User talk:EBusiness

Welcome!

Hello, EBusiness, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ysangkok (talk) 14:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your AN3 report about Nvidia computer chips

I closed the report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:210.195.84.194 reported by User:EBusiness (Result: Semi) with semiprotection. I also put on a two-week rangeblock of 210.195.80.0/20 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). Since it is not obvious who is right about the underlying issue, it might be helpful if you could try to develop a talk page consensus at Talk:GeForce 700 Series. One idea would be to write to User:Matthew Anthony Smith, who from his user page seems to be making an effort to develop this kind of article Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In case we were not sure about the IP editor's good faith, we can see his statement below. EdJohnston (talk) 15:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

D R O P D E A D

Section retained for amusement value.

GOOD WORK, VANDAL

YOU REMOVED GOOD INFO ABOUT GK110 AND NOW THERE'S NO INFO ON THE GEFORCE 700 PAGE, HOPE YOU DROP DEAD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.187.249.236 (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The marketing paper with almost the same words directly from the horses mouth is still available for anyone to read, there is even a link directly from the article page. But it is not Wikipedia material. And don't expect me to answer anything written in that tone again. EBusiness (talk) 14:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DROP DEAD, LOSER, IT'S NOT YOUR FATHER'S WIKIPEDIA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.195.180.20 (talk) 15:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]