This is an archive of past discussions with User:Elipongo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello, Elipongo/Archive 9! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!
Hello, Elipongo/Archive 9! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!
Most of the further reading has no relation to the article.
A License to Steal: The Untold Story of Michael Milken and the Conspiracy to Bilk the Nation., Official and Confidential: The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover. , Is America Necessary?: Conservative, Liberal, & Socialist Perspectives of United States Political Institutions,Dope, Inc.: The Book That Drove Kissinger Crazy. Washington DC: Executive Intelligence Review.
You may very well be correct about the books listed, however it is Wikipedia's policy to assume good faith and the usual presumption is that such lists of works are meant as references by novice editors. Since that introduces some ambiguity into the assertion of notability of the article it is my feeling that a discussion at Articles for deletion would be more appropriate than a simple Proposed deletion. --—Elipongo (Talkcontribs) 02:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
Proposed new WikiProject University of Connecticut
You are cordially invited to join the newly-proposed WikiProject University of Connecticut, designed to promote collaboration and improvement on UConn-related articles on Wikipedia. Specifically, the following articles are proposed to be within the new WikiProject's scope:
The University itself, including the campuses, notable buildings, notable academic programs, and notable professors;
WikiProject University of Connecticut, when created, will be a centralized location to coordinate monitoring and improvement of UConn-related articles.
To comment on the proposed creation of the new WikiProject University of Connecticut, click here. To join the proposed WikiProject, click here, as the membership list is transcluded directly on the proposal page. Thank you for your attention, and GO HUSKIES! –Grondemar
Hi. We are working on taking an article to featured status and are using this picture
I can't find the image on the listed federal website and it is on a state one. Just wondered if you might recall anything more on where it came from (definitely from the federal one, or not, or whatever). And this is not a deletion thing or any of that. I just want to check into the image and make sure no issues when we are in FLC. Thanks in advance!
Thanks for your note! So you're the ones cluttering up my watchlist, lol! I hope you don't mind my adding a timestamp to your signature, it's needed for proper functioning of the archive bot. I see what you mean. The FWS website's obviously been "upgraded" with an interactive flash map, but no actual image of the species! And I do see the image (in much better resolution then I found back in '07!) on other websites with a different attribution, such as here. Perhaps the FWS removed the image from their site because they themselves had misattributed it and it never belonged there in the first place? I'm dropping them a note via the contact form on their website, but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for their reply. —Elipongo (Talkcontribs) 08:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
As I recall, the image was on the species' webpage without an attribution. I assumed it was the work of a FWS employee and thus in the public domain.
Today I was questioned as to the provenance of the image considering that is no longer visible on your site and can be found on other sites, in better resolution, and with a different attribution - for example here: http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/face/Article.jsp?id=h-1398
I'm hoping that you can assist me in working out what is going on.
New WikiProject United States Newsletter: February 2011 edition
Starting with the February 2011 issueWikiProject United States has established a newsletter to inform anyone interested in United States related topics of the latest changes. This newsletter will not only discuss issues relating to WikiProject United States but also:
and changes to Wikipolicy, events and other things that may be of interest to you.
You may read or assist in writing the newsletter, subscribe, unsubscribe or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following this link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page or the Newsletters talk page.
--Kumioko (talk) 20:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
United Hatzalah
Thanks for gettiung back to me.
For starters can I just removed the youtube link to my earlier edit that was botted and then revert?
cur | prev) 17:54, 23 January 2011 XLinkBot (talk | contribs) (38,178 bytes) (BOT--Reverting link addition(s) by 213.8.119.129 to revision 407806711 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PTFxM294Ns)) (undo)
(cur | prev) 17:51, 23 January 2011 213.8.119.129 (talk) (38,377 bytes) (Removed references to Hatzolah Israel which no longer exists and updated references to United Hatzalah) (undo)
Do you have any suggestions to make this segment more complete? My next project is to make a United Hatzalah page that will contain more detailed information not relevant to the global Hatzalah page.
Hi and thanks for writing me here! I believe you're writing about this edit? It is problematic in several ways.
First off, you really should log in when you edit, that allows other editors to judge your edits based on your past editing history and also affords a stable location, your user talk page, where other editors can have discussions with you.
