User talk:Green light3

Green light3, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Green light3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrator's noticeboard discussion

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Slight edit warring on Ikigai. The discussion is about the topic Ikigai. Thank you. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 11:29, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Blue Zone, you may be blocked from editing.

As for "evidence", here you go: Blue_Zone#Blue_Zones. Right there, in black and white. Calton | Talk 15:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry where is the evidence, citations??? Green light3 (talk) 04:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Competence or Trolling?

At this point I have to question your competence in READING Wikipedia, let alone editing it. I've already provided the evidence, literally just above your confused question. Here it is again:

-->As for "evidence", here you go: Blue_Zone#Blue_Zones. Right there, in black and white.<--

That blue text is known as a "link", and if you click on it with your mouse, it will take you to the part of the article page that you can (presumably) read exactly what you have been asking for. But in case your computer mouse isn't working, I'll provide the words here for you:

*Loma Linda, California: Researchers studied a group of Seventh-day Adventists who rank among North America's longest-lived people.[1][2]

1. Buettner, Dan (21 April 2009) [2008]. "Contents". The Blue Zones: Lessons for Living Longer From the People Who've Lived the Longest (First Paperback ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Geographic. p. vii. ISBN 978-1-4262-0400-5. OCLC 246886564. Retrieved 15 September 2009.
2. Anderson Cooper, Gary Tuchman (November 16, 2005). "Transcripts on Living Longer". CNN. Archived from the original on September 8, 2006. Retrieved 2006-08-25. See CNN excerpt Archived 2011-03-17 at the Wayback Machine on YouTube.

That is more than enough explanation, which you should have already understood the last few times you were reverted. Now, if there are no further excuses, I'm going to put back the sentence. If you remove it again, to make it official:

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Blue Zone. --Calton | Talk 05:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, looks like I overlooked the citation, please accept my apologies for wasting your time. Green light3 (talk) 06:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calton - they keep adding the section back in, and clearly have no intention of stopping. Could I please ask that, if it's within your remit, you block this editor? -- Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 09:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ikigai

I've noticed that you keep adding a paragraph to Ikigai which makes two claims:

1) ...but early studies claiming this effect cannot be substantiated as many birth and death records perished in WWII.

2) Later research finds no exceptional extended life expectancy in the region compared within Japan as a whole or other developed countries.

I'm going to look for a copy of the cited article when I get the chance, but I've read the abstract and I don't see even a HINT of either of those two claims in it. The second claim, in fact, directly contradicts an obvious assumption baked into the study, namely that Okinawan longevity has DECLINED from a high point.

Since you're citing the study, you must have read it. So cite and quote the EXACT passages which DIRECTLY SUPPORT both claims: your edit stays out until you do.

And again, a reminder: edit-warring -- whether you cross the bright-line three-revert rule or not -- is the road to a block, ESPECIALLY since you have never ONCE used an article talk page. This article has a Talk page: use it. --Calton | Talk 11:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing on Ikigai. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 10:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gogyo have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gogyo was changed by Green light3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984152 on 2021-06-05T05:39:40+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sockpuppet of Zongqi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sockpuppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. - TNT ^💞 01:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]