User talk:Frost/Archive 1

Missing Source for Rollback

Dear user Frost, you recently rolled back an edit of the article Hasan Akhund without providing a reliable source for the rollback. Please make sure to always include reliable sources before re-adding removed controversial claims to an article, for example stating that a terrorist is the Prime Minister of a state. Reliable sources include election results published by established and objective media outlets, statements from legitimate government officials or international organizations such as the UN.

Thank you very much for your contribution. 2A02:3037:201:D88D:A114:2BF4:7E24:46B3 (talk) 17:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Ae245. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 21:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Isaac Mabaya

The article Isaac Mabaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Fails GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 21:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Jan Ke Tami (talk) 04:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of UEFA Champions League finals

Please undo that move. It was originally put through as uncontroversial when it definitely should have gone through the WP:RM process. Furthermore, the finals before 1993 were not under the UEFA Champions League name, similar to how the List of UEFA Cup and Europa League finals includes finals prior to 2010. Finally, why did you make an edit to List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League finals? I can only assume it was a deliberate attempt to prevent the article from being moved back. – PeeJay 15:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the page because it was unsatisfying to see the pleonasm in using two names of the same competition and it also makes it seem like they're two different competitions, which is even more unsatisfying. When I requested the technical move, someone permitted it and they didn't think it was controversial when they performed the move on my behalf. Ae245 (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Footballer categories

Hello. I think you're mistaken about only including players in a club category if they played at senior level. The question's been raised several times over the years (see discussions from Feb 2009, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Nov 2017, Jan 2018, Sep 2019, Sep 2022, some more constructive than others...) but there's never been consensus for removal of the club category from players who had a genuine connection with the club (Mr Newell was at Liverpool from age 12 to 18) but didn't appear for the first team. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the users seem to agree on removing the category for youth players in the September 2022 discussion. Ae245 (talk) 03:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

chatting madshit wallahi

Revert snipes

Always fun to see someone else actively helping out! Cheers! Heyallkatehere (talk) 11:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for your hard work fighting vandalism! Gottagotospace (talk) 21:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edits?

Why????? Wiki conitributor (talk) 03:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You used the word "thoout". Ae245 (talk) 03:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was a spelling error. Wiki conitributor (talk) 03:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Ae245 (talk) 03:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your swift action with the Toby Carvery page! OnlyNano 14:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To Mr. Ae245,

Dear Mr. Ae245,

You may remember me for my edits on the page of Sacabambaspis, and for my edits not having proper sourcing, I do solemnly apologize for my actions, I just wanted to edit the page of the greatest fish... no... the greatest ANIMAL... NO... THE GREATEST THING OF ALL TIME. I wanted to contribute, but your response to my edits, I understand, I do hereby promise that I shall make clean, and honest edits, that are not swayed by opinions.

TLDR: Me Sowwy :(

Sincerely, User Sacabambaspis, Professional Sacabambaspis Enthusiast Sacabambaspis (talk) 16:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 11:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WestNet Inc., deleted in progress

WestNet Inc., Hi there how are you, could you please undelete it ? It was still in progress and we did our est to follow guidleines.. I appreciate your concerns regarding the article on WestNet Inc. I understand that the initial draft may have come across as promotional, but I am committed to revising and improving the article to ensure it meets Wikipedia's standards. WestNet Inc. is a notable company with a significant history in the telecommunications industry. It has been involved in pioneering the deployment of Wi-Fi networks in Calgary and played a crucial role during emergencies such as the 2013 Alberta floods by providing essential internet access through their Mobile HotSpot Vehicles. Additionally, in 2020, WestNet Inc. became a major supplier of medical masks during the global pandemic, highlighting its contributions to public health and safety. I have gathered reliable sources and am currently working on adding comprehensive information to the article, including citations from independent sources to establish the company's notability. Could you please allow me some time to make the necessary improvements? I am dedicated to ensuring that the article adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Thank you for your understanding. (talk) 04:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Calgaryleb (talk) 07:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I can't undelete it because I'm not an admin. You may ask the deleting admin (@Bbb23) on their talk page, or use the articles for creation process. Ae245 (talk) 09:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really?

