User talk:EarthFurst/Archive 1

For some reason nobody seems to have gotten around to welcoming you, so . . .

Welcome!

Hello, EarthFurst/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --GreenReaper 16:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The hag vandal

I wouldn't read too much into that coincidence. The vandal in question has a specific personal vendetta against Cheri DiNovo. Bearcat 08:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing talk

I notice that you moved one of my comments, and in the process changed its apparent meaning (since the "they" I referred to was no longer the current "they" in the new context).

I used indentation in the standard style and signed my comment to make it clear that I was another user replying to that person's comment and that specific point (hence its placement).

It's not the best for style purposes, I'll admit, but I don't think that it's "inappropriate", since it doesn't mislead or make the parent message unreadable. Fourohfour 16:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it would be easy to rewrite it. It might- or might not- even have been better placed/written that way (although IMHO it's still sometimes clearer to reply point-by-point within a sentence).

However, my point was that you rearranged a conversation and in the process changed the meaning of what was being said.

There *are* cases (IMHO not this one) where it's necessary and reasonable to move comments like that. (Mainly if another user replies in a misleading place and alters the perceived flow/context of existing conversation). However, if this is likely to change the perception or meaning of the moved comment, it's still the responsibility of the mover to somehow make clear what has been done; preferably via a brief explanatory note. Fourohfour 11:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kidd Radd

Thanks for pointing me to the answer as to why the Kid Radd page was removed. Too bad I did not learn about the discussion in time to chime in. Pity, as Radd was among the best online comic strips ever for reasons already pointed out. Hopefully someone will see fit to reinclude it in the future. (There's mentions of far more obscure stuff in Wikipedia already.) -Wilfredo Martinez 14:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for the link to the Wiki with the article as well. Much appreciated. :) -Wilfredo Martinez 16:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Groban

Josh is a tenor. If you do a search for him in yahoo or google and read the bi-line for his official website in the search results it says Official website of tenor Josh Groban. Thos bi-lines are generated by the actual website. I would assume then that if the official webste says tenor he is a tenor.Nrswanson (talk) 19:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Groban is a Baritone I am a member of his fanclub. THERE is no where that states he is a tenor. It is baritone — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swabbi (talk • contribs) 16:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]