User talk:Grstain

This user may have left Wikipedia. Grstain has not edited Wikipedia since February 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 00:35, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

I saw you were the only editor, with over 20000 edits, whose name is in bold, indicating a willingness to be nominated for adminstrator, whose entry indicates they have not been nominated. Have you, in fact, not been nominated, even though your name appears to have been in bold for over two years? Are you still interested? Geo Swan 16:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just moved my entry into the 20,000 edit band. I considered putting my name in bold -- then I read the discussions of some of those who had previously been nominated, and chose not to.

Cheers! Geo Swan 16:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. —Grstain | Talk 18:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

National Trust

Re. your entry on Sydney Harb. Nat. Pk, what did you mean by "dab national trust"? Can't work it out.

Sardaka 11:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the reference to National Trust (which leads to National Trusts worldwide) by a link to National Trust of Australia —Grstain | Talk 18:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blyton bibliography

A template you created, Template:Blyton bibliography, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 04:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. —Grstain | Talk 18:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Four Great SF Novels

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Four Great SF Novels, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. BPMullins | Talk 18:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I wonder if the articles on the four novels were updated to state that they were reprinted in Four Great SF Novels. —Grstain | Talk 18:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAR National parks of England and Wales

National parks of England and Wales has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. — Rod ^talk 20:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International Kitchen Garden Day

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article International Kitchen Garden Day, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of International Kitchen Garden Day. Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish. —Grstain | Talk 16:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Pope

Template:Pope has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Bazj (talk) 21:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Songs written by Boudleaux Bryant

I have nominated Category:Songs written by Boudleaux Bryant (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Songs written by Boudleaux Bryant (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wondered how the page on the Literary Translators' Association came about. I'm an LTAC member and had only recently thought about creating a wikipedia entry for the association. It's nice that it already exists. Are you a member of LTAC, Grstain? Or do you just add associations of various couleurs to wikipedia? Cheers Handlore (talk) 11:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Grstain! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 21 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Gérald Larose - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Sheila Fischman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Irish Translators' & Interpreters' Association

The article Irish Translators' & Interpreters' Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be a notable organization; see WP:ORG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Cornish Trilogy

A tag has been placed on Template:Cornish Trilogy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. IznoRepeat (talk) 18:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Salterton Trilogy

A tag has been placed on Template:Salterton Trilogy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Izno (talk) 18:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Toronto Trilogy

A tag has been placed on Template:Toronto Trilogy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Izno (talk) 18:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Marchbanks Books

A tag has been placed on Template:Marchbanks Books requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Izno (talk) 18:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Canadian Translation Associations

Template:Canadian Translation Associations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicholas Hoare

The article Nicholas Hoare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article asserts no notability, only identifies that it is a bookstore with 2 (two) locations. Nothing of note here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:33, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Bishop (actor)

The article Stephen Bishop (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC) JDDJS (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Promenades Cathédrale

The article Promenades Cathédrale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of High Spirits (short story collection) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High Spirits (short story collection) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Spirits (short story collection) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Untranslatability for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Untranslatability is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untranslatability until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 13:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Mac OS History

Template:Mac OS History has been nominated for merging with Template:Apple Inc. operating systems. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.  - Paul^T+/_C 04:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for DMZ_(computing)

An article that you have been involved in editing—DMZ_(computing)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Librairie Raffin

The article Librairie Raffin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adam C. Engst

The article Adam C. Engst has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability backed by independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 15:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of No Crystal Stair

The article No Crystal Stair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent RS available that discusses this topic in detail or otherwise. Fails WP:NBOOK AND GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steve Quinn (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Emma (1996 televsion)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Emma (1996 televsion). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 5#Emma (1996 televsion) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 17:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Emma (1972 televsion)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Emma (1972 televsion). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 5#Emma (1972 televsion) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 17:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ben Taylor (musician)

The article Ben Taylor (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Outside of many references in conjunction with his famous parents, and one NPR interview with him directly (which doesn’t serve to establish notability), I can’t find anything on him in books or the news that would satisfy WP:NM independently. No good refs have been added to his article in 10 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LovelyLillith (talk) 17:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 12 Books That Changed the World for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 12 Books That Changed the World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 Books That Changed the World until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The helper5667 (talk) 08:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ATIM

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ATIM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]