User talk:Fma12/Archive 8

Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11

7 ≤ - Go to archive: - ≥ 9

Hola

Hola, veo que modificaste la foto panorámica que puse en el artículo de River Plate, entiendo la modificación si es por un tema de formato, pero cambiar la imagen que puse (de mi autoría) por una más vieja? por que? La foto que dejaste no refleja el estado actual del estadio, ya que la pintura y el marcador cambiaron, así cómo la distribución y palcos, podrías restituírla con el formato apropiado? o al menos fundamentar por que sacás mi imagen. Saludos. Innoverdrive (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Hola

Hola, veo que has hecho logos en vector, me pregunto si podrías hacer el logo del Puerto Rico FC de la segundo división de Estados Unidos en vector? Seriesphile (talk · ctb) 09:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Argentina national football team

I understand why you have chosen the colour scheme of Template:Argentina national football team but did you realize that it is very poorly readable? In fact, the bottom row (in dark blue) is the best readable of the whole template. Could you do me (and people with a poor vision) a favour by changing the colour scheme? The Banner talk 22:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

I have removed some of the content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://sandowncobrasfc.com.au/club_history.html, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Port Adelaide Football Club

Noice work on the guernsey maaaaaaaate ♥♥. Best club of all time! KAHN THE PEAR™! #1870 Thejoebloggsblog (talk) 21:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Thejoebloggsblog !!!!! :D :D I'm happy you've appreciated my work !! Best regards ! Fma12 (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Claremont Tigers Jumper.svg

Hi Fma12, I was just wanting to get your opinion on the licencing for File:Claremont Tigers Jumper.svg, mainly in regards to the CFC on it. I would think the CFC is too complex for the guernsey to fit under the licencing of PD-shape and Claremont have only been using the CFC on the guernsey since 1964, so it wouldn't be in the public domain for that reason either. It is near identical to Carlton's CFC which is in the public domain due it being created before 1923, so does the CFC fit under that? Or should it be classified as a non-free image, and by that token it should probably be deleted because I cannot see how the NFCC rationale would fit any of the articles it's being used on. What are your thoughts? Thanks, Flickerd (talk) 07:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Flickerd, you're pointing at a complex case... I don't really think the CFC logo is too complex to be above the TOO although it is very low in Australia. Beyond that, the CFC logo is quite similar to Carlton's one as you indicate so the jersey could be uploaded to Commons with a license indicating the logo is PD-1923. I was taking a look at other guernseys designed by the uploader on his talk page (see here) and something similar occurs with the South Adelaide Panthers guernsey (this), which is tagged as "non-free" because of its anagram on the chest. I guess this logo is post-1923 so it is considered copyrighted in Australia (for the same reason: "the TOO in that country is considerably below"). In fact, the vast majority of logos are considered non-free there (as is stated on Commons).
Summarizing, if you move the Tigers jumper to Commons, you should indicate the CFC logo was created before 1923, otherwise something else should nominate the file for deletion... Thanks for answering, and keep in touch if you need further assistance.
Best, 11:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Omar Oreste Corbatta

Hello there, from Portugal,

regarding our last edits there, i have filed a report at WP:FOOTY, please do participate there. Like i said in my last edit summary, sorry for wanting to help.

Happy editing --Quite A Character (talk) 16:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Cheers, sorry for the confusion --Quite A Character (talk) 16:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

  • No reply whatsoever or input at WP:FOOTY, even though i admitted my shortcomings and politely apologized. OK, i did not use the talk page like you suggested, but the WP:FOOTY report is the next best thing so your request did not exactly fall on deaf ears.

Perdone usted por las molestias, sí? Adiós. --Quite A Character (talk) 20:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Many thanks for the reply! I have made some more minor adjustments and left additional comments at WP:FOOTY; even though we don't use numbers in honours (you don't believe me, nothing more i can do), out of respect i have left them there, if someone else removes them then i have nothing to do with it.

Have a pleasant week --Quite A Character (talk) 21:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, @Quite A Character:, If you don't mind, I'd prefer you make the changes in the article so I'm currently working on a comics project. Thanks for the support and the explanations about some points where I had doubts. Keep in contact ! Best wishes, - Fma12 (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

No problems at all, i'll do it! I just wanted to warn you so you did not think I was editing stuff behind your back (so to speak)... Best wishes back --Quite A Character (talk) 11:45, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Nick menza photo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nick menza photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:09, 8 March 2018 (UTC)