User talk:Garemoko

This user gives a helping hand to new editors at the Feedback Dashboard.

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you Garemoko! You are a true super star! Thank you for teaching me! This really helped! Kerwin Thompson (talk) 01:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Garemoko,Thank you for teaching me the ways of putting a image...into...well you know. Im not just a puppeteer I am a really great cartoonist! People like my art and love it! One day I hope to be a cartoonist and make comics and shows. And I wish to be a puppeteer on Sesame Street. Thank You!:D -(talk)

Talkback

I replied to you at WP:HD#Add aspect from, Special:FeedbackDashboard onto my userpage, although I don't have a real solution for you. Regards. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 19:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great job!

Hi there! I am Jedd Raynier. I was surprised to know that you were ahead of me by a very large number of responses! How did you do that in only one day? Jedd Raynier (talk) 04:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. A lot of the time I use templates which I have open in Notepad which saves a lot of time because you then just edit the details as required. I'll try and remember to post my templates at Wikipedia:New editor feedback/Response team

Thank you!

	The Feedback Dashboard barnstar
	Dear Garemoko, thank you for all the work you've done responding to feedback via the Feedback Dashboard! The feature is useless without folks like you who put in the time to mentor new users, so please continue to be awesome and make Wikipedia better! :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Garemoko (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What she said :P. I moseyed on over here to give you a barnstar and found Maryana had got there first! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, I really appreciate the positive feedback from WMF peoples! Makes me feel all special! Garemoko (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New message!

Hello, Garemoko. You have new messages at Jedd Raynier's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank You Typhoonwikihelper (talk) 11:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Feedback

Thanks for the compliment, I'm glad I can help. :) SwisterTwister talk 21:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Garemoko. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:New_editor_feedback.
Message added 04:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(Section 29) --Non-Dropframe _talk 04:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Helping new users protect themselves from sock puppet accusations

Hello! I just noted this phrase, and I believe this is a bad approach. I think you may find this essay interesting. vvv^t 18:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the feedback. I read the essay and I still think that helping new users protect themselves from sock puppet accusations is a good idea. In the case you cite, the end result was that the user added links to their multiple accounts, thus protecting themselves from sock puppetry accusations. This approach seems to be exactly in line with the goals of the article you linked.

I couldn't see why you had named this section "biting" so I have renamed it to more accurately reflect the topic we're discussing. Garemoko (talk) 06:47, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Error 41

The article Error 41 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable - there are zillions of error codes out there

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 09:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Error 41 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Error 41 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Error 41 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Glass is a liquid misconception

(Note: I'm listing this on the talk pages of all editors active at Talk:List of common misconceptions for the last two weeks).

I started an RfC on the "glass is a liquid" issue that caused the edit war leading to protection status. Your comments would be appreciated, so that we can build a consensus and avoid further edit warring. siafu (talk) 20:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]