You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annelise Coste until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Noted, Sure this article does not have much citations I have nominated article for deletion I was about it list is for self deletion. Thanks
Were you paid to create this BLP? And also why are you suggesting this for deletion after I initiated the deletion process? If you have any COI please declare them. I have concerns about potential COIs across several pages where your involvement seems suspicious. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 10:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ovais Mangalwala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
He is very well known Pakistani journalist and full fills the WP:JOURNALIST guidelines instead of nominating for deletion you should help to improve the article or ask for citations, this article does require improvements however does not require to be deleted as Pakistani Mr Ovais is famous TV personality and face of Pakistani media for more than 3 decades. We should improve articles together Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions12:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faysal Aziz Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Special:Diff/1216431005 contains you should work on your team skills and please keep your ego at side, which are personal attacks.
Special:Diff/1216432108 contains you just projected negativity and [you] try to increase your edit count, which are similarly inappropriate accusations.
I understand that there may have been personal attacks against you, but they don't excuse your own behavior. Please avoid doing this.
I am just trying to advice him in a nice and most proper way, and I hope you must have read, my offer to support his articles and improvement as well.
I think you are taking side, as admin honestly I thought you will be doing justice but honestly sir you ignored his behavior totally you did not tell him to improve his statements and you are just telling me.
Its really upsetting, I hope that you do justice with your position, honestly its very upsetting to see that you just catch my words not his.
Faizanalivarya, I have noticed the friendly parts such as I hope to end with a positive note again, lets join hands and work together too, of course. However, adding them to a message doesn't make the attacks disappear. It just makes the message seem strange.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halifax Community College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Faizanalivarya. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