The edit completely erased properly cited content and replaced it with content that used external links inappropriately.
Links to Youtube are generally not useful to encyclopedia articles, that's why XLinkBot reverts them - especially if they're added by new or anonymous editors. The particular video you linked to not only has no English language content and thus is of dubious utility on the English edition of Wikipedia, but it also appears to me to be a copyright violation of a newscast and is therefore definitely inappropiate.
My advice for improving the section is this: Avoid either making edits to the section or creating an article on the subject yourself because, as you told me in your email, you have a conflict of interest in the matter. Rather you should start a discussion on the article's talk page. Describe the changes you think need to be made to the article and verify the facts with citations to third party reliable sources.
I would advise you also to diversify your editing to subjects other than Hatzalah because right now your editing history is that of a single purpose account which affects how you, your edits, and your suggestions are regarded by other editors. There are certainly plenty of other places where you could be of great help in improving the encyclopedia; a good place to start might be one of the WikiProjects such as WikiProject Israel, WikiProject Judaism, or the EMS task force to name just a few examples you might be interested in.
Please be sure to click on the links I have included in this message, as well as in the welcome I posted to your user page; they're to Wikipedia policies and guidelines that expand on the subjects I'm only alluding to. I hope you find my reply to be useful, I actually spent far more time than I expected to in crafting it. Be well and stay safe! —Elipongo (Talkcontribs) 00:10, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
I put the link on my page because I figured most other people wouldnt need it. Is it common for links in edit summaries to not copy/paste to the address bar? —Soap—22:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Oops, sorry for not noticing this comment beneath the talkback before! The inability to copy from Wikipedia pages (except in the edit window) seems to be an idiosyncrasy of the Android browser. —Elipongo (Talkcontribs) 16:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
While I appreciate your zeal and quickness at reversions & edits, I thought I should discuss my thoughts about them with you.
You placed an 'unregistered IP' notice on User talk:Wid2002, but they are not an unregistered IP-editor.
You & I were simply working on placing warnings and adjusting the edits on the Marilyn Monroe and Joseph Schenck articles at the same time. I did not characterize your edits in any of my edit summaries to either that talkpage or to the two related articles.
I do not use Twinkle in the matter you suggested in the edit summary here. If you have a problem with my edits perhaps a more appropriate action would be to directly discuss them with me on my talk page.
The image's information is unsourced. The caption that Wid2002 placed within the Schenck article states that the Schencks were 'born in the white house', but this assertion is unsourced and as such would seem to constitute original research.
Wid2002 has placed an external link of dubious importance within both the Monroe & Joseph Schenck articles, in the case of the Marilyn Monroe article their edit has been reverted twice, once by yourself and previously by another editor. You removed my External Link notice from their talkpage without addressing the External Link issue with this user, therefore the user has not yet received an appropriate notice about this repeated action.
I can see by the sheer number of your contributions that you take your time on Wikipedia seriously...it's great to come across another editor who cares so much about this project. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Ah, I do now see that you did place a line of text about placing that External Link in the Monroe article within the Unregistered-IP Notice warning on Wid2002's talkpage, my apologies for missing it. I think an additional note about this (dubious) External Link would still be appropriate, since this editor has repeatedly added the link to two different articles. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 20:13, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
(edit conflict)I thank you for pointing out my error in leaving the "anon=true" in when I posted {{w-basic}} on the user's page, I have corrected that. You are correct about the image licensing, but that needs to be addressed on Commons, not here. I did warn the user about the external links, but very gently within the welcome template as he may very well have meant them as a reference of some sort (hard to tell since I don't read Russian). I do apologize if my edit summary hurt your feelings, it was in reaction to your own since the offending link had already been removed and no content at all had been deleted. I should have noted that our two edits were less than a minute apart and been less judgmental, sorry! I am well aware what a poor job the outdated diff function does when people add paragraphs, it's easy to get confused. As to the image caption, good point! I shall rephrase it and add a {{cn}} tag. Thanks for the nice comments at the end, but while edit counts may be a rough measure of experience, they are not a measure of worthiness. Thanks for writing and happy editing! —Elipongo (Talkcontribs) 20:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
User talk:74.240.68.37
Sorry, that was an accident. I clicked on the rollback link, and as that page was loading, on the warning link. I didn't get the message that you had beat me too it until after I had already warned the vandal. I guess I shouldn't warn until I rollback but my computer is being slow lately :( --E♴ (talk) 05:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I read the citation page. No citation needed cuz it says "This requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations." Please put my edit back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghbvgy (talk • contribs) 05:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Why would you have challenged it in the first place. If you want to challenge something for needing citations. Start at the top of the article.
The Berlin Wall (German: Berliner Mauer) was a barrier constructed by the German Democratic Republic (GDR, East Germany) starting on 13 August 1961, that completely cut off West Berlin from surrounding East Germany and from East Berlin. NOT CITED
The Soviet-dominated Eastern Bloc officially claimed that the wall was erected to protect its population from fascist elements conspiring to prevent the "will of the people" in building a Socialist State in East Germany. NOT CITED
However, in practice, the Wall served to prevent the massive emigration and defection that marked Germany and the communist Eastern Bloc during the post-World War II period. NOT CITED
You have a lot of work to do deleting content from that article for not being cited. Good luck! Ghbvgy (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:23, 6 March 2011 (UTC).
Just looking back at your edits I see you put {{cn}} in the Laugh In page but you deleted what I put in. Why didn't you delete that content too? If your method of challenging is to delete, I think you should have deleted the Laugh In content. Wouldn't it be better to put the notation in what I contributed and left me a note. Ghbvgy (talk) 06:37, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello Greg. It is better to keep article content discussions on the article's talk page rather than spread out over user talk pages. I replied to your post there. —Elipongo (Talkcontribs) 11:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
User talk:174.95.18.124
I appreciate your assistance in helping User talk:174.95.18.124 understand WP's editing guidelines. I had left him a message regarding his first edit; he removed most of it and noted "okay." Your subsequent message to him (I think on Sound) also restored the warning. Users are permitted to remove warnings from their talk page, and it seems to me that restoring the message may feel to him/her like "piling on." I'm going to re-remove the warning and replace it with his acknowledgement. Matchups14:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
LOL! You're wrong! I live in Manhattan on the Upper West Side, and all the effort you would have to use to find that out would be to look at my user page right here! I'm afraid that the fact that I was editing from a mobile phone decieved you. —Elipongo (Talkcontribs) 04:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
April 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Hi Elipongo. Just wondered if you would like to comment on the Bot template page where a discussion about the change of the icon that trial bots use has been started. I feel more input is required before consensus is reached. You are reciving this message as you are signed up for the RFC service. Thank you. Cj005257 (talk) 18:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC).
Jack Moline
Dear Elipongo - Shavua Tov! I just expanded the stub article on Conservative Rabbi Jack Moline. If you are interested and have a chance, could you take a look at it? It needs a quality assessment, and in addition it needs someone to volunteer to review it for good article status. If you would be willing to do one or the other (or both) I'd be grateful. NearTheZoo (talk) 15:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Gut voch! I only just had time for a quick glance at it just now. The thing that jumped out at me was that its external links section is overflowing. I would see if the content of some of those could be worked into the article as references, otherwise I'd probably dump most of them per WP:EL. That's just a fleeting initial impression, I'll try to do more later. —Elipongo (Talkcontribs) 16:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick look! Just took out 4-5, either deleting them or transforming them into references for comments in the text. Let me know if the others look good or if I should do more "pruning." I look forward to hearing your thoughts when you take a closer look at the article. (Also, if you have not already seen it, look at the Abbott and Costello parody linked to the end of the section on Moline as a speaker and writer. I think you'll enjoy it!) Thanks again! NearTheZoo (talk) 17:08, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
You could be having this much fun! Seriously, consider coming.
This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area next Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 8 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together at Norman's Landscape (directions) in Manhattan's Central Park.
Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.
If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.
Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.
There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Elipongo/Archive 9, you're invited to participate in WikiProject Judaism, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about all aspects of Judaism and Jewish Life. You can check out the Judaism WikiProject page for more information about the project and what our goals are. You can join by adding your name here. We hope to see you join us! ___________ -Invited on 1 July 2011 by Magister Scienta.
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Samguk Sagi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
Moved to User talk:Ghbvgy § Berlin Wall
