User talk:Fortheloveofbacon/Archive 1

January 2012

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChildofMidnight. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Fortheloveofbacon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please see my response here WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/ChildofMidnight and note that my defense was not addressed prior to this block. This is a witch hunt. Although it seems ridiculous to address, I would like to point out that the only overlap in my editing habits is one vandalism revert on the Doritos article. Fortheloveofbacon (talk) 23:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

This appears to have been a case of mistaken identity, based on a number of factors we were able to look into during the Arbitration Committee review, which would not have been available during the SPI investigation. I have unblocked you and apologize for the confusion here. Happy editing. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain RelevantUsername (talk · contribs), which you created earlier today? --MuZemike 23:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CLEANSTART Frankly, I assumed when I woke up for the day that this issue would be over and done with. I guess the admins are all vegetarians? I did not think that the word "bacon" was enough for WP:DUCK, and assumed that when I came back to the wiki today, I'd be able to get on with things... Should be noted that arbcom has also been notified.Fortheloveofbacon (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as a bacon-loving vegetarian (It's been hard - we have meetings to go to), I'm not at all suprised if there are issues of "identity overlap" between these two accounts. However I strongly feel that any blocking of this account for such a matter would be no more than punitive and far from assisting the encyclopedia. If the baconlover transgresses on their account's own terms, then block away. For past history though, there's no need for it at all and if there's no need I ask if the reason is instead more to do with past attitudes than current judgement. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:46, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unclear on exactly what you mean. Could you rephrase? Fortheloveofbacon (talk) 13:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]