Check again. 92.6.27.15 (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was a mistake, sorry. Ae245 (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for you to revert yourself. Don't want to edit war with you. 92.6.27.15 (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 92.6.27.15 (talk) 15:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent AIV report

Apologies, I didn't read far enough down the page. -- Euryalus (talk) 07:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surprised with a user requesting a speedy deletion

Good evening, Ae245. Currently an article I wrote is being nominated for speedy deletion. OK, maybe I did not write it correctly, or whatever. But I am surprised with a fact: there is the user:CarmenNozal64, who seems to have appeared on Wikipedia with the only purpose of contesting this article (and another related to it). Further, CarmenNozal64 placed not one, but three templates requesting deletion, including one "as hoax" (which I consider excessive). And I would like to have some extra time to edit/rewrite. Please, could you be so kind and take a look at it? Thanks in advance. Regards, Fadesga (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My most cordial greeting, the reason why I placed the promotional ad and deleted the page is because according to what I researched on Google about "Carlos Javier Jarquin" it is objectively seen that he is not a relevant and encyclopedic character, logically, the article is promotional , and I refer to the following tests:

1. The media in which Jarquin collaborates advertise his "works" with excessive promotional language.

2. All articles published in virtual media about Jarquin are made by friends of Jarquin (see Google)

3. Jarquin's books are self-published by Amazon.

4. Holding a virtual event on poetry is not considered of encyclopedic relevance, and then if so, can everyone who makes a couple of self-publications on Amazon and disseminates them in virtual media where they collaborate already appear on Wikipedia? I think that goes against Wikipedia's relevance principles.

5. Please read the discussion about the article, there I highlight an investigation that I did where the same user who created the article "Carlos Javier Jarquin" is a poet and is a friend of Jarquin and has been published by him in the media where he collaborates (you can search on Google).

In short, I do not do it with the intention of affecting Jarquin or anyone but with the intention of maintaining that encyclopedic principle of Wikipedia. If the person who created the article wants a page for his friend, he can make a web page without necessarily having to host his friend's biography on Wikipedia.

Kind regards. CarmenNozal64 (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decision regarding acceptance of Draft:Damien Haas

Good evening,

I would ask that you reconsider your view that Draft:Damien Haas is ready for mainspace. You appear to have added multiple sources to establish the inclusion of biographical details that are very clearly not suitable for such use, namely "thebiography.org" (which is clearly a low-grade SEO "celeb facts" site with poor use of grammar) and "pop.inquirer.net" (also a low-grade site that also fails on basic spelling and grammar). Beyond that there are basically no sources to demonstrate notability that have been presented and therefore should not be moved into mainspace until such a time it has been established. Rambling Rambler (talk) 23:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed the subject passes the criteria for actors/entertainers by having significant roles in multiple notable films/projects, and therefore is likely to be notable. But yes, I should've considered the suitability of the sources more carefully. I will not accept the draft. Ae245 (talk) 07:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reconsidering. On those specific criteria they are still in addition to the basic one of having to have enough RS to justify inclusion. Haas' work is relatively broad but seems lacking in major notable roles that would come with the coverage to justify an article on him at present. Rambling Rambler (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why you delete my edit

when I edit why you delete always 2409:4080:830C:599C:0:0:A46:20AD (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you delete this article

This article article shows information of the musican Qalinle, 154.115.222.186 (talk) 11:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edits?

This article intended to describe what HoYoverse is based on publicly available information? Why do you consider the sources not reliable? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HoYoverse&redirect=no Paimon123 (talk) 07:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you just revert ...

At the Sysop article? See this edit; I've encountered see also sections that were a lot worse than that one. Graham87 (talk) 07:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the IP's edit wasn't problematic but incomplete so I helped fix it, and I didn't restore the section because the article looked better without it. Ae245 (talk) 07:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copiii Soarelui

Hello, can you please review the page Draft:Copiii_Soarelui? I have added more to the article. Thank you. -- Arwenz (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

about umar gombe

When I went back through umar gombe's Twitter logs, we found a number of replies that we could determine that the owner of the account doing the spamming was umar gombe himself, and also that he had fixed a link to wikipedia on his profile, so we decided to describe him as "actively spamming. If you find any problems with the description, please do the "duty" of a sensible senior Wikipedian and restructure the edited part as an example. Manatsunoyonoinmer (talk) 14:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover granted

Hello, Ae245. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 16:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hurricane Alley RM

