|
User talk:Eagles247/Archive 41
Hey, E247Just came across your recent edits to the Brian Dawkins article. I hope this means we will see more of you during the coming fall season. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 08:41, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Talk Page ProtectionI have unprotected your talk page per WP:PP. Indefinite protections of talk pages are rarely used now and when talk pages are protected, should be accompanied by an unprotected subpage. If you continue to experience persistent vandalism,
How did you make this? WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Your input is requested . . . .Happy New Year, E247. I'd like to get your opinion on this revised infobox template for college football players: [1]. Once the college player template is revised, we will probably be taking another look at Template:Infobox NFL player next; given your first-hand knowledge about the last series of revisions and merges to the NFL player infobox, as well as your understanding of the template's history, you could be of help in both instances. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
War EditingGreetings, Another user and myself got into a bit of an editing war on G-Dragon's page over disputed information. I do believe we have violated the 3 revert rules, however, I am not sure. Would you mind reviewing it? Thank you. AhnSoonKyung (talk) 13:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of SPA tag?Hello. It has come to my attention that you, at least in the past, have been using the SPA tag not in accordance with the guidelines proposed in the SPA essay. Please see WP:SPA for details. The reason you are receiving this message is that multiple of your SPA tags in the following discussion Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Autonomous_Sensory_Meridian_Response were not in accordance with the guideline. My guess is that this was a one off event, but in case it wasn't, I'd ask you from refraining from using the tag on users who have several edits on multiple subjects. Note there are other tags you can use for some of the users you tagged as an SPA, but please reserve the SPA tag for single subject editors. For example if someone has 4 edits on 3 different subjects and joins an AFD discussion, do not use the SPA tag on them, but feel free to use other tags if it is appropriate to do so. Thanks. MATThematical (talk) 16:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
An article deleted in 2010Could you please let me know how I can get a copy of a deleted article Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology (created in 2010)? The society grew in the recent years and can provide references to the articles published nationally. I would like to edit this article and put it again through the verification process. Could you please help? Gpeja (talk) 23:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Could you please review? Is there enough references (the reason this article was deleted in 2010)? Gpeja (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Your thoughts?Timeline of Philadelphia has a discussion about selection and inclusion criteria. Two editors are discussing it, but we have divergent views. More opinions would be helpful. - SummerPhDv2.0 13:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Mike KafkaHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mike Kafka you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Mike KafkaThe article Mike Kafka you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold
Your GA nomination of Mike KafkaThe article Mike Kafka you nominated as a good article has passed Hi, Hi, Izzy LangFYI, Pro-football-reference.com lists Izzy Lang's date of death as October 10, 2008. TheIceMan-44 (talk) 03:14, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:EaglesEdBlock
 It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Van BurenAs an Eagles fan, I thought it might interest you to see my work on Steve Van Buren, and maybe provide some input. I picked the article up as an LSU fan. It's been up for GA review for about a month, so it'll probably be reviewed any day now. I'm pretty confident in it. The only thing is, I'm unsure about his coaching career after 1967. Sources are scarce on it. Lizard (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection Hello, Eagles247. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. Two-Factor Authentication now available for adminsHello, Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC) A new user right for New Page PatrollersHi Eagles247. A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best. If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Eagles247. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) You're invited...
Celebrating 8 years of editing
ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Eagles247. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) CongratulationsI was rooting for the Eagles in the Super Bowl today, and I just wanted to say, congratulations! I don't remember any other time winning a Super Bowl with a backup QB all the way!--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Eagles247. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) CopyVio RevDel RequestAre you available to do a CopyVio RevDel request? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:21 on April 3, 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protect for Elvis Is Back!Can you semi-protect the page to persistent genre warring by 73.123.69.220? [2][3][4][5][6][7] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.114.126 (talk) 03:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
|
