You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Eh meu chapa, é só uma linha, importas-te de dizer porque é que estás zangado comigo (e estás, por favor não negues, sim eu já sei que por vezes te esqueces de responder a mensagens e o tempo passa, e devo respeitar isso, mas vejo-te a responder a outras mensagens, inclusive bem mais agressivas que as minhas)? Peço desculpa pelo que fiz (posso tê-lo feito e nem ter reparado), e depois JURO que não te incomodo mais.
Ah, e já agora, em termos 100% enciclopédicos: depois de eu corrigir, voltaste a reverter-me no Isaac Gómez, por favor lê a historinha, ele jogou primeiro no TIME SÉNIOR e só depois foi para os RESERVAS, quando apareceu no time principal ainda era JÚNIOR. Relacionado com este artigo também já percebi que, ao contrário do que tínhamos falado da outra vez, vais pôr RAYO VALLECANO B na caixinha. OK tudo bem, já não discuto mais esse tema.
Bom fim de semana, por favor responde nem que sejam vinte palavras ("Sim estou brabo, fizeste isto e isto e isto"). Obrigado, por favor responde na tua página.
Translation: Hi there, how's it going?
Hey man, just one line, do you mind why you're angry with me (and you are, please do not deny it, yes i know you sometimes forget to reply to messages and time goes by, and i must respect that, but i see you reply to other messages, some way more aggressive than mine)? I apologize for what i have done (i may have done it without noticing), and then i SWEAR i won't bother you anymore.
Ah, while we're at it, in 100% encyclopedical terms: after i corrected it, you reverted me again in Isaac Gómez, please read storyline, he played first with the SENIOR TEAM and only afterwards did he join the RESERVES, when he appeared for the main squad he was still a JUNIOR. In relation with this article i also have realized that, unlike we discussed the last time, will write RAYO VALLECANO B in the box. OK fine, i am done discussing this situation.
Happy weekend, please reply even if it's just twenty words ("Yes i am pissed off, you did this and this and this"). Thank you, please reply in your page. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 13:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Após ver uma mensagem do PJ na tua página, fui lá e defendi-te. Ele pede que por favor vás até lá e dês a tua opinião (Translation: After seeing a message from PJ in your page, i went there and defended you. He asks you to please go there and provide an opinion). --84.90.219.128 (talk) 13:48, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
E aí cara, tudo OK?
Não entendi nada disso também, se eu te fiz algum mal peço desculpas, mas também peço que explique o que aconteceu, só para esclarecer. Também percebi que você responde as mensagens dos outros, mas não as minhas.
Abraços, tudo de melhor.
Translation:
Hi man, everything is OK?
I didn't get nothing of this too, if I harmed you in some way I apologize, but I'm also wanting to know what happened, just to make it clear. I also saw that you're answering other people's message but not mine.
Ah, sem problemas, meu amigo! Achei que tinha ficado bravo conosco ou algo parecido. Bom fim de semana para ti também!
Translation: Oh, no problems, my friend! I thought you were angry with us or something like that. Happy weeken for you too! MYS77✉21:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you should try and read the messages for once and stop make controversial page moves and stop edit warring. Your history will probably make it a long block and you seem to have no intention to stop. When you return (if not indefinately blocked) have fun. I will not revert you any more and risk being blocked myself. QED237(talk)00:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Are you even gonna respond to attempts of communicating? You are not allowed to make controversial page moves and I will take this further. Please respond. QED237(talk)17:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikicology: My actions are supported by the offical club source used for the squad, cant be much more clearer but I dont want to edit war. I have seen on his contributions he is currently editing and on the same page totally ignoring me and not willing to solve dispute as his content is currently on the article. And no page should be moved if controversial. Then it should go through WP:RM first. Gringo just ignores everything whch is why he has been blocked three times and reported to ANI and ANEW 5 (or 6) times, looked it up yesterday but dont remember exactly. QED237(talk)18:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Both competence and good faith are required to edit usefully. From my WP:NPOV, I think QED237 had demonstrated a certain level of competence by not engaging in an edit war. If an editor has already demonstrated incompetence that causes disruption, no amount of good faith can fix the problem resulting from the editor's lack of competence. As the old saying goes Give 'em enough rope, and they'll hang themselves. If a user has already been blocked numerous times for the same behavior, they've already gotten all the rope they need; the hangman is just asleep at the switch. Qed237 I acknowledge your efforts, you may concentrate on other task, the hangman will soon be awake.Wikicology (talk) 20:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, what part of "DO NOT MOVE A PAGE IF CONTROVERSIAL, INSTEAD ASK FOR A REQUESTED MOVE AS PER WP:RM" do you not understand? Haha have fun being blocked. QED237(talk)00:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously? Is this really needed? Is like writing, MURCIA, Region of MURCIA! Or BARCELONA, Province of BARCELONA! It would also help if you write something in the edit summary. Cheers, MYS77✉04:33, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I saw your draft in your user page. Nothing against it, though. But I moved it to User:Gringoladomenega/Pau López to be "officially registered" as a draft. When the player make his first-team debut you can simply move it to his correct page.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to FC Barcelona, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tentei explicar, o ano passado, no Iago Aspas, ou ficava tudo comprimido (os nomes dos times) na historinha/intro ou nenhum (na caixa claro que sim, não é?), era uma bagunça ficarem uns e outros não. Concordaste e disseste "Ah, é que nem reparei quem fez a alteração, desculpa, etc, etc", e voltas a fazer o mesmo no intro. Desisto!
Gostava de receber uma resposta, mas já percebi que não estás para aí virado, com NINGUÉM. Fica também descansado, não mexo mais no Aspas. Até mais, fica bem --84.90.219.128 (talk) 16:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