Did you notice the comments about capitalization? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 06:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I looked it up on Google and found that many sources refer to it in the capitalized form. Ae245 (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two people commented in the RM to say it should be in sentence case, and two other people later used the phrase in lowercase in their comments (and a fifth person used lowercase in a comment before people explicitly started talking about lowercase in their comments). No one said they disagreed with using lowercase. If you want to close the discussion with a different conclusion, I suggest that your closing statement should at least mention that the idea was considered. I suggest to also consider the possibility that your closure with a different outcome looks like a WP:SUPERVOTE. In the discussion, no one talked about whether there are many sources that refer to it in the capitalized form or not. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 08:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't clear that there's a consensus for moving to the lowercase name, as only two people explicitly endorsed it, and while some of the others did refer to the subject in that way, I don't think it necessarily confirmed their support for that style, as I presumed the one proposed by the requester was the one supported by default. I searched for the topic to confirm the style used more by sources to make the closure in accordance with the closing instructions, not to give the impression I was making a super vote. I've added a note in my closing summary. Ae245 (talk) 12:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the clarifying commentary. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 13:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting my edit

Edit is not bad here 125.26.91.70 (talk) 13:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@125.26.91.70, it's grammatically wrong. A city is correct, not an city. Why do you keep changing it? Frost (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my edits? Do you not like correct information being on wiki? Ayomommaaaaaaaaa45 (talk) 07:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fr, bro is so bad at this, he deleted my correct info as well Billie Mcrae (talk) 11:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

tui manua

why u lying about this? DayGG (talk) 11:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Billie Mcrae

WHY, DID YOU DELETE CORRECT INFO??? YOU ARE SO ANNOYING?? I NEED INFO PLS, ON WHAT I DID WRONG Billie Mcrae (talk) 11:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are vandalism. Stop. Frost 11:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GHOSTING??

ARE U GHOSTING ME??? ANSWER MY QUESTION @Frost Billie Mcrae (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

stop the ghost pls

WHY Billie Mcrae (talk) 11:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link

Why did you remove the link I added? It was for a campaign website and there was another link which had been left untouched. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.100.44.128 (talk) 12:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like spam. Frost 13:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't though. You could have checked. 2.100.44.128 (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dumitru Staniloae's description

I understand your point, but I consider that antisemitism and fascist extremism should be on the front page of a "saint", so do you have an idea of how that can be introduced, in an academic framework? Thank you. Icsitmua (talk) 14:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, words like 'anti-Semite' should be avoided on Wikipedia because they are non-neutral. See WP:NPOV for more. Frost 14:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edited your closure outcome message

Just letting you know that on Talk:Gender_nonconformity#Requested_move_12_July_2024, I changed your outcome message from

The result of the move request was: moved.

to

The result of the move request was: moved to "Gender nonconformity", as originally proposed.

because there was substantial discussion of a hyphenated alternative. Jruderman (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is stepping on rules about "editing other people's comments" and "touching procedurally closed discussions", but I think it's a neutral, straightforward improvement to clarity. Jruderman (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And sorry for making the closure harder by forcing you to think about hyphens in the first place. Jruderman (talk) 17:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it weird for someone famous from another move discussion to mess with a move discussion you closed? Jruderman (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. It's fine and thanks. Frost 06:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit on Kevin Behrens

Hi,

Kevin Behrens is the brother in law of Steven van de Velde. There is already a source for this despite the fact that you said there wasn’t. I added the information that Steven van de Velde is a convicted child rapist. I felt this necessary to add since it is what he is most known for and it is all over the news. I’m going to re-add it as it is important information.

thanks. Squirtball (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Frost 05:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop fantasizing

I am unrelated to some content defacers. I demand apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.94.60.26 (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFF

Hey, I noticed you accepted a technical move request to move Draft:The Fantastic Four: First Steps. I have reverted this as the requesting editor was told at the draft talk that this draft should not yet be moved as, per WP:NFF, we require sources confirming that filming has actually begun before moving. Their request was in violation of this policy. Just letting you know so you are aware of this for the future. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Frost 15:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JD Vance

Hi Frost

Just a query about your close at [1]... you stated that the majority were "arguing that MOS:BIOEXCEPT is satisfied and the name is used most commonly by sources". However, it is pretty much objective fact that MOS:BIOEXCEPT is not met. The guideline requires that two conditions be met. The first is that "the person has clearly declared and consistently used a preferred exceptional style for their own name" (emphasis mine). Nowhere in the discussion was it shown that Vance has clearly declared a preference, and indeed I don't think he ever has. Furthermore, it's not the case that almost every source styles it without a period, because a good number also use spaced or unspaced periods - [2][3][4] All-in-all, despite a 2/3 majority being in favour of the move, I think that the conditions for creating a carve-out from our standard guidelines are emphatically not met. According to the guidelines this move cannot go ahead. Please could you re-visit the close.  — Amakuru (talk) 20:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[5][6] seem to indicate a clearly declared preference, in my opinion, and they were brought up in the discussion. Vance's social media accounts also use JD, while the use of J. D. is lessening among sources. Frost 04:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1.231.110.146 & etc.

Damned disagreeable little pest aint he? Thanks for handling all their reverts. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Thanks for blocking. Frost 05:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking over, I need a nap lol

I cleaned up the backlog to 30 days, but it could use a once over, Idk if I got it all. Heyallkatehere (talk) 07:21, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, 50 results, set to 30 days lol Heyallkatehere (talk) 07:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Frost 07:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Emmanuel III

Many years ago , I had a family bible which belonged to my great grandfather and he said that he was descended from Charles Emmanuel III . I apologise, I thought that I would add it for that reason. The whereabouts of the Bible is unknown. Tcini09 (talk) 12:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for whacking the Hmong LTA. Jdcomix (talk) 14:57, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Frost 14:59, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i did a constructie change and you get mad

i did a more accurate translation of Hang Tuah in article and you mad. i am native mayalasia and that is a more accruate translation than hang i put it is a nickname 69.150.17.56 (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Norris Greenholt

Thanks for the revert. Is there something I should know about this editor? Mjroots (talk) 09:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's Hamish Ross [7] Frost 09:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I also had a block warning from Greenholt. Thank you for reverting it, Frost. My edits were good faith ones. I have been an editor for almost 20 years... --FeanorStar7 (talk) 09:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Euphoria Morning article title change

Hello, I just tried to change the article title of "Euphoria Morning" to "Euphoria Mourning" as that was the actual name of the album the article discusses (the article itself says this, in fact, so it's for sure an accurate change). I could not find a way to do this other than swapping the contents of the article and redirect and altering the redirect to be to "Euphoria Mourning", and a user on the talk page discussed frustration with this as well. If this is not the way this should be done, I apologize, and please let me know how this change should be done if my method is incorrect. Motorologist (talk) 10:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Motorologist you may add a request to change the page name at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Frost 10:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shahmee Saheedh

Dear Frost, Why did you nominated my article Shahmee Saheedh for speedy deletion as this article contain all reliable sources Abdullah Rifath (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ZillaKami Controversy Removal

Hey Frost, whilst I fully agree that we need peer-reviewed, high quality sources for Wikipedia, I should highlight that this rapper/artist "ZillaKami" is very low-tier, low calibre and niche in the music industry and he is rarely covered by reputable news outlets now so please refer to the current sources I've provided for his recent sexual misconduct allegations involving minors, as they're all factual and in-depth. I would not be writing lengthy and fake sections on Wikipedia about such a serious topic so please do not just disregard my work and quickly remove it because it does not contain the type of source material you want because let's face it - not all information in the world is derived from a news outlet or world class publication. In cases of musical artists in the underground such as ZillaKami, it often comes from within and from themselves and we need still update their pages based on what is provided to us. So please, do not delete my work and try to indirectly hide his controversial stints because that's just doing everyone a disservice and in fact, doing ZillaKami a service. Thank you and best wishes buddy. 2001:56A:F471:5500:252D:ABF4:E374:4638 (talk) 18:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Ammirati

Anthony Ammirati is a French pole vaulter of Italian descent. According to 23 and me, the name comes from the North/central region of Italy and means "commander" in Italian. 75.84.219.114 (talk) 18:39, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring "that" user

Hey there, I fell into the trap of reverting the user that keeps creating accounts. I've reported all of the accounts i could find at AIV, but they'll probably come back now you've done it again lol :) -REDACTED403 (talk) 12:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It should be easy to catch! Their usernames get shorter each time. Frost 12:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shane Beamer

He is a cheater his team had the signals for both Clemson and Tennessee 2601:3CA:C200:2615:0:0:0:18 (talk) 15:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

weird edit

with this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Too_Clever_by_Half&diff=1239278661&oldid=1239278600 you removed all reference to the more common English language item of the name to an article about a russian translation that only sometimes uses that name, in fact the "Too Clever By Half" alternate name isnt even mentioned anywhere in that article! if the article is gong to be a redirect, it should redirect to John Lang's biblography.67.220.13.43 (talk) 19:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right that it shouldn't be redirected to the current title, but I'm not sure about redirecting it to John Lang. Since there are other uses for this title, maybe a disambiguation page should be there instead. I'll try to create one. Frost 03:51, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted edit??

Made an edit to the Arthur murray page to replace Parramatta studio and webpage (which is no longer in operation) and replaced of with that of Arthur Murray Sydney www.learntodance.com.au (one of Australia's oldest and longest running Arthur Murray studios). Why would this be deemed inappropriate? Sebastian.potter.1975 (talk) 14:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't sure if the website is legitimate. Could you provide a source confirming Arthur Murray's link to it? Frost 14:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reed (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyler Reed. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frozen

While I agree that Talk:Frozen (2013 film)#Requested move 2 August 2024 had a consensus not to move the 2013 film to the base name I'm not sure there was a consensus for making Freezing primary since it was noted that the film gets 20x the views as the physical property article. Might it not be better to open a new RM at the DAB page to see if there is a consensus for making the Freezing article primary, thanks. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:49, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I shouldn't have said "strong support" for the redirect but I still think there's a consensus for it. However, since there weren't many people weighing in about that, I think a new RM wouldn't be a problem. So go ahead. Frost 07:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very much in agreement with User:Crouch, Swale. There was some support for the idea of "Frozen" being a primary redirect to "Freezing", but not nearly enough to justify a move without a separate discussion on the issue. (Incidentally, did you notice that the three IP addresses (1; 2; 3) opposing the proposed move all geolocate to Indonesia?)

In the circumstances, would you consider reverting the change and opening a separate move request yourself? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

People were clearly devided on if the concept or 2013 film were primary even though most thought that there was no primary topic. If the concept should be primary I think there should be a new RM on the DAB page for that which would be easier to assess consensus for. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean-de-Nivelle I did consider that fact about the IPs. In this situation, it seems best to gain a strong consensus so I will revert the move and update my close to 'no consensus' for the disambiguation page, to make way for a new RM. @Crouch, Swale. Frost 06:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warned and Blocked by Administrator

I think they is newest account ever you warned, you reported them and administrators asked me don't advised after reported them because i'm younger editor and i didn't understand at 1 month ago Raayaan9911 (talk) 15:03, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mau Mau Rebellion

Hello, I am a Kenyan and I know we won if we didn’t than we would of been in British rule. Infowritere (talk) 18:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the revert

I see the dick obsessive is back. Knitsey (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Frost 06:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you too! But can you explain what it was and can we continue editing random articles on Nepalese geography without block threats? — 2dk (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a long-term abuser. Frost 17:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

I put your warning back. This one is heading for a block. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Thanks. Frost 15:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting quite fed up with their moving the AfD target every 23 seconds, too. Heck, they moved it to mainspace in this state 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's troubling. Frost 16:33, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hologram49

Just a heads up: If you wind up putting this one to AIV (I see you’ve reverted four of his edits), don’t miss his sock. [8] MM (Give me info.) ^(Victories) 14:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks. Frost 14:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exuse my sir - I have a question about an edit you just made (fixed I think) to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Palanca_Awards (thanks)

Hi, I am a relatively new "editor" here on Wikipedia. I am just trying to make useful contributions, with only the best intentions. I primarily "fix" bare URLs, and occasionally find other things in the articles wrong and try to correct them and their assoc. references/citations.

I wonder if you could quickly explain to me what just happened (very quickly it seems)... This user "Darwin Cormier" said I vandalized the following page and undid my edit (but doesn't look like all the others I edited with same edit within minutes of this one): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Palanca_Awards

I tried to respond to him as he didn't give a reason, on my talk page. It looks like I edited it very simply to fix a bare URL, which should have been OK I think. Then I tried going to his page, and I think he might have been blocked by an admin.

I really just want to understand if I did something wrong so I can fix it, since I was editing a WHOLE BUNCH of these same pages for Palanca awards, with the exact same edit.

Also sorty of want to understand what I am reading on the talk page of that user.

Looks like GiantSnowman Blocked him? Then he asked to unblock Then jpgordon denied his request?

Oh - Now I see there is more info there that this person is trying to disrupt Wikipedia. So likely I didn't do anything wrong??

Thanks for your time. I understand if you don't respond it's likely some "troll" type person causing problems... Jjamulla (talk) 17:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did nothing wrong. The user is a long-term vandal. Frost 17:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP user

This IP may be related to a vandalism only account that you just blocked. BOZ (talk) 14:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV. Frost 14:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I see now you were not the one who blocked them, but thank you for reporting them. :) BOZ (talk) 14:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Query about version restoration you performed

Hello Frost,

On this article Cameroon–India relations, I made an edit which was for no reason undone by a vandaliser. You kindly reverted the vandaliser's action and for that I thank you! However after that you then restored the version from before I made my initial edit, could you clarify why?

Kind regards, Editor LM (talk) 17:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I misunderstood the context. Sorry! I will self-revert now. Frost 18:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Thank you Editor LM (talk) 18:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not noteworthy...to who.... personal interpritation ..interesting... undo Tags: Twinkle Undo

have a nice day Curtis "Wall Street" Carroll on Serving 27 Years, Becoming Stock Expert in Prison (Full Interview)

Trying to put in the date he got out of jail... interesting you used a Twinkle program to delete in two minutes...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbtERBXQPgg

try and watch and learn something... education is nice

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Carroll how can I add an image..

can you do this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.10.199.23 (talk) 16:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The later part in your edit seemed like a joke, so I removed it.

You can add an image in Visual Editor by clicking Insert > Images and media. Frost 16:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can add an image in Visual Editor by clicking Insert >great ..when can you do it... use Images and media.

You can find an image on the internet

YOU CAN DO IT 190.10.199.23 (talk) 16:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

still laughin at the speedy delete... Not noteworthy..

did you do 27 years in JAIL... how about you add a picture... User_talk:Frost 190.10.199.23 (talk) 16:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Talk Page Messages?

Hello! I don't entirely know the guideline on remove talk page messages but I'm confused as to why you did here on an IP user's talk page, removing a message (warning) posted eight minutes ago at the time. I'll assume that if the warning is inappropriate in this case, then the user who warned would be given {{uw-tempabuse1}} or something simliar, but... no? I'm just curious about that. Thanks for your time, and have a good day/night! Replicative Cloverleaf (talk) 11:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The warning was posted by a long-term vandal. Frost 11:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, but shouldn't there be some actions? I mean, there are automatic actions on AIV, but is that enough? Also I can't find anything on ANI, Sock investigation or simliar... Did I miss something here? Replicative Cloverleaf (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a link [9] Frost 12:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Replicative Cloverleaf (talk) 12:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting that link. I was wondering what was going on there... —C.Fred (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note

please help stop that user. here is amount of indian socks and few of editors fighting to stop:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Daniel_Case 93.140.190.14 (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rodolfo Hoeger

User:Rodolfo Hoeger was a vandal with many random edits. You reverted some of the edits but note that many of the bad edits the user made are still online. 46.44.158.42 (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the vandalism edits are still not reverted. See here. Where to report that? 46.44.158.42 (talk) 20:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I checked them all but didn't revert some because they undid unconstructive edits or edits that I thought shouldn't stay. If I missed any that should be reverted, I'm sure the regular editors on the pages will handle them, or the reverted editors themselves. However, if you still want someone to check again, you may ask at the Wikipedia:Help desk. Frost 03:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I just came across the most recent sockpuppet of User:Ms. Lance Boyer and found that you had done a lot of work last month, reverting their vandalism on IP User talk pages. That was a lot of work and your help is appreciated. Thank you! Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Frost 03:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Hello there, Thanks to keep safe for Miss Grand Myanmar 2025. since Aubrey is blocked of harassment ✅. PickMe10 (talk) 10:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Frost 10:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😁 PickMe10 (talk) 10:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to proceed on finding reliable source?

Dear user Frost,

my edit on the Britney Manson page which described a recent controversy has been reverted due to lack of reliable source, and I would like guidance on what could constitute as a reliable source in this context. The parties involved are internet personalities and the coverage on this situation hasn't reached a level it would have if they had larger followings. All of the facts have been confirmed on social media (by Manson herself, so this wouldn't count as libel) however most of the sources which could be cited aren't considered reliable according to Wikipedia standards. Eruricanon666 (talk) 17:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need an article about the controversy by a reputable publication verifying every statement. If the content you're adding can't be verified by reliable sources, it shouldn't be in the article - see WP:BLP. Genius and Passes aren't reliable, and in this case, they don't verify anything you added other than trivial details like an age and a release date. Even if the subject has confirmed the validity of the content, it still needs proper citation. If you need help with editing, I recommend checking out the teahouse. Good luck! Frost 18:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

