This is an archive of past discussions with User:Finetooth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi Finetooth. A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. I had to squeeze the text down to a little over 1200 characters; was there anything I left out you'd like to see put back in? - Dank (push to talk) 20:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Finetooth, you are blowing my socks off with the work you are doing on the Jackalope article! No one should be allowed to have that much fun on wiki! After this, I might recommend a deeper look at cow tipping. Holler if you need a hand with anything. Montanabw(talk)04:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I keep finding stuff, more than I thought likely. Please jump in anywhere and make improvements. There are still several unsourced claims in the article, and some of the sources for other claims are not RS. I haven't been able to find anything to back up the Huichol claims. The Wichita Eagle article has more good stuff, which I will get to tomorrow, I hope. It mentions horned rabbits in Asia and Africa. If Jackalope is to rise in the world of Wikipedia, though, I will certainly need help. Finetooth (talk) 05:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
I've mostly been watching in awe. When you have pretty much drilled down on all you can find, ping me and I'll do some wikignoming and cleanup. In the meantime, speaking of the whimsical, take a peek at my latest, Jim Dolan (sculptor). Montanabw(talk)00:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
You are hereby awarded this "special flavor" barnstar for outstanding dedication to better understanding of that elusive and fearsome critter, the jackalope! Montanabw(talk)04:36, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Finetooth: I've added some new text to Staryl Austin article and broken it up into sections. Since you recently did some improvement work on that article, though you might want to take a look and make sure you're ok with changes.--Orygun (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Orygun. I was hoping you'd pop in and improve the article. You did, and I think it is much better. I went over it once more with a feather duster just now; nothing big. Finetooth (talk) 00:54, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, congrats! It's funny I actually started that article from a redir, I had forgotten. I take no credit for its current status however! Valfontis (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I didn't know you had started the article. Curious about Portland's water supply, I drove to Bull Run but could only get to the lower stretch of the river outside the fenced area. Sometime later I signed up for a Water Bureau tour of the stuff inside the fence and got more photos. That was a fun trip, including a visit to the inside of one of the dams. Finetooth (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
I have no such powers. I recommend looking at the list of options at WP:RFC and starting with the least complicated option; that is, discussion with the other user on the article's talk page. If that fails to resolve the problem, you can move to other options in the list. The goal is to reach agreement, possibly a compromise, rather than to win the argument. Finetooth (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jackalope you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mr. Guye -- Mr. Guye (talk) 02:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sybil Plumlee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Montanabw -- Montanabw (talk) 05:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Finetooth, checking to see if you have any objection if I add Jackalope to my GA list at my userpage. I'm also checking to see if the contribs I made since the first of the year are enough for wikicup points. I definitely think you took the lead on this and I don't want to step on your toes in my quest for shiny things so let me know if I'm going to create an issue by claiming shotgun for credits... Montanabw(talk)02:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Just wanted to add my congrats to you Finetooth for your work in bringing the Jackalope article to GA status. Well done and your efforts are much appreciated. MarnetteD|Talk17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
My favorite revert of all time was during a period when an 8th-grade English teacher let a middle schooler loose on the article for extra credit: [1] Thought you would appreciate that one! Montanabw(talk)15:34, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
I love it. I spent eight weeks in Basin a few years ago but saw nary a mean badger. Mean dogs, yes. Maybe the Anaconda badgers don't like Basin topography, or maybe they don't like dogs. Finetooth (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Not sure if this article interests you or not, but since you worked on Mary's Club and other venue-related articles like Roseland Theater, I thought I would see if you had any interest. This article is about Ron Jeremy's swingers' club that just closed. Seems like it would be a pretty easy article to complete and promote to Good status--it certainly passes the notability threshold but doesn't have a ton of articles to incorporate. I expect there will be a few articles about its opening but then more about its recent string of troubles and eventual closure. Anyways, if you have any interest in working on another quirky Portland-related article, feel free to swing by (oy...) the article and help out! ---Another Believer(Talk)15:37, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I think there may be some public material about lawsuits, but since this is a private club, the data will be pretty scant, I'm guessing. Good luck with it. Finetooth (talk) 22:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi! It's been a while since we were in touch, but I'm pleased to see that you've been editing most productively in the meantime. I too been busy on a range of projects, and I am hoping you might have time to give me a little help on a map issue. Let me explain.
I have been researching the USS Jeannette disaster, and hope soon to begin work on the article. The map on the present Jeannette article is in my view wholly inadequate. You may remember that, a few years ago, for Last voyage of the Karluk, you were able to produce this superb map, and I wonder if it would be possible to produce something similar for the Jeanette article?
The base map is here. There is absolutely no hurry as I can't start immediately, but if you feel able to tackle this, I'll give you details of what's required – basically, bold lines based on the old map, insertion of some dates and a few more labels. I feel a little awkward about asking this favour after so much time, but if you can do it I'm sure the article will benefit greatly – as the Karluk one did. My very best wishes. Brianboulton (talk) 22:51, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your speedy response, and I'm delighted with your offer to help. I will furnish details of what's required within a few days. Brianboulton (talk) 20:24, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Further to my recent request, here are details from which you may be be able to draft a route map for the ice journey of the Jeannette crew. It is very kind of you to agree to this; please let me know if you need more information, or if there are unforeseen problems.
The base map to be used is File:New Siberian Islands map.png. The objective is to show the journey, by boat and sledge, from the point of the ship's sinking to landing on the the Lena Delta on the Siberian coast. Unfortunately the map does not show clear latitude or longitude lines, so the positions won't be exact, but should be close enough.
The co-ordinates for the sinking are 77°15N, 155°E, which is a point slightly to the north and west of Henrietta island, in the top right hand corner of th map. This point should be marked with an x and noted: "Jeannette sunk, June 11, 1881".
The line of the march proceeds initially NW from sinking site for a short distance, then sharply doubles back SE, before turning sharply W to Bennett Is. The date of arrival at Bennett Island should be marked, July 2, 1881
From Bennett Is. the line travels south and slightly west to pass between Faddeyevsky & Novaya Sibir Islands. The partly landed at the southernmost point of Faddeyevsky Island on August 30. Mark.
The journey continues along the southern coast of Kotelny I., with a stop half way along, dated September 4.
Continuing, passes north of Stolbovoy Island then continues westward and slightly south.
Just past the northern point of Stolbovoy I, the party stopped at Semyonowsky I., a small island that subesequently was submerged and vanished. This island needs to be marked as a dot, with a note that the party stopped there on September 10.
As the journey line approaches the most westerly meridian shown on the map, it divides into 3 parts. The division point should be dated September 12. One line, marked "De Long", continues westward to the edge of the map at the most northerly point of the protruding land. This land is the Lena Delta. Another line, marked "Melville", travels south west, and reaches the delta just north of the deep bay immediately above Tikski. This point of landing should be marked September 17
A third, very short line, marked "Chipp", bisects the De Long and Melville lines and ends in the sea.
The name "Tikski" should be removed from the map – it wasn't there at the time.
There is no immediate hurry. I am still doing the basic research and reading, and am unlikely to start serious drafting for at least a week. This cheerful article is my summer holidays project! Brianboulton (talk) 10:18, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
I remember hearing you were interested in this article. Since it became a GA, I've been working to prepare it for FA. Would you recommend a peer review before FAC? Thanks, and there's no hurry. Jsayre64(talk)20:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Just to let you know how things are going: I decided to split the expedition from the existing ship article. The ship, after all, had many years of history before it even became Jeannette, and the expedition is a worthy story in its own right. Your excellent chart now sits in the expedition article. I've just completed the first draft; it's a rather bloated 7,700 words at present, but over the next week I will have it trimmed by 1000 or so. I'm looking to have it peer reviewed at the end of the month. I trust you are well and are having a restful and enjoyable summer. Brianboulton (talk) 22:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Curious why you changed the weather stats to Butte -- Butte has a rather different ecosystem from Basin exmples. Basin is in a relatively sheltered canyon, different elevation, and still-technically- east of the divide...? Montanabw(talk)04:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
