User talk:Edwardx/Archive 32

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Edwardx. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 25

←

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

Archive 33

Archive 34

Archive 35

Nomination of Sabina Fluxà for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabina Fluxà is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabina Fluxà until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matthew hk (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for a magnificent donation of deltiological delights! Philafrenzy (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

You are too kind, and still a net donor at the monthly collectibles exchange. Edwardx (talk) 22:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

P.S. An inspection of the book table on my return journey revealed most gone already. The Art of Conversation was still there, surprisingly since it was an almost new hardback, but perhaps thats because it's not done to talk to strangers on the tube. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Request for your advice

Hi Edwardx, I have seen on your user page that you publish a lot of articles of American businesspeople, so I figured maybe you can give me advice on how to fix my problem. I am trying to publish an article of an American CEO here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rice_Powell. However, Wikipedians have repeatedly declined the article for missing reliable sources and notability. As you can see, every single fact is verified by a reliable source in the references and I do not see insufficient notability speaking of a CEO who runs a world leading firm that has 114,000 employees in around 50 countries worldwide. Perhaps you can help me, since I am feeling a little stuck here. Your opinion on this would be much appreciated, thank you. --Stefanie at FMC CorpCom (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Ref Fill tool

Careful with that tool; occasionally domain squatters will grab abandoned domains and redirect them to the most interesting of places. Kuru (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Unexplained content removal?

Hi. You asked why content was removed in this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soren_Kaplan. Seemed redundant since the content and citation was exactly the same as in the section below it. Verbatim002 (talk) 08:05, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Amit Munjal

Request: Hello, edward. you recently had made a request for deleting the Amit Munjal Page. I am impressed by your glorious history with wikipedia and will appreciate if you could take a second look at it. I am not connected to him but do read about him and watch his interviews in media. i think people like him definitely need to be covered on wikipedia as many readers are interested in knowing about them. Nevada2020 (talk) 08:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Nevada2020

27 Feb

Hi, Can you please explain why did you undo my last edit on this article? HBM Iqbal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papyrus cyrus (talk • contribs) 01:33, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

You need to stop removing properly cited content. And stop adding uncited or hagiographic content. If you are not happy with the article, please raise your concerns on that article's talkpage, not here! Edwardx (talk) 01:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Remo Ruffini

Hi Edward, since you've created the article about Remo Ruffini, would you give me an opinion about the updates I recently proposed in the talk page (here)? --Cristiana Napoleone (talk) 11:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grange Hotels

The article Grange Hotels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, fail to find any reliable independent sources with significant coverage of the hotel chain (rather than the owner).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 09:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raj Matharu

The article Raj Matharu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. No significant coverage in any reliable independent secondary sources - only trivial coverage about his brothers as a whole.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 09:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Karen (orangutan)

On 18 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karen (orangutan), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1994, Karen became the first orangutan to have open heart surgery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karen (orangutan). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Karen (orangutan)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:35, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of By The Horns Brewing Co. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article By The Horns Brewing Co. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/By The Horns Brewing Co. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 20:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

"strong and stable"

No Deal is better than a bad deal

I've decided this might be notable after all, and have expanded it out of a redirect. Feel free to chip in. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. To the efforts of you and Philafrenzy, it is looking much better. Can't have anyone calling it "weak and wobbly" can we? Edwardx (talk) 15:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

It's rock solid, no need for any indicative votes. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:19, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Hear, hear. Edwardx (talk) 19:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

P.S. There would certainly be enough sources to develop Brexit means Brexit from a redirect on the same basis. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

I can't believe somebody would say that no DYK is better than a bad DYK though. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

TRM? Those two hooks are both fine, yet there might be something stronger we could think up. Edwardx (talk) 13:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Victor Vescovo

The article Victor Vescovo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 06:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)