There has been a user, @CFA, who has been hounding me and deleting nearly all my edits. When I asked him about this on his talk page he simply said I was a sock account, although he gave no proof, and has refused to even discuss with me why he thinks this. Is there anything you could do about this? Somaliaficionado (talk) 08:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest waiting for the outcome of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bennyblanco10#31 August 2024. Frost 08:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know but it is it really ok for him to be deleting my edits before the outcome of investigation? Also, will you guys take action if he continues to delete my edits after the investigation closes? Somaliaficionado (talk) 11:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History of Pennsylvania article vandalism

Thank you for reverting the recent vandalism on History of Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, a user from an unidentified IP address has re-vandalized with several, consecutive nonsense entries. I tried reverting but the Wikipedia system won't allow me to do anything but manually revert everything, which would be too time-consuming. (Unfortunately, I don't have Rollback privileges.) When you have a moment, could you please do a rollback to revert the most recent vandalism? Thanks in advance for your help. - 47thPennVols (talk) 22:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see it has been dealt with. Thanks for letting me know. If you use Twinkle, you can restore the last good version of an article in two clicks, without needing Rollback. Frost 03:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and it's now protected, which should hopefully deter future "tinkering" by that IP address. Thank you for the tip re: Twinkle! 47thPennVols (talk) 04:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advise and review of Draft: Bang Chan

Hello, I am currently working on a draft named "Draft: Bang Chan". Can you please review the draft for me and tell me where I need to improve? It will be a great help if you can guide me with the references as the draft previously got declined.

Thank you. RDWolfgang (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't so different from the version that was nominated for deletion. You should add sources discussing Bang Chan in-depth to establish his notability as an individual and not just as a member of his band. See WP:BANDMEMBER. They need to be more than passing mentions and focus on his activities outside of the band. When you're done, resubmit and wait for someone to accept or decline. Frost 11:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your reply. I appreciate your time. I shall work on these. Thank you again! RDWolfgang (talk) 11:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for helping revert vandalism on Rossville, Indiana! Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 19:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this barnstar! Frost 19:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please check out the Maya Script page, someone removed multiple syllables!

Someone removed multiple syllables as far as i can tell, such as Le, a version of Ma and a version of Li (could be others too) SheepyTheSheep (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to these changes?: [10] Try discussing it with the user on their talk page. I'm not familiar with this topic. Frost 05:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and alright, ill have to find another way though as it seems they havent responded to other people asking on their talk page, thank you anyway SheepyTheSheep (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TWINKLE

TWINKLE failed, I fulfilled! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.238.105.56 (talk) 09:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archive page

Sorry, my bad 79.17.172.126 (talk) 14:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Frost 14:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add these categories

to these articles 2600:4808:9C70:6600:9078:80AF:D446:EBFB (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Mitchell

It was a mistake, a thousand apologies--Alon9393 (talk) 19:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine. I shouldn't have reverted you either. Sorry! Frost 19:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Frost, can we be friends

Hello frost 72.252.27.28 (talk) 15:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2025 FIVB Men's Volleyball World Championship

Hello, Frost,

According to WP:NORED, we shouldn't have any red link categories on the project and some of your edits introduced these non-existent categories. Please either change the categories to a category that currently exists or, better yet, create these missing categories yourself. Thank you. Liz ^Read! Talk! 18:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on it, thanks. Frost 18:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And, looking at Category:FIVB Volleyball Men's World Championship, it looks like there might be other categories that should be renamed. Please go propose speedy renames at Categories for Discussion so you don't need to go create a lot of categories. Liz ^Read! Talk! 18:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring with socks

I saw you 3RRing (within the rules) a sock of Andrew5 a bit ago. I advise you to check out the essay Wikipedia:Don't edit-war with vandals or sockpuppets because doing so when they'll be blocked and mass reverted in moments anyway isn't helpful. However, thanks for assisting in cleanup either way! GeorgeMemulous (talk) 12:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input. Frost 12:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your anti-vandalism contributions. Cheers! JeffSpaceman (talk) 12:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it, thank you. Frost 12:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add these categories to

These articles 2600:4808:9C70:6600:39FC:FA8E:740D:568F (talk) 18:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]