For years I used the Weather Channel as a reliable source. Alas, the Weather Channel has deleted its long-term charts, and those pages are not archived, as far as I can tell. The Weather Underground, another possibility, is so loaded with blinking ads that it's painful to visit and may not be RS. Ow! Ow! I needed to replace the dead URL in Basin with something reliable. No such source exists, apparently. However, the NOAA numbers for Butte looked quite similar to the old Weather Channel numbers for Basin, so I went with it. It's an imperfect solution, I agree. I'm open to suggestion since I have interests in many similar small-town articles. Link rot makes me tear my hair (or used to when I had some). Finetooth (talk) 16:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Both Weather Channel and Weather Underground (and virtually every other weather website) get their data from the National Centers for Environmental Information (free for anyone to download). Wouldn't be as easy as citing with a link, but then you would never have to deal with link rot. Boulder and Galena, Montana appear to have stations closer to Basin than Butte, would any of them work? Basin did, however, have a weather station from 1949 to 1970, but apparently only measured precipitation if that's any better. Niagara Don't give up the ship00:17, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Lurked for awhile, but slowly getting back into writing again...which if you're so inclined to use your considerable copy-editing expertise on a a certain article (or perhaps a review), it would be greatly appreciated. If you do have further trouble getting the climate data, let me know...I managed to get results similar to what's already there. Niagara Don't give up the ship02:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I looked over the NCEI site after getting your note but did not figure out how to find anything about Basin. I might be able to puzzle through it, but if you have precise instructions or links, I'd be grateful. Also, I'd be glad to review Union Station. Might take me a few days to get to it. Finetooth (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
From the NCEI homepage > "Weather and Climate" > "Data Access" > "Land-Based Station" > "Find a Station". Search for "Basin, Montana" with as wide of a date range as possible. The data won't actually be averaged by month, rather in raw monthly measurements, but I downloaded the data and calculated it in Excel (the reason why I cut back time on Wikipedia was to finish a degree in Meteorology, which explains why I'm familiar with finding and using this data). I do not believe you will be able to link directly to it, but including the station name, station identification, and a link to the NCEI should enable anyone interested enough to be able to find it. Niagara Don't give up the ship01:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. That sounds like it should work. Congrats on the degree in meteorology, which is a field that sounds fascinating. Finetooth (talk) 04:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Good sleuthing, folks. If you get desperate, Boulder] is only 10 miles from Basin, (Basin and Butte are about 30 mi apart) though Boulder and Basin have different microclimates, so best to try and find Basin data - Basin is in a fairly deep canyon, while Boulder is in more open country. But they are closer than Butte and on the same side of the mountains. Montanabw(talk)04:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Found the precip numbers via the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) site. No luck finding temps. The WRCC says "insufficient data" for temps, and the NCEI site returns nothing at all, probably because I haven't figured out how to make it do anything useful. I did a halfway fix to the Basin page but now must disappear for three or four days to tend to things off-wiki. Finetooth (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
I believe there may be only precip data available for Basin, if NCEI doesn't have it (which they don't), it probably doesn't exist. It might be best to use either only Boulder data, or both Boulder and what there is for Basin (noting which one is which so they can be compared). Niagara Don't give up the ship21:28, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
I added links to NCEI data and Basin snowfall; I believe separating the two boxes would provide for better clarification (also the observations are over different time periods). There is also Boulder data on record max and min temperatures; if that would be useful, I could add it. Niagara Don't give up the ship23:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Much appreciated. I left town in a hurry before getting around to snowfall, etc. I'm back home again and just starting to review the train station article. Basin max, mins would be useful and anything else you come up with. Soon we may be adding smoke stats to anything in the West (just kidding in a dark way). Clean air is really nice, and forest-fire smoke is not. Finetooth (talk) 23:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Kudos to both of you for great work. Indeed, the smoke is terrible; couldn't see the mountains today at all - not even stuff 10 miles away! Horrible... Montanabw(talk)06:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
The Air Now site quantifies the pollution and has a dynamic illustration (AQI Loop) of how the smoke clouds moved during any particular day at any location in the United States. Here's the link.
Quick question: I've always read "nature preserve" in AmEng, "reserve" is BritEng AFAIK, but you may know different. - Dank (push to talk) 13:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
They are synonyms, according to Wiktionary: wikt:nature reserve. Nature preserve redirects to "nature reserve", which includes U.S. examples. No need to change it, IMHO. Thanks for the notification. I'm tweaking the 62 in the summary since it starts a sentence. Finetooth (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Also Limpy Creek. There's a ton more, of the "funny name" variety, that aren't tagged as orphans but aren't in the river page. Let me know if you want a list. Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 23:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, please. I'm sure I can fix them all, serially, no matter how long the list. I have other promises to keep, so I'll have to get to them one by one as time allows. I see that you are busy with a variety of interesting things. Finetooth (talk) 23:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the edits and the comments! Please take a look at my responses to your comments, and if you think I'm mistaken, please speak up. I haven't gotten to the refs/dead links yet but will do so. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Just stumbled upon this article again. It looks great!... or, one might say... good. :) Unless you feel additional research is needed, I hope you'll consider nominating this article for Good status one day. ---Another Believer(Talk)04:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, sir
Tim Riley just pinged me that the Andrew Sledd article has been promoted to Feature Article. It was a much improved article for your review and comments, and I look forward to our next GA/FA collaboration. Best wishes for a Merry Christmas. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
It's that time of the year
Seasonal Greetings and Good Wishes
Seasonal greetings for 2015, and best wishes for 2016. Here's to another year's productive editing, with peace, goodwill and friendship to all! Brianboulton (talk) 17:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
And it's that time of the year when everyone starts saying that it's that time of the year. But really, what coverage of Oregon waterways the encyclopedia has thanks to you! Pennsylvania may come close, but I say we're #1. Jsayre64(talk)21:29, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Best wishes for your Christmas Is all you get from me 'Cause I ain't no Santa Claus Don't own no Christmas tree. But if wishes was health and money I'd fill your buck-skin poke Your doctor would go hungry An' you never would be broke." —C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1914. Montanabw(talk)
Merry Christmas!
Finetooth, I hope you have a Merry Christmas and hope your day is full of the true spirit of the day. Plus, good food, good family and good times. :) Have a Great Day! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Spread the joy of Christmas by adding {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/MerryChristmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Congratulations
100000 Edits
Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that only 346 editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection. BTW, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.
FYI. In case you didn’t see discussion on Wiki-Oregon Talk Page, project editors are reviewing some articles for upgrade to TOP importance. Vote is now underway in case you’re interested.--Orygun (talk) 23:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Oregon's upcoming Art+Feminism events, which will be held in Portland and Eugene on Saturday, March 5, 2016. Please see the following links for additional information, or to sign up:
Eugene: Architecture and Allied Arts (A&AA) Library (200 Lawrence Hall, University of Oregon), 12:00–5:00pm
About Art+Feminism:
Art+Feminism is pleased to announce its third annual Wikipedia edit-a-thon, an all-day event designed to generate coverage of women and the arts on Wikipedia and encourage female editorship. Last year, over 1,500 participants at more than 75 events around the world participated in the second annual campaign, resulting in the creation of nearly 400 new pages and significant improvements to 500 articles on Wikipedia. For more information, see Art+Feminism.
I so appreciate your contributions to Kalaloch, Washington. My fond childhood memories of camping there every summer during the '50s led me to add content to the stub article when I was first editing, and I did a little maintenance of citations recently, but you take the art of editing to a new finetooth comb level! Really good work. Thank you, thank you! --Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Proofread needed, if you have the time or inclination!
Hi Finetooth, Ssilvers (talk·contribs) suggested I contact you for a proofread of an article I currently have at FAC: Walt Disney. Although I'm normally happy enough with what I put out, I am British and some of the American punctuation (particularly comma use) escapes me. Ssilvers and Wehwalt have given the article a good clean-up of the obvious things (at PR stage), but any additional help in clearing out the last bits would be much appreciated. No problems if you don't have the time etc! Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 10:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Cow tipping has been nominated for Did You Know
Hello, Finetooth. Cow tipping, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Brianhe. I've been away for three days and just saw this. I was on a ranch for two of those days and met five cows who live there. Moo x 5. Finetooth (talk) 23:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Cow tipping
On 3 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cow tipping, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to scientists, cow tipping would require between 4 and 14 coordinated people, unlike the depiction of the urban legend in film and television? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cow tipping. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Cow tipping), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi Finetooth.. I hope you are doing well ... It is been a long time since you helped Ahalya's journey to a FA. The article Chinnamasta was recently expanded for a potential FAC. Like Ahalya, Chinnamasta will benefit from reviewers, who are unfamiliar with Hinduism so that we can know if a non-Hindu understands the article. Chinnamasta is a self-decapitated Hindu goddess, who holds her severed head in her hand and drinks blood from her wound.--RedtigerxyzTalk17:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Conversions
Hi Finetooth, thank you for adding conversions to articles which, in general, is not a bad thing as long as we don't go overboard. For example, MOS:CONVERSIONS are deprecated where it would make the expression awkward e.g. "a 32-metre-high tower" and by implication we should not have to change the word order purely in order to use a conversion. Also in articles that use a lot of measurements it can be excessive to convert every occurrence. Especially for articles on European structures and places, everyone uses the metric system apart from the occasional tourist. ☺ --Bermicourt (talk) 08:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
During a recent lengthy discussion on the WP:FAC talkpage, several ideas were put forward as to how this procedure could be improved, particularly in making it more user-friendly towards first-time nominees. The promotion rate for first-timers at FAC is depressingly low – around 16 percent – which is a cause for concern. To help remedy this, Mike Christie and I, with the co-operation of the FAC coordinators, have devised a voluntary mentoring scheme, in which newcomers will guided by more experienced editors through the stages of preparation and submission of their articles. The general format of the scheme is explained in more detail on Wikipedia: Mentoring for FAC, which also includes a list of editors who have indicated that they are prepared to act as mentors.
Would you be prepared to take on this role occasionally? If so, please add your name to the list. By doing so you incur no obligation; it will be entirely for you to decide how often and on which articles you want to act in this capacity. We anticipate that the scheme will have a trial run for a few months before we appraise its effectiveness. Your participation will be most welcome. Brianboulton (talk) 18:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the invitation and the kind words. While it's true that I still do some Wikipedia editing, it's trifling compared to times past. Like Candide, I spend much of my time tending my garden, editing Bermuda grass. I have no desire to be a mentor, but I wish you luck on the project and in your other endeavors. Finetooth (talk) 16:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Lola Baldwin
Hi, Finetooth! I think I'd like to nominate this article for Good status. Do you object for any reason, or have an interest in being listed as a co-nominator? ---Another Believer(Talk)01:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Just a heads up: Another editor has been making changes to this article, but I reverted them and encouraged discussion of proposed changes on the talk page. You are welcome to see if any of the proposed changes are worth keeping, if interested. ---Another Believer(Talk)01:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!
Hello, Finetooth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
"Here's hoping that the worst end of your trail is behind you That Dad Time be your friend from here to the end And sickness nor sorrow don't find you." —C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1926. Montanabw(talk) 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Come on, now, what other GA-worthy articles have you written that I can nominate on your behalf? :p I'm sure there are some other gems needing the little green icon. ---Another Believer(Talk)02:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Nothing comes to mind. For what it's worth, I'd like to see Crater Lake National Park improved at least to GA, and I think Oregon Caves National Monument might make FA with a relatively modest amount of further work. Someone with lots of energy might take either of these on; that person or group would have a fair chance of success, I think. Finetooth (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Noted. Content familiarity is crucial at FA, so I'd probably only try to promote articles I've expanded myself, but thanks for the leads. ---Another Believer(Talk)06:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Another great Finetooth article. FWIW, I'm removing "as of 2012", since TFA is a daily column rather than an article. If a source gives a different figure for 2017, please change the number. - Dank (push to talk) 20:04, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article OR-7 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
In the middle of a rather intense discussion at WT:FAC, I cannot describe how pleased I was to see your name popping up to review articles! Sarastro1 (talk) 21:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. I was equally happy to see you among the coordinators. Sorry about the intense discussion, which I just browsed through. Yow! Finetooth (talk) 23:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Art+Feminism @ Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (March 18, 2017)
You are invited to the upcoming Art+Feminism edit-athon, which will be held at the Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (415 Southwest 10th Avenue #300, Portland 97205) on Saturday, March 18, 2017 from 10:00am – 5:00pm. For more information, visit Eventbrite.
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Finetooth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
.jpg){kind=link}
