User talk:JNZ

This user may have left Wikipedia. JNZ has not edited Wikipedia since January 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, JNZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Yao Ziyuan 07:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Establishment of The Wikimedia Hong Kong

Comecon

You had asked some time ago for an updating of the Comecon article. I have done so; I think I've done a fairly good job. Admittedly, I was working from a single source, but it was, itself, a broad survey of the literature, so I think it was a good one to work from. - Jmabel | Talk 17:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Venue suggestion needed for a meet-up in Yuen Long

message from Dagadt

Thank you very much for your answer! Dagadt (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:New Zealand-centric

I have nominated Category:New Zealand-centric (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 20:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AUK

This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us.

Taifarious1 09:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Antipasto

Hi JNZ,

I'm not sure what your thing with antipasto is, but please stop claiming that it's some kind of cornerstone of New Zealand cuisine unless you have a source. Obviously a lot of people you know eat it a lot, but it is far from universal; I have to say I have never been to someone's house for dinner and had an antipasto platter as the first course. Possibly me and my friends and family are all weird, but this does show that you need some kind of citation. Thanks. --Helenalex (talk) 01:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly and relevant to my response here, we just had a company social/meal celebration earlier this afternoon here in a rural and non-touristy part of North Canterbury (it is a farming district, not Hanmer Springs or Kaikoura) which is one of the two most Pakeha-internsive regions in the country, and my boss, who organized the meal, is about as traditional Kiwi as you get here - certainly no Jafa and not even a city person. The main feature of the meal gathering is, you guessed it, antipasto. A bowl of aioli surrounded by julienned celery and carrots, and another plate is plattered with green and black olives, sun-dried tomatoes, liver pate, salami (pepperoni?). Mind you, we are not in Jafaland aka Auckland, so you can't simply dismiss our case as a cosmopolitan-area outlier. So the fact that we in rural NZ serve antipasto for entertaining guests does say something.

Allyson Gofton has put ways to make an antipasti platter in her recipe books without labelling this as "ethnic dish" as she does laksa (eg see this http://www.ecook.co.nz/index.php/ps_pagename/recipedetail/pi_recipeid/2080 ), and Peta Mathias claims it has become a common part of meals for entertaining guests (see her descriptions on olives, delicatessens, aioli on her A Cook's Tour of New Zealand (2005)), so I strongly disagree it is not yet a part of New Zealand cuisine. I wouldn't say your picture is incorrect, and indeed your perception of what NZ cuisine is and should be is identical to the picture my HK Chinese migrant parents still hold. It is only that perception has become a little out of date or old-fashioned. NZ food has been turned upside down pretty much since 1995, so perhaps the wave of change hasn't caught among your family and friends yet.

Anyhow, there is soon going to be a publication on the history and evolution of New Zealand cuisine in September, First, Catch Your Weka: The Story of New Zealand Cooking by David Veart. I think we should declare ceasefire to the argument of whether NZ cuisine is morphing into generic cosmopolitan fares (my side) or still sticking to traditional dishes (your side) these days, and use Veart's book as a judge. --JNZ (talk) 10:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to the ceasefire. I think you might be missing my point, though. I'm not denying that antipasto is fairly popular (if a little dated here in Auckland). I'm just saying it is not a particularly iconic or crucial part of NZ cuisine. Basically I can't think of any reason for including antipasto which would not also justify the inclusion of corn chips, sushi, sorbet, risotto and about a million other dishes/foods which are popular here. The point of the page and the list of iconic foods is not to list everything that New Zealanders commonly eat (which would be a huge list) but to give an indication of the things which are widely seen as essential to New Zealand cuisine(s). Obviously this is pretty subjective, which is why I wanted a source. If Veart or anyone else says that antipasto has become iconic or a major part of the New Zealand diet, I'm willing to accept that.

Thinking about this, I suppose we're running into a problem about what 'New Zealand cuisine' actually means. If it just means 'what New Zealanders eat' then it is so broad as to be meaningless. If it means a sort of 'kiwiana' view of New Zealand food (pavlova and fish n chips) then it is probably about 30 years out of date. We should probably try and work out what we're talking about before we get into arguments about content.

Please reply on my page; I generally don't watchlist other people's talk pages. --Helenalex (talk) 23:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I fully agree that the acceptance of outside influences is an important part of recent NZ cuisine, which is why I wrote a big section on exactly that. I just don't agree that antipasto is any more important than most of the many, many other new foods which people have started eating here in the last few decades. Like I said earlier, if we include antipasto then why not sushi, guacamole, yum cha, risotto, etc etc etc? Surely it is enough to say that people's tastes have broadened without listing everything that people have started eating. Rather than bickering on each others' talk pages, perhaps we should take this opportunity to actually try and find a definition of New Zealand cuisine, and generally work on improving the page based on good sources. --Helenalex (talk) 05:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christchurch meetup

Hello to all Christchurch based Wikipedians. It must be high time that we all got out from behind our computers and had a meetup. Somewhere with free wireless access would be ideal so we can get our caffine/sugar/alcohol/nutrient fix along with our Wikipedia fix!! Reply at Wikipedia:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board#Christchurch meetup. Please let any other Chrischurch Wikipedians who not listed at Category:Wikipedians in Christchurch know of this event. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of Christchurch heritage buildings

I'd like to draw your attention to a new article on historic places in Christchurch. On the article's talk page, there is a list of missing photos. Of the 320 items that are registered with the New Zealand Historic Places Trust in the geographic area of Christchurch (excluding Banks Peninsula), there are only 80 registrations that we haven't got photos of. If you have a camera and would like to contribute, have a look what needs doing. Please leave a note on the talk page if you managed to get some photos, or if you know your way around Wikimedia Commons, you could upload them directly (note that it's complicated and I recommend that you start by leaving a note if you've never uploaded to Commons before). Thanks for your consideration! Schwede66 05:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong meetup 58

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 58
	Date: October 21
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 57 - next: Meetup 59

SusanLai (talk) 05:48, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Electrical engineering

Hi fellow editor, You are invited to join the WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of electrical engineering. If you'd like to join, add also your name to the member list. Thanks for reading! SchreyP ^(messages) 19:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Sweet and sour

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sweet and sour , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rincewind42 (talk) 03:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong meetup 83

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 83
	Date: November 15
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 82 - next: Meetup 84

SusanLai (talk) 10:13, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong meetup 83

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 83
	Date: November 15
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 82 - next: Meetup 84

SusanLai (talk) 11:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong meetup 84

In the area? You're invited to
Hong Kong Meetup # 84
	Date: December 13
	Time: 7PM
	Place: Think Cafe, Unit B, 19/F, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Road, Causeway Bay
prev: Meetup 83 - next: Meetup 85

SusanLai (talk) 07:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JNZ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JNZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Please feel free to come to a Wikipedia meeting in Christchurch on Wednesday, 29 May 2019. Schwede66 22:27, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]