User talk:Graemem56

Hello Graemem56, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Graemem56, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 09:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Economics of nuclear power plants may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• book [[The Doomsday Machine (2012 book)|The Doomsday Machine]] by Martin Cohen and Andrew McKillop ]) that what is often not appreciated in debates about the economics of nuclear power is that the
• A 2011 report for the [[Union of Concerned Scientists]] (An anti-nuclear group co-founded by anti-nuclear extremist [[Helen Caldicott]]stated that "the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:25, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, strontium-90. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Kolbasz (talk) 22:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jammu & Kashmir National Conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• live ammunition being fired by state paramilitary forces.<ref name="Kashmir protests to intensify">{{cite web|url=http://www.english.rfi.fr/africa/20100831-protests-intensify-after-11-year-old-killed |
• English| accessdate= 18 September 2010</ref><ref name="Death toll 100 in Kashmir demonstrations">{{cite web|url=http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2010/09/18/Death-toll-100-in-Kashmir-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 2 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Nuclear safety and security page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nuclear safety and security, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear economics

Thanks for your message. I agree with you about the lack of balance in the Economics of nuclear power plants. The article appears to emphasize every anti-nuclear activist. The first paragraph of the overview section in particular should be a summary of both sides, rather than just a compilation of anti-nuke quotes. That said, I believe that my edits were good. You don't specify which of my edits you disagree with. I removed the line calling someone a "fake expert," but that was a highly POV statement not contained in the cited source; it was sure to be removed sooner or later. Unless you can quote a reliable source calling him a fake expert, that just didn't belong. The line about nuclear being the only viable alternative to prevent global warming was about environmental impact, and said nothing about economics, and so was off-topic. Now if the "only viable alternative" statement were changed slightly to "the most economic non-carbon emitting baseload," or something similar, that would be appropriate for this article, assuming that it is properly sourced. The article needs to be balanced, but in a bullet-proof way that follows the Wikipedia guidelines, and that cannot be reasonably reverted. I welcome your comments, and I hope that we can find common ground in making the article more balanced. Regards. Plazak (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited High-level radioactive waste management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Economics of nuclear power plants

"There are a large number of exciting proposals for new reactors which exemplify the great promise that nuclear fission shows in providing abundant cheap energy" is a statement of opinion which doesn't belong in the article. Likewise, you can't state as a fact that somebody is a false authority. Either the statement can be included without editorializing, or it should not be included at all. See the guideline on "peacock terms" and the policy of neutrality. (Please don't unilaterally re-write sections of the article; instead, go to the talk page and discuss the changes you intend to make, and don't go ahead without consensus.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Did you read anything I have written? You can't add statements of opinion into articles; articles need to be written in a neutral and factual manner. It's good that you have gone to the talk page, but "discuss the change" doesn't mean "state your position and then go ahead with the change". Even if the article is biased, you can't counter that by adding more blatantly partisan content. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Again, please stop reverting to your preferred version! Several user have noted that your phrasing is inappropriate. If you continue revert warring, I will protect the article from editing, or ask another administrator to do the same. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]