as primary education, and standard practice is for secondary schools to go through AFD.

Nice to see you back here. I presume your new job keeps you pretty busy.-gadfium 09:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:New Zealand albums by artist

Category:New Zealand albums by artist, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Wolfer68 (talk) 00:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/governments

Hello Helenalex, I note that you have contributed to Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/governments in the past, are you willing to join me in re-creating it? It is no longer in use and New Zealand politics articles in general need substantial improving. Drop me a line if you want to help: There is work to do! Kiwiteen123 (talk) 9 January 2025 T 22:56 (UTC)

Are you out of here?

You seem to be winding up as a Wikipedia editor. Are you out of here? I'm sorry if you are. --Geronimo20 (talk) 11:32, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your note on Geronimo20's page. I've missed you too.
The interface shouldn't have changed for an existing user. Are you talking about the fundraising banner? That happens each year around this time. You can suppress it with Special:Preferences - Gadgets. You can also change your skin from the preferences page. Perhaps yours got reset somehow - possibly you chose to join the Beta? It will say "Beta feedback" and "Leave Beta" at the top of the screen if so. The monobook skin is the default one and probably what you're used to.-gadfium 18:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nzcivilunion.JPG

Hi Helenalex. can you please upload this file to Commons so I can use it on Hebrew Wiki? thank. אנדר-ויק (talk) 13:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WPNZ template

I've tried to start a discussion on the WPNZ template with respect to the governments project, but this hasn't attracted any contributions. Given that you sometimes contribute to pages on politics, I thought you might be interested in this. Schwede66 22:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland Meetup 5 on 9 May 2010

You are invited to Auckland Meetup 5 on the afternoon of Sunday 9th May 2010 at Esquires Cafe, Ground Floor, Auckland Central City Library, Lorne St, Auckland. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 5 for details and RSVP. You can also bookmark Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland to be informed of future NZ meetups. - Linnah (talk) 01:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Amoka.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Amoka.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

I happened to be at your ceremony this afternoon. Very well done.-gadfium 08:44, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assume this means you've graduated. Congratulations! Linnah (talk) 10:07, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Compilation albums by country

I have nominated Category:Compilation albums by country (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Compilation albums by artist nationality (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Amoka.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Amoka.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand politics

This user wants you to join WikiProject NZ politics.

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:New Zealand film soundtracks

Category:New Zealand film soundtracks, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:33, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reform Government of New Zealand

Hi, obviously a good article like Reform Government of New Zealand wasn't written off the top of your head. Could you please list your sources (preferably as inline citations, at at least as a list) so the article can be ranked higher than "start"? dramatic (talk) 23:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I'm begging you

Discworld articles are repeatedly targeted for deletion. The last thing we need is more of them. I'm trying to preserve the data while limiting the number of articles. So far it's barely worked. But sooner or later the deletionists will round on Discworld and I'll have to start the fight all over again. Serendipodous 18:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:New Zealand film soundtracks

Category:New Zealand film soundtracks, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Compilation albums of New Zealand music

Category:Compilation albums of New Zealand music, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cuisinemag.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cuisinemag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Paramatchitt.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Paramatchitt.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Shane cotton.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shane cotton.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Summer heat.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Summer heat.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Report

I'm trying to get some feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Northern Ireland#Rose Report on the "Rose Report" which has been listed for several years on WikiProject Northern Ireland as an article in need of creation. I've had the request for information up since 20 August without response. At least we should be able to identify what it is so we can see if it really belongs on that list. Even if you don't know what it is, saying so would be a help. If we get enough of those, that will at least answer the question about its importance. Thanks in advance. --Bejnar (talk) 02:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:New Zealand film soundtracks

Category:New Zealand film soundtracks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ritaangus.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ritaangus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:19, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ena Te Papatahi.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ena Te Papatahi.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Gun law in the United States, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from https://www.nraila.org/articles/20040324/citizen-s-guide-to-federal-firearms-law, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Gun law in the United States saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Lightbreather (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Helenalex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Willis Thomas Goodwin Airey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Student Christian Movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Helenalex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:06 June Metro.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:06 June Metro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Religions of the Discworld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Religions of the Discworld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religions of the Discworld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Technology of the Discworld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Technology of the Discworld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology of the Discworld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Troubles in Derry

Hi. You created this article a long time ago, but it appears to have deteriorated and it badly needs some inline citations. The trigger for this is I took some information from the article to use in Terraced houses in the United Kingdom and another editor has challenged its factual accuracy.

From a cursory view, the information looks roughly what I remember from learning about the Troubles in geography at school, but I wouldn't trust my decades-old memory as a reliable source, so I really want to look up individual claims. I don't think it's Yngvadottir's area of expertise but I wouldn't be surprised if they could work miracles on this.... Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]