This is my talk page. Feel free to leave comments.
Is this the only account that you have used on Wikipedia since you have created this account? Cs32en Talk to me 22:28, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is. Ok lets chat. Fiolou (talk) 22:45, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:02, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Sorry Fiolou (talk) 23:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Fiolou. His ideology is clearly enough neoconservative to say that WP:BLUE (the cloudless sky is blue, so if you say otherwise, reality trumps that) covers it, but so few of the spinners in the press want to say it directly (interesting that many imply it without using any dangerous words). Leads on to the reliable sources idea, what happens when all of the reliable sources feel forced to conceal things (true of most commentary on this one)?Borgmcklorg (talk) 12:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Both of you might benefit from reading Wikipedia:Verifiability and the essay WP:TRUTH. --Saddhiyama (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't see how. You might benefit from butting out, nobody asked you.Borgmcklorg (talk) 11:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I do know the author's name on this article, and that the name would make it too much of a battle to use as a source (although nobody has really shown that his words are generally unreliable). It is on a site that would normally be considered a reliable source. How does that work? Worth reading.Borgmcklorg (talk) 12:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
