User talk:Freedom skies/Archive 5Re: Decline of Buddism in India medcab caseI'd suggest let's wait for some more time. Tigeroo might be taking a wikibreak. utcursch | talk 13:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007
Delivered by grafikbot 17:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC) GreetingsHappy Holi !!--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Happy holiThanks and the same to you too. =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Take your exams!Enjoy your vacation! Spend time with your family! Don't worry, I'll keep the poachers at bay while you rest ;-) Look forward to working with you again afterwards! Djma12 03:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC) No good deed goes unpunished ;-) ...
Bio: Rajkumar KanagasingamHi, An editor is continuously vandalising my Bio over dispute related to Talk:Anton Balasingham. The editor tried hard to delete my Bio from wikipedia. You can see the evidence here(1) and here(2)' The editor is taking an undue interest over my Bio and deleted over Citation. I have restored the information. I requested an Administrator to check my Bio whether Citations are enough. I also taken this matter for Request for Comment. Though I have off-line media archives(which are attached on Talk:Rajkumar Kanagasingam, I couldn't bring it to the articles. Now I am very much frustrated. Please help me on this matter.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 05:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC) Oden RaveenS Bakasuprman SiobhanHansa Wackymacs Seraphimblade Freedom skies Rumpelstiltskin223 Dangerous-Boy Ccscott Mariano Anto Bruno Mascarenhas Tarinth Origins of BodhidharmaHmm, I see what you're saying, and understand your reservations. Let me mull on this one for awhile. However, I do think that the block format for the quotes within the section is distracting. I'm not sure that the quotes even need to be included. Having the statements that they backup + citation should be sufficient. If your concern is that your edits would be automatically flagged for revert, why don't you tell me about them and I could implement them? (After review, of course.) Best regards, Djma12 (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC) ndfI am not here to fight. Please read my comment on your edits in the article NDF - Talk:National_Development_Front#Congress_campaigns_against_terrorism --Fear the Fire 11:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Hello, I have seen your repeated edits in the page in NDF page. You are trying to put your POV in this page. Please bring facts and references to prove your points, otherwise. Please read the discussion page before you edit the page. The points in the book 'AHANKARI' are not related to NDF, if you read it. Why you are very much interested to relate NDF to Lashkar and other islamist group? --- Sundaram7 06:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC) RFArI've requested an arbitration involving you. Hi, An AFD on my Bio Rajkumar Kanagasingam is brought only to distract the offences at wikipedia after stealing my e-mail address and thereafter my wiki passwords by Netmonger and his/her group and nothing else. How this user can bring this AFD before he clears himself from the offences which is now under investigation under an Administrator’s supervision and the details are here.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 05:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Your arbitration evidenceFor your reference, the arbitrators generally request that statements on the requests for arbitration page be no longer than approximately 500 words. Your current section, including rebuttals, is well over that length, and it would be desirable for you to shorten your overall presentation. Please bear in mind that the only issue right now is whether the Arbitration Committee should hear the case, and that if the case is accepted, you will have a further opportunity to present a statement, evidence, and workshop proposals. Thank you. Newyorkbrad 17:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Image:1Hills.jpg listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1Hills.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Selket Talk 15:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Image:Freedomskies.jpg listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Freedomskies.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Selket Talk 15:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Hello, An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Freedom skies. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Freedom skies/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Freedom skies/Workshop. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 02:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Image:Rajandtheben.jpg listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rajandtheben.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BJBot 13:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC) The SadhuIf you have time, check out The Sadhu page. I've updated it extensively. Better still, please go to the peer review section and give me some feedback. Zuracech lordum 10:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
RepliedI replied your message in the copyright help page: Confusion about two pages I added. Eisenhower 19:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315 You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC) Edit summariesFor convenience of other editors (compassion :-)), please remember to explain your edits either through edit summaries or on talk page. This helps other editors understand what's going on. One example is moving back the Song of Enlightenment from teachers section to the mythology section, which was not even mentioned in your edit summary. --Knverma 20:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
A few Sources
Freedom skies| talk 01:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC) Buddhism2 templateThank you for your extremely generous and enthusiastic note. I too appreciate your impressive, on-going contributions. I also really enjoy looking at the beautiful thangkas that you've placed on your User and User_talk pages -- makes me want to linger and smile -- a wonderful oasis for all Wikipedians. Thanks so much again. I wish you well, Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 22:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC) The Sadhu nominationThanks for informing me but do you really think it's ready? I, for one, hope that the excessive wordage be cut down and that some improvements be made such as additional reviews, sales information and so on. Moreover, I sent an e-mail to the writer, Gotham Chopra, detailing a number of questions which I hoped that he would answer and although I have obtained my response, I am unable to use it because it has been obtained through e-mail and hence constitutes original research. You can see the transcript of what Gotham Chopra had to say here (I copied the html code from the e-mail). Obviously, this resource cannot be verified and trusted to put up on the page and I did ask Mr. Chopra to help me by including it in his personal blog but he has not replied for a while and I have been preoccupied with university to persevere with my request. What do you think about using this amateur interview as a resource? Do you think anything can be done so as to make it usable? Of course, this all hinges on whether you trust that I actually did talk to the writer and did not make this up! Zuracech lordum 18:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I dont perticularily care about the status of the article, but favoritism, 'posetive' or 'negative', is infactual - thus your edit of the introduction to include four martial arts representing different religious communities is unwarranted. One could just as easily argue for a regional distribution - north/south/east/west, or any other pointless catagorisation - I happened to choose martial arts reflecting North India, Central India, North-East India, and South India - and chose based on status in popular revival. You are quite clearly trying to artifically project a cosmopolitan image in your choice of arts - perhaps an admirable sentiment - but also infactual. Should Pehlwani, effectively a competition sport, be listed alongside actual combat arts that reflect Indian martial tradition more accuratly? Its up to you. For your benefit, I will also point out that Pehlwani is not infact Muslim in origin, im not sure which art is meant to be Buddhist in origin, and that one of Kalarippayattu's most senior masters is a Muslim. Letting the arts speak for themselves instead of trying to bias their presentation might have been better - Indian martial arts are usually based on dharmic philosophy, but have been just as open to other religions as Buddhist Kung Fu has. On that philosophical note, isnt artificially projecting a model diversity, as bad as artificially projecting a model singularity? Sorry for my uncharecteristically arid reply, but im feeling perticularily nihilist today. I do have a wiki account, but dont bother signing on anymore, because most articles are inevitably currupted by fanatic/obsessive unreferenced editing. P.S. I appretiate your contribution to the article, and it is nice to see you are also contributing to the Virgin Comics articles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.44.114.194 (talk) 05:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC). Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Tha Sadhu GA nom failedHello friend. Sorry to have failed the GA nomination of The Sadhu. Please see the article's talk page to know why it failed, and what can be done. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
My ethnicityHi, I hadn't noticed these diffs earlier: [1] [2]. So now I am left wondering why you deleted your comments. Regards, Knverma 10:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC) This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.
For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 18:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia