User talk:EllenvanderVeen

References

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The prior ref

Did not support the new text you added? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Hello, EllenvanderVeen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Quick introduction to Wikipedia
• How to write a great article
• Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLOS Computational Biology
• Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles (general advice)
• Wikipedia's Manual of Style for medicine-related articles (general style guide)
• A few tricks to help you format references are at WP:MEDHOW

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, try Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then type {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page.

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to visit the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).

Again, welcome!  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks good ref

Have summarised it further and formatted per WP:MEDHOW [1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Few other tips

• Ref goes after punctuation
• We use person rather than patient generally

Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The literature...

Hi Ellen - great to see you here. A couple of tips. Your Uni library may be able to get you access to some paywalled journal articles, such as PMID 12077711 (which probably has more historical info than those book links) – try asking a librarian there. Also, sometime when you have a bit of time, you might like to learn a bit more about ways of consulting PubMed (including use of MeSH terms). There are plenty of tutorials around (eg [2][3][4]), and it's something that I think universities really should be getting all life-science students to do. Learning to use PubMed well is incredibly useful and a great investment for the future :))

Best, 86.181.67.166 (talk) 22:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC) (a regular ip editor)[reply]

Thank you 86.181.67.166! I could actually open the Pubmed link you have provided, but only through the university library web page with my student account. Those MeSH terms are interesting, I have heard of it, never really did anything with it. Will do those tutorials as you suggested. Thanks for that and everything. Have a great day! :-) EllenvanderVeen (talk) 23:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome Ellen. Yes, MeSH terms can be particularly useful for "specific" (rather than "sensitive") searches. PubMed filters are also really simple and useful: for Wikipedia purposes (eg finding MEDRS to source any sort of clinical claim) the "Article types" filter is key. A word of warning though: it pays to remember that the NLM librarians who catalogue articles are only human, and the way individual articles get catalogued actually varies quite a lot. For relapsing polychondritis, no paper was actually indexed as an "historical article". Nevertheless, scanning the abstracts of review articles (filter here) quickly led me to one which appears to include an historical focus. 86.181.67.166 (talk) 00:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Relapsing Polychondritis manifestations.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Relapsing Polychondritis manifestations.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please do delete both! sorry I didn't know these files still been around. Thanks!

EllenvanderVeen (talk) 15:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Relapsing polychondritis manifestations.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Relapsing polychondritis manifestations.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, EllenvanderVeen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Relapsing polychondritis Manifestations.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Relapsing polychondritis Manifestations.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]