User talk:Ejnogarb

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Also note that this is not a forum for discussing any topic generally. Instead, alert me to the appropriate talk page and I will respond there. As a general rule, I typically delete any messages or warnings that are either old or unimportant. Please don't send me welcome templates, either, because I've already been welcomed.  EJNOGARB

Talk page guidelines Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also, refrain from making personal attacks and remain civil.

}

154CM

Proposed deletion of 154CM

The article 154CM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Re-sharpening can require extra effort, but is needed less often. Known for its best all-around qualities, it offers great corrosion resistance with good toughness and edge quality." without citation

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bulwersator (talk) 18:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dads and Daughters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dads and Daughters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dads and Daughters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]