User talk:Eecogru

Welcome!

Hello, Eecogru!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olusola David Ayibiowu (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olusola David Ayibiowu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eecogru! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olusola David Ayibiowu (September 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Guessitsavis was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The vast majority of these sources are either duplicates of podcasts (published by the organization the subject is affiliated with) or other works published by the subject. Any others do not establish notability.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 23:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Timtrent. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Johannes Maximilian#AFC-Rejected by atheist who doesn't believe in this particular Afc. that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Your attack on the impartiality of Guessitsavis is wholly unacceptable. It is against the tenets of Wikipedia to make such an attack. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I note with pleasure that you have made a full apology to the editor concerned. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Olusola David Ayibiowu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Olusola David Ayibiowu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be sure that you know that this nomination for speedy deletion is not because of any lapse of behaviour (for which you have now apologised). I have made a judgement only on the draft. If the patrolling admin agrees with me, it will be deleted. If not, then not. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Timtrent, please help me. Don't let it be deleted.

Thank you. Eecogru (talk) 13:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the simple answer is that this draft, as it was written and as it was referenced, was always going to be considered to be an advert.

This does not prevent you from preparing another draft a simpler draft, a better draft.

I think you have worked WP:BACKWARDS. Please read that. Then please read this essay. There is a process inside it which is guaranteed to create an acceptable draft with one condition: The references must show the topic or person to be notable in a Wikipedia sense. If they do not then do not even start to write the draft.

That is the very best help I can give you 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Eecogru, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone, it's s pleasure to joined the Teahouse.And l am to be here as s new Editor.

Thank you all for accepting to join this forum. I am grateful. Eecogru (talk) 06:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]