User talk:Editorofthewiki/Archive 55
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality. SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:25, 10 July 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 09 July 2012
DYK nomination of Conquistador (song)Hello! Your submission of Conquistador (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gobōnobo + c 23:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
July 2012Your recent editing history at St. Jimmy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — TheSpecialUser (TSU) 04:37, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Although you may feel that you showed there is notability, and if 2 people feel that you haven't, thus the reverts, you should not continue to revert to do so. If they do not nominate it for deletion, still, it is not their problem, but you simply cannot revert. If you want, you can nominate it for deletion, but once again, it doesn't mean you can revert because they don't nominate it for deletion.Curb Chain (talk) 22:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 16 July 2012
Pink Turns to Blue DKYHi, I just reviewed your DKY nom. Ideally I'd like to see a full cite to the book (with a page number etc.) rather than the (I assume not-reliable, third-party) website. Nevertheless if this isn't possible I'll probably just AGF OK it, leaving it up to anyone else to veto. Thanks, bridies (talk) 16:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC) DYK for Jack Ely
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality. SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 23 July 2012
CivilityPlease don't tell people to "Shut the fuck up." It's not civil. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 13:21, 25 July 2012 (UTC) DYK for Turn on the News
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 28 July 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Signpost: 30 July 2012
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia