User talk:Ducknish/Archive 3
The Signpost: 29 January 2014
The Signpost: 29 January 2014
The Signpost: 12 February 2014
The Signpost: 19 February 2014
The Signpost: 26 February 2014
(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014
Editor ReviewHello, this is just to let you know that your editor review has been completed, one or several editors have provided their feedback on your editor review page. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Happy editing and regards, Mewhho18 (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia: Editor review/Ducknish The Signpost: 12 March 2014
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor reviewThis is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 21 March 2014 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding The Signpost: 19 March 2014
The Signpost: 26 March 2014
The Signpost: 02 April 2014
Wolfie SmithYour warnings seem very harsh and inaccurate - Wolfie Smith's additions are hardly "vandalism" - their most recent edit even provided a list of sources for their edit (which I'd asked them to provide only a few minutes beforehand). Wouldn't it be better to simply advise them that the sources were unreliable, rather than threaten to block them? Sionk (talk) 00:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Its about Jhinwar page.information on the page was incorrect and ambiguous.I have always tried to maintain a good knowledge sourse as this wikipedia page but there has been tampering and thus all the information in Jhinwar page will be sent tO kashyap Rajput page.Its all done in goodwill. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greatvirgo (talk • contribs) 22:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 09 April 2014
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User talk:Ahtehsham100. Thank you. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 11:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC) hello sir, just here to tell you that i'm trying to make things here politically incorrect as possible. if you can keep it that way, i'll appreciate it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarhead4Life (talk • contribs) 00:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC) Xmarc999 regarding The Gurdjieff Journal entryI presume this is the appropriate place to have a "meta-discussion" about the article, such as "meat-puppetry"? In brief, I do believe the article is worth keeping. I have made what I considered a serious proposal to improve the article, and was hoping for comments from experienced editors. Not sure of the proper forum to have that conversation, since this talk page is directed to "Ducknish" which I presume would not normally be visible to the other two commentators. I have continued to look at other similar articles, such as that for Parabola, as well as your own entries, for guidance. I also found "Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia", with a whole set of supporting links that I am just beginning to traverse. Being cautious, I normally would have waited to peruse all this before doing any editing, but I didn't have any sense of the timeline for a decision on deletion. "Speedy keep" didn't necessarily sound good. It's probably good that I didn't look at the Welcome page right away; I might have been confused by the comment "there will always be other Wikipedians happy to help" in conjunction with being called a meatpuppet. I have updated my User Page with some background. Appreciate any guidance on moving this discussion forward. I'm guessing there is some clever WP way of linking to that discussion but for now I will just have to stick in the hyperlink. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gurdjieff_Journal Xmarc999 (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)xmarc999 Your GA nomination of Mike CierpiotHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mike Cierpiot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Acalycine -- Acalycine (talk) 02:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Mike CierpiotThe article Mike Cierpiot you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mike Cierpiot for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Acalycine -- Acalycine (talk) 02:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 23 April 2014
The Signpost: 30 April 2014
The Signpost: 07 May 2014
The Signpost: 14 May 2014
The Signpost: 21 May 2014
The Signpost: 28 May 2014
The Signpost: 04 June 2014
The Signpost: 11 June 2014
The Signpost: 18 June 2014
The Signpost: 25 June 2014
The Signpost: 02 July 2014
The Signpost: 09 July 2014
The Signpost: 16 July 2014
The Signpost: 23 July 2014
The Signpost: 30 July 2014
The Signpost: 06 August 2014
The Signpost: 13 August 2014
The Signpost: 20 August 2014
The Signpost: 27 August 2014
The Signpost: 03 September 2014
The Signpost: 10 September 2014
The Signpost: 17 September 2014
September 2014Hello, I'm Seaphoto. Your recent edit to the page Internal bleeding appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SeaphotoTalk 19:20, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
MS DOS editHiya, I did put an explanation in my edit summary, was it insufficient? "corrected History section, w. cite, that MS-DOS was not default OS offering w. IBM PC just one of 3)" ReedSturtevant (talk) 01:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Ouch! Sorry, my bad, I am an infrequent contributor I can re-edit just in the History section or happy to have your guidance in that editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReedSturtevant (talk • contribs) 01:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 24 September 2014
The Signpost: 01 October 2014
The Signpost: 08 October 2014
The Signpost: 15 October 2014
The Signpost: 22 October 2014
The Signpost: 29 October 2014
The Signpost: 05 November 2014
The Signpost: 12 November 2014
The Signpost: 26 November 2014
The Signpost: 03 December 2014
The Signpost: 10 December 2014
The Signpost: 17 December 2014
The Signpost: 24 December 2014
The Signpost: 31 December 2014
The Signpost: 07 January 2015
The Signpost: 14 January 2015
The Signpost: 21 January 2015
The Signpost: 28 January 2015
The Signpost: 04 February 2015
The Signpost: 11 February 2015
Thank you for your editsHi Ducknish, Thank you for reverting the changes made by anonymous user on our Wikipedia page. Can I ask how you were informed of the erroneous content and why you kindly reverted it for us? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JkimNYC (talk • contribs) 15:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Nathan FielderGoogle "Nathan Fielder Wizard of Loneliness". It's a description of his act. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:2B1:7D01:8127:502F:9AC5:59D (talk) 06:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC) The Signpost: 18 February 2015
The Signpost: 25 February 2015
The Signpost: 25 February 2015
The Signpost: 04 March 2015
The Signpost: 11 March 2015
The Signpost: 18 March 2015
. The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
The Signpost, 1 April 2015
The Signpost: 01 April 2015
The Signpost: 08 April 2015
The Signpost: 08 April 2015
The Signpost: 15 April 2015
The Signpost: 22 April 2015
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia