|
User talk:EWikist/Archive1Status: Offline
User:EWikist/Templates/BouncingWiki  Wednesday, 29 January Recent edits:  Wikipedia vandalism information  Moderate to high level of vandalism
4.47 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 15:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
My Apologies on the TMI LU Edits!I just wanted to apologize for that. I did it by mistake, it was only by this morning that I realized it was an email sent out to beta testers only. TAD~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAppleDragon (talk • contribs) 16:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC) MinuteClinicWhat were the issues with my minuteclinic logo? I applied the correct Licensing information (even though it is not an SVG file) so the logo would not be removed. What was wrong? Tofutwitch11 (talk) 14:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC) I wanted to see if there was a table for JPG, but there was not, just SVG. I wasn't using it as a sandbox, but just trying something. As not many people would have seen the article at that time, it would have little to no effect. Thanks anyway. Tofutwitch11 (talk) 14:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Reviewer granted Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. –xenotalk 18:37, 20 June 2010 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Lego Universe
Since I cannot edit the talk page there I am writing to you directly. I note your reversion to my edit. This section provides some balance to the similar section about the United Kingdom. You ask for citations, but the first two paragraphs already have full Wikipedia articles on the topics. The third paragraph is simply quoting a referenced newspaper. I therefore suggest you restore my addition. Oxtersniffer (talk) 21:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC) Ponce De Leon Boutique HotelMaybe I'm overlooking something, but I can't figure out why would you do this or this? I'm just another editor, not a sysop or some other high muckymuck, and you have no obligation to answer me, but I'm concerned that you may be confused about how some things work here and I'd like to help you understand that if I can. Or maybe it's me that's overlooking something. Either way, I'm confused. Best regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 16:48, 23 June 2010 (UTC) AdopitionYes, please adopt me. Thanks! Battleaxe9872 Talk 18:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC) OreoYou recently removed a red-link name on the Oreo article and in the edit summary called it a "dead link". Do you do this often?Asher196 (talk) 20:55, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
AutopiaCould you please return the Continuity section to Autopia please? I'm not too fussed about whether you agree or not, but to be honest with you, a lot of true Who fans find continuity very important and some of the information that was portrayed in that section, no matter how small, was still important. Please discuss before you delete. |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
