User talk:GameLegend

Welcome!

Hello, GameLegend, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 05:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A question

As much as I admire your efforts to improve the List of video game companies article, I do not entirely understand the purpose of unlinking all the listings in the Role(s) column (which incidentally I created)that I made. What was wrong with having a link to the Wikipedia article on Game Developers, Game Publishers or Console Developers, may I ask, and why did you feel so inclined to change it? Apart from this small oddity, thank you so much for editing this page and making it better. ShmenonPie - You wanna slice of me? (talk) 19:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ShmenonPie,

I thought it was kind of an overabundance to have all these links to the same article, and this might look better.

I just left the links at the top of the page, and link to the less common articles (arcade game, reality game etc.)

That's just my idea though. If you think it's better to have everything linked, feel free to =)

Cheers GameLegend (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Join the dark side, we have cookies

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Join the dark side, we have cookies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Join the dark side, we have cookies. Deb (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cult video games

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cult video games, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Cult video games. – Cyrus XIII ^(talk) 17:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russian cult games article

Hi GameLegend,

I have linked the right page. I am native speaker of Russian and I assure you that the literal translation of the name of the page is "Cult computer games". Yes, we do have a major problem with this page in Russian Wiki, as some people don't seem to understand what cult game is, stating that any hit game is a cult game and any hit film is a cult film. We are working on re-writing Russian article. Netrat_msk (talk) 08:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of VSTEP

A tag has been placed on VSTEP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of VSTEP

A tag has been placed on VSTEP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 04:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of VSTEP

I have nominated VSTEP, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VSTEP. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 04:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Namespace vio

I have moved GameLegend/Global Warming to User:GameLegend/Global Warming. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coin-Op Interactive

I want to remind you that you need to include verifiable, third-party sources in this article in order to demonstrate that this company is indeed notable. Otherwise, this article could be proposed for deletion per guidelines. Thank you, MuZemike (talk) 05:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Coin-Op Interactive

An article that you have been involved in editing, Coin-Op Interactive, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coin-Op Interactive. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MuZemike (talk) 17:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article

I moved it because I think that, with a general subject like video games, it should be enumerated that the article refers to world records. Though it's possible to move it back, I'll ask to see which one is more correct.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

People at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games have suggested moving it once again to List of video game related world records or keeping it the same.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uncharted 2: Among Thieves

Sorry about that. I guess i need to wait a week or month to see Uncharted 2: Among Thieves aggregate score in game-rankings.--Woad85 (talk) 03:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of First-person action game

I have nominated First-person action game, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First-person action game. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Marlith (Talk)  22:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Formula One driver records

Hi GameLegend. I have started a discussion about the "Highest average of races finished in the points" table (now called "Highest percentage of races finished in the points") which you added to List of Formula One driver records. I invite you to participate in the discussion. DH85868993 (talk) 11:28, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(film)#Reception for the relevant policy, specifically "Do not quote comments from members of the general public (e.g., user comments from Amazon.com, the Internet Movie Database or personal blogs), as they are self-published and have no proven expertise or credibility in the field" and "Do not include user ratings submitted to websites such as the Internet Movie Database or Rotten Tomatoes, as they are vulnerable to vote stacking and demographic skew". Only critic reviews belong in the reception section of a movie or videogame, not user-submitted reviews. It doesn't matter how relevant you think they might be, that's policy. Herr Gruber (talk) 10:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see how citing a critic saying that the fans will decide something is a notable statement about the game, since it's not about how good or otherwise the game is. The section is supposed to be about what the critics think of the work, and including such a comment is against the spirit of the rules. Herr Gruber (talk) 12:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are quoting a critic talking about the fans, not the game. Furthermore, the quote is a useless platitude that says nothing. Herr Gruber (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:Senna accident.jpg

I have removed File:Senna accident.jpg which you added to 1994 Formula One cheating controversy with this edit, because it does not have a valid non-free media use rationale for the article. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content for the applicable policy and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline if you want to address the issues. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 12:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mansell/Vettel

The mention of these records needs a clarification of how the two drivers compare, or there is zero point in having them on there. I know you don't do a lot else but maintain these records, but they still have to be encyclopedic. Saying that the Mansell and Vettel poles records are equal is misleading, and unencyclopedic. A slight breakdown of how they reached the 14 poles has to be, and will be, added. 14 out of 16 and 14 out of 18 are not equal. A mere mention of the percentage record is not enough, because it fails to make the link between the two records, for the casual reader. It's just not clear enough. So if you insist on reverting my (perfectly accurate, verifiable and pertinent) edit, then pease add this information in a way you are happy with, either at the pole record mention, or the percentage record mention, or we'll take it somewhere else. I don't wonder though, why you insist on reverting such a harmless edit. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:28, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Team6 Game Studios for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Team6 Game Studios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team6 Game Studios until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ayrton Senna 1994

Fine tweak, sir! Yes, earned indeed. Britmax (talk) 12:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Formula One Stats Wiki

I'm fine with it. But I am still fairly new to Wikipedia, so I won't be much of an expert. StandNThrow (talk) 02:37, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Zwarte Piet. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN3 report

You might want to finish off your report at WP:AN3. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Thanks for the heads up. GameLegend (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of video games developed in the Netherlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FRU. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MultiSafepay

The article MultiSafepay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MultiSafepay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MultiSafepay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MultiSafepay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:36, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gamergate is under general sanctions

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Digital Infinity

The article Digital Infinity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obscure video game company with little info and notablity

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Digital Infinity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digital Infinity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Infinity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MultiSafepay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MultiSafepay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MultiSafepay (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MultiSafePay logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MultiSafePay logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GameLegend. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Davilex Games for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davilex Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davilex Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GameLegend. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GameLegend. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shirley van der Lof

The article Shirley van der Lof has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Amateur driver who fails WP:NMOTORSPORT criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Corvus tristis (talk) 06:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zylom

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zylom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spellborn International

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Spellborn International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nedgame

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nedgame requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"DigiBlast" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect DigiBlast. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#DigiBlast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Power Play (Dutch TV program)

The article Power Play (Dutch TV program) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2018

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Campfire Legends for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campfire Legends is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campfire Legends until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- ferret (talk) 00:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Campfirelegendsthehookman-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Campfirelegendsthehookman-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Delicious (video game series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delicious (video game series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delicious (video game series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

soetermans. ^↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]