User talk:FastLizard4/Archive 1
The Sierra Madre, CA External link removalThe Downtown Dirt link should be removed because there isn't any content there anymore. It has all been removed, except for a quote on the main page. As to the question of biased news sources, should the article only have links to unbiased news sources? In that case, what about the Mt. Wilson Observer link? The Mt. Wilson Observer is essentially "the other side" of issues when compared with Downtown Dirt. I'm guessing that because of the nature of an encyclopedia, perhaps there should only be links to unbiased sources, but on the other hand, how about including all the links and letting readers have at it and decide for themselves? Judging from the ugly politics in the city lately, it seems like deciding what's correct and not correct to link to here on Wikipedia could start a wiki-war ... (In any case, no matter what happens, there is still no content on the Downtown Dirt site, so it still makes sense to me to have the link removed. Just my take.) The CumquatDelete Italicized text before commenting. Your VandalProof ApplicationDear FastLizard4, Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel Bryant 10:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Re:Problems with ArticlesNonsense external link? Remove it. PeaceNT 04:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Strong Password UBXThanks for the suggestion, I changed the link color. Is it better now? -Lεmσηflαsh(t)/(c) 13:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC) How to get the number on the blue screen of deathIt actually hasn't happened since I posted that, ironically. *knocks on wood* But thanks, at least now I know what to do incase it happens again, for now I'm not gonna do all of what you said...just don't wanna touch any of that right now as it's working fine, haha. But, if it does happen, I'll be sure to try it. Thank you. BsroiaadnTalk 04:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Joining a WikiprojectJust add your name to the list of members and you're in! Or just start contributing to the project and you're sort of in anyhow. Cheers. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC) I really need help...I never thought I would be using this tag, but I would like to know exactly how to create a category. I tried to create one titled "Wikipedians who have experienced Blue Screens of Death", but no matter what I did, it always sorted everyone under "U" for "User", not under their username. The remnants of my futile attempt are there, but my userboxes no longer link to it. If you can, please create the category for me. Thanks!
RE: I'll Fix Your UserpageI need layout help etc. My userboxes are all jumbled up and I'd like to find more (which you helped me with, thanks). So basically can you make boxes where you have to click to open the userboxes. I give you permission to add those to my userboxes, but not my projects involved in. Any other way I could improve my page would be greatly appreciated. Brennerdlinger 07:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC) EndUN UserboxHi, you recently participated in the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DieWeisseRose/Userboxes/EndUN discussion. I have reluctantly submitted the closing statement by User:Tony Sidaway for deletion review. Please consider taking a look at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_1#User:DieWeisseRose.2FUserboxes.2FEndUN. Thanks. --DieWeisseRose 02:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. --DieWeisseRose 19:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC) Ownership of Userboxes?Although I respect your desire to keep control of the userboxes you have created, this seems to go against WP:OWN. I have created a whole bunch of userboxes and I can't stop anyone from modifying them. I suppose I could go into an edit war but userboxes are not worth the effort. The copyright for making userboxes is the same as articles, so although you may like to have some "comment" before changing them, an editor who wishes to change one is not actually doing anything wrong. I'm not saying this because I have decided to change your userboxes, but because I respect the rights of other editors to modify the userboxes I create without having to consult me. --One Salient Oversight 11:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
BSoD UBXThat's fine, as a member of Wikiproject Userboxes, it's what I spend a lot of my time doing. :-) > Rugby471 talk 07:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC) ThanksThankyou for rewriting my comment in a fashion which it will be kept on the anti-UN userbox discussion. However, on my talk page Sefringle has left a Personal Attack warning. I think this is going far too far and am thinking of contacting an admin to get it permanently removed. I thought I'd message you first as you have more experience on here than I, to ask if do you think my comment could have been misconstrued as a personal attack? Thanks, --Nordic Crusader 05:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
User box functionsI have noticed that you have one of the userboxes I have created on your page. Did you know that that userbox has 2 variable parameters? the first one replaces the "insert random comment here" and the second one (optional, can be used to help the random comment (see it on my userpage) it has a butterfly as a picture.) Oh, I like your BSOD user boxes ;). Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 22:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC) And, how did you do that online status thing anyway? Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 23:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the tips! {{User:Sir Intellegent/StatusTemplate|out}} 2. Create a page called User:Sir Intellegent/StatusTemplate and copy the below to it <!-- Credit [[User:Misza13]] --> '''<div style="border: 0px solid black; background: white; float: right; position: relative; top: -30px; padding: 5px"> Sir Intellegent's status: {{ #switch: {{{1}}} | in=<span style="color: green;">Online [[Image:Ledlightgreen.png|40px]]</span> | busy=<span style="color: blue;">Busy/Away [[Image:Ledlightblue.png|40px]]</span> | out=<span style="color: red;">Offline [[Image:Ledlightred.png|40px]]</span> }} </div>''' 3. Copy the below to your monobook.js file // [[User:Voice_of_All/Addtabs/monobook.js]] importScript('User:Voice_of_All/Addtabs/monobook.js'); // [[User:Misza13/statusChanger.js]] importScript('User:Misza13/statusChanger.js'); 4. Clear your browser's cache Good GravyThat vandal must REALLY hate immorality. Good job on the vandalism cleanups. :) -WarthogDemon 04:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for not immediately moving it back to Colorado Springs, Colorado. I was following Wikipedia:Naming conventions (settlements), which I assumed was part of the MOS. NCC states that "The general rule is to name an article about a city or town with a name that does not conflict with any other town or concept as city name." Since there is no other Colorado Springs that needed to be disambiguated, the correct title for the article is simply Colorado Springs. Λυδαcιτγ 23:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Page Renovation OfferHello, thanks for offering your help. Anyway, do you have something like a 'portfolio' page so I can take a look at your past renovations, if you have any? Optakeover 10:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia