User talk:Fearstreetsaga

This is Fearstreetsaga's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1

Orphaned non-free media (File:Welcome to Dead House.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Welcome to Dead House.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 03:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Goosebumps

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Goosebumps you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 20:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Goosebumps

The article Goosebumps you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Goosebumps for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 19:52, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno why it says failed, it passed! — Cirt (talk) 01:54, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Thanks for the review. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 21:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quarter Million Award

		The Quarter Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Goosebumps (estimated annual readership: 434,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Quarter Million Award for bringing Goosebumps to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the thanks:)

Hi Fearstreetsaga, thanks for your thanks re my edits at Wilfrid S. Bronson. As a wikicat with definite wikikitten tendencies, I have been concentrating on stubby child lit articles, mainly reassessing and adding tags, but like the kitten in the picture, regularly coming up for air and doing afds and other stuff that catches my eye.

Coolabahapple (talk) 01:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Coolabahapple: You're doing a good job. Thanks for the wikicat (this is becoming somewhat of a thanksception ). Fearstreetsaga (talk) 22:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fearstreetsaga. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fearstreetsaga. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Killing Mr. Griffin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Killing Mr. Griffin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 16:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Killing Mr. Griffin

The article Killing Mr. Griffin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Killing Mr. Griffin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 17:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for all the work you put into the Killing Mr. Griffin entry! Congratulations on getting it ranked as a Good Article! LibraryGurl (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Librarygurl: Thanks for the work you've done on the article as well. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 20:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fearstreetsaga. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Haunted Mask (Goosebumps episode)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Haunted Mask (Goosebumps episode) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 14:21, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Haunted Mask (Goosebumps episode)

The article The Haunted Mask (Goosebumps episode) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Haunted Mask (Goosebumps episode) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 12:41, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Midnighter

Thanks for taking a look. I'll get to working with your criteria when I'm off of work. Etzedek24 ^(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 02:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: I think I got to everything you specified in your review. Let me know if anything else needs touching up. Etzedek24 ^(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 04:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Etzedek24: The changes look good. By the way, I added a couple comments on the review page. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 17:15, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And I've touched those up as well. Etzedek24 ^(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Etzedek24: Awesome. I went ahead and passed the article. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 17:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch! Etzedek24 ^(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Revenge of the Living Dummy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Revenge of the Living Dummy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:15, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stranger with My Face

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stranger with My Face you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fearstreetsaga. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stranger with My Face

The article Stranger with My Face you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stranger with My Face for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 23:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Literature Project Relaunch

Children's Literature Project Relaunch December 2018

Hi, I'm Barkeep49! You're receiving this message because at one time you had signed up for the Children's literature project. While the project has been largely inactive, I'm hoping make the project active once again. I think there are a lot of exciting directions we could take the project and I would love if you would join me by adding your name back to the active members list.

Recognized Content

Congrats to the following editors for having newly recognized content in November and December:

The Adventures of Abdi by IndianBio Crown: An Ode to the Fresh Cut Lotsa de Casha by IndianBio Marlon Bundo's A Day in the Life of the Vice President Stranger with My Face by Fearstreetsaga

When Megan Went Away by Collin Wolf in the Snow Derrick Barnes by Bradv Whose Boat Is This Boat? by GreenMeansGo

Join the Discussion

Have some ideas of activities for the project? Need some help? Join in at the project talk page

Unless you sign-up as a member at the project you will not receive any future newsletters. If you would like to sign-up for just the newsletters or want to be an active member but not get the newsletters you can do that here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Locked in Time

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Locked in Time you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ben79487 -- Ben79487 (talk) 05:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Locked in Time

The article Locked in Time you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Locked in Time for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ben79487 -- Ben79487 (talk) 03:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Locked in Time GA nomination passed

Just so you know, your Locked in Time good article nomination passed. Congrats! – Ben79487 (talk contribs) 03:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ben79487: Thanks for reviewing the article. It's much appreciated. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 04:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Literature Newsletter February 2019

Children's Literature February 2019

Wow! Can you believe that we've gone from less than 5 members to over 20 in just a short time? Thanks to everyone for joining (or rejoining) the project and hopefully we will do some great work ahead. Please feel free to bring any ideas you might have to our talk page.

Recognized Content

The Adventures of Beekle: The Unimaginary Friend Review by ReaderofthePack Locked in Time by Fearstreetsaga Review by Ben79487 Radiant Child: The Story of Young Artist Jean-Michel Basquiat Review by Snowycats

Project Tagging - Your help is needed

Thanks to Earwig and his bot some articles had our project banner placed on their pages - this will let us monitor and support these articles better. However, the tagging received some complaints about too many incorrectly place tags (see here). Some help in going through the categories to be used by the bot would be appreciated. That list of categories can be found at: User:The Earwig/Sandbox/Children's Lit

Article Alerts

A great way to stay on top of articles which need particular attention is through the project's article alerts page. You can find out about new Good Article Nominees, Articles for Deletion, and more. If you watch the page you can even see the new additions each night right frmo your watchlist.

You are receiving this because you are listed as an active member of the Children's Literature WikiProject or have chosen to subscribe to the newsletter. If you would like to sign-up for just the newsletters or want to be an active member but not get the newsletters you can do that here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Literature Newsletter March 2019

Children's Literature March 2019

More good work has been underway since our last newsletter. Thanks to all the project members for what you to do to support Children's literature on Wikipedia.

Newly Recognized Content

Finding Winnie Review by Guettarda Hello Lighthouse Review by Nova Crystallis Jew in the Thorns by Shrike and Nishidani The Rough Patch Review by Nova Crystallis

Stellaluna by Enwebb Ursula K. Le Guin by Vanamonde Review by Chiswick Chap X: A Fabulous Child's Story by Bobamnertiopsis

Article Assessment

With the completion of our project banner project, we have a large backlog of unassessed articles. Doing article rating is a great way to find interesting articles with-in our project's scope and to also find articles that were incorrectly tagged. This project will hopefully let us better monitor and aid in the development the many articles that this project supports. Thanks to Legoktm for all his work in making this happen.

Google Custom Search Engine

Looking for information on a book? Try out the new Children's literature custom search engine. This custom google search engine will look at designated sites for information. Included so far are Kirkus Reviews, School Library Journal, Horn Book, and Publisher's Weekly. If you have ideas for other sites which should be added start a discussion on our project talk page.

You are receiving this because you are listed as an active member of the Children's Literature WikiProject or have chosen to subscribe to the newsletter. If you would like to sign-up for just the newsletters or want to be an active member but not get the newsletters you can do that here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Gift of Magic

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Gift of Magic you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 15:22, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Gift of Magic

The article A Gift of Magic you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Gift of Magic for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 13:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Literature Newsletter April/May 2019

Children's Literature April/May 2019

This newsletter sees us embark on a project drive around article creation of some medium, or higher, importance topics that are currently redlinks. Read more and consider joining the work.

Newly Recognized Content

A Sick Day for Amos McGee Review by Valereee Children of Blood and Bone Review by Fearstreetsaga Derrick Barnes by Bradv Review by ReaderofthePack The Great Migration: Journey to the North by Malexander (BYU) Harry B. Neilson by Moonraker

The Lion & the Mouse Review by Farang Rak Tham Newbery Medal Scoops (magazine) by Mike Christie A Sick Day for Amos McGee Review by Valereee This is Not My Hat Review by Ceranthor

Awards in Red

MrLinkinPark333 recently pointed out that on some of our Top importance pages about Children's literature awards there are many redlinks. The three pages with these redlinks are Caldecott Medal, Newbery Medal, and Carnegie Medal (with 0 existing redlinks in the other top importance award article - Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award). As of this newsletter there are 222 redlinks in those three articles. How many can we as a project create over the next 6 weeks? Could we even do better and see if we could create any that earn a Did You Know or even get it up to Good Article status?

As always feel free to head on over to the project discussion page if you find yourself in need of any help as we work to turn these notable entries on some of our most important articles blue.

You are receiving this because you are listed as an active member of the Children's Literature WikiProject or have chosen to subscribe to the newsletter. If you would like to sign-up for just the newsletters or want to be an active member but not get the newsletters you can do that here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Fear Street (film)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Fear Street (film).

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

The article looks ok, but given your username I'm going to have to ask you to disclose whether or not you have a conflict of interest with the subject. You can learn more about Wikipedia's policies on editing with a conflict of interest at WP:COI. The instructions for how to disclose a conflict of interest are at WP:DISCLOSE. If you do not have a conflict of interest, a simple statement on the article's talk page will suffice.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: I appreciate you reaching out to me. I can confirm that I have no connection with the film or the book series itself. I came up with this account name when I was a lot younger and simply have not bothered changing the name yet.

As an aside, I'm not sure the tag belongs on the article to begin with. Template:COI/doc states that the template should only be used where there are concerns the article itself is non-neutral. Unless such concerns are brought up, I don't really see the point of bringing this up on the article's talk page. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Down a Dark Hall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Down a Dark Hall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 04:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Down a Dark Hall

The article Down a Dark Hall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Down a Dark Hall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 10:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bestseller lists

Heya. We both contributed sources and helped expand Labyrinth of Evil when it was nominated for AFD. Among your contributions were its placement on New York Times Best Sellers lists, including when and how long it was on the lists. Is there a specific place to look up that information, beyond just searching the NYT website? I ask because I'm planning some expansions to a Wikipedia article about a book (specifically American Lion) and I know it was on the NYT Bestsellers list for some time, but am having trouble finding exact details such as how long it was on the list and where it peaked. Please let me know if you can help me. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 12:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hunter Kahn. I often use Google to search http://hawes.com and find books on the NYT best seller list (then use the NYT website to link to a reliable source on the actual article itself). I find that Hawes is organized a lot nicer than some of the archived versions of the list on the actual website. They also sort the best seller lists by date: http://hawes.com/pastlist.htm. It looks like American Lion had a peak ranking of 2 when it debuted in November 2008 and was on the bestseller list for 15 weeks.[1][2] I hope that helps. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 00:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Perfect. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 01:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue barnstar

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		I award Fearstreetsaga this rescue barnstar for exemplary work on Almost Lost. Haukur (talk) 19:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Haukur: Thanks for the barnstar! Fearstreetsaga (talk) 20:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Haunted Mask VHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Revenge of the Living Dummy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Revenge of the Living Dummy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Fizeau experiment

Fizeau experiment has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]