User talk:Grumpylawnchair/Archive 4

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hey guten Morgen, wie geht es dir? has been accepted

Hey guten Morgen, wie geht es dir?, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 16:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tonio Schachinger has been accepted

Tonio Schachinger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Identitti has been accepted

Identitti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

+rollback

Hi Grumpylawnchair,

After reviewing your request, I have re-added your account to the rollback group. You've already seen most of this advice, but a few points are new.

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
  • Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
  • Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
  • Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
  • If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:57, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Merry Xmas too and happy New Year 2025

Volten001 16:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Stuff

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of building or structure fires, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Houston Public Media.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Stuff

List of building or structure fires

List of disasters in Poland by death toll

Telugu wedding ceremony

Grumpylawnchair [ALT] (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 66

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 66, November – December 2024

  • Les Jours and East View Press join the library
  • Tech tip: Newspapers.com

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --17:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ToNiePokój escape room fire has been accepted

ToNiePokój escape room fire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca talk to me! 02:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-03

MediaWiki message delivery 01:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Grumpylawnchair. Thank you for your work on ToNiePokój escape room fire. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article! Hopefully you have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including ToNiePokój escape room fire, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list by clicking the big blue button at WP:DYKNOM. Alternatively you can use the following user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Which can be activated with one click after turning automatic script intallation in your Preferences->Gadgets (check the "Install scripts without having to manually edit JavaScript files" option and save page; then visit the DYK-helper page and click install; then go to your new article and you'll find the new DYK menu). Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

@Piotrus: Thank you for the recommendation, I have submitted a nomination. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-04

MediaWiki message delivery 01:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

"The scale of the fire and number of deaths was" in [9]? 173.206.40.108 (talk) 01:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed the first part of the phrase, I've self reverted so your edit is reinstated. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 01:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
np 173.206.40.108 (talk) 02:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2025

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

  • Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history

Tip of the month:

Suggestion:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Tech News: 2025-05

MediaWiki message delivery 22:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: File:Eduard Kazmierski low res.tif

Hello Grumpylawnchair, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Eduard Kazmierski low res.tif, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: File is on commons. F1 does not apply. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

@Whpq, no it isn't. File:X Edward Kazmierski.jpg is the image on commons and that one isn't the one I'm proposing to delete. File:Eduard Kazmierski low res.tif is non-free. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 02:38, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
You are looking for WP:F8. If you look at the version you posted, the db-F1 tag literally tells you that. -- Whpq (talk) 04:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, my mistake. Sorry if I came off as rude and I apologise for any inconvenience I may have caused. Thanks for your time, Grumpylawnchair (talk) 04:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
No worries. I would have deleted it as F8 instead, but I am not sure that the PD status noted on Commons is correct without a bit of resaerch which would be helped if I knew any Polish. -- Whpq (talk) 04:54, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
It probably is in the public domain in Poland because any image published without a clear copyright notice before March 1994 is assumed to be in the public domain. This is from a Polish work from 1984. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 05:02, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Podujevo massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Copyvio revel A Rózsa énekei

Thank you for identifying the copyright violation. I hid the affected revisions. I did want to point out that the revisions you listed for revdel wasn’t correct. It should span from the first occurrence of the problem to the edit prior to the one that deleted the infringing content. In this case, you only marked a few of the edits involved and included the deleting edit. I changed the range to cover the correct ones. See A Rózsa énekei to see. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 06:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for informing me. Best regards, Grumpylawnchair [ALT] (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

 

Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia