User talk:Field Marshal

This user left Wikipedia. Field Marshal has not edited Wikipedia since August 1, 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to my talk page! Remember to follow the talk page guidelines and etiquette. If you are new, you may click on New message which will allow you to send a pre-signed message. Clicking on Visual editor will enable visual editing.
New message Archives Visual editor

Field Marshal is taking a short wikibreak to get ready for exams and will be back on Wikipedia once the exams are over.

Archives

Archive 1

Your username

Hi. Up front, I can just hear you thinking "what, this again?". I'm sorry for that, and I'll try to keep it brief.

I saw the explanation on your user page, and understand it. However, there is a large part of the world whose knowledge of a particularly bad time in human history during which the word was mis-appropriated and perverted along with symbols like the swastika, exceeds their knowledge about the origins of those things. To those people, (including me, I'm afraid), it creates a perception that is incorrect (based on your user page statement). Since I only recently started seeing your name at the help desks, perhaps it will go away in time (I will be "de-sensitized" to it), but users who see it for the first time will largely have that reaction, just as they would in seeing a swastika (though the symbol is perhaps worse).

I'll note that I think you recently changed the font of your signature to "Stencil", which is also associated with military things (i.e., it resembles labeling that is stenciled on all sorts of military supplies and hardware), further reinforcing the mistaken impression.

I would ask you to seriously consider a change, even to something like "Field Marshal A", or something totally different. I'm sure the admins at WP:CHU would be happy to help.

Thanks again for hearing me out. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 23:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Clarified —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 04:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AlanM1, I understand what you mean. I guess I just have genuinely terrible luck because Aryan is my real name, the one that I was born with. Add to that my obsession for military history and technology. I have faced problems quite a few times, especially when I was on a trip to Germany, so I surely can see what non-Indians (not the native Americans) associate with my name. I am willing to change my name to 'Field Marshal' because I don't want to stir up drama and also because I hate Nazism and being associated with it, even out of ignorance, is pretty bad/hurtful. I appreciate that you brought up the matter with me though I still feel that it is really unfair that people from a certain culture or with a certain name are mis-associated with such a horrible thing. Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 05:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's unfair, but I think you'll be doing the right thing. Thanks again. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 13:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AlanM1, Thank YOU. Also, FYI, name change request will take about a month to be processed. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see the request at meta:Steward requests/Username changes#Field Marshal Aryan. Too bad it has to be drawn out so long, but I guess that's an intentional delay for usurpations in case those ancient users are still lurking and want those accounts somehow. BTW, I'm not an admin – sorry if I said anything to give you that impression. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 14:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AlanM1, Oh darn, yes, you aren't an admin. It's my fault. I have no idea why I thought so! Anyways, you have been here long enough to know all what an admin would know. Yeah the delay is pretty long but I'm 99% sure that the guy (Field Marshal from ar-wiki) isn't going to respond. Being a global sysop must be tough though. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 07:46, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, Aryan, I think it's a smart decision. I'm sorry this is an ongoing problem for you, it sucks. (Got here from doing the final check on your DYK nom due on main page 28 July.) —valereee (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 16:43, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yee haw! Thanks a lot Path slopu! Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About the article Vishwakarma (caste)

That is a wrong information acc. to various courts judgements they are Brahmin. https://vishwakarmas.webs.com/chittoor-jilla-adalath this is a link of a webpage in which all court cases are described. http://haryanascbc.gov.in/list-of-backward-classes this is a link of haryana gov. official website of obc caste list where they mention Vishwakarma as Panchal Brahmin, Jagid Brahmin, Dhiman Brahmin. May be you understand now because this reference is from government list. Mr.B.Panchal (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr.B.Panchal, Your edit was undone because you added external link to the body of the article. You can reinstate them but please make sure to follow the Manual of Style. If you want to source something then please do not use external links but instead cite it directly. Thanks, Field Marshal (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A WDG-4 for you!

	A WDG-4 for you!
	Thanks for signing my guestbook! ❯❯❯   S A H A 20:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds

Make your changes as you wish but don't revert all my contributions. As an impartal editor, I will revise any objections to see whether it is POV or whether it is factual .Sunderland were rank outsiders for the FA Cup of 1973 and it is sourced. Leeds dominated the match and that too can be verified. The Peacocks Are Back (talk) 07:56, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Peacocks Are Back: I don't see the sentence/paragraph being supported by any citation at all. It is fairly justified to assume 'better side having won' as an WP:NPOV issue. Specially when I see what your userpage reads. I will still wait and hope youdo act neutrally. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 08:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen that I've changed that part... The Peacocks Are Back (talk) 08:03, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message on 26 July 2020

Do you have a reference where it indicates its without a "h"? 106.51.241.120 (talk) 10:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, you should not be creating inconsistency between the article title and the name used in the article. If you want a change, you should request a page move. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 10:42, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to self

Apply defaultsort for articles within subcats of Locomotives of India. Signed by Field Marshal (talk) of the past at 17:34, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry.

I'm sorry for posting that reference that was (although real) was not uploaded by the original owners of that show, I didn't know that. :( Arthur&JohnnyDude69 (talk) 2:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Arthur&JohnnyDude69: That's completely normal for new users. Cheers, Field Marshal (talk) 06:26, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn quick templates

Hello, just a tip - I've noticed you've made an extra warning pack - you might prefer to add <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> to your quick template content, rather than a fixed header as this will cause RedWarm to automatically place the notice under the date header (i.e. July 2020) as if it was added using RedWarn's built in new notice feature. Ed6767 talk! 21:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, Ed6767. I thought that it was just not compatible with Quick templates! Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 21:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Indian locomotive class WDG-4G

On 28 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Indian locomotive class WDG-4G, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that it took 190 litres (42 imp gal; 50 US gal) of paint to complete the livery of the Indian locomotive class WDG-4G (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Indian locomotive class WDG-4G. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Indian locomotive class WDG-4G), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your nomination withdrawal of Alok Industries

You mentioned in the edit summary Not personally convinced about notability.... In my opinion, you should have really not withdrawn the nom in that case. And I apologise if my keep argument improperly compelled you to withdraw. You can re-nominate the article too. I'll make sure I cut the BS and keep my argument brief if I am around. And I'd feel really guilty if you were discouraged in any way, to participate in AfDs because of that nom. That is the last thing I'd want. We need more participation there, not less. Also, good luck for your exams. - hako9 (talk) 02:39, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hako9: To be honest, you did come out as rude, but let's forget that. It's not like I am an Oshwah all the time either. I don't think I will be active enough to participate in the afd discussion even if it happened so no need of reinstating it back. Thanks for the luck and same to you. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 09:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cannon for you!

	You deserve a cannon
	A salute for your edits! ― ISL fan|✉   11:43, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Best of luck on your WikiBreak! I'll await your return (if you do so)! — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕Contribs 12:11, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message on 12 August 2020

Please see the talk section "Crimes against humanity" on Lupaszka. The guy was a criminal with blood on his hands and massacred civilians in 1944/45. Kommie27 (talk) 17:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi Field Marshal,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message on 1 September 2020

Re your message; " I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Get Out, " Sorry, I don't remember even reading the article Get Out, far less changing the content. 119.18.36.174 (talk) 07:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your award

Participation award

Participation award

Thank you for participating in the Wikiproject India Tag & Assess 2020. I skimmed through your contribs and know you assessed at least 1 article during the drive, which is more than most project members! Congrats on 3rd place.

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Phineas Gage Edits

Hello. You contacted me about my edits to Phineas Gage and how I shouldn't use YouTube as a source. I wasn't using it as a source, I was bringing up appearances of him in popular videos. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Have a nice day. Prof. Pedantic (talk) 15:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Field Marshal,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Happy First Edit Day!

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Wikipedia mini globe handheld

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members list.

Hi Field Marshal! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Good evening, the page "Unipolar motor" is wrong: the unipolar motors aren't homopolar motors which have their Wikipedia page. Unipolars have windings and magnet, homopolars have only magnet; unipolars need a change of phase, homopolars not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.57.232.177 (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

missing

Hi. You are now listed as missing, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:33, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]