en User talk:FloridaArmy Archive 83

This is an archive of past discussions with User:FloridaArmy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 80

Archive 81

Archive 82

→

Your draft article, Draft:Cyril Sartor

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cyril Sartor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tomoka, Florida

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tomoka, Florida, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vincent Virga

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vincent Virga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Black Shadows on a Silver Screen

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black Shadows on a Silver Screen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lee Nance

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lee Nance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Behnke-Walker Business College

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Behnke-Walker Business College".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Excel High School

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Excel High School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Jackson Millsaps has been accepted

Jesse Jackson Millsaps, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curron J. Adolphe has been accepted

Curron J. Adolphe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacksonville Courier has been accepted

Jacksonville Courier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HenryTemplo (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George F. Bowles has been accepted

George F. Bowles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Hey, FYI I just uploaded File:Negro lawyers and other historic characters of Mississippi.png to commons, if/when I get time I'll spilt some out. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 17:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lake Buffum

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lake Buffum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Mordant (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fakescientist8000 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edwin Mordant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edwin Mordant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 13:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Asher Barash

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Asher Barash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Energetic Eva

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Energetic Eva, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:George G. Mosely

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George G. Mosely, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Christ Missionary and Industrial College

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Christ Missionary and Industrial College, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudolph Bent (May 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Fakescientist8000 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Article has not been shown to be improved. Still fails both WP:GNG and WP:NBOX.

Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 17:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Troubles of Sambo and Dinah (May 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Fakescientist8000 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Fails WP:GNG. Article has not been shown to have reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the article.

Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 17:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Troubles of Sambo and Dinah (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs to have significant coverage in multiple secondary sources- sources appear to make only a passing mention of the topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Troubles of Sambo and Dinah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Troubles of Sambo and Dinah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William H. Tunnard (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

an obituary does not establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William H. Tunnard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:William H. Tunnard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 20:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Centerville Industrial Institute

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Centerville Industrial Institute, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tom Rice (film historian)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom Rice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alice Gorgas

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alice Gorgas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:New York Independent News

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New York Independent News, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Brown Bombers

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brown Bombers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:United States Civil Rights Trail

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States Civil Rights Trail, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academy for Classical Education has been accepted

Academy for Classical Education, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 02:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tony Paton

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tony Paton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudolph Bent (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rudolph Bent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rudolph Bent, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SlySabre (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SlySabre (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lew Golder

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lew Golder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Herbert Cowell

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Herbert Cowell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Summy-Birchard Company

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Summy-Birchard Company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anderson J. Peeler

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anderson J. Peeler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Aiona has been accepted

Sam Aiona, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 11:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas H. Pope III

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas H. Pope III".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

State senator for 8 years. User:Liz should not be deleting entries like this. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

It wasn't edited in 6 months... therefore it was deleted under G13... you can request it back from WP:REFUND/G13 - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Lee Love (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ed Lee Love and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ed Lee Love, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 13:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:I. M. Weingarden

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I. M. Weingarden, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Finsterwald

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Finsterwald, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Black Film Festival

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Black Film Festival, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anna Pitzer

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anna Pitzer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Al Alt

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Al Alt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mateel Farnham (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mateel Farnham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mateel Farnham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 05:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:William S. Cawthon

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William S. Cawthon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Barber (1916 film)

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Barber (1916 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mateel Farnham (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs to be expanded with information from the references. The page doesn't even say if they are alive or not.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mateel Farnham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mateel Farnham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 13:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Edward Lewis (filmmaker)

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edward Lewis (filmmaker), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arthur Laidler Macbeth

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arthur Laidler Macbeth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hammer - Palmer Mansion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hammer - Palmer Mansion. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:David E. Wilt

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David E. Wilt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles A. Finley (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

lot of short choppy sentences

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles A. Finley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charles A. Finley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 23:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Shelby Bacon

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shelby Bacon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Hunter Craig (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Hunter Craig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Henry Hunter Craig, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 23:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Greetings user:Kaleeb18, thank you for reviewing afc submissions. State legislators are considered notable. This one is particularly interesting and notable in several respects. Your rejection above this one is also of a state legislator. “Choppy sentences” is not appropriate grounds for rejecting a submission and you are most welcome to expand on these entries and improve the wording and sentence structure as you see fit. Wikipedia is a collaborative enterprise. I am impressed with what I saw of you article submissions and wish you all the best. Have a great summer. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

If I may, I don't see why it wouldn't hurt for you to at least try and get the spelling mechanics right in a paragraph-long submission ("aling" and "onnthe")? -Indy beetle (talk) 00:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks for pointing those mistakes out. Fixing mistakes doesn’t hurt me a bit. I do it all the time. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

The Terry Sanford article you submitted for GA states “ Sanford served as Governor of North Carolina from 1961 1965” in the opening paragraph. I try to avoid using the phrase “a number of”. 0 is a number. 1 is a number. 2 is a number, on up. It clutters things is unencyclopedic and doesn’t tell the reader anything. It should be left out. “Best known for” is also a frequent offender Wikipedia’s use. I mention it here only because it’s so annoyingly pervasive, I didn’t see it in the entry you’re working on. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk)

I never said that Choppy sentences was the reason I declined I just made that comment. It seem as though the second reference might be the only reliable source in that article and according to WP:THREE (although it is not a policy) there should be at bare minimum three. You say it is notable but according to WP:POLITICIAN it says "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline." ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 00:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

The key word there is “local” User:Kaleeb18 and the sentence preceding it notes that statewide officials are considered notable. Neither entry has a single reliable source. You’re welcome to expand them and add additional sourcing. Often 19th and early 20th century sources are harder to come by but they are out there. Thanks again. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

hmm @Primefac: do we accept the drafts for politicians (presuming the politician is notable) even if the sources in the draft may not be reliable? ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 00:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Moved it to article-space; polished it up fractionally. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

One of my goals is to create an article on every one of the Reconstruction-era black legislators, state officials, etc. I've done work on my native state of Tennessee, and some here in Wisconsin. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

We’ve got a VERY long way to go for Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, and South Carolina I’m sorry to say User:Orangemike. And that’s just for state legislators. We also don’t have articles for many (most?) of William D. Foster’s films. So very much work to do. Thanks for your help. Happy Summer. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, no interest in or expertise about films. I'm a legislative guy; was the Democratic nominee in my home town in 1974, and had to meet with the local NAACP chapters in church parking lots at night so nobody knew I was talking to them about my candidacy. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

No one else on Wikipedia appears to have the expertise or interest to write up the work of one of the earliest and most important filmmakers in our history. It’s like the struggle to provide access for African Americans to schools like the ones Barack Obama, Kamala Harris, and Clarence Thomas attended. The more things change the more they stay the same. Thanks for your help. Happy editing. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hammer/Palmer Mansion has been accepted

Hammer/Palmer Mansion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles A. Finley (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was:

This really needs to be cleaned up. Consider using Doug Broxson or Loranne Ausley as a model. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles A. Finley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charles A. Finley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 02:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

I don't dispute that he's notable. The problem is the draft is a serious mess. Please withdraw the submission and clean it up before submitting it again. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 02:36, 29 May 2022

User:Hammersoft you are comparing current officeholders to a 19th century officeholder and University of Florida founder. You need to understand the difference. Feel free to make any and all improvements you find appropriate. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Not at all. I'm suggesting using well fleshed out articles for how to clean up this draft. --Hammersoft (talk) 08:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mateel Farnham has been accepted

Mateel Farnham, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 09:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:P. T. Pearce

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "P. T. Pearce".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cecile Starr

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cecile Starr, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Afro-American League

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Afro-American League".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Henry Roper has been accepted

James Henry Roper, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 21:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Lee Love (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ed Lee Love and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ed Lee Love, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 21:40, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Camille Dory Chamoun (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Camille Dory Chamoun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Camille Dory Chamoun, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 01:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Camille Dory Chamoun has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Camille Dory Chamoun. Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 02:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ernest Touissant Welcome

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ernest Touissant Welcome, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canada Butler has been accepted

Canada Butler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:John Clein

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Clein".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: D. H. Hopson has been accepted

D. H. Hopson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward D. Green has been accepted

Edward D. Green, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 16:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph B. Brooks has been accepted

Joseph B. Brooks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 17:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norman Washington Harllee has been accepted

Norman Washington Harllee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 17:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Emanuel F. Heisler

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emanuel F. Heisler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Arthur Sizemore

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arthur Sizemore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Camille Dory Chamoun has been accepted

Camille Dory Chamoun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 20:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isaac Purcell (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fakescientist8000 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is potential here; this person might be considered notable. However, there needs to be more citations as well as more verification.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isaac Purcell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Isaac Purcell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 22:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Payne Institute has been accepted

Payne Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarah Dudley Pettey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Temperance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poplar Ridge, Alabama has been accepted

Poplar Ridge, Alabama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eliza McHatton Ripley has been accepted

Eliza McHatton Ripley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 10:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marion Moise has been accepted

Marion Moise, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 19:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star of Zion (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Star of Zion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Star of Zion, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 20:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. Douglas Wetmore has been accepted

J. Douglas Wetmore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 20:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert Tatum Dent has been accepted

Albert Tatum Dent, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Scorpions13256 (talk) 18:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James A. Shorter has been accepted

James A. Shorter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jacqueline DeShazor

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jacqueline DeShazor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alwyn Barr

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alwyn Barr, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 83

Your draft article, Draft:Cyril Sartor

Concern regarding Draft:Tomoka, Florida

Your draft article, Draft:Vincent Virga

Concern regarding Draft:Black Shadows on a Silver Screen

Concern regarding Draft:Lee Nance

Your draft article, Draft:Behnke-Walker Business College

Your draft article, Draft:Excel High School

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Jackson Millsaps has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curron J. Adolphe has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacksonville Courier has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: George F. Bowles has been accepted

Your draft article, Draft:Lake Buffum

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Mordant (May 23)

Concern regarding Draft:Asher Barash

Concern regarding Draft:Energetic Eva

Concern regarding Draft:George G. Mosely

Concern regarding Draft:Christ Missionary and Industrial College

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudolph Bent (May 24)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Troubles of Sambo and Dinah (May 24)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Troubles of Sambo and Dinah (May 24)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William H. Tunnard (May 24)

Concern regarding Draft:Centerville Industrial Institute

Your draft article, Draft:Tom Rice (film historian)

Concern regarding Draft:Alice Gorgas

Concern regarding Draft:New York Independent News

Concern regarding Draft:Brown Bombers

Concern regarding Draft:United States Civil Rights Trail

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academy for Classical Education has been accepted

Concern regarding Draft:Tony Paton

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudolph Bent (May 26)

Concern regarding Draft:Lew Golder

Your draft article, Draft:Herbert Cowell

Your draft article, Draft:Summy-Birchard Company

Your draft article, Draft:Anderson J. Peeler

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Aiona has been accepted

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas H. Pope III

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Lee Love (May 27)

Concern regarding Draft:I. M. Weingarden

Concern regarding Draft:Finsterwald

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Black Film Festival

Your draft article, Draft:Anna Pitzer

Concern regarding Draft:Al Alt

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mateel Farnham (May 28)

Your draft article, Draft:William S. Cawthon

Concern regarding Draft:The Barber (1916 film)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mateel Farnham (May 28)

Concern regarding Draft:Edward Lewis (filmmaker)

Concern regarding Draft:Arthur Laidler Macbeth

AfC notification: Draft:Hammer - Palmer Mansion has a new comment

Concern regarding Draft:David E. Wilt

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles A. Finley (May 28)

Concern regarding Draft:Shelby Bacon

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Hunter Craig (May 28)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hammer/Palmer Mansion has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles A. Finley (May 29)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mateel Farnham has been accepted

Your draft article, Draft:P. T. Pearce

Concern regarding Draft:Cecile Starr

Your draft article, Draft:Afro-American League

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Henry Roper has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Lee Love (May 29)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Camille Dory Chamoun (May 30)

AfC notification: Draft:Camille Dory Chamoun has a new comment

Concern regarding Draft:Ernest Touissant Welcome

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canada Butler has been accepted

Your draft article, Draft:John Clein

Your submission at Articles for creation: D. H. Hopson has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward D. Green has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph B. Brooks has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norman Washington Harllee has been accepted

Your draft article, Draft:Emanuel F. Heisler

Your draft article, Draft:Arthur Sizemore

Your submission at Articles for creation: Camille Dory Chamoun has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isaac Purcell (May 30)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Payne Institute has been accepted

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poplar Ridge, Alabama has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eliza McHatton Ripley has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marion Moise has been